| *** elo1 has quit IRC | 00:22 | |
| *** elo has joined #tacker | 00:23 | |
| *** vishwanathj has joined #tacker | 00:27 | |
| *** trozet has joined #tacker | 00:31 | |
| *** trozet has quit IRC | 00:39 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 01:00 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 01:16 | |
| *** tbh_ has joined #tacker | 01:18 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 01:30 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 01:34 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 01:35 | |
| *** tbh_ has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 01:38 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 01:42 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 01:45 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 02:01 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 02:05 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 02:16 | |
| sridhar_ram | bobh: howdy? do you mind giving a thumbs up for our new Tuesday meeting slot at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241201 | 02:18 |
|---|---|---|
| sridhar_ram | s3wong: bobh: howdy? do you mind giving a thumbs up for our new Tuesday meeting slot at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241201 | 02:18 |
| bobh | sridhar_ram: will do - did you see Tony's comment? | 02:18 |
| sridhar_ram | bobh: yes, replying as I type :) | 02:18 |
| s3wong | sridhar_ram: it is available? amazing! | 02:19 |
| sridhar_ram | s3wong: yeah, openstack-meeting-4 is available, rushing to grab it ! | 02:19 |
| s3wong | sridhar_ram: definitely | 02:20 |
| s3wong | sridhar_ram: Oh? You changed it to 1600? | 02:20 |
| s3wong | sridhar_ram: that would be 9am PST and 10am PDT | 02:21 |
| sridhar_ram | s3wong: hmm... I used this to line up things . http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2015&month=11&day=4&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=283&p2=64&p3=176 | 02:23 |
| sridhar_ram | s3wong: we are still sticking to the 9am slot | 02:24 |
| s3wong | sridhar_ram: I am fine with the time, luckily you didn't change it to 7am PST, in which case I would have to miss | 02:24 |
| sridhar_ram | s3wong: 9am seems reasonable to attract max participation | 02:25 |
| s3wong | sridhar_ram: sure | 02:25 |
| sridhar_ram | s3wong: ofcourse this will change as we get more APAC participants | 02:25 |
| s3wong | sridhar_ram: do we? :-) | 02:25 |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 02:26 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 02:27 | |
| *** s3wong has quit IRC | 02:31 | |
| *** elo has quit IRC | 02:46 | |
| *** elo has joined #tacker | 02:46 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 03:35 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 03:42 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 03:57 | |
| *** elo has quit IRC | 03:58 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 04:02 | |
| *** vishwana_ has joined #tacker | 04:07 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 04:07 | |
| *** bobh_ has joined #tacker | 04:07 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 04:08 | |
| *** vishwanathj has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
| *** bobh_ has quit IRC | 04:26 | |
| *** tbharath has joined #tacker | 04:30 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 05:19 | |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, Hi, it is nice to listen that tacker got a good response in summit | 05:25 |
| tbharath | and expected to see container related stuff in etherpad | 05:27 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: howdy! yeah, we had fantastic response... missed you in the developer meetup | 05:43 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: container is something we need a solid use-case to indulge more... | 05:44 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: .. but we need to keep exploring | 05:44 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: I remember you worked on Magnum ? | 05:44 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, yeah, even in magnum currently pushing monitoring k8s bay :) | 05:45 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: :) | 05:46 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, one more thing, when you find some time, let me know, you said that we will discuss more on NFV | 05:47 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: yeah, I still owe you one.. lets plan something for next week | 05:48 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, sure, thank you! | 05:48 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: we had another dev from indian timezone interested in tacker .. | 05:49 |
| tbharath | tbharath, is he in IRC? | 05:49 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: hope we can grow tacker-india team..! | 05:49 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, that's nice | 05:49 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: Her name is Veena .. and I believe the irc is #veena | 05:50 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, we got few people experimenting with tacker, like KLuka_ karimb and one more guy who mailed last week | 05:50 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, yeah I saw her yesterday | 05:50 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: introduce yourself .. perhaps she could use some initial help standing things up | 05:51 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, sure | 05:51 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, bobh and me were discussing about providing respawn limit for VNF | 05:52 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, pushed inital version of the patch, and bobh gave suggestions, and we are waiting for you review also on that design also | 05:53 |
| tbharath | whenever you get time you can see his comments or in the next IRC meeting we can discuss on it | 05:54 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: will take a look.. hopefully by tomorrow. The idea of "localized" respawn limit sounded interesting | 05:56 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: a qq on magnum | 05:56 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, I didn't get this "localized" respawn | 05:58 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, sure | 05:59 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: I thought bobh suggested respawn limit should factor in how soon respawn happens. If it happens infrequently looks he was suggesting not to mark max-respawn-reached ? | 06:00 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, yes, his idea to reset failure count, if VNF is active for long time period | 06:01 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: okay.. I'll respond soon on that gerrit.. | 06:02 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, in that I used check_intvl for activeness of VNF, but I realised it is not accurate, so I will better store time | 06:03 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: on magnum - I see bay create with backend pointing to k8s or docker swarm or mesos... can they all co-exists on the same installation ? | 06:07 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: for eg: can I create have 3 bays of each of these diff type and land docker containers on each of them ? | 06:08 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, yes, whenever you create baymodel, you can specify which COE you want to use | 06:08 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, so while creating bay, you have to specify baymodel | 06:08 |
| tbharath | baymodel is like flavour where you specify that I want docker swarm coe, I want to use testkey keypair, I want to use public network | 06:09 |
| tbharath | so you can create three baymodels one for each coe | 06:10 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, does that make sense? | 06:13 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: that's cool... | 06:13 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: yes, it does.. I meant this try this one day. how easy is the setup ? few VMs ? | 06:14 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, I have used devstack to setup magnum, and to create a bay it requires minimum two VMs | 06:15 |
| tbharath | one for master and one for agent | 06:15 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: okay.. thanks a lot. will give this a spin at some point! | 06:16 |
| sridhar_ram | tbharath: time to snooze.. will catch you tomorrow | 06:16 |
| tbharath | sridhar_ram, sure, see you | 06:16 |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 06:26 | |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 06:36 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 08:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | Santosh Kodicherla proposed openstack/tacker: Add tacker multi vdu tests https://review.openstack.org/239546 | 08:03 |
| *** mbound has joined #tacker | 08:36 | |
| *** veena has joined #tacker | 08:38 | |
| *** tab_ has joined #tacker | 09:09 | |
| *** karimb has joined #tacker | 09:13 | |
| *** dkusidlo has joined #tacker | 09:37 | |
| *** tab_ has quit IRC | 09:41 | |
| *** veena has quit IRC | 09:56 | |
| *** khomkrit has joined #tacker | 10:57 | |
| *** veena has joined #tacker | 10:57 | |
| *** elo has joined #tacker | 11:21 | |
| *** dkusidlo has quit IRC | 11:22 | |
| *** elo has quit IRC | 11:25 | |
| *** elo has joined #tacker | 11:49 | |
| *** elo has quit IRC | 11:54 | |
| *** veena has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
| *** veena has joined #tacker | 12:11 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 13:15 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 13:23 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 13:42 | |
| *** tbharath has quit IRC | 13:54 | |
| *** veena_ has joined #tacker | 14:17 | |
| *** veena has quit IRC | 14:17 | |
| openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker: Set respawn limit to VNF respawn policy https://review.openstack.org/240814 | 14:18 |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 14:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker: Set respawn limit to VNF respawn policy https://review.openstack.org/240814 | 14:30 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 14:47 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 14:47 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 14:55 | |
| *** trozet has joined #tacker | 15:09 | |
| mbound | bobh: I had a question regarding the monitoring policies for VNFs. I understand the policy when a VNFs is not reachable is by default to respawn it. Does also a "noop" policy exist? So that the VNF is not respawned even if it's not responding? I find this would be very helpful for debugging network issues. | 15:12 |
| mbound | Or maybe this is actually possible with the latest commits, by specifying a respawn limit of 0? | 15:13 |
| *** veena_ has quit IRC | 15:24 | |
| tbh | mbound: if we set monitor driver as noop, tacker won't monitor the vnf | 15:24 |
| tbh | So it won't even respawn | 15:25 |
| mbound | tbh: thanks :-) but is it possible to monitor it (via ping or other method), but not respawn it when it fails? so have a failure action set to "noop" or similar. | 15:27 |
| tbh | mbound: in vnfd don't specify 'failure: respawn: | 15:29 |
| mbound | tbh: ok, thanks! so i can just remove the line? | 15:30 |
| tbh | mbound: set failure:log | 15:31 |
| tbh | So that it will log that vnf is dead | 15:32 |
| mbound | thanks :-) | 15:36 |
| bobh | mbound: There is an action of "log" which will log a message when the monitor finds a problem but not resawn | 15:39 |
| bobh | s/resawn/respawn/ | 15:40 |
| mbound | bobh: thanks, I must have missed it. Is there a wiki/documentation already or is it WIP? I wouldn't mind writing a couple of lines of documentation while I test on my machines | 15:42 |
| bobh | mbound: I'm not sure if it is even WIP - though it should be. We had talked about a monitoring devref but I don't know if it ever got started/finished. Feel free to contribute one if you have time :-) Thanks! | 15:46 |
| mbound | bobh: i'll do my best, I just need to pick my brains on how the contributing process works, as I've never done it, but I'd be glad to contribute | 15:47 |
| bobh | mbound: thanks. Feel free to ask any questions - it can be confusing the first time - there is some good documentation of the process here: #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/How_To_Contribute#If_you.27re_a_developer | 15:56 |
| mbound | bobh: thanks! I'll take a look :-) | 16:00 |
| bobh | mound: and welcome! | 16:01 |
| bobh | mbound: and welcome! | 16:01 |
| tbh | bobh mbound monitoring devref was already got merged | 16:02 |
| *** tbh_ has joined #tacker | 16:03 | |
| tbh_ | bobh mbound https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/doc/source/devref/monitor-api.rst | 16:03 |
| *** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 16:04 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 16:06 | |
| bobh | tbh_: Thanks - I thought it was there already | 16:11 |
| mbound | tbh_: thanks for the info, didn't know it existed | 16:17 |
| KLuka_ | Hi, guys do you think it would be useful, if we add some option to display template file for VNFD in nice format (with preserved newlines etc...)? | 16:20 |
| KLuka_ | I have a patch ready and I can submit a PR if you wish. And maybe we can work on details on gerrit... | 16:20 |
| KLuka_ | Please let me know | 16:20 |
| KLuka_ | what do you think :) | 16:20 |
| bobh | KLuka_: I think that would be useful - please submit and we can review the changes | 16:21 |
| KLuka_ | Ok great ;) I will do that, but now I have to run. Here is the preview: http://paste.openstack.org/show/477987/ | 16:23 |
| bobh | KLuka_: Thanks! Looking forward to the review | 16:24 |
| *** mbound has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 16:34 | |
| *** tbh_ has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
| *** tbharath has joined #tacker | 17:00 | |
| *** karimb has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker: Set respawn limit to VNF respawn policy https://review.openstack.org/240814 | 17:49 |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
| *** tbharath has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 19:02 | |
| *** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker | 19:06 | |
| *** s3wong has joined #tacker | 19:07 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 19:07 | |
| *** vishwana_ has quit IRC | 19:27 | |
| *** santoshkumark has joined #tacker | 19:33 | |
| *** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC | 19:43 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 20:09 | |
| *** khomkrit has quit IRC | 20:26 | |
| openstackgerrit | Luka Krajger proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Added option for displaying VNFD template https://review.openstack.org/241762 | 20:48 |
| *** KLuka__ has joined #tacker | 20:51 | |
| *** karimb has joined #tacker | 21:02 | |
| openstackgerrit | Luka Krajger proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Added option for displaying VNFD template https://review.openstack.org/241762 | 21:08 |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 21:14 | |
| *** KLuka__ has quit IRC | 21:23 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 21:39 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 22:20 | |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 22:24 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 23:09 | |
| *** santoshk has joined #tacker | 23:10 | |
| *** santoshkumark has quit IRC | 23:13 | |
| *** trozet has quit IRC | 23:19 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 23:40 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 23:56 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!