| @jreed:matrix.org | @fungi - Any issues with https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/899587? | 20:55 |
|---|---|---|
| @fungicide:matrix.org | > <@jreed:matrix.org> @fungi - Any issues with https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/899587? | 22:13 |
| i don't really see any, but i'm not a user of it so probably not well-equipped to review that change | ||
| @fungicide:matrix.org | the only real red flag for me is that all the testing for that repository is static analysis, no unit/functional/integration testing | 22:14 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | hard to guess whether the removal of those files is going to break known consumers of the repository | 22:18 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | which is what integration tests would normally tell you | 22:18 |
| @jreed:matrix.org | Good point, I had not considered it. I thought it was a stand alone tool that people just use if needed. Is there some sort of deprecation procedure StarlingX follows? | 22:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!