Thursday, 2020-05-14

*** sgw has quit IRC05:18
*** zbsarash1 has quit IRC07:04
*** bengates has joined #starlingx07:29
*** bengates has joined #starlingx07:30
*** hyunsikyang__ has joined #starlingx11:26
*** hyunsikyang has quit IRC11:30
*** billzvonar has joined #starlingx11:46
*** ijolliffe has joined #starlingx12:19
*** hoonetorg has quit IRC13:16
*** hoonetorg has joined #starlingx13:22
*** zbsarash1 has joined #starlingx13:48
*** sgw has joined #starlingx13:58
*** dpenney has joined #starlingx14:01
*** riuzen has joined #starlingx14:32
*** rcw has joined #starlingx14:40
sgwMorning all14:49
dpenneygood morning Saul!14:56
*** cp- has quit IRC15:02
*** cp- has joined #starlingx15:07
sgwjsomervi1: Morning, I am still trying to understand the root cause of the kernel-rt --edit issue, unfortunately I have something else broken in my build and I can't even reproduce this, why is the version not getting set correctly for the -rt kernel but is getting set for the -std kernel?15:19
*** riuzen has quit IRC15:22
jsomervi1sgw I haven't dug into the issue, but the spec files are significantly different between the two kernels, and Dongqi indicated that it comes down to rpmbuild in the std spec splitting the VERSION=  ahead of the generate_all_configs.sh call onto a separate line.15:48
jsomervi1s/std spec/rt spec/15:48
*** hoonetorg has quit IRC15:56
sgwjsomervi1: I guess do we need to address this in the specfile instead of hacking it in the rpm_utils script?15:56
jsomervi1your guess is as good as mine.  isn't the rpm_utils script already a hackfest?  not my area15:58
sgwgenerally agreed rpm_utils is kind of ...15:58
jsomervi1another related problem, build-pkgs --edit --std kernel throws an error at the end, even though it does appear to unpack the source and apply the patches correctly16:01
jsomervi1another regression from pre 4.1816:01
sgwDid you file a launchpad?16:04
*** hoonetorg has joined #starlingx16:08
jsomervi1sgw not yet16:24
*** bengates has quit IRC16:37
*** hoonetorg has quit IRC17:05
*** bengates has joined #starlingx17:07
*** bengates has quit IRC17:14
sgwdpenney: I am noticing that people are adding rpms to both flock and distro rpms_centos.lst, is that actually required? for example https://review.opendev.org/#/c/728005/17:20
*** hoonetorg has joined #starlingx17:28
*** hyunsikyang__ has quit IRC17:52
*** hyunsikyang has joined #starlingx17:52
*** bengates has joined #starlingx17:54
dpenneysgw: I wouldn't think it should be necessary. I believe the various lst files get aggregated, don't they? so the flock build would use the distro and compile lsts? I guess you could argue that if it's needed for a flock pkg as well as a distro pkg, it may be good to add to both in case someone removes it from distro because it's no longer needed there... but that could result in lots of duplication17:54
*** bengates has quit IRC17:54
*** bengates has joined #starlingx17:55
*** bengates has quit IRC17:55
*** bengates has joined #starlingx17:56
sgwzbsarash1: FYI, my updated build booted, but did not install correctly, it failed after preparing boot partition.  I am looking at the code to see where if failed18:11
*** bengates has quit IRC18:11
sgwdpenney: tsmith2 (I assume this is Tyler): have you had a chance to look at Ambarish's email about fault?18:12
*** bengates has joined #starlingx18:13
tsmith2not yet, i'll take a look today and dig up some of the old info that was floating around18:14
*** bengates has quit IRC18:17
*** ijolliffe has quit IRC18:43
*** bengates has joined #starlingx18:47
*** bengates has quit IRC18:48
*** billzvonar has quit IRC21:38
*** rcw has quit IRC22:33
*** rcw has joined #starlingx22:33
*** rcw has quit IRC23:29
*** rcw has joined #starlingx23:48
*** rcw has quit IRC23:53
*** rcw has joined #starlingx23:54

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!