| *** cheng1 has quit IRC | 08:10 | |
| *** cheng1 has joined #starlingx | 08:11 | |
| *** cheng1 has quit IRC | 08:20 | |
| *** cheng1 has joined #starlingx | 08:24 | |
| *** anyrude10_ has joined #starlingx | 11:27 | |
| anyrude10_ | Hi Team, I want to setup StarlingX simplex 2018.10 setup, but I don't have DPDK support on my machine as a result of which the compute is in degraded state and i can see error in ovs-vswitch logs. Can someone please suggest an alternative? Can I create a StarlingX Simplex Setup without DPDK support? | 11:29 |
|---|---|---|
| *** anyrude10_ has quit IRC | 12:08 | |
| *** mriedem has joined #starlingx | 13:19 | |
| *** marosales has joined #starlingx | 13:58 | |
| sgw | morning all | 14:02 |
| sgw | slittle1: https://hub.docker.com/r/openbuildservice/backend | 14:12 |
| sgw | dtroyer: Morning, what's the state of getting the ansible-playbook status? | 14:26 |
| *** luzC has quit IRC | 15:14 | |
| *** ericbarrett has joined #starlingx | 15:18 | |
| *** dpenney__ has quit IRC | 15:19 | |
| *** dpenney has joined #starlingx | 15:21 | |
| *** dtroyer has quit IRC | 17:05 | |
| *** dtroyer has joined #starlingx | 17:06 | |
| * dtroyer waves - fixed znc finally | 17:08 | |
| sgw | o/ | 17:09 |
| dtroyer | slittle1: I just saw your ML reply, b) is good. I'll wait about 10 min than ask fungi to do the push | 17:10 |
| dtroyer | for the logs: https://github.com/dtroyer/ansible-playbooks-staging-1 is what we are proposing to force-push over starlingx/ansible-playbooks | 17:11 |
| slittle1 | looks good | 17:16 |
| slittle1 | is it only playbookconfig, and not playbooks as well ? | 17:20 |
| dtroyer | that is all that is in the original ansible-playbooks repo, do we need more? | 17:23 |
| dpenney | the playbooks directory in stx-config is zuul-related | 17:23 |
| dpenney | it was only the playbookconfig directory that was moved | 17:24 |
| slittle1 | Tee confirmed as much | 17:25 |
| slittle1 | Tee isn't on IRC yet, I've forwarded Deans link to her to have a look | 17:26 |
| dtroyer | slittle1, dpenney: fungi just finished the push, have a look at https://opendev.org/starlingx/ansible-playbooks/commits/branch/master | 17:43 |
| dtroyer | local repos will need to be re-cloned | 17:43 |
| dpenney | cool! | 17:45 |
| slittle1 | 'repo sync --force-sync' appears to be sufficient to load the new history | 17:49 |
| dtroyer | good to know... | 17:51 |
| *** rcw has joined #starlingx | 17:51 | |
| dtroyer | I'll send a note to the ML if everyone here is happy with it | 17:51 |
| sgw | Great, I will get my reviews pushed shortly | 17:51 |
| dpenney | it looks right to me... thanks dtroyer | 17:52 |
| dtroyer | sgw: that will be good, that will be the first validation via zuul that the jobs are ok | 17:52 |
| slittle1 | Thanks Dean. | 17:54 |
| dtroyer | slittle1: does cengn do any repo caching that might need to be refreshed? | 17:55 |
| slittle1 | If 'repo sync --force-sync' works, we should be good. | 17:57 |
| dtroyer | cool, good to know for the future, thanks | 17:58 |
| slittle1 | I'll trigger a build anyway, just to be sure. | 17:58 |
| slittle1 | I might abort this build if Saul's stuff merges quickly. | 17:59 |
| sgw | I am working on the rebase right now | 17:59 |
| *** rcw has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
| dpenney | sgw: once you post the updated reviews, can you send an email to the mailing list to announce it, so test teams or anyone else can do whatever they need to prepare for it in the next build? I think we should be able to get it approved and merged today, and in for tonight's build | 18:12 |
| dpenney | I've chatted with Ghada, Numan, and others here about it so we're good to go on our end | 18:13 |
| sgw | dpenney: just finished pushing those rebases | 18:14 |
| sgw | Will send an email now | 18:14 |
| dpenney | zuul test succeeded on the ansible review | 18:19 |
| sgw | looks like config needs a second +2 and +W and we are waiting on Zuul checks in general. | 18:22 |
| dpenney | yep, Bart's looking at that now | 18:22 |
| dpenney | so once all the zuul checks pass, I think we go ahead and merge it... any last thoughts? | 18:23 |
| dpenney | :) | 18:23 |
| bwensley | Do it!!! | 18:24 |
| sgw | dpenney: not that I can think of, I will be off for a a lunch time workout shortly | 18:25 |
| dpenney | and the reviews in zuul are all consecutive numbers, so easy to track and watch ;) | 18:25 |
| dpenney | I'll keep an eye on it and get it moving once zuul passes | 18:25 |
| dpenney | sgw: your reviews are now in the gate queue | 18:55 |
| *** rcw has joined #starlingx | 19:11 | |
| dpenney | sgw: everything merged | 19:37 |
| sgw | dpenney: great, so I am guessing slittle1 fired a fresh internal build and this will be picked up by the nightly later | 20:40 |
| dpenney | the one launched at 2pm for the ansible repo change is still running. The Monday night build is scheduled a little earlier, at 7:30 I believe, due to the docker images... so I'd say it's just as well to wait for the nightly | 20:42 |
| *** rcw has quit IRC | 21:28 | |
| sgw | dtroyer: stupid Zuul question time, and maybe this needs to be asked in infra, but I will start here. | 21:52 |
| sgw | dtroyer: can a Zuul job be run inside a custom docker container? | 21:53 |
| dtroyer | A Zuul job could launch a container that then runs something, yes. There are considerations around building images and network connectivity that may matter in terms of job reliability but those can be dealt with | 22:05 |
| dtroyer | I know there are jobs doing exactly that, I don't recall offhand where | 22:05 |
| dtroyer | sgw ^^ | 22:05 |
| sgw | dtroyer: if you remember let me know, otherwise I guess I can ask in the #zuul channel | 22:07 |
| *** ChanServ has quit IRC | 22:09 | |
| *** ChanServ has joined #starlingx | 22:14 | |
| *** niven.freenode.net sets mode: +o ChanServ | 22:14 | |
| sgw | dtroyer: how can fix the channel banner so we can include website and log info there? | 22:19 |
| *** mriedem has quit IRC | 22:27 | |
| dtroyer | sgw: you might ask in -infra about that, they have channel ops | 22:33 |
| sgw | Will do | 22:33 |
| * sgw Folks: ny issues with me taking a role as Channel Op to set the topic and other channel op related things? | 22:43 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "Discussion for the StarlingX Community | Home https://www.starlingx.io/ | E-mail starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io | channel logs http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23starlingx/" | 22:51 | |
| sgw | dtroyer: better? | 22:51 |
| dtroyer | sgw: looks great, thanks | 23:35 |
| dtroyer | sgw: re docker zuul jobs… I'm looking through opestack/kolla, they do a bit of setup for docker in heir base job. openstack/openstack-helm also does some docker stuff but is less obvious | 23:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!