Monday, 2018-07-09

sfbenderMerged software-factory/sf-web-assets-distgit master: Add vuejs-2.15.6  https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/1292800:06
sfbenderTristan de Cacqueray created software-factory/sf-config master: repos: add patch and review sync strategy  https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/1292901:17
sfbenderTristan de Cacqueray created software-factory/sf-config master: log-classify: add a dedicated component  https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/1293001:17
sfbenderTristan de Cacqueray created logreduce master: Add api server skeleton with db schema draft  https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/1293105:52
sfbenderTristan de Cacqueray created logreduce master: Add vue-cli output skeleton  https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/1293205:52
sfbenderTristan de Cacqueray created logreduce master: webpack: change dist output to server module  https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/1293305:53
sfbenderTristan de Cacqueray created logreduce master: web: add vue interface  https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/1293405:53
*** apevec has joined #softwarefactory07:14
*** apevec has joined #softwarefactory07:14
*** fbo|off is now known as fbo07:15
sfbenderTristan de Cacqueray created software-factory/sf-config master: log-classify: integrate server component and webui  https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/1293607:39
sfbenderMerged software-factory/sf-config master: Install sfmanager on the executor  https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/1290609:19
sfbenderMerged software-factory/cauth master: cauth/repoxplorer: harden part 2 (timeout)  https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/1291209:50
*** jangutter_ is now known as jangutter11:11
gundalowI've enabled https://github.com/apps/softwarefactory-project-zuul on `ansible/zuul-config` and `ansible/zuul-test-repo`. Does someone please have time to review https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/#/c/12896/14:09
fbogundalow: looking14:25
*** pabelanger has quit IRC14:33
*** pabelanger has joined #softwarefactory14:33
fbohttps://github.com/ansible/zuul-config/blob/master/zuul.d/pipelines.yaml#L61 that should be the tenant name, ansible instead of ansible-network14:40
fbogundalow: but we cannot manage two zuul tenants on ansible.softwarefactory-project.io14:41
fboBetter we check with tristanC if that's possible to do that first14:42
fbohttps://ansible.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status.html is scoped to ansible-network only14:45
fbocould the ansible-network tenant be used first during the test phase ?14:46
gundalowfbo: I'm happy for https://ansible.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status.html to be used for both gh/network-engine and gh/ansible14:47
gundalowThough there maybe considerations that I'm not aware of14:47
tristanCgundalow: ansible.sf-project.io/zuul is a white-label interface for the ansible-network14:50
fbois there a strict segmentation between ansible and ansible network ? or is it fine for both to use a tenant called ansible with same base jobs/pipelines ?14:50
tristanCperhaps what we should do instead is rename the ansible-network tenant into just 'ansible'14:50
tristanCgundalow: the change looks good, though we need to verify the new tenant description things with fbo, and i'm about to EOD now, can this wait tomorrow?14:50
tristanC(tenant's are new defined in resources like this: https://softwarefactory-project.io/cgit/config/tree/resources/tenants.yaml#n6 )14:51
tristanCtenants are now*14:51
gundalowtristanC: sure, can wait till tomorrow14:52
fboyes that's not a configuration we have tested yet, so that require asome test before landing14:52
fbo*some tests*14:52
gundalowHappy to follow your lead on this14:52
fbothanks14:52
gundalowgh/ansible-network will continue to be used and have more tests added over time14:52
gundalowsame for gh/ansible14:52
tristanCgundalow: but is there going to be jobs or pipelines conflict? for example is it a problem if the check/gate pipelines are defined in ansible-network/zuul-config, or could we move those in ansible/zuul-config?14:54
tristanCor more generaly, could we just migrate most  ansible-network/zuul-config to ansible/zuul-config, and only keep the things specifics to ansible-network (e.g. the clodu-vpn jobs/secrets)14:56
gundalowrcarrillocruz: tristanC FYI, see discussion here14:59
gundalowI don't think we would share anything between gh/ansible-network and gh/ansible, so not sure what/how conflicts could happen15:00
tristanCgundalow: how about the pipeline and the base jobs (which define the logserver url and elk index)?15:02
gundalowfor gh/ansible/ansible testing I was planning on having most of the Zuul job & role configuration *in* the Ansible branch, so what we are testing and how we are testing are versioned together15:02
gundalowtristanC: That sounds reasonable15:02
tristanCgundalow: rcarrillocruz: then it seems like both config-projects (a-n/z-c and a/z-c) could live in a single ansible tenant. It would be easier to manage like that15:03
tristanCotherwise, we could also look into hosting both a-n and a on ansible.sf-project.io15:05
rcarrillocruzyeah, i think the latter may be easier15:05
rcarrillocruzif it's not too complex15:05
rcarrillocruzone site to rule all ansible-*15:05
tristanCwe can look into that with fbo, sure15:06
tristanCalso, how about creating a github apps like ansible-zuul or ansible-ci?15:06
tristanCi *think* one zuul can handle multiple app too15:06
rcarrillocruzi'm counting on that, otherwise 3rd party CI on zuul GH is flawed :/15:07
rcarrillocruzon my POC i had two GH apps managed to one zuul15:07
sfbenderTristan de Cacqueray created logreduce master: common: small fixes for automated process  https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/1294315:23
sfbenderTristan de Cacqueray created logreduce master: db: add manual command line interface  https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/1294415:23
*** fbo is now known as fbo|off17:52
*** apevec has quit IRC20:14
*** yassine has joined #softwarefactory22:22
*** yassine is now known as Guest6131822:22
*** Guest61318 has quit IRC23:58
*** Guest61318 has joined #softwarefactory23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!