*** kong has quit IRC | 01:44 | |
*** kong has joined #openstack-zaqar | 01:46 | |
*** wanghao has quit IRC | 03:50 | |
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 03:51 | |
*** flwang1 has quit IRC | 09:37 | |
*** mdnadeem has joined #openstack-zaqar | 10:48 | |
*** mdnadeem_ has quit IRC | 10:50 | |
*** dynarro has joined #openstack-zaqar | 15:24 | |
*** wanghao has quit IRC | 16:06 | |
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 16:07 | |
*** dynarro has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
*** AAzza has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
*** AAzza has joined #openstack-zaqar | 17:21 | |
*** wanghao has quit IRC | 18:22 | |
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 18:22 | |
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 18:51 | |
Eva-i | flwang1: flwang: ping | 19:23 |
---|---|---|
flwang1 | pong | 19:23 |
Eva-i | flwang1: will there be meeting tomorrow? | 19:23 |
flwang1 | Eva-i: no, but if you have topics we can propose one | 19:24 |
flwang1 | and i'm going to send out a mail to announce the new time | 19:24 |
Eva-i | flwang1: okay | 19:24 |
flwang1 | the new time will start from next week | 19:24 |
Eva-i | flwang1: how do you think is this comment is always true: "the remaining messages will always be unclaimed as well" in here https://github.com/openstack/zaqar/blob/master/zaqar/storage/redis/scripts/claim_messages.lua#L51 | 19:28 |
Eva-i | ? | 19:28 |
Eva-i | flwang1: what if one message's claim is expired but messages after this messages are still claimed? | 19:30 |
flwang1 | Eva-i: i have to drive to office now, will ttyl | 19:34 |
Eva-i | flwang1: yeah, sure | 19:34 |
flwang1 | thx :) | 19:35 |
*** flwang1 has quit IRC | 19:39 | |
*** mdnadeem_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 20:18 | |
*** mdnadeem has quit IRC | 20:21 | |
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 21:08 | |
flwang | Eva-i: back | 21:24 |
Eva-i | flwang: oki | 21:25 |
flwang | the code you're referring is trying to claim a msg | 21:28 |
flwang | sorry, several msg by msg ids | 21:28 |
flwang | so what did you mean 'what if one message's claim is expired'? | 21:28 |
Eva-i | flwang: yes, and the code assumes that if first unclaimed message is found, then all next messages in the list are unclaimed too | 21:29 |
Eva-i | flwang: do you think it's correct? | 21:29 |
Eva-i | flwang: ok, wait, I'll try to explain better | 21:31 |
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 21:35 | |
Eva-i | flwang: http://paste.openstack.org/show/U3vHgH9hRBaTMpZN59XG/ | 21:37 |
flwang | seems it's possible, but TBH, i never tried this before, so i think it deserves a test before opening a bug | 21:42 |
Eva-i | flwang: okay, I'll test it | 21:43 |
Eva-i | flwang: also can this script be executed simultaneously multiple times? For example two Zaqar instances using single redis database? | 21:44 |
flwang | Eva-i: i will send out a mail about the summary of our summit design sessions today so that we can be on the same page for the priorities | 21:45 |
Eva-i | flwang: thanks for your work | 21:45 |
Eva-i | flwang: this bug is not in priority, right? https://bugs.launchpad.net/zaqar/+bug/1548135 | 21:49 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1548135 in zaqar "(Redis) Unable to claim messages after some messages expired" [Undecided,New] | 21:49 |
flwang | Eva-i: i will set it as high | 21:59 |
flwang | Eva-i: based on my rule, all the bugs break functions will be set as high | 21:59 |
Eva-i | flwang: oh, oki. I'm writing a fix for it. | 22:01 |
flwang | Eva-i: thanks :) | 22:11 |
flwang | Eva-i: so in newton, you will be responsible for improving the notification format, is that ok? | 22:13 |
Eva-i | flwang: yes, I would like that | 22:17 |
flwang | Eva-i: cool, and you're still working on the install guide, right? | 22:19 |
Eva-i | flwang: yes | 22:19 |
flwang | awesome | 22:20 |
flwang | i will drive the api doc, btw | 22:20 |
Eva-i | flwang: nice | 22:21 |
flwang | newton will be another busy release | 22:22 |
Eva-i | flwang: I don't see Fernando (fribeiro) in chat. Did he left Zaqar? | 22:28 |
flaper87 | Eva-i: I believe he was at the summit but never attended Zaqar sessions | 22:30 |
Eva-i | flaper87: hello, okay | 22:30 |
flwang | flaper87: hi stranger | 22:31 |
flaper87 | flwang: 'sup bro! | 22:32 |
flaper87 | Eva-i: HIIIIIIII! | 22:32 |
flwang | flaper87: i'd like to know your opinion about the pool group | 22:32 |
flaper87 | flwang: link? | 22:34 |
flaper87 | We talked about this at the summit, right? | 22:34 |
flwang | flaper87: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-zaqar-summit-planning | 22:34 |
flwang | if we should deprecated it and if we keep it, should we add a new api endpoint for it(i don't want to add it, TBH) | 22:35 |
Eva-i | flwang: do you think I acted not the best way with fribeiro? | 22:36 |
flwang | Eva-i: sorry? i can't follow | 22:36 |
Eva-i | flwang: I was too strict in my review of his first patch? | 22:37 |
flwang | Eva-i: oh, i don't think it made fribeiro upset :D | 22:38 |
Eva-i | flwang: oki | 22:39 |
flwang | Eva-i: so don't worry about that | 22:40 |
Eva-i | flwang: okay, I performed test and yes, it seems there is a bug: http://paste.openstack.org/show/6KYk1fPumWteuCR8aDIr/. Also found another bug during this. So now there are 3 bugs in Redis waiting to be solved. | 23:21 |
flwang | Eva-i: cool, thanks for working on this | 23:29 |
flwang | Eva-i: but i'm thinking another thing | 23:29 |
flwang | what's the bad side if the msg is claimed again by same client | 23:29 |
Eva-i | flwang: it might process it two times | 23:30 |
Eva-i | flwang: if it's bank transaction, 2x money will be sent =) | 23:31 |
flwang | Eva-i: haha, could be, but generally the client should handle more :) | 23:32 |
flwang | anyway, i agree it's a bug | 23:32 |
Eva-i | flwang: okay, I'll make a report for this bug | 23:33 |
flwang | Eva-i: thanks | 23:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!