Wednesday, 2015-11-18

« Tuesday, 2015-11-17 Index Thursday, 2015-11-19 »
openstackgerritSantosh Kodicherla proposed openstack/tacker: Adding tacker http monitor test  https://review.openstack.org/24224801:10
openstackgerritSantosh Kodicherla proposed openstack/tacker: Adding tacker http monitor test  https://review.openstack.org/24224801:59
*** prashantD has quit IRC02:01
*** santoshk has quit IRC02:10
*** tbh has joined #tacker02:11
*** bobh has joined #tacker02:25
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:36
*** lhcheng has quit IRC02:49
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker02:50
*** lhcheng has quit IRC02:50
*** bobh has quit IRC02:53
*** tbh has quit IRC02:56
*** mdnadeem has quit IRC03:05
*** yfujioka has quit IRC03:22
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker03:23
*** mdnadeem has joined #tacker03:23
*** prashantD has joined #tacker03:26
*** prashantD_ has joined #tacker03:55
*** prashantD has quit IRC03:56
openstackgerritSantosh Kodicherla proposed openstack/tacker: Tacker test for multi vdu  https://review.openstack.org/24673804:17
*** amotoki has joined #tacker04:34
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:49
*** amotoki has joined #tacker05:01
*** amotoki has quit IRC05:10
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker05:11
*** amotoki has joined #tacker05:14
*** prashantD_ has quit IRC05:19
*** tbh has joined #tacker05:28
*** lhcheng_ has joined #tacker05:29
*** lhcheng has quit IRC05:32
*** amotoki has quit IRC05:40
*** gongysh__ has joined #tacker06:06
*** tbh has quit IRC06:07
*** tbh has joined #tacker06:09
*** gongysh__ has quit IRC06:15
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC06:16
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker06:17
*** sridhar_ram has left #tacker06:27
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker06:39
*** lhcheng_ has quit IRC06:42
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker06:47
tbhsridhar_ram, ping, is it right time to talk?06:48
*** santoshkumark has joined #tacker06:48
sridhar_ramsridhar_ram: sure, I've sometime now..06:48
tbhsridhar_ram, I have gone through tosca docs roughly, I cannot find properties that we can specify in host -> properties06:51
tbhsridhar_ram, I am looking for what other properties we can look for (considering better VNF placement BP)06:52
sridhar_ramtbh: which doc did you refer to ?06:52
tbhsridhar_ram, disk_size06:52
tbhsridhar_ram, http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML/v1.0/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.0.html06:52
tbhsry typo there06:52
sridhar_ramtbh: can you look at the "Hello World" example there .. http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML/v1.0/csprd01/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.0-csprd01.html#_Toc43001561806:54
sridhar_ramtbh: #Host Container Properties06:55
tbhsridhar_ram, yes, but only those three06:55
sridhar_ramtbh: ah.. you are looking for perf knobs like cpu-pinning, numa, etc ?06:56
tbhsridhar_ram, yes06:56
sridhar_ramtbh: they are not yet defined in tosca-nfv... we need define here in tacker and push it back into tosca-nfv specification06:57
sridhar_ramtbh: fyi, I'm in the tosca-nfv standards group to take the gaps we find in tacker and push it back into the specs06:57
tbhsridhar_ram, oh that's nice06:58
tbhsridhar_ram, I am not aware of it06:58
sridhar_ramso.. go ahead and define something that is meaningful and we can review internally and then propose it back to tosca-nfv06:58
sridhar_ramtbh: btw, if possible let limit the scope of flavor and do things in smaller chunks...06:59
tbhsridhar_ram, and can I take it as independent task06:59
tbhsridhar_ram, yes about to say, I want to start with those three properties07:00
sridhar_ramtbh: exactly .. we are in sync!07:00
tbhand will add todo for that to expand properties07:00
sridhar_ramtbh: sounds good07:01
tbhsridhar_ram, I will explain possibilities to implement in RFE and tackers can correct me there07:02
sridhar_ramtbh: sounds like a plan...07:02
*** gongysh__ has joined #tacker07:17
openstackgerritgongysh proposed openstack/tacker: Add tacker http monitor test  https://review.openstack.org/24224807:49
*** santoshkumark has quit IRC07:50
sridhar_ramanyone hitting this problem in master devstack. glance cirros image upload fails with ...07:54
sridhar_ram2015-11-18 07:46:18.298 | + openstack --os-cloud=devstack-admin image create cirros-0.3.4-x86_64-uec --public --container-format ami --disk-format ami07:54
sridhar_ram2015-11-18 07:46:18.761 | Could not determine a suitable URL for the plugin07:54
sridhar_ramstrange thing, when I run this 'image create' separately it works fine...07:55
gongyshsridhar_ram, what does the fox log say?07:56
sridhar_ramgongysh: hmm.. what you mean by fox log ? you mean stack.log ?07:57
gongyshsorry, the stack log07:58
sridhar_ramgongysh: here is the bottom half of stack.log .. http://paste.openstack.org/show/479212/08:09
sridhar_ramgongysh: I hope something silly going on here .. local.conf doesn't have any tacker stuff08:09
sridhar_ramgongysh: thanks for looking into this, incidently I was trying to test out your global req patchsets08:10
sridhar_ramgongysh: google search shows this could be due to keystone v2 vs v3 ..  devstack is using openstack client and key-access.log shows /v2.0/tokens access08:12
*** gabriel90 has joined #tacker08:16
*** gabriel90 is now known as gpergon08:18
*** gpergon is now known as gperal08:18
*** gperal has quit IRC08:18
*** gperal has joined #tacker08:19
*** gperal has quit IRC08:26
*** egonzalez has joined #tacker08:30
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC08:30
*** gperal has joined #tacker08:33
*** karimb has joined #tacker08:35
*** lhcheng has quit IRC08:45
*** zeih has joined #tacker08:53
*** zeih has quit IRC08:56
*** zeih has joined #tacker08:59
*** zeih has quit IRC09:12
*** zeih has joined #tacker09:14
*** egonzalez has quit IRC09:20
*** zeih has quit IRC09:35
*** zeih has joined #tacker09:38
*** zeih has quit IRC10:05
*** gongysh__ has quit IRC11:11
*** prashantD has joined #tacker11:17
*** prashantD has quit IRC11:21
*** ziggypup has joined #tacker11:49
*** ziggypup has left #tacker11:49
*** egonzalez has joined #tacker12:03
*** egonzalez has quit IRC12:22
*** tbh has quit IRC12:37
*** mbound has joined #tacker12:39
*** mbound has quit IRC12:41
*** gongysh__ has joined #tacker12:44
*** mbound has joined #tacker12:50
*** tab has joined #tacker13:14
*** tab is now known as Guest9945213:15
*** prashantD has joined #tacker13:25
*** prashantD has quit IRC13:29
*** prashantD has joined #tacker13:30
*** prashantD has quit IRC13:31
*** igordcard has joined #tacker13:44
*** karimb has quit IRC13:53
*** karimb has joined #tacker13:54
*** gongysh__ has quit IRC14:12
*** gongysh__ has joined #tacker14:22
*** gongysh__ has quit IRC14:25
*** gongysh__ has joined #tacker14:26
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC14:31
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker14:32
*** trozet has joined #tacker14:40
*** trozet has quit IRC14:56
*** mbound has quit IRC14:58
*** trozet has joined #tacker14:58
*** bobh has joined #tacker15:05
*** gongysh__ has quit IRC15:14
*** sarob has quit IRC15:16
*** sarob has joined #tacker15:19
*** mbound has joined #tacker15:29
*** tbh has joined #tacker15:50
*** gperal has quit IRC15:57
*** trozet has quit IRC16:41
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker16:50
*** trozet has joined #tacker16:53
*** prashantD has joined #tacker16:58
*** igordcard has quit IRC17:01
*** igordcard has joined #tacker17:01
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker17:01
*** lhcheng_ has joined #tacker17:02
*** lhcheng has quit IRC17:02
*** lhcheng_ is now known as lhcheng17:05
sridhar_ramtbh: ping17:08
tbhsridhar_ram, pong17:08
sridhar_ramdid you had a chance to create a RFE for auto-network create ?17:08
tbhsridhar_ram, https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/151740517:09
openstackLaunchpad bug 1517405 in tacker "Automatic Network Creation based on VNFD Template" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to bharaththiruveedula (bharath-ves)17:09
tbhsridhar_ram, updated my views on implementation for automatic flavor creation17:10
sridhar_ramtbh: cool, thanks.. I missed it17:10
sridhar_ramtbh: will check17:10
*** mbound has quit IRC17:19
*** s3wong has joined #tacker18:12
*** tbh has quit IRC18:26
*** santoshkumark has joined #tacker18:34
*** mbound has joined #tacker18:56
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC18:56
*** mbound has quit IRC19:10
*** mbound has joined #tacker19:12
*** prashantD has quit IRC19:20
*** prashantD has joined #tacker19:23
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC19:29
*** shuqiangzhang has joined #tacker19:32
*** shuqiangzhang has left #tacker19:32
*** Guest89216 has joined #tacker19:34
*** Guest89216 has left #tacker19:35
*** prashantD has quit IRC19:42
*** prashantD has joined #tacker19:44
*** igordcard has quit IRC20:05
*** santoshk has joined #tacker20:21
*** santoshkumark has quit IRC20:24
*** lhcheng has quit IRC20:35
*** joonmyung has joined #tacker20:49
*** openstack has joined #tacker21:03
*** mbound has quit IRC21:04
*** mbound has joined #tacker21:06
*** mbound has quit IRC21:11
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker21:24
*** gongysh__ has joined #tacker21:35
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker22:00
*** lhcheng has quit IRC22:04
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker22:15
*** gongysh__ has quit IRC22:35
sridhar_rambobh: ping23:16
s3wongsridhar_ram: you may want to attend networking-sfc meeting tomorrow (9am)23:18
s3wongsridhar_ram: Tacker using networking-sfc APIs is one of the topics of discussion23:19
sridhar_rams3wong: thanks for the heads up .. will try to attend.23:20
sridhar_rams3wong: I have a tosca call at that slot, but that is a voice conf call and this is irc / text.. never tried that combination before ;-)23:20
s3wongsridhar_ram: I did before with ODL TSC and OpenStack GBP23:22
s3wongsridhar_ram: but I generally only listen (without really paying much attention) on the ODL TSC call; but I paid a lot more attention to OpenStack GBP on IRC :-)23:23
sridhar_rams3wong: same here, will mostly listen on the tosca call23:23
sridhar_rams3wong: which channel btw ?23:23
s3wongsridhar_ram: #openstack-meeting-423:28
s3wongsridhar_ram: same as us now :-)   (it was amazing that we used to get #openstack-meeting before :-) )23:28
sridhar_rams3wong: that's a divine alignment .. we are meant to be together!23:29
*** gongysh__ has joined #tacker23:29
s3wongsridhar_ram: I actually agree with that... without something like Tacker, networking-sfc is just a plumbing interface; without networking-sfc, we would need to bypass Neutron23:30
s3wongsridhar_ram: this is of course in the context of NFV23:30
gongysh__shouldn't tacker deal with NFVFWG?23:32
s3wonggongysh__: you mean NFV VNFFG?23:33
gongysh__ok, that is it.23:33
s3wonggongysh__: sridhar_ram is helping out on the definition of that effort with OASIS NFV working group23:34
s3wonggongysh__: once it is available, Tacker will certainly consume it on the northbound side23:34
s3wonggongysh__: on the southbound, we need to invoke something to do the plumbing23:35
*** karimb_ has joined #tacker23:35
s3wonggongysh__: since the network topology is set up by Neutron, the redirection of traffic should be done by Neutron as well23:36
gongysh__sure, the south (or put it other way, the driver) can use heat or nova with networking-sfc23:36
s3wonggongysh__: yep, we can use heat once networking-sfc has heat support (someone is working on that now on the networking-sfc side)23:36
*** karimb has quit IRC23:37
s3wonggongysh__: in the mean time, we need to extract Neutron ports that are created via heat, and directly invoke networking-sfc APIs to construct the chain(s)23:38
gongysh__ok, that makes sense if we are eager to get the SFC in, but we can watch on heat's networking-sfc feature.23:39
gongysh__s3wong, one more thing I think we need to improve is the sample cases.23:40
s3wonggongysh__: I am OK either way. I am also part of networking-sfc team, and we are looking at M1 timeframe to get all the basic patches in, but TBH that doesn't include heat support yet23:41
gongysh__s3wong, I see we have multiple vdu or something, but these VDUs does not work as a true VNF.23:41
gongysh__for example, the firewall vdu, the router vdu. we just start cirrorus image, which do not real work as the intended VNF functions.23:42
*** karimb_ has quit IRC23:43
s3wonggongysh__: I see. Reference implementation is a bit cruel23:43
s3wonggongysh__: so what you want is that the multiple VDUs can be grouped into a VNF, and somehow connect them better or do better job on their placement?23:44
gongysh__neutron has lbaas, fwaas etc services.23:46
gongysh__which are doing their real feature23:46
s3wonggongysh__: I see, you want configuration orchestration23:46
gongysh__I am not clear myself. Just think our reference implementation is just a raw starter.23:47
s3wonggongysh__: you want to go be able to define some attributes in the yaml file and Tacker would help configure the services being deployed?23:48
s3wonggongysh__: no doubt. We need to improve upon our reference, even if we continue to use OpenWrt23:48
gongysh__I just want this VNF is a real VNF.23:48
gongysh__I noticed the management driver of OpenWrt23:49
gongysh__s3wong, do u have a doc which about how to implement  a working VNF with OpenWrt management driver?23:51
gongysh__I find no such document in tacker project.23:51
s3wonggongysh__: I don't think so... perhaps it is worthwhile to file a bug to specify the expectation on doc in terms of deploying a OpenWRT as VNF23:52
gongysh__ok, let me do it now23:53
s3wonggongysh__: I am sure that would be great exercise for us to realize the limitation of what we can do (yaml attributes, config driver interface...etc)23:53
s3wonggongysh__: Thanks!23:54
sridhar_ramgongysh_: s3wong: catching up on this discussion ...23:57
sridhar_ramgongysh__:  catching up on this nice discussion ...23:57
s3wongsridhar_ram: was wondering where you were :-)23:57
gongysh__sridhar_ram :)23:58
sridhar_ramgongysh__: true, the repo only has OpenWRT as the "real" VNF..23:58
gongysh__s3wong, are in China or ?23:58
gongysh__are u in China or ?23:58
s3wonggongysh__: no, in Bay Area23:58
sridhar_ramgongysh__: in the tokyo summit we demonstrated with Tacker orchestrating brocade 5600 vRouter and another vEPC. The later is a 7 VDU VNF!!23:59
« Tuesday, 2015-11-17 Index Thursday, 2015-11-19 »

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!