Tuesday, 2015-09-29

openstackgerritSantosh Kodicherla proposed stackforge/tacker:     Add tacker create vnf test  https://review.openstack.org/22607200:04
*** mbound has quit IRC00:06
*** bobh has joined #tacker00:28
openstackgerritSantosh Kodicherla proposed stackforge/tacker:     Add tacker create vnf test  https://review.openstack.org/22607200:31
openstackgerritMerged stackforge/tacker:     Add tacker create vnf test  https://review.openstack.org/22607200:40
*** lhcheng has quit IRC00:42
*** mbound has joined #tacker01:00
*** elo1 has quit IRC01:01
*** mbound has quit IRC01:06
*** santoshkumark has quit IRC01:15
*** sripriya has quit IRC01:50
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC01:51
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:00
*** bobh has quit IRC02:13
*** bobh has joined #tacker02:16
*** bobh has quit IRC02:20
*** arturt has joined #tacker02:22
*** prashantD has quit IRC02:31
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker02:36
*** lhcheng has quit IRC02:36
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker02:37
*** bobh has joined #tacker02:46
*** arturt has quit IRC03:02
*** bobh has quit IRC03:32
*** tbh has joined #tacker03:39
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed stackforge/tacker: IP Address parameterization support  https://review.openstack.org/21900004:48
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed stackforge/tacker: IP Address parameterization support  https://review.openstack.org/21900004:53
*** bobh has joined #tacker05:33
*** lhcheng has quit IRC05:37
*** bobh has quit IRC05:38
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker05:38
*** lhcheng has quit IRC05:44
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker05:46
*** lhcheng has quit IRC05:58
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC06:16
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker06:16
*** jst_ has quit IRC06:21
*** santoshkumark has joined #tacker06:23
*** changzhi has joined #tacker06:56
*** bobh has joined #tacker07:34
*** bobh has quit IRC07:38
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker07:49
*** santoshkumark has quit IRC07:49
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC07:54
*** KLuka_ has joined #tacker10:58
*** changzhi has quit IRC11:17
*** bobh has joined #tacker11:35
*** bobh has quit IRC11:40
*** tbh has quit IRC12:28
*** tbh has joined #tacker12:40
*** tbh has quit IRC12:42
*** trozet has quit IRC13:09
*** trozet has joined #tacker14:12
*** arturt has joined #tacker14:19
*** changzhi has joined #tacker14:25
*** arturt has quit IRC14:29
*** bobh has joined #tacker14:36
*** changzhi has quit IRC14:48
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker15:33
*** sripriya has joined #tacker15:43
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC15:52
*** vishwanathj has joined #tacker16:06
vishwanathjsripriya, would appreciate your review at your convenience for the patch set https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219000/16:16
*** KLuka__ has joined #tacker16:17
*** KLuka__ has left #tacker16:18
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker16:22
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker16:31
*** prashantD has joined #tacker16:36
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC16:52
*** s3wong has joined #tacker16:53
*** sripriya has quit IRC17:01
*** elo1 has joined #tacker17:13
*** sripriya has joined #tacker17:30
sripriyavish: ack17:30
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker17:36
*** elo1 has quit IRC17:53
vishwanathjsripriya, thanks17:56
vishwanathjs3wong, sridhar_ram, core reviewer attention to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219000/ is very much appreciated at your earliest convenience...thanks in advance17:57
s3wongvishwanathj: have you done 'check experimental'?17:59
*** elo1 has joined #tacker17:59
vishwanathjs3wong, sridhar_ram did it18:00
s3wongvishwanathj: really? the last time it was done (Sept 28th, 11:45pm), it failed...18:01
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC18:04
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker18:07
vishwanathjs3wong, I uploaded the latest patch set Sep 28 11:53 PM CDT, Sridhar did check experimental on Sep 29 1:13 AM CDT18:09
vishwanathjwhat is to be expected with "check experimental"...pardon my ignorance here, been focussed more on fixing bugs and addressing comments :)18:10
s3wongvishwanathj: from gerrit log --- sridhar_ram executed 'check experimental' on 9/28 @11:13pm, the functional test at gate took 31m28s to run, and it reported failure @11:45pm18:11
s3wongvishwanathj: I think it is the new experimental functional gate test18:12
s3wongvishwanathj: I believe sridhar_ram checked it in via infra, and Santosh added some tests there as well18:12
vishwanathjs3wong, Ok,....18:13
sridhar_rams3wong: looks there is a nova - neutron error, unrelated to tacker18:13
vishwanathjdo you want me to execute "check experimental" again?18:13
sripriyas3wong: we are currently looking into this failure on nova side, this may be a one off issue (race condition between ovs and libvirt), but since you reinitiated the command, we can wait to see if it happens again18:13
s3wongvishwanathj: I issued the command, let's see how things go18:13
sripriyavishwanathj: s3wong already initiated it18:14
s3wongsridhar_ram: OK... then our gate is too fragile :-)18:14
vishwanathjon the bright side, we alteast have a gate :)18:15
s3wongvishwanathj: we've always have a gate, even if it only contains pep8 tests :-)18:16
vishwanathjs3wong, meanwhile any code related comments to my patchset is highly appreciated...thanks18:28
s3wongvishwanathj: I gave you a +2 before, so this is just gate issue :-)18:29
vishwanathjs3wong, yes you did, FYI:I also made minor fine tuning per Sripriya's comments after your +218:31
s3wongvishwanathj: took a peek on that change, looks good18:32
vishwanathjthanks18:32
sridhar_rams3wong: dsvm gate jobs are still in monitoring phase - that's why it is in experimental18:38
s3wongsridhar_ram: but since we intended to keep it, we should (as much as possible) try to make sure nothing that breaks the gate should go in18:39
s3wongvishwanathj: see, all good! nothing to worry about :-)18:47
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC18:56
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker19:01
*** bobh has quit IRC19:06
*** bobh has joined #tacker19:07
openstackgerritMerged stackforge/tacker: IP Address parameterization support  https://review.openstack.org/21900019:08
*** elo1 has quit IRC19:17
*** elo1 has joined #tacker19:17
*** elo1 has quit IRC19:28
*** elo1 has joined #tacker19:30
*** elo1 has quit IRC19:44
sridhar_rams3wong: absolutely, for legitimate patchset issues..  but there are lots of devstack gate knobs to figure out / set properly .. that's the phase we are in.19:47
*** elo1 has joined #tacker19:47
sridhar_rams3wong: I also have this patchset in infra to add py27 jobs and ..19:47
sridhar_rams3wong: .. move dsvm functional testing out of experimental.. so that it gets run all the time19:47
sridhar_ramhttps://review.openstack.org/22864919:48
*** santoshkumark has joined #tacker19:49
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC20:00
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker20:04
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker20:04
*** sripriya has quit IRC20:07
prashantDsridhar_ram : hi20:10
prashantDwould you have some time to discuss TOSCA template changes for autoscaling?20:11
*** santoshk has joined #tacker20:13
*** santoshkumark has quit IRC20:16
*** elo1 has quit IRC20:18
*** elo1 has joined #tacker20:19
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC20:19
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker20:20
s3wongsridhar_ram: I saw Andreas' comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/228649/; if we have confidence, making functional and unit tests as part of gate seem like something we should do instead of experimental20:34
s3wongsridhar_ram: if we think the tests are relevant (I would guess we do, otherwise we wouldn't have merged them), we should make them a requirement to pass for all patchset20:35
*** s3wong has quit IRC21:00
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC21:02
*** s3wong has joined #tacker21:03
*** sripriya has joined #tacker21:07
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker21:07
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC21:10
sridhar_rams3wong: dvsm started passing just last Friday .. I don't we have enough data to build the confidence level.21:12
sridhar_rams3wong: however, i agree we should started insisting the jobs to pass for patchset.. if you notice that is what I'm enabling with https://review.openstack.org/22864921:12
sridhar_rams3wong: Given AJ's comment .. I'm  thinking to add py27 to both check and gate pipeline with voting .. but leave dsvm function only in check as non-voting until we build more confidence..21:14
sridhar_ramprashantD: hi there!21:14
*** lhcheng has quit IRC21:22
prashantDsridhar_ram : hi, just wanted go over the template changes for autoscaling21:22
sridhar_ramprashantD: sure21:22
prashantDthe one in google docs doesn't align with the format format monitoring21:23
prashantDthis is the doc I am looking at https://docs.google.com/document/d/14LL_ZK0oQ_MDFgT82a0aBAiKb3kOJNQJUPcZkOVXVzI/edit#21:23
sridhar_ramprashantD: have you looked at the proposal embedded in the health-mon api spec ?21:24
prashantDsridhar_ram : I am looking at the sample yaml file that bob uploaded with his review...https://review.openstack.org/#/c/224384/10/devstack/samples/sample-vnfd-monitor.yaml21:25
sridhar_ramprashantD: we put together that proposal during the midcycle meetup ... that envisions an uniform syntax across monitoring + healing ... respawn / auto-scaling are just two cases of an healing action21:26
sridhar_ramprashantD: see https://review.openstack.org/20212621:26
prashantDsridhar_ram: okay that looks better21:32
prashantDsridhar_ram: for CPU utilization we need few parameters. I will just add them21:33
sridhar_ramsounds good...21:33
sridhar_ramprashantD: btw, I haven't tried your yaml file yet (sorry), you still need some data point from me, correct ?21:33
prashantDsridhar_ram : yes, I tried few things over the week like reducing the number of "worker" threads for each service. I still run into some memory issues21:35
prashantDsridhar_ram : when you have time can you check the google doc. I have added option 4 with what you guys discussed. Somehow I don't see a need for action tag right now.21:48
*** bobh has quit IRC22:01
*** trozet has quit IRC22:06
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed stackforge/tacker: Sample VNFD parameterized templates and param values  https://review.openstack.org/22916522:07
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker22:13
sridhar_ramprashantD: looks better.. but I still think we need to think a bit generic here and keep up w/ the overall syntax ..22:21
sridhar_ramprashantD: perhaps separate the properties related to monitoring (resource: cpu, threashold: 10000) and action (scale_up with rest of scale attrs like max, min, cooldown, etc)22:21
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed stackforge/tacker: Sample VNFD parameterized templates and param values  https://review.openstack.org/22916522:41
vishwanathjs3wong, sridhar_ram, Uploaded sample VNFD parameterization templates and parameter values file as part of ^^^ above patchset, should be an easy review and merge22:51
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC22:56
*** elo1 has quit IRC23:15
*** elo1 has joined #tacker23:16
*** elo1 has quit IRC23:18
*** elo1 has joined #tacker23:19
*** elo1 has quit IRC23:24
*** elo1 has joined #tacker23:27
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed stackforge/tacker: Sample VNFD parameterized templates and param values  https://review.openstack.org/22916523:40
*** bobh has joined #tacker23:41
*** elo1 has quit IRC23:49

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!