Friday, 2026-06-19

opendevreviewJoan Gilabert proposed openstack/watcher master: Add Inventory wrapper class for placement data  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99114706:50
opendevreviewJoan Gilabert proposed openstack/watcher master: Switch PlacementHelper to OpenStackSDK  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99114806:50
opendevreviewJoan Gilabert proposed openstack/watcher master: Remove unused placement from OpenStackClients  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99114906:50
opendevreviewJoan Gilabert proposed openstack/watcher master: Switch PlacementHelper to OpenStackSDK  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99114807:46
opendevreviewJoan Gilabert proposed openstack/watcher master: Remove unused placement from OpenStackClients  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99114907:46
sean-k-mooneydviroel: amoralej teim-ci is mostly fixed. rebooting the vm didnt help but rebooting and updated all my ubiqi networking gear did09:29
amoraleji saw in last reviews that it was running but not reporting comments ?09:30
sean-k-mooneyhowever the new version fo gerrit removed the api that zuul uses for inlien comments. i updated to the latest released zuul but the fix for that is not aviable yet09:30
amoralejah, that09:30
sean-k-mooneyya so you can view the html report if you click in to the review comment at the top level09:31
sean-k-mooneybut i will either have to swap to zuul master if they fix has been commited or wait a bit until that gets done09:31
amoraleji see https://minio-api.teim.app/zuul-logs/ab1/main/ab1ecd754d7547eeb7e1db7e745fe18e/code-review/review-report.html09:31
amoralejthanks!09:32
amoralejis there any magic comment to trigger teim-ci job only? other than recheck ?09:32
sean-k-mooney teim-ci: manual09:33
amoralejack09:33
sean-k-mooneywell or teim-ci: auto09:33
sean-k-mooneyhttps://github.com/SeanMooney/ci-sean-mooney/blob/main/zuul.d/pipelines.yaml#L2-L6709:34
sean-k-mooneyfor watcher the 2 pipelines are basiclly the same https://github.com/SeanMooney/ci-sean-mooney/blob/main/zuul.d/projects.yaml#L27-L3409:34
sean-k-mooneyi might change that in the future so the auto pipleine is basiclly what trigers when you push a review i.e. check , the manual one my version of experimental09:35
sean-k-mooneyi have consicerd addign other thing to my zuul instnace in the furue but i didnt really have anything concreate09:36
sean-k-mooneyfor example i do have nightly and weekly pipelines09:37
amoralejteim-ci: experimental would be more clear for experimental version09:37
amoralejthanks for maintaining that09:38
sean-k-mooneywell i guess i choos manual as i planned ot use it not for experminal jobs in the normal sence but rather extra jobs that we dont need all the time09:38
sean-k-mooneyso basiclly if i had perodic stuff and we wanted a 1 off trigger then  it would go in manual09:38
sean-k-mooneyi had planned orginally to make teim aviable to all project via the manual tigger09:38
sean-k-mooneybut i turned that off09:38
sean-k-mooneyamoralej: if you have ideas for useful jobs just let me know or any changes you would like to see09:40
amoralejthaks, i'll let you know if i figure out something09:51
opendevreviewJoan Gilabert proposed openstack/watcher master: Switch PlacementHelper to OpenStackSDK  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99114810:24
opendevreviewJoan Gilabert proposed openstack/watcher master: Remove unused placement from OpenStackClients  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99114910:24
opendevreviewJoan Gilabert proposed openstack/watcher master: Switch PlacementHelper to OpenStackSDK  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99114811:00
opendevreviewJoan Gilabert proposed openstack/watcher master: Remove unused placement from OpenStackClients  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99114911:00
jgilaberdviroel amoralej sean-k-mooney Hi! After all the 2025.2 backports for zone migration merged I enabled the volume migration tests there https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99397611:49
jgilaberplease take a look when free11:50
dviroelack , thanks jgilaber 11:50
amoralejchecking11:51
jgilaberthanks, that was quick!11:54
jgilabersecond thing I wanted to raise is TIMED_OUT jobs11:54
sean-k-mooneyi mean the ci was passing and your enableing more tests :)11:54
jgilaberit seems that lately we're seeing it more often11:55
jgilaberhttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?project=openstack%2Fwatcher&result=TIMED_OUT&skip=011:55
jgilaberI looked at a few of them at they seem to be fine, just running a bit slower than usual11:55
sean-k-mooneywe have our limits set to about 2 hours11:55
jgilaberit looks to me that they are about to finish with a couple of tests to run11:55
sean-k-mooneyhonestly we are not runign enouch test in our jobs to be hittign those limits11:55
sean-k-mooneyso im not sure we should increase them without investigating why these have got so slow11:56
sean-k-mooneyso devstack took ~30mins in the job im checkign 11:58
sean-k-mooneywhich is not excessive11:58
jgilaberlast time I checked this the cluster was slow in general11:59
sean-k-mooney2026-06-19 11:26:00.087436 | controller | {0} watcher_tempest_plugin.tests.scenario.test_execute_zone_migration.TestExecuteZoneMigrationStrategy.test_execute_zone_migration_with_destination_host [108.219466s] ... ok11:59
sean-k-mooney2026-06-19 11:27:45.803972 | controller | {0} watcher_tempest_plugin.tests.scenario.test_execute_zone_migration.TestExecuteZoneMigrationStrategy.test_execute_zone_migration_without_destination_host [105.683355s] ... ok11:59
sean-k-mooney2026-06-19 11:31:46.199408 | controller | {0} watcher_tempest_plugin.tests.scenario.test_execute_zone_migration.TestExecuteZoneMigrationStrategyVolume.test_execute_zone_migration_volume_migrate [192.233187s] ... ok11:59
sean-k-mooney2026-06-19 11:33:50.807120 | controller | {0} watcher_tempest_plugin.tests.scenario.test_execute_zone_migration.TestExecuteZoneMigrationStrategyVolume.test_execute_zone_migration_volume_retype [124.578776s] ... ok11:59
jgilaberI'm about to have lunch but I'll try giving claude the logs and see if it spots anything12:00
sean-k-mooneysome of the watchewr tests are taking quite long12:00
sean-k-mooneyalso the job is running serially12:00
amoralejit'd be interesting to see what's the deploy time for those jobs compared to the passing ones?12:00
sean-k-mooneythis is on ovh https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/fa5d1415b54543179e9a63ec47a2a4e2/log/job-output.txt12:00
sean-k-mooneyso that is not a case of a slow host12:01
sean-k-mooneystart of the job to tempest starting was 45 mins12:02
sean-k-mooneybut we have selver test that are indivugally taking 2-3 minutes each12:04
sean-k-mooney30-90 seconds is the accpabel range for a senario test wihtout it being condier exessivly slow and we ahve severa at doubel that12:05
sean-k-mooney2026-06-19 10:34:42.897426 | controller | {0} watcher_tempest_plugin.tests.scenario.test_execute_actuator.TestExecuteActionsViaActuator.test_execute_scenarios [254.536037s] ... ok12:05
dviroelyeah, i noticed that. Sometimes job passes with 1 hr 9 mins 49 secs, while others timed out after 2h12:24
dviroelif we check a job build history https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=watcher-tempest-prometheus&project=openstack%2Fwatcher&branch=master&skip=012:25
sean-k-mooneyim goign to tell an agent to dig into that job but i woudl assume we are misisng notifciotn or takign a very long time to execute12:50
jgilaberhere are the findings from opus https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/watcher_tempest_slowness12:52
jgilaberI'm still going through the logs to verify the claims12:52
sean-k-mooneythat form a diffent testn tehn i was looking at i think12:55
sean-k-mooneybut its interting that the action poooling and data model syscn are the too most expensive12:56
jgilaberI'm looking at https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/fa5d1415b54543179e9a63ec47a2a4e2 for reference12:56
sean-k-mooneyoh it is the same12:56
opendevreviewMerged openstack/watcher stable/2025.2: Enable extra zone migration tests on master branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99397613:25
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/watcher-dashboard master: Add Playwright-based E2E testing framework  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-dashboard/+/97035314:58
opendevreviewDouglas Viroel proposed openstack/watcher stable/2026.1: Add regression test for notification lost during synchronization  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99416120:10
opendevreviewDouglas Viroel proposed openstack/watcher stable/2026.1: Fix notification updates lost during cluster data model synchronization  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99416220:10
opendevreviewDouglas Viroel proposed openstack/watcher stable/2026.1: Fix LP bug link in releasenote for bug 2152645  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99416320:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/watcher master: Add Inventory wrapper class for placement data  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/99114721:10

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!