Tuesday, 2025-06-03

opendevreviewDavid proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Add tests for workload balance with real data  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/95033508:35
opendevreviewAlfredo Moralejo proposed openstack/watcher master: Add debug message to report calculated metric for workload_balance  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/95163910:01
opendevreviewDavid proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Add tests for workload_balance with injected data  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/94972210:05
opendevreviewDavid proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Add tests for workload balance with real data  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/95033510:05
opendevreviewAlfredo Moralejo proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Enforce compute host in create_one_instance_per_host  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/95038911:16
opendevreviewAlfredo Moralejo proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Enforce compute host in create_one_instance_per_host  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/95038911:18
opendevreviewDavid proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Add tests for workload balance with real data  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/95033512:28
opendevreviewDavid proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Add tests for workload balance with real data  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/95033512:29
opendevreviewDavid proposed openstack/watcher master: Adapt zuul.yaml strategies jobs to include tests with tag 'strategy' outside file test_execute_strategies  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/95164913:05
opendevreviewDavid proposed openstack/watcher master: Adapt zuul.yaml strategies jobs to include tests with tag 'strategy' outside file test_execute_strategies  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/95164913:13
opendevreviewDavid proposed openstack/watcher master: Adapt zuul.yaml strategies jobs to include tests with tag 'strategy' outside file test_execute_strategies  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/95164913:29
opendevreviewDavid proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Add tests for workload balance with real data  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/95033513:45
amoralejhi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/950969 also has 2 +2, may we get it merged? i hope it will improve ci reliability14:02
amoralejah, sorry, i missread it14:02
amoralejstill only one +214:03
sean-k-mooneyamoralej: not sure that it the correct way to stablise ci.14:20
sean-k-mooneyi left some coments it looks to be at best a workaorund.14:20
amoralejthanks14:20
sean-k-mooneymy recomendation is to make the timespan and offset configurable14:21
sean-k-mooneyand then update teh gnocii job acordingly14:21
sean-k-mooneya hardcoded 2 minute offset might work but if there is an interaction with the gnoiccii rate and the perfroamcne fo the ci vms we should not hard code it14:22
amoralejok, making it configurable would make sense14:22
opendevreviewDavid proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Add tests for workload balance with real data  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/95033515:07
opendevreviewDavid proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Add tests for workload balance with real data  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/95033515:08
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/watcher master: devstack: Drop template for mod_wsgi  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/95166215:14
opendevreviewJoan Gilabert proposed openstack/watcher master: Support zone migration audit without compute_nodes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/95066515:19
opendevreviewDavid proposed openstack/watcher master: Adapt zuul.yaml strategies jobs to include tests with tag 'strategy' outside file test_execute_strategies  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/95164915:20
opendevreviewMerged openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Change timeframe of fake metrics uploaded to gnocchi.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/95096915:24
sean-k-mooneygmaan: if you have time to comment on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-specs/+/949528/comment/354d836d_631424e3/ specificly how we shoudl deal with actions that are skipped if you do an acation show using an api microverion before that state was added18:07
sean-k-mooneythe microverion is signalling 2 things in my mind. the presence fo the new state and the aviableity of the new PATCH endpoint for /actions/{id}18:08
sean-k-mooneyim wonderign what we shoudl retrun for the state if the action is in skip and we do a get to /actions/{id} for an action in skip with an old microverion18:09
sean-k-mooneywe coudl return SKIPPED or we coudl translate it to one of the previously allowed values18:09
sean-k-mooneygmaan: the closet parallel i could draw to nova is the task_state or vm_sate filed in server show18:11
sean-k-mooneyi.e. OS-EXT-STS:task_state18:11
sean-k-mooneyim not sure we have extened either since we started using micorverions18:13
sean-k-mooneythe last time we extened that i think was when we added shelve https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/c346befc630fd12623d9dc72f9f0c608aaaf230318:16
sean-k-mooneyif i look at that code i dont think we masked it for older microversoin but that was also newton and i dont know when we intoduced 2.1 off the top of my head18:18
sean-k-mooneyhum actully shelve might be older then that we were using micoversion in newton but shelv eexisted before that18:20
sean-k-mooneyi guess we have to treat it as unversions given they are just strings18:21
opendevreviewDouglas Viroel proposed openstack/watcher master: Add Integrations doc page with support matrix  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/95169919:14
gmaansean-k-mooney: ack, will check19:21
sean-k-mooneygmaan: i think there is no really not good answer os we will jsut have to do the best we can19:27
gmaansean-k-mooney: replied, I agree with you. here we are just adding new value and does not change field or field's value type so it does not needs to be capped with microversion20:41
gmaanNova added microversion 2.1 in kilo. For nova shelve case, we added new value in existing field, with same value type. 20:42
gmaanif we change field or the type of value it return then we need to take care of  change with microversion20:43
sean-k-mooneygmaan: ack i replied in teh spec but thanks for providing your insight21:21
sean-k-mooneythat makes things simpler21:21
gmaannp!21:21

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!