| *** vkmc has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** reed has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** zhiyan has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** boris-42 has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** vipul has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** X019 has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** cpallares has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** yfujioka has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** ekarlso has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** wpf has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** flwang has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** dmitryme has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** AAzza_afk has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** sebasmagri has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** flaper87 has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** tmu has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** notmyname has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** riveter has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** dguerri has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** malini|afk has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** kgriffs|afk has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** X019 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** boris-42 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** reed has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** malini|afk has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** yfujioka has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** flwang has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** wpf has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** dmitryme has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** ekarlso has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** AAzza_afk has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** zhiyan has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** sebasmagri has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** riveter has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** flaper87 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** vipul has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** tmu has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** kgriffs|afk has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** dguerri has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| *** notmyname has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rose Ames proposed a change to openstack/zaqar: Remove duplicated code in pooling meta-controllers https://review.openstack.org/129109 | 01:53 |
|---|---|---|
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed a change to openstack/zaqar: Version discovery for root URI https://review.openstack.org/130094 | 02:14 |
| wpf | jeffrey4l: ping | 02:18 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, pong | 02:18 |
| wpf | you are the Jeffrey Zhang ,right ? | 02:18 |
| jeffrey4l | yup | 02:19 |
| jeffrey4l | sup? | 02:19 |
| wpf | jeffrey4l: :p , Ok ,I saw your comments for my PS ,about the x-openstack-request-id logline, thanks | 02:19 |
| jeffrey4l | i remember that. | 02:20 |
| wpf | jeffrey4l: anyway, do you know what how the 'request_id' context was plugged in ? | 02:21 |
| wpf | I try to find it ,but did not get the entry point | 02:21 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, do u mean how the request_id is generated in the context object? | 02:23 |
| wpf | and I debug the zaqar code, r record.__dict__.get('request_id') is None | 02:24 |
| jeffrey4l | yep. I know that. | 02:24 |
| jeffrey4l | Here is the magic. | 02:24 |
| wpf | thanks | 02:24 |
| * jeffrey4l searching the code | 02:24 | |
| jeffrey4l | btw, this bp is needed for this feature https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zaqar/+spec/log-project-id | 02:25 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, check this line https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/zaqar/tree/zaqar/openstack/common/log.py#n316 | 02:26 |
| wpf | I thought this bp had not been implemented | 02:26 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, yes. I am trying to implement the bp. | 02:26 |
| jeffrey4l | the context object is load from `local.store` ( a threading local weak object) https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/zaqar/tree/zaqar/openstack/common/local.py#n38 | 02:27 |
| wpf | jeffrey4l: you know , in my PS, I only generate the uuid and set it into the req.env and also the response.headers using the before/after handler of Falcon, | 02:28 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, Now, there is no code to set the local.store variable. | 02:29 |
| wpf | so do you mean that I need to put the request-id into the context? | 02:29 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, in your PS, my comments mean that why the request-id should be exist when and only the status_code < 400 | 02:30 |
| jeffrey4l | how about when the server raise 404/500 error, i think the request-id should also be exist. | 02:31 |
| jeffrey4l | I think putting the request-id into the context is another things. | 02:31 |
| wpf | it depends I thought | 02:31 |
| wpf | since there are also some other validations before the request was really handled, such as if there is no CLIENT-ID, | 02:32 |
| wpf | then the request will be refused by 400 or some other exception | 02:33 |
| wpf | in that case , I don't think we need the request-id | 02:33 |
| wpf | and of course we may put the 'generated request id ' as the first step for any requests, but do we really need that? | 02:34 |
| jeffrey4l | why? reqest-id can help us debug the code. I'd like the request_id exist in all situation. | 02:34 |
| wpf | Ok, I will think it again , (actually ,I have not read you inline comments, just saw that you give me the clue of the log info , -:)) | 02:36 |
| jeffrey4l | roger that. ;p | 02:37 |
| wpf | but I still have no idea about how to put the request-id into the context | 02:38 |
| wpf | -____- | 02:38 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, aha | 02:40 |
| jeffrey4l | it should be put in the loca.store in the beginning of the request. | 02:40 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, pls check the nova context code http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/context.py#n97 . when the context is created, it will be store into local.store( a threading weakref objects) | 02:45 |
| jeffrey4l | then when logging, the context can be accessed by the logging module. | 02:45 |
| jeffrey4l | the request-id is include in the context objects. | 02:45 |
| wpf | Ok, thanks , I will try to understand it , | 02:45 |
| jeffrey4l | http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/context.py#n74 | 02:46 |
| wpf | and will ping you again if there are some questions , :P | 02:46 |
| jeffrey4l | no problem. | 02:46 |
| jeffrey4l | I think you patch should focus on the request-id in the environment. and my incoming patch( implements https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zaqar/+spec/log-project-id) should encapsulation is into context object and logging it every where. | 02:47 |
| wpf | -:) | 02:48 |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 03:34 | |
| *** reed has quit IRC | 03:45 | |
| *** fifieldt has joined #openstack-zaqar | 04:08 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed a change to openstack/python-zaqarclient: Fix the client name typo https://review.openstack.org/130116 | 04:22 |
| *** sgotliv_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 05:21 | |
| wpf | jeffrey4l: ping | 05:28 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, pong | 05:34 |
| wpf | jeffrey4l: when on_xxxxxx(such as on_post) raise some exception , the 'after' hook will be executed in Falcon | 05:35 |
| wpf | I thought I can't make sure that all >400 responses had the header since some of the 400 response are exceptions ,and some of them are normal response just with status-code is 400 | 05:36 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, yup. I need check the Falcon's code to make sure of that. | 05:38 |
| wpf | @wraps(responder) | 05:39 |
| wpf | def do_after(req, resp, **kwargs): | 05:39 |
| wpf | responder(req, resp, **kwargs) | 05:39 |
| wpf | action(req, resp) | 05:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Peng Fei Wang proposed a change to openstack/zaqar: Add x-openstack-request-id to zaqar responses https://review.openstack.org/128815 | 05:45 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, I checked the code and know the reason. | 06:21 |
| wpf | jeffrey4l: yep | 06:22 |
| jeffrey4l | But i think still think the request-id should be exist all the time, no matter whether the exception is raised. | 06:22 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, So i think it should be a bug/feature( falcon should handle the exception more gracefully). Or we can use middleware to handle the exception. | 06:24 |
| wpf | Ok, when flaper87 who worked on Falcon I thought is online , I will get his insights | 06:26 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, another question: I doubt that whether the request id should be created every time and never passed to other project( i.e. keystone). IMHO, the cross-service-request-id mean that in one request through several service, the request-id should keep the same. | 06:29 |
| jeffrey4l | I don't know whether i understand correctly. | 06:30 |
| jeffrey4l | if so, there is more work to do. For example, pass the request id to keystone when necessarily. | 06:31 |
| jeffrey4l | But it seems that the cross-service-request-id is not implemented in keystone. :( | 06:31 |
| wpf | yes, no x-openstack-request-id in keystone | 06:33 |
| * wpf dig a big hole for my self | 06:33 | |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, pls check https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=cross-service-request-id and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70823/ | 06:33 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, LOL | 06:33 |
| *** sgotliv__ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 06:33 | |
| jeffrey4l | The request id does not involve Keystone, nor should it be generated by Keystone: it should be generated by Heat and or Nova when scheduling a long running task. Keystone is not part of that. | 06:35 |
| jeffrey4l | comments from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70823/ | 06:35 |
| wpf | then why our zaqar need it ? :P | 06:36 |
| wpf | it should should be pretty fast tasks within zaqar | 06:36 |
| *** sgotliv_ has quit IRC | 06:37 | |
| jeffrey4l | at least, zaqar need connect to keystone. In this case, cross request id is needed, i think. | 06:37 |
| *** sgotliv__ has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
| wpf | ok, it's cross-service | 06:39 |
| jeffrey4l | i think so. | 06:39 |
| *** X019 has quit IRC | 06:39 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed a change to openstack/zaqar: Always include the project id in the logs https://review.openstack.org/130139 | 07:01 |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:08 | |
| wpf | flaper87: ping | 07:22 |
| flaper87 | wpf: pong | 07:24 |
| wpf | flaper87: one question in Falcon | 07:25 |
| wpf | if the responder raises some exceptions ,then the after hook will not be executed ,right ? | 07:26 |
| wpf | jeffrey4l: I saw that there always be one request-id in the request context when injecting, can we add it into the response header? | 07:30 |
| flaper87 | wpf: mmh, I think that's right, yes! I mean, the after hooks shouldn't be | 07:30 |
| wpf | flaper87: Ok, since jeffrey4l want to all the response (even raise exception) have to the request_id, so with after hook, it will not work | 07:31 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, I think this should be different thing with cross-service-request-id. | 07:31 |
| *** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:32 | |
| flaper87 | wpf: I should probably double check that | 07:32 |
| flaper87 | but it'd be easier to just try it out :P | 07:32 |
| wpf | I'd check the Falcon code, just confirm with you :P | 07:32 |
| jeffrey4l | If the cross service request id is what I understand, there should be more work to do( discussed above) | 07:32 |
| wpf | jeffrey4l: you mean transfer it to keystone ? | 07:33 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, right. | 07:33 |
| *** AAzzal has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:33 | |
| *** AAzzal is now known as AAzza | 07:33 | |
| wpf | jeffrey4l: Ok ,actually when I check nova related code, it seems that they only add the request-id into request.env and response header with middleware, did not something with the keystone | 07:34 |
| wpf | maybe I need to check it again. | 07:34 |
| *** AAzzal has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:34 | |
| jeffrey4l | so I want separate those two things and don't want to add it into the response header. Even though it it easy. | 07:35 |
| *** AAzza_afk has quit IRC | 07:36 | |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, About the cross-service-request-id, I think that none of the project/service implement it. So we find nothing in the nova's code. | 07:36 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, check this. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=cross-service-request-id none service implement it. | 07:37 |
| wpf | yes, I agree that it's two things ,but it should not prevent us to add it into the response header I though, since in my project , I usually add and id into the request log (such as xxx-id >> sina.com) , and then add the same id into the response log line (such as xxx-id << 200 Ok) | 07:37 |
| *** AAzza has quit IRC | 07:37 | |
| *** AAzzal is now known as AAzza | 07:37 | |
| wpf | which will make the debug very easy. | 07:38 |
| wpf | so I don't get your point that why you did not want to add it into the response header. | 07:38 |
| jeffrey4l | you mean add the response id into the logs or headers? | 07:39 |
| wpf | request-id | 07:39 |
| jeffrey4l | so , you mean add the request-id into the headers? | 07:40 |
| wpf | yes | 07:40 |
| wpf | I am just curious that why we do not , it seems to be nothing related with the cross-service | 07:41 |
| jeffrey4l | I am trying the clear your question. I think there is some misunderstand between us. | 07:41 |
| jeffrey4l | After that, you can log the request-id( read from headers) into logs? | 07:41 |
| jeffrey4l | this is what u want? right? | 07:41 |
| wpf | no, with your changes, the request-id is already in the log ,right? | 07:42 |
| jeffrey4l | yep | 07:42 |
| jeffrey4l | So why it is necessary to add it to the response header? | 07:43 |
| wpf | I thought it's easy for user to find out that which lines in the logs are for his request | 07:44 |
| jeffrey4l | logs include the request id and the line number. It isn't solve the problem? | 07:45 |
| *** AAzza is now known as AAzza_afk | 07:46 | |
| wpf | I am not sure how the request_id was logged, is it a pair in the log file, the first line is the entry of request ,and then blablabla,,, then another line with the same id for the response ? | 07:47 |
| *** X019 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:47 | |
| jeffrey4l | yes. | 07:48 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, something like below | 07:49 |
| jeffrey4l | 2014-10-22 15:48:56.115 24496 DEBUG zaqar.queues.transport.wsgi.v1_0.queues [req-b3f3436b-cb66-46db-852f-d91550b839c2 - - - - -] [project_id:a] Queue collection GET on_get /home/jeffrey/openstack/zaqar/zaqar/queues/transport/wsgi/v1_0/queues.py:91 | 07:49 |
| jeffrey4l | req-xxxx is the request id and it will exist in all the logs. | 07:49 |
| wpf | Ok, suppose that I make the call with curl or some other client, as at the same time ,maybe other also make the same request with different body, I am not sure whether I need the response header to find 'my' log in the log file or not | 07:51 |
| wpf | :-) | 07:51 |
| wpf | maybe you can also output the client-id | 07:52 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, so when u want the log for a certain request, u can filter the log with a certain request-id. U can get all the related log . | 07:52 |
| wpf | yes | 07:52 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, the client-id is optional. | 07:52 |
| wpf | since I don't know which line is for me | 07:52 |
| wpf | optional? | 07:53 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, u can modify the logging_context_format_string conf to add the client-id. | 07:53 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, wrong word. Should use configurable. | 07:53 |
| wpf | ok | 07:53 |
| jeffrey4l | logging_context_format_string=%(client_id)s | 07:54 |
| jeffrey4l | some thing like above. | 07:54 |
| wpf | yes, got it | 07:54 |
| jeffrey4l | all the value in the context variable can be logged through above method. | 07:54 |
| jeffrey4l | :p | 07:54 |
| wpf | anyway , seems that I can abandon my PS, :) | 07:54 |
| jeffrey4l | I think so. We can implement this until the cross-service-request-id implemented in keystone at least. | 07:56 |
| *** sgotliv__ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:59 | |
| *** sgotliv__ has quit IRC | 07:59 | |
| *** sgotliv has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:59 | |
| wpf | jeffrey4l: ok, thanks for your help . I need to understand the magic for the log context | 08:01 |
| jeffrey4l | wpf, :D | 08:02 |
| *** AAzza_afk is now known as AAzza | 08:10 | |
| *** sgotliv has quit IRC | 08:46 | |
| *** sgotliv has joined #openstack-zaqar | 08:49 | |
| *** yfujioka has quit IRC | 09:11 | |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 09:12 | |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 09:12 | |
| *** jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 09:19 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 09:28 | |
| *** sgotliv has quit IRC | 09:29 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-zaqar | 09:29 | |
| *** jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-zaqar | 09:32 | |
| *** sgotliv has joined #openstack-zaqar | 09:41 | |
| *** bradjones has joined #openstack-zaqar | 09:58 | |
| *** bradjones has quit IRC | 10:08 | |
| *** bradjones has joined #openstack-zaqar | 10:08 | |
| *** flwang2 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 10:13 | |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 10:13 | |
| *** sgotliv has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 10:45 | |
| *** sgotliv has joined #openstack-zaqar | 11:00 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-zaqar | 11:03 | |
| *** sgotliv has quit IRC | 11:10 | |
| *** malini has joined #openstack-zaqar | 11:11 | |
| *** sgotliv has joined #openstack-zaqar | 11:13 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 11:24 | |
| *** bradjones has quit IRC | 11:30 | |
| *** bradjones has joined #openstack-zaqar | 11:32 | |
| *** sgotliv has quit IRC | 11:41 | |
| *** sgotliv has joined #openstack-zaqar | 11:42 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-zaqar | 11:44 | |
| *** vkmc has joined #openstack-zaqar | 12:32 | |
| vkmc | morniiiing | 12:33 |
| *** sgotliv has quit IRC | 12:38 | |
| *** sgotliv has joined #openstack-zaqar | 12:51 | |
| *** sgotliv has quit IRC | 12:56 | |
| *** sgotliv has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:02 | |
| exploreshaifali | flaper87, around? | 13:02 |
| exploreshaifali | flaper87, what should I do now? | 13:04 |
| *** jchai has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:05 | |
| *** sriram has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:06 | |
| *** malini has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
| flaper87 | exploreshaifali: yo yo | 13:10 |
| flaper87 | back | 13:10 |
| flaper87 | exploreshaifali: what do you mean? | 13:10 |
| flaper87 | vkmc: good morning, young lady! | 13:10 |
| *** mpanetta has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:12 | |
| exploreshaifali | flaper87, I have submitted the application, now how to proceed ahead? | 13:16 |
| vkmc | flaper87, morning good sir | 13:17 |
| exploreshaifali | vkmc, I need one suggestion | 13:18 |
| exploreshaifali | I have put details and schedules for 3 projects in application | 13:18 |
| exploreshaifali | vkmc, I was wondering if it will make my application weaker by showing interest in many projects | 13:19 |
| exploreshaifali | vkmc, what do you think? | 13:19 |
| flaper87 | exploreshaifali: next step is to wait for the approval | 13:19 |
| exploreshaifali | flaper87, but till then I think I should try out to fix any bug for zaqar as I haven't contributed to it? | 13:20 |
| flaper87 | exploreshaifali: that sounds perfect to me and it's definitely a great idea | 13:21 |
| flaper87 | :D | 13:21 |
| exploreshaifali | or any other stuff like so | 13:21 |
| flaper87 | exploreshaifali: have you looked into the bug list? | 13:21 |
| exploreshaifali | yup | 13:21 |
| exploreshaifali | there is no any low hanging fruit bug | 13:21 |
| exploreshaifali | can you suggest any bug which will be easy to fix for someone new to zaqar? | 13:22 |
| exploreshaifali | or I there is not, I think I should try for any bug that I find intutive as there is loong time in approval date | 13:23 |
| flaper87 | exploreshaifali: the later, my advice is to always jump in, read and take a look at what feels good | 13:24 |
| flaper87 | not necessarily easy, it may also be a difficult bug | 13:24 |
| flaper87 | you just need to be interested in working on it | 13:24 |
| exploreshaifali | yeah | 13:24 |
| exploreshaifali | flaper87, have you seen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seUzASB8sxU | 13:25 |
| exploreshaifali | :P | 13:25 |
| *** flwang2 has quit IRC | 13:25 | |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:26 | |
| flaper87 | exploreshaifali: LOOOOOOOOOL, I hadn't | 13:34 |
| exploreshaifali | :D | 13:34 |
| *** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 13:39 | |
| *** malini has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:46 | |
| *** ametts has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:47 | |
| *** cpallares has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:51 | |
| *** AAzza has quit IRC | 13:57 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:58 | |
| *** AAzza_afk has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:59 | |
| *** AAzza_afk is now known as AAzza | 13:59 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:01 | |
| *** jchai is now known as jchai_afk | 14:11 | |
| *** vkmc has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
| *** jchai_afk is now known as jchai | 14:25 | |
| *** vkmc has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:31 | |
| riveter | mornin vkmc | 14:43 |
| vkmc | morning riveter! | 14:45 |
| *** jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 14:52 | |
| vkmc | flaper87, around? can you review this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129988/? | 15:01 |
| flaper87 | vkmc: around now | 15:08 |
| *** reed has joined #openstack-zaqar | 15:10 | |
| *** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 15:13 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 15:17 | |
| *** vkmc has quit IRC | 15:17 | |
| flaper87 | vkmc left >.> | 15:17 |
| *** vkmc has joined #openstack-zaqar | 15:24 | |
| *** vkmc has joined #openstack-zaqar | 15:24 | |
| flaper87 | vkmc: stop running away from me | 15:24 |
| * flaper87 calls his buddy: THE PENGUIN! | 15:25 | |
| flaper87 | vkmc: I left a comment :) | 15:25 |
| vkmc | flaper87, heh sorry, the connection is not very good here | 15:25 |
| vkmc | I'm in the conference | 15:25 |
| vkmc | :T | 15:25 |
| flaper87 | vkmc: no no no, do not play the conference card on me... NO! | 15:25 |
| flaper87 | I refuse to be treated like that | 15:25 |
| * flaper87 is calling his lawyer | 15:25 | |
| vkmc | hahaha | 15:25 |
| * flaper87 will sue vkmc | 15:26 | |
| riveter | is your lawyer a penguin? | 15:26 |
| vkmc | nooo, I promise I won't run away again | 15:26 |
| flaper87 | riveter: no no, the penguin is THE PENGUIN | 15:29 |
| vkmc | da penguin | 15:30 |
| riveter | but does THE PENGUIN or does THE PENGUIN not have a law degree? | 15:31 |
| riveter | I suspect you have not even bothered to ascertain this basic information | 15:31 |
| kgriffs | flaper87: you've seen the original of that gummy bear song, right? | 15:31 |
| flaper87 | kgriffs: no | 15:37 |
| flaper87 | :P | 15:37 |
| flaper87 | riveter: exactly, it just gets the job done | 15:38 |
| flaper87 | but we can just say it has one | 15:38 |
| * kgriffs drops a link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFM-_ncS8ZY | 15:39 | |
| flaper87 | LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL | 15:40 |
| flaper87 | ok, that's it! | 15:40 |
| *** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-zaqar | 16:02 | |
| riveter | hi explore | 16:02 |
| exploreshaifali | hi riveter | 16:03 |
| *** bradjones has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
| *** jchai is now known as jchai_afk | 17:00 | |
| *** jchai_afk is now known as jchai | 17:06 | |
| vkmc | flaper87, could you give me more context on the comment you left in https://review.openstack.org/129988 | 17:11 |
| vkmc | _ | 17:11 |
| *** cpallares has quit IRC | 17:38 | |
| kgriffs | flaper87, riveter: when you both have a minute, I'd like to discuss https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129109/ | 17:47 |
| riveter | I'm here | 17:47 |
| kgriffs | flaper87: around? | 17:47 |
| riveter | do you want to talk now or should we wait til he's around? | 17:54 |
| *** sgotliv has quit IRC | 18:07 | |
| riveter | kgriffs: I'm going out in half an hour or so but I'll be on later | 18:09 |
| kgriffs | ok | 18:09 |
| kgriffs | when you get back lets try to ping flaper87 again | 18:10 |
| riveter | I could talk now, just thought I mention that I'd be going | 18:10 |
| riveter | so he didn't show up and then I jump up and leave :) | 18:10 |
| riveter | flaper87, around? | 18:11 |
| riveter | ok, I'm heading out, will ping you when I get back | 18:39 |
| *** AAzza is now known as AAzza_afk | 18:51 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 19:13 | |
| *** AAzza_afk is now known as AAzza | 19:18 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-zaqar | 19:24 | |
| *** malini has quit IRC | 19:30 | |
| *** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 19:44 | |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 19:48 | |
| *** AAzza is now known as AAzza_afk | 19:51 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-zaqar | 19:57 | |
| *** AAzza_afk is now known as AAzza | 20:15 | |
| *** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 20:17 | |
| *** AAzza is now known as AAzza_afk | 20:18 | |
| *** sgotliv has joined #openstack-zaqar | 20:32 | |
| *** AAzza_afk is now known as AAzza | 20:42 | |
| *** AAzza is now known as AAzza_afk | 20:44 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 20:50 | |
| *** vkmc has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
| *** X019 has quit IRC | 20:59 | |
| *** sgotliv has quit IRC | 20:59 | |
| *** boris-42 has quit IRC | 21:00 | |
| *** malini has joined #openstack-zaqar | 21:03 | |
| *** sriram has quit IRC | 21:04 | |
| *** malini has quit IRC | 21:04 | |
| *** malini has joined #openstack-zaqar | 21:05 | |
| *** vkmc has joined #openstack-zaqar | 21:06 | |
| *** boris-42 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 21:07 | |
| *** vkmc has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
| *** mpanetta has quit IRC | 21:14 | |
| flwang | flaper87: do we have another meeting to discuss the topic of summit? | 21:14 |
| *** bradjones has joined #openstack-zaqar | 21:17 | |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 21:54 | |
| *** vkmc has joined #openstack-zaqar | 21:57 | |
| *** vkmc has joined #openstack-zaqar | 21:57 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 21:58 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-zaqar | 22:00 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
| *** malini has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
| *** jchai has quit IRC | 22:08 | |
| *** vkmc has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-zaqar | 23:12 | |
| riveter | kgriffs, ping | 23:16 |
| *** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 23:17 | |
| *** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 23:39 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-zaqar | 23:43 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!