| *** yanyanhu has joined #senlin | 01:33 | |
| *** Qiming has joined #senlin | 01:40 | |
| openstackgerrit | Yanyan Hu proposed openstack/senlin: Add tempest test cases for node create/delete/update API https://review.openstack.org/308728 | 01:41 |
|---|---|---|
| *** elynn has joined #senlin | 01:42 | |
| elynn | morning | 01:43 |
| *** elynn_ has joined #senlin | 01:49 | |
| *** elynn has quit IRC | 01:51 | |
| yanyanhu | morning :) | 01:56 |
| elynn_ | Can fall asleep since 3 am... | 01:56 |
| yanyanhu | ... | 01:58 |
| openstackgerrit | Yanyan Hu proposed openstack/senlin: Add tempest test cases for node create/delete/update API https://review.openstack.org/308728 | 02:01 |
| *** elynn has joined #senlin | 02:23 | |
| *** elynn_ has quit IRC | 02:27 | |
| elynn | Hi yanyanhu | 02:29 |
| yanyanhu | hello | 02:30 |
| elynn | saw your comments to split creation and deletion, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312344/1/senlin/tests/tempest/api/receivers/test_receiver_create_delete.py | 02:30 |
| yanyanhu | yes | 02:30 |
| elynn | You mean in creation tests, we create a new without delete it? | 02:31 |
| yanyanhu | yes, we can delete it in cleanup method | 02:31 |
| yanyanhu | and for delete test, we can create a receiver in setup method | 02:31 |
| elynn | Okay, I see. | 02:32 |
| elynn | I will modify it. | 02:32 |
| yanyanhu | thanks :) just feel this could avoid different test cases interfere each other | 02:33 |
| elynn | You are right :) | 02:33 |
| Qiming | xuhaiwei, yuanying there? | 02:34 |
| *** R_lixh has joined #senlin | 02:45 | |
| *** Qiming has quit IRC | 04:07 | |
| *** elynn has quit IRC | 04:15 | |
| *** R_lixh has quit IRC | 04:21 | |
| *** R_lixh has joined #senlin | 04:22 | |
| *** Qiming has joined #senlin | 05:04 | |
| *** Qiming has quit IRC | 05:51 | |
| *** elynn has joined #senlin | 05:54 | |
| *** elynn has quit IRC | 05:59 | |
| *** elynn has joined #senlin | 05:59 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/senlin: replace logging with oslo.log https://review.openstack.org/309950 | 06:01 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 06:03 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #senlin | 06:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | Yanyan Hu proposed openstack/senlin: [WIP]Rework engine scheduler https://review.openstack.org/312843 | 07:07 |
| openstackgerrit | Ethan Lynn proposed openstack/senlin: Add tempest tests for receiver create/delete API https://review.openstack.org/312344 | 07:35 |
| openstackgerrit | Ethan Lynn proposed openstack/senlin: Add tempest tests for receiver create/delete API https://review.openstack.org/312344 | 07:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Ethan Lynn proposed openstack/senlin: Add tempest tests for receiver create/delete API https://review.openstack.org/312344 | 07:43 |
| openstackgerrit | Yanyan Hu proposed openstack/senlin: [WIP]Rework engine scheduler https://review.openstack.org/312843 | 07:59 |
| openstackgerrit | Yanyan Hu proposed openstack/senlin: Rework engine scheduler https://review.openstack.org/312843 | 08:40 |
| openstackgerrit | Ethan Lynn proposed openstack/senlin: Add tempest tests for policy create/delete/update API https://review.openstack.org/312864 | 08:55 |
| *** yanyanhu has quit IRC | 09:07 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ethan Lynn proposed openstack/senlin: Add tempest tests for policy create/delete/update API https://review.openstack.org/312864 | 09:07 |
| *** elynn has quit IRC | 09:57 | |
| openstackgerrit | Qiming Teng proposed openstack/senlin: Profile API doc part 2 https://review.openstack.org/312888 | 10:25 |
| *** Qiming has joined #senlin | 13:08 | |
| *** Qiming has quit IRC | 13:40 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 13:47 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #senlin | 13:48 | |
| *** Drago has joined #senlin | 14:31 | |
| *** Qiming has joined #senlin | 14:32 | |
| *** Drago has quit IRC | 14:33 | |
| *** Drago has joined #senlin | 14:33 | |
| *** Qiming has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
| *** Qiming has joined #senlin | 15:15 | |
| jdandrea | Qiming: Hello! Question for you. Heat (and nova/cinder) API URls start with /v1/{tenant_id} ... but Senlin (and other) API URIs do not. Do you know the history of putting tenant IDs in the URL vs. the body? Was it something all OpenStack projects used to do and don't do anymore? Does it matter either way? | 15:21 |
| Qiming | hi, jdandrea | 15:26 |
| Qiming | it has become a consensus that all API endpoints won't have tenant_id or project_id in their URLs | 15:26 |
| *** Qiming has quit IRC | 15:38 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit is restarting to address performance issues related to a suspected memory leak | 19:22 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit is restarting to revert incorrect changes to test result displays | 20:30 | |
| *** Drago has quit IRC | 20:34 | |
| *** Drago has joined #senlin | 20:36 | |
| *** Drago has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
| *** Drago has joined #senlin | 20:40 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!