| opendevreview | chandan kumar proposed openstack/watcher-specs master: Add spec for improving watcher-dashboard testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-specs/+/970220 | 07:25 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | chandan kumar proposed openstack/watcher-specs master: Add spec for improving watcher-dashboard testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-specs/+/970220 | 07:29 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Add stable/2026.1 job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/981220 | 08:45 |
| opendevreview | chandan kumar proposed openstack/watcher stable/2026.1: Add watcher-grenade-skip-level-always job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/981225 | 10:24 |
| dviroel | hi folks, heads up, watcher meeting will start in 9 min, here in this channel | 11:51 |
| dviroel | feel free to add you own topics to the meeting etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-watcher-irc-meeting | 11:51 |
| dviroel | #startmeeting watcher | 12:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Thu Mar 19 12:00:33 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dviroel. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 12:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 12:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' | 12:00 |
| amoralej | o/ | 12:00 |
| dviroel | hi o/ who is around today? | 12:00 |
| chandankumar | o/ | 12:01 |
| jgilaber | o/ | 12:01 |
| dviroel | courtesy ping: sean-k-mooney rlandy | 12:01 |
| dviroel | hi everyone o/ | 12:02 |
| dviroel | let's start with today's meeting agenda | 12:02 |
| dviroel | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-watcher-irc-meeting#L25 (Meeting agenda) | 12:02 |
| dviroel | as usual, feel free to add your own topics to the agenda | 12:02 |
| dviroel | we also have a topic for reviews and bugs, if you want to discuss any, feel free to add there | 12:03 |
| dviroel | #topic Release Schedule | 12:03 |
| rlandy | o/ | 12:03 |
| dviroel | #link https://releases.openstack.org/gazpacho/schedule.html | 12:03 |
| dviroel | we are at R-2 week | 12:04 |
| dviroel | next week is our final week to propose new RCs, if any | 12:04 |
| dviroel | so far, i only see one issue with the watcher-dashboard | 12:04 |
| dviroel | there was an update in the requirements that broke our dashboard | 12:05 |
| dviroel | #link https://github.com/openstack/requirements/commit/c4bfeb4d265ef6e34b2228387118aed32af85309 | 12:05 |
| chandankumar | it is broken on RDO only i think | 12:05 |
| dviroel | the most recent version of Static-Font-Awesome renamed some css files | 12:05 |
| amoralej | so we need https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980533 | 12:06 |
| dviroel | we merged a fix that was proposed | 12:06 |
| dviroel | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980456 | 12:06 |
| dviroel | yeah, but 2026.1 is still broken | 12:06 |
| chandankumar | We are not sure anyone is going to update the version of XStatic-Font-Awesome in RDO side | 12:06 |
| dviroel | if we look at 2026.1 patches | 12:07 |
| dviroel | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980414 | 12:07 |
| dviroel | for instance, you will see that is failing on CI | 12:07 |
| dviroel | so we will need to get this backported, and request a new release for the dashboard | 12:07 |
| amoralej | yep | 12:08 |
| dviroel | amoralej: yeah, this is the backport | 12:08 |
| dviroel | chandankumar: yeah, the rdo side is anothe issue | 12:08 |
| amoralej | requirements project is not branched yet | 12:08 |
| amoralej | so master applies to 2026.1 i guess | 12:08 |
| dviroel | there was many updats proposed to the requirements in the past weeks | 12:08 |
| dviroel | i do belive so, otherwise it will break horizon then :) | 12:09 |
| amoralej | yep :) | 12:09 |
| dviroel | since they also removed their workaround to work with both current and previous version of the package | 12:09 |
| amoralej | the change in horizon was backported to 2026.1 ? | 12:09 |
| dviroel | amoralej: i think that merged before the release | 12:10 |
| dviroel | this is the patch | 12:11 |
| dviroel | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/979009 | 12:11 |
| chandankumar | yes, we need that backport all the release 2026.1 specific patches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980415 jobs are broken due to compressor.exceptions.UncompressableFileError: 'horizon/lib/font_awesome/css/font-awesome.css' could not be found in the COMPRESS_ROOT '/tmp' or with staticfiles. | 12:11 |
| amoralej | yep, that's in 2026.1 | 12:11 |
| amoralej | so, let's merge the backport | 12:11 |
| dviroel | for the records | 12:12 |
| dviroel | #link https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/deliverables/gazpacho/horizon.yaml | 12:12 |
| dviroel | this is the commit, which includes the previous change | 12:12 |
| dviroel | so yeah, we will need to backport | 12:13 |
| amoralej | actually, it mentions the fontawesome think even in the highlights | 12:13 |
| dviroel | i will reach the cores to get that merged today/tomorrow | 12:13 |
| dviroel | amoralej: true | 12:13 |
| dviroel | any other concern with that? | 12:14 |
| chandankumar | nope | 12:14 |
| dviroel | ok, moving on | 12:14 |
| dviroel | #topic Core team updates | 12:14 |
| dviroel | I sent an email to openstack-discuss mailing list past friday with a proposal for watcher core team updates | 12:14 |
| dviroel | the removals is a follow up from previous actions wrt core team cleanups, mainly for core maintainers that are no longer active in watcher repos | 12:15 |
| dviroel | those listed were already removed from core-groups, as mentioned in the email, but they will always be welcome back if they want to continue contributing with the project | 12:15 |
| dviroel | and note that, there is also a core addition proposal | 12:15 |
| dviroel | I also proposed to add amoralej to both watcher-core and watcher-dashboard groups | 12:16 |
| dviroel | amoralej has a good amount of high quality reviews in most of our repos as also help us a lot maintaining the project healthy | 12:16 |
| chandankumar | +1 to the proposal | 12:16 |
| dviroel | amoralej: thanks for accepting | 12:16 |
| amoralej | Thank you for your trust :) | 12:16 |
| chandankumar | amoralej: helped a ton in reviewing in watcher-dashboard patches | 12:16 |
| dviroel | if you all agree with that, and since there is no concerns/feedbacks in the ML, i will proceed with adding amoralej to these groups after we close this meeting | 12:17 |
| jgilaber | +1 to all, it'll be great to have amoralej in the core team! | 12:17 |
| dviroel | great! since there is no objection, i will proceed with that :) | 12:18 |
| amoralej | thanks! | 12:18 |
| dviroel | #agreed adding amoralej to the proposed core groups | 12:18 |
| dviroel | amoralej++ | 12:18 |
| dviroel | alright, next topic | 12:19 |
| dviroel | #topic PTG Topics and slots proposal | 12:19 |
| dviroel | I would like to add a initial proposal for our ptg | 12:19 |
| dviroel | and book some slots for us, so other teams can also book theirs to avoid conflicts (e.g. cyborg) | 12:20 |
| dviroel | we can change that at any time before the PTG too | 12:20 |
| dviroel | I would initially propose | 12:20 |
| dviroel | Wed (22th) and Thu (23th): 12:00 UTC - 16:00 UTC | 12:20 |
| dviroel | this is April ^, ok :) | 12:20 |
| dviroel | as have Fri as backup if needed | 12:21 |
| dviroel | I would be also extending for an 1h, compared to the previous PTG | 12:21 |
| dviroel | i am intentionally skipping tuesday due to a national holiday, but I am ok with joining on a Tuesday too if the team prefers | 12:21 |
| amoralej | yep, last time we were short of time, i think, good to extend | 12:21 |
| dviroel | we should also take care to not take too much time in some topics, so we can at least cover more stuff | 12:22 |
| dviroel | part of the wathcer team will divide its attention with other teams | 12:22 |
| dviroel | like nova, cyborg | 12:22 |
| dviroel | what do you folks think? | 12:23 |
| dviroel | we can always revisit the allocation too | 12:23 |
| dviroel | we may book some time in monday too, if we want, just to run a quick retro | 12:24 |
| sean-k-mooney | o/ | 12:24 |
| jgilaber | I think it's reasonable, I don't think we have dates set for cyborg and I don't know about nova | 12:24 |
| jgilaber | which I think will be the most likely sources of conflicts for our team | 12:24 |
| amoralej | wed + thu lgtm | 12:24 |
| dviroel | sean-k-mooney: hey o/ | 12:24 |
| dviroel | already, that said, i can initially book both days for watcher, and we can sync with other teams later | 12:25 |
| chandankumar | looks good for wed and thu, timing works for me also. | 12:25 |
| dviroel | ++ | 12:25 |
| jgilaber | +1 | 12:25 |
| dviroel | ok, we can sync again in a few weeks about that | 12:25 |
| dviroel | right now i would just ask folks to start adding topics to our PTG etherpad | 12:26 |
| dviroel | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/watcher-2026.2-ptg | 12:26 |
| dviroel | ok, one more topic that I want to quick cover | 12:27 |
| dviroel | #topic OpenInfra Live - Gazpacho release | 12:27 |
| dviroel | there was a mail in the ML last week | 12:27 |
| dviroel | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/XSMMR2KF5PHACXXD4UCDCETKCYT4UJ3Q/#N2A5BQACADL4RNSYA7JSCJLSFO577DFM | 12:27 |
| dviroel | the OpenInfra Live will happen on Thursday, April 2 at 1400 UTC | 12:27 |
| dviroel | It is a webinar in the openinfra youtube channel that we can present the highlight of openstack projects | 12:28 |
| dviroel | I will be presenting the watcher highlights for gazpacho release | 12:28 |
| dviroel | it seems that it might be holiday in a couple of countries | 12:29 |
| dviroel | but if you miss it, you can still watch the recording afterwards in their channel | 12:29 |
| dviroel | ok, that's it for the topic | 12:30 |
| dviroel | moving to the next one then | 12:30 |
| dviroel | #topic Reviews | 12:30 |
| dviroel | I proposed a follow up change in the eventlet-removal topic | 12:30 |
| dviroel | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/980818 (Make native threading the default concurrency mode) | 12:31 |
| dviroel | to make threading mode as default in 2026.2 release | 12:31 |
| dviroel | with that patch, jobs that were running in eventlet mode, now will run in threading mode | 12:31 |
| dviroel | and the unit and tempest one that were in threading mode, will now run in eventlet mode | 12:32 |
| dviroel | We still have the option to switch between modes using the flag, but now it defaults to disable eventlet | 12:32 |
| dviroel | please review when you have some time | 12:33 |
| amoralej | eventlet switch has been great work dviroel++ I think it's good to change the defaults early in the cycle | 12:33 |
| dviroel | thanks amoralej! | 12:33 |
| sean-k-mooney | +1 to updating the default early | 12:34 |
| dviroel | i also have a DNM patch (which I will rebase/update) that validates the code removal too, just in case you folks want to take a look | 12:34 |
| sean-k-mooney | to let it bake in ci for as long as possible | 12:34 |
| dviroel | ack, we will keep 2 jobs still testing eventlet, to avoid any breakage that may occur in the way | 12:35 |
| dviroel | alright, moving to next reviews | 12:35 |
| dviroel | these are specs proposed for 2026.2 cycle | 12:35 |
| dviroel | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-specs/+/969840 (Audit Pipeline) | 12:35 |
| dviroel | we discussed a lot about that in 2026.1 cycle, with tons of reviews (thanks all for that) | 12:36 |
| dviroel | I have been playing locally with a small PoC of the proposal | 12:36 |
| dviroel | i have already made some updates to the spec based on that, like more detailed section about the mutable data cluster and the metric data cache | 12:36 |
| dviroel | the updated was pushed yesterday | 12:37 |
| dviroel | ah, and the work items section was also updated to provided a better phased development | 12:37 |
| sean-k-mooney | have you started any POCs or practical explortatiosn of the work? | 12:37 |
| sean-k-mooney | i assume the addtion of the parmater ot the audit templeate would be one fo the first steps | 12:38 |
| dviroel | sean-k-mooney: I have a workable PoC at this moment, an audit pipeline with 2 stages (a zone_migration + workload_stabilization) | 12:38 |
| sean-k-mooney | ack, i think the defautl_parmaters part is not contovertial and could/shoudl likely be the first chagne actully pushed for this since it really does not depend on the details fo the rest | 12:39 |
| dviroel | ++ | 12:39 |
| sean-k-mooney | i have not looked at this since december so i have not loaded context but i think we should proably try and review it over the next week or 3 | 12:40 |
| dviroel | ack, thaks | 12:40 |
| sean-k-mooney | if we are in general agreement i dont think this nessisarly need to be a ptg topic but fi we still have open questions it could be | 12:40 |
| dviroel | we can discuss in more details in the following weeks, and if needed we can discuss more details in the ptg | 12:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | or we coudld do a one of gmeet instaead of oen of these meetings | 12:41 |
| dviroel | ++ | 12:41 |
| amoralej | i will review the last PS | 12:41 |
| dviroel | this is a good idea | 12:41 |
| dviroel | we can use part of the weekly meeting and discuss in a gmeet | 12:41 |
| * dviroel will be on pto for 2 weeks, we can schedule a session early in april | 12:42 | |
| amoralej | +1 for gmeet out of ptg | 12:42 |
| sean-k-mooney | ack | 12:42 |
| dviroel | one detail in the spec | 12:42 |
| dviroel | i removed the audit trigger from it | 12:43 |
| dviroel | since the spec was growing, i decided to remove the Audit Trigger piece, which will have it's own spec proposed still for 2026.2 cycle | 12:43 |
| dviroel | i think that it is better this way, but I also accept feedbacks | 12:43 |
| dviroel | writting a spec only for the trigger since it will touch more places than I was expecting initially | 12:44 |
| dviroel | i may poc only the trigger part too | 12:44 |
| dviroel | to validate it | 12:44 |
| sean-k-mooney | ok | 12:45 |
| dviroel | and we can decide on implementing if first or later, we shall discuss in the following weeks | 12:45 |
| dviroel | but it is on my backlog here | 12:45 |
| dviroel | ok, next review then | 12:45 |
| dviroel | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-specs/+/970220 (Add spec for improving watcher-dashboard testing) | 12:46 |
| chandankumar | I have added this one | 12:46 |
| chandankumar | thank you everyone for all the reviews, I have addressed most of them | 12:47 |
| chandankumar | Since master is open now. I would like get feedback on this and get merged | 12:47 |
| chandankumar | We have the playwright poc and skip action integration patch also up based on the spec | 12:48 |
| dviroel | chandankumar++ thanks, yes, and is a spec that was alredy discssued and validated with PoCs | 12:48 |
| chandankumar | I will propose the requirements patch to add playwright once spec is merged | 12:48 |
| sean-k-mooney | im wondering if i shoudl convert https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22service-layer-pattern%22 into a spec and or how to make sure it does not conflict with that work | 12:48 |
| sean-k-mooney | ^ was part of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-specs/+/963438 | 12:48 |
| sean-k-mooney | or at leat it implemntn part of ^ | 12:49 |
| sean-k-mooney | but it goes beyond that | 12:49 |
| sean-k-mooney | we likly can aprpove your spec indepmendently | 12:49 |
| sean-k-mooney | but there is a stong overlap as that is removeing selenium and doing the refactor of the test layout | 12:50 |
| dviroel | sean-k-mooney: it would be good to have it documented in a spec | 12:50 |
| sean-k-mooney | right the documentiaotn is currently in the first patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/978239/3/doc/source/contributor/service-layer-pattern.rst | 12:51 |
| dviroel | oh ok, so a spec may only duplicate things | 12:51 |
| sean-k-mooney | i created a set of contibutor docs as the first patch to distial feedback i raised in a number of reviews | 12:52 |
| sean-k-mooney | well yes and no | 12:52 |
| sean-k-mooney | im kind of doing 3 thing in that serise | 12:52 |
| sean-k-mooney | 1 the adoption of ruff | 12:52 |
| sean-k-mooney | 2 the spliting of the test direcotres to make room for future testing | 12:52 |
| sean-k-mooney | and 3 docuemntign and implementign the service layer pattern | 12:52 |
| chandankumar | 2 is covered in integration test spec | 12:52 |
| dviroel | 1 and 2 may not need a spec I guess | 12:53 |
| sean-k-mooney | yes but it was also covered by the spec form the last cycle https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-specs/+/970220/12/specs/2026.2/approved/improve-watcher-dashboard-ui-testing.rst | 12:53 |
| chandankumar | 3 would be good to have a spec | 12:53 |
| sean-k-mooney | so ya i ll factor 3 out into a spec | 12:53 |
| dviroel | +1 | 12:53 |
| amoralej | but i like the idea of keeping the contributor guide | 12:53 |
| sean-k-mooney | what i was going to propose is pulling 1 and 2 out into the very start of my series | 12:54 |
| amoralej | so spec would be a summary? | 12:54 |
| sean-k-mooney | i.e. the ruff and test directoy refactor | 12:54 |
| sean-k-mooney | that will remove the confilcit | 12:54 |
| sean-k-mooney | then have a spec to detial the design pattern | 12:54 |
| sean-k-mooney | amoralej: kind of yes it woudl capture why it hink we shoudl be adopting this and an overview | 12:55 |
| amoralej | good | 12:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | and then the contibotr docs woudl have the details as it applies to this project | 12:55 |
| dviroel | lgtm | 12:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | so basiclly im proposing this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/978258/3 and the 2 patchs before it shoudl be merged soon | 12:56 |
| sean-k-mooney | and then there will be no conflict | 12:56 |
| sean-k-mooney | i need ot redo the isort one | 12:56 |
| sean-k-mooney | and ill file a spec for the rest seperately and chandan can proceed withthe playwritght work | 12:56 |
| dviroel | alright, thanks for the hard work there sean-k-mooney | 12:57 |
| sean-k-mooney | chandankumar: if that works for you ill pull the 3-4 patches out onto master cleanly later today and then you can build your work on top | 12:57 |
| sean-k-mooney | chandankumar:does that sound ok? | 12:58 |
| chandankumar | works for me | 12:58 |
| dviroel | great | 12:59 |
| sean-k-mooney | 1 ruff isort, 2 ruff format, 3 test resutcre ,4 selenium deletion 5 your stuffs | 12:59 |
| dviroel | if you two agree, works for me too | 12:59 |
| sean-k-mooney | we can likely review/approve your spec in the next few days | 13:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | dviroel: when will you be on pto is it form tomorow? | 13:00 |
| dviroel | my last day before pto is tomorrow | 13:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | ack so i guess unless you want to review it specificlly ill review it with jgilaber and or amoralej if you proceed with thte core addtion before you leave | 13:01 |
| dviroel | sure, that works | 13:01 |
| dviroel | let me quickly link the next spec too | 13:02 |
| dviroel | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-specs/+/978897 | 13:02 |
| dviroel | (Add 2026.2 OpenStackSDK migration spec for remaining services) | 13:02 |
| dviroel | since we are out of time | 13:02 |
| dviroel | jgilaber: a quick summary of this one | 13:02 |
| jgilaber | sure | 13:02 |
| dviroel | I think that most of us already know, but it is good for the records :) | 13:03 |
| jgilaber | I reproposed last cycle's spec but updating with what I would like to do this cycle | 13:03 |
| jgilaber | moving the kesytone, ironic, placement and cinder helpers to use openstacksdk like we did for the nova helper | 13:03 |
| dviroel | +1 | 13:04 |
| dviroel | great work that you did with nova migration to openstacksdk | 13:04 |
| jgilaber | my only question really is if I should create a new blueprint or reuse the same one | 13:04 |
| dviroel | a single one might be easier to track the overall migration, in future | 13:05 |
| dviroel | i think that we continue with the same one | 13:05 |
| dviroel | but we may have other opiniions in the spec | 13:05 |
| dviroel | we have to close this meeting | 13:06 |
| dviroel | but before that | 13:06 |
| jgilaber | that was thinking as well so I think we're set for now. I added the topic for the PTG, we can either have a really short discussion or skip it | 13:06 |
| dviroel | #topic Volunteers to chair next meetin | 13:06 |
| sean-k-mooney | normally we woudl ahve 1 per cycle | 13:06 |
| amoralej | I can take it | 13:06 |
| sean-k-mooney | and just add part-2 | 13:06 |
| sean-k-mooney | ectra | 13:06 |
| sean-k-mooney | but either is fine | 13:06 |
| dviroel | amoralej: thanks! | 13:06 |
| dviroel | amoralej: please check if April 2nd you will have enough people, otherwise you may want to cancel that meeting, during next meeting :) | 13:07 |
| dviroel | alright, thanks everyone | 13:07 |
| amoralej | actually, i will also be out on apr 2nd | 13:07 |
| amoralej | we can discuss it next week, yep | 13:08 |
| dviroel | exaclty | 13:08 |
| dviroel | jgilaber: may be out too | 13:08 |
| dviroel | ok | 13:08 |
| dviroel | let's wrap up for today | 13:08 |
| jgilaber | yep I'll be out as well | 13:08 |
| dviroel | we will meet again next week | 13:08 |
| dviroel | thank you all for participating | 13:08 |
| dviroel | #endmeeting | 13:08 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Thu Mar 19 13:08:39 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 13:08 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/watcher/2026/watcher.2026-03-19-12.00.html | 13:08 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/watcher/2026/watcher.2026-03-19-12.00.txt | 13:08 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/watcher/2026/watcher.2026-03-19-12.00.log.html | 13:08 |
| dviroel | sean-k-mooney: hey since you are around, can you check the issue in watcher-dashboard, we discussed earlier in the meeting: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/watcher/2026/watcher.2026-03-19-12.00.log.html#l-17 | 13:09 |
| dviroel | sean-k-mooney: we need to approve the dashboard backport to 2026.1 | 13:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | is it the font awsome one | 13:10 |
| dviroel | yep | 13:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | because i tought i approved that at the weekend | 13:10 |
| dviroel | sean-k-mooney: you approved in master | 13:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | oh the backport right | 13:10 |
| dviroel | yeah | 13:10 |
| dviroel | 2026.1 is broken | 13:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | ok ill look at that shortly | 13:10 |
| dviroel | thanks! | 13:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | looks like it failed on pep8 | 13:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | compressor.exceptions.UncompressableFileError: 'horizon/lib/font_awesome/css/font-awesome.css' could not be found in the COMPRESS_ROOT '/tmp' or with staticfiles. | 13:11 |
| dviroel | which patch are u looking? | 13:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | oh sorry | 13:12 |
| dviroel | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980533 | 13:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | wrach link | 13:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980415 | 13:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | i was looking at the bot patches | 13:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | which are failing on the lack of your patch link | 13:12 |
| dviroel | right | 13:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | jgilaber: is there aa reason your only +1? | 13:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | asking before i add +2w | 13:13 |
| dviroel | jgilaber: is not in the dashboard core | 13:13 |
| dviroel | sean-k-mooney: ^ | 13:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | oh right | 13:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | ok ill merge that so and amoralej will be on that team soone anyway | 13:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | so we will have coverage | 13:13 |
| dviroel | ++ | 13:13 |
| dviroel | yes | 13:14 |
| sean-k-mooney | once that is in ill recheck the bot patches and approve them if they pass | 13:14 |
| sean-k-mooney | actully let me just rebase them | 13:14 |
| dviroel | sean-k-mooney: that merged, we will need to request a new rc for dashboard | 13:14 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/watcher-dashboard stable/2026.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980414 | 13:15 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/watcher-dashboard stable/2026.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980415 | 13:15 |
| dviroel | ++ | 13:15 |
| sean-k-mooney | yes that unfortuneate but it happens | 13:15 |
| sean-k-mooney | espcially when our depencies get a requirement freeze exception | 13:16 |
| sean-k-mooney | jgilaber: chandankumar since ye are the desigated release liasons can ye follow up with the RC2 release patch once its fixed | 13:17 |
| dviroel | :) | 13:17 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/watcher-dashboard stable/2026.1: Fix fontawesome.css patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980533 | 13:27 |
| dviroel | amoralej: you have been added to the core groups mentioned in the meetings/email | 13:28 |
| dviroel | amoralej: you can test it here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980414 :) | 13:28 |
| amoralej | dviroel, it's working fine :) | 14:05 |
| dviroel | \o/ | 14:06 |
| jgilaber | sean-k-mooney, I can propose the patch for the rc2 | 14:16 |
| sean-k-mooney | ack jgilaber you may or may not want to wait for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980415/2 to merge | 14:18 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/watcher-dashboard stable/2026.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980414 | 14:18 |
| sean-k-mooney | its not actully requried for the rc but that the last patch i expect us to merge until after the release | 14:19 |
| jgilaber | sure, no reason to not wait for a bit and have that in, I can prepare the patch in the meantime and send it when this lands | 14:20 |
| sean-k-mooney | should be merged in less than an hour | 14:20 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/watcher-dashboard stable/2026.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/980415 | 14:31 |
| dviroel | jgilaber: thanks jgilaber | 14:32 |
| jgilaber | that merged faster than expected :) I submitted the rc2 patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/981293 | 14:35 |
| jgilaber | dviroel, I guess it will need your +1 as PTL | 14:35 |
| dviroel | jgilaber: thanks, lgtm, checked the commit hash and matches | 14:46 |
| dviroel | jgilaber: still not the official ptl yet, but they know that you/chandan are still the release liasons also | 14:47 |
| sean-k-mooney | jgilaber: os actully dviroel does not need too | 14:59 |
| sean-k-mooney | if you are set as the release liason properly then ptl-approved shoudl be set | 15:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | but we might need to go update that properly in the release rpo | 15:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | its sotread in a diffent localtion for ptl projects | 15:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | ye need to be listed here https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/data/release_liaisons.yaml | 15:00 |
| dviroel | that would be my first task as ptl | 15:03 |
| dviroel | since we reset the dpl model, we don't have any other place saying who are our release liaisons | 15:04 |
| dviroel | but that's fine, would not block the release patch to get merged | 15:05 |
| sean-k-mooney | im going to have to update this for cyborg as well if you dont get time for this before you go on pto i can just do one patch for both | 15:06 |
| dviroel | let me see iirc, we decided to have both jgilaber and chandankumar as release liaisons on both projects, but they would focus more on one each? | 15:08 |
| sean-k-mooney | yep | 15:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | basically so each is the others backup and you and i as ptl will be the secondary backup | 15:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | the ptl still are emporwed to do the release even if we have liasons nominated to do that | 15:12 |
| jgilaber | yes, that was the idea dviroel | 15:16 |
| dviroel | ack, going to prepare the patch - thanks | 15:17 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!