| *** shu-mutou has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:27 | |
| *** pt_15 has quit IRC | 00:45 | |
| *** zhurong has joined #openstack-zaqar | 01:06 | |
| *** lhx__ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 01:48 | |
| *** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 01:50 | |
| flwang | wxy: wanghao: meeting | 02:06 |
|---|---|---|
| flwang | #openstack-meeting-3 | 02:06 |
| wanghao | flwang: coming | 02:06 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/zaqar master: Support cold migration https://review.openstack.org/426943 | 02:31 |
| *** lhx__ has quit IRC | 02:57 | |
| *** wanghao has quit IRC | 02:58 | |
| *** lhx__ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 02:58 | |
| *** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 02:58 | |
| flwang | wxy: ping | 03:04 |
| flwang | wanghao: need you guys a hand | 03:04 |
| wanghao | flwang: here | 03:05 |
| wxy | flwang: here | 03:07 |
| flwang | do you think it makes sense if admin user can create queue in user's tenant? | 03:09 |
| wxy | flwang: it's useful for admin management. | 03:11 |
| flwang | wxy: the background is searchlight is trying to post messages to user's queues | 03:12 |
| wxy | flwang: to use searchlight service user? | 03:14 |
| openstackgerrit | wangxiyuan proposed openstack/zaqar master: Make import clearly in i18n.py https://review.openstack.org/441820 | 03:15 |
| flwang | no, currently, searchlight can collect notifications and index them. now they would like to forward those notifications to zaqar queue so that end user can consume them | 03:15 |
| flwang | shu-mutou: ping | 03:15 |
| *** lhx__ has quit IRC | 03:16 | |
| shu-mutou | hi, flwang! | 03:16 |
| wxy | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438384/ this one? | 03:16 |
| flwang | shu-mutou: i have a question about the ChoiceField | 03:18 |
| flwang | wxy: yes | 03:18 |
| flwang | shu-mutou: if i have two ChoiceField | 03:18 |
| flwang | how can set the 2nd ChoiceFiled's choices based on the selected value of the 1st? | 03:18 |
| wxy | flwang: can searchlight decide which notification will be sent to which user's queue? | 03:18 |
| flwang | wxy: no, i think | 03:19 |
| shu-mutou | flwang: is that for purge_queue? | 03:20 |
| flwang | shu-mutou: no another work :) | 03:20 |
| flwang | shu-mutou: btw, as for the purge queue, i have a patch set will propose soon. but feel free to update it if you can | 03:21 |
| flwang | shu-mutou: btw, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/437230/1 is ready for review, we have merged the patch needed in python-zaqarclient | 03:22 |
| shu-mutou | flwang: is that using angular-json-schema? | 03:22 |
| flwang | shu-mutou: no, traditional ChoiceField of forms | 03:22 |
| wxy | flwang: I think it makes sense if admin user can create a queue for a user | 03:24 |
| wxy | flwang: But I can't see how searchlight use it at this moment. | 03:24 |
| flwang | wxy: but seems no other service supports that | 03:24 |
| wxy | flwang: Glance can create an image with owner. | 03:25 |
| *** wanghao_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 03:25 | |
| flwang | wxy: so you mean glance can create an new image in tenant A as an admin, even thought admin is not in tenant A? | 03:26 |
| *** eliqiao_ is now known as eliqiao | 03:28 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/zaqar-ui master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/440130 | 03:28 |
| shu-mutou | flwang: ah.. I am not familiar with django forms. | 03:28 |
| shu-mutou | flwang: but I found https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/59257/how-to-dynamically-update-the-initial-value-in-a-form-choicefield/ | 03:28 |
| *** wanghao has quit IRC | 03:29 | |
| shu-mutou | flwang: I hope that helps you. | 03:29 |
| flwang | shu-mutou: cool, thanks | 03:30 |
| wxy | flwang: Glance admin user can create an new image for a common tenant. | 03:30 |
| flwang | wxy: ok, i will take a look. thanks | 03:32 |
| wxy | For example, paste.openstack.org/show/601687 | 03:33 |
| shu-mutou | flwang: btw, I get time to review your patches today. so please check them later. ;) | 03:33 |
| flwang | shu-mutou: yep, sure | 03:34 |
| flwang | shu-mutou: thanks | 03:37 |
| *** lhx__ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 04:30 | |
| wanghao_ | flwang: sorry for delay, a internal meeting this morning. Well, I understand the background, but I think is there an other option that admin could create a queue that some tenants could see it, but it's not created in this tenant. | 05:03 |
| wanghao_ | flwang: like a public queue, some tenant which could be specified by admin can see it and consume it. This kind of queue still belong to admin tenant. | 05:04 |
| *** lhx__ has quit IRC | 05:08 | |
| *** lhx__ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 05:08 | |
| openstackgerrit | XueFeng Liu proposed openstack/python-zaqarclient master: Fix The header X-PROJECT-ID missing bug https://review.openstack.org/440223 | 05:09 |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-zaqar | 05:19 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 05:20 | |
| *** jtomasek has quit IRC | 05:35 | |
| *** wanghao_ has quit IRC | 05:36 | |
| *** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 05:36 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-zaqar | 05:40 | |
| *** wanghao has quit IRC | 05:54 | |
| *** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 05:55 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/zaqar master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/438330 | 05:55 |
| *** wanghao has quit IRC | 06:02 | |
| *** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 06:02 | |
| openstackgerrit | Shu Muto proposed openstack/zaqar-ui master: Use common Angular view for Queues panel https://review.openstack.org/433429 | 06:05 |
| *** wanghao_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 06:07 | |
| *** wanghao has quit IRC | 06:11 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 06:13 | |
| wxy | wanghao_: it's like image's "is_public" property. Right? | 06:20 |
| wxy | wanghao_: But it may break the queue's order feature, Such as FIFO. | 06:20 |
| wanghao_ | wxy: yes | 06:23 |
| wanghao_ | wxy: How to break? admin can publish message to this queue, and other tenants can get the message from this queue. | 06:25 |
| wanghao_ | still FIFO I think. | 06:25 |
| wxy | flwang: other tenants can't publish message? | 06:25 |
| wxy | if some tenants can publish message in the same queue, the message will be mixed at output side. | 06:26 |
| wanghao_ | wxy: my thought is tenants can't publish message in public queue which is created by admin. | 07:12 |
| wxy | wanghao_: If so, another problem is that which message should be claimed by which user? The user doesn't know what messages in the queue and whether the coming messages are belong to him. | 07:17 |
| wxy | wanghao_: IMO, public queue could be used for this kind of situation: some publisher send messages to the queue, but the destination is only one. Only one user could get the messages. | 07:20 |
| wanghao_ | wxy: your concern could be fixed under this way: admin could create some public queues for each tenant. | 07:33 |
| wanghao_ | wxy: so, each tenant could see one queue and claim messages as it want. | 07:33 |
| wanghao_ | wxy: Of course, admin can create one public queue for many tenants, in this case, many tenants are like workers, they share messages. | 07:36 |
| wxy | wanghao_: Cool. So this kind of queue is created by tenant A , is shared with B. Then A can send message, B can receive message. It's n:1 mapping. | 07:38 |
| wanghao_ | wxy: yes, you can set it as n:1 mapping or n:m mapping | 07:40 |
| wxy | wanghao_: n:m maybe doesn't work. This is my previous opinion: the messages in one queue should not be claimed by more than one users. | 07:41 |
| wanghao_ | wxy: one queue, many users, this case will like workers model. | 07:42 |
| wanghao_ | wxy: I mean, we didn't restrict the mapping model, it's more flexible。 | 07:43 |
| wanghao_ | wxy: 1:n, n:1, n:m we can support them all. | 07:44 |
| *** tesseract has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:47 | |
| wxy | wanghao_: OK, leave the log to flwang. I think a spec is needed here. | 07:47 |
| wanghao_ | wxy: yes | 07:48 |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:50 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:55 | |
| *** lhx__ has quit IRC | 07:58 | |
| *** lhx__ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 08:06 | |
| openstackgerrit | wangxiyuan proposed openstack/zaqar master: Move auth and osprofiler to middleware folder https://review.openstack.org/436641 | 08:30 |
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 08:38 | |
| *** jtomasek has joined #openstack-zaqar | 08:59 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-zaqar | 09:00 | |
| *** wanghao_ has quit IRC | 09:17 | |
| openstackgerrit | XueFeng Liu proposed openstack/python-zaqarclient master: Fix The header X-PROJECT-ID missing bug https://review.openstack.org/440223 | 09:22 |
| *** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 09:23 | |
| *** wanghao has quit IRC | 09:27 | |
| *** shu-mutou is now known as shu-mutou-AWAY | 09:49 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 09:58 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 10:33 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-zaqar | 10:40 | |
| *** Guest6667 is now known as Guest6666 | 10:43 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-zaqar | 11:23 | |
| openstackgerrit | wangxiyuan proposed openstack/zaqar master: Support CORS https://review.openstack.org/436661 | 11:23 |
| openstackgerrit | wangxiyuan proposed openstack/zaqar master: Move auth and osprofiler to middleware folder https://review.openstack.org/436641 | 11:23 |
| *** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 11:42 | |
| *** wanghao has quit IRC | 12:07 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-zaqarclient master: Fix The header X-PROJECT-ID missing bug https://review.openstack.org/440223 | 12:20 |
| *** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 12:27 | |
| *** wanghao has quit IRC | 12:37 | |
| *** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 12:40 | |
| *** zhurong has quit IRC | 12:45 | |
| *** wanghao has quit IRC | 13:05 | |
| *** lhx__ has quit IRC | 13:10 | |
| *** rbrady-afk is now known as rbrady | 13:23 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 13:30 | |
| *** zhurong has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:35 | |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 13:54 | |
| *** lhx__ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:55 | |
| *** zhurong has quit IRC | 14:16 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:23 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 14:26 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:33 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 14:55 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 15:09 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-zaqar | 15:23 | |
| openstackgerrit | Thomas Herve proposed openstack/python-zaqarclient master: Revert "Fix The header X-PROJECT-ID missing bug" https://review.openstack.org/442573 | 15:56 |
| therve | wxy, ^^^ | 15:57 |
| therve | flwang, ^^^ | 15:57 |
| therve | Zaqar client broke heat gate I believe | 15:57 |
| wxy | therve: can you show me any log? | 16:05 |
| therve | wxy, http://logs.openstack.org/75/442475/1/check/gate-heat-dsvm-functional-orig-mysql-lbaasv2-ubuntu-xenial/5d92779/ | 16:06 |
| therve | But I have no doubt that's the issue | 16:06 |
| therve | wxy, For the record: https://github.com/openstack/heat/blob/master/heat/engine/clients/os/zaqar.py#L51 | 16:08 |
| therve | Possibly line 67 actually | 16:08 |
| wxy | therve: Got it. I'll take a look tomorrow. | 16:18 |
| wxy | Yeah the problem is at L67 | 16:18 |
| therve | Thanks for the approve! Let me know if we can test something tomorrow | 16:19 |
| wxy | project id is changed so pre-sign failed | 16:19 |
| wxy | Sure. Have to go sleep now. It's hard for me to debug with phone ;) | 16:20 |
| therve | :) | 16:21 |
| *** adu has joined #openstack-zaqar | 16:24 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 16:26 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 16:30 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-zaqar | 16:30 | |
| *** lhx__ has quit IRC | 16:31 | |
| *** tesseract has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
| *** adu has left #openstack-zaqar | 16:47 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-zaqarclient master: Revert "Fix The header X-PROJECT-ID missing bug" https://review.openstack.org/442573 | 16:57 |
| *** david-lyle_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 17:52 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 17:54 | |
| *** david-lyle_ is now known as david-lyle | 17:55 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-zaqar | 18:05 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 18:23 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-zaqar | 18:25 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 18:29 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-zaqar | 18:36 | |
| *** jtomasek has quit IRC | 18:39 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-zaqar | 18:43 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 18:45 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-zaqar | 19:06 | |
| *** rbrady is now known as rbrady-afk | 19:22 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-zaqar | 19:40 | |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 19:43 | |
| *** flwang has quit IRC | 19:49 | |
| *** flwang has joined #openstack-zaqar | 20:02 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 20:24 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/zaqar-ui master: Support subscriptoin age and confirmed https://review.openstack.org/437230 | 20:38 |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-zaqar | 22:24 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ken'ichi Ohmichi proposed openstack/zaqar master: Switch to use stable data_utils https://review.openstack.org/442854 | 23:05 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!