| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 00:03 | |
| *** u_kozat has quit IRC | 00:18 | |
| *** sripriya_ has quit IRC | 00:31 | |
| *** u_kozat has joined #tacker | 00:38 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 00:46 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 00:54 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 00:54 | |
| *** xianghui has quit IRC | 00:59 | |
| *** xianghui has joined #tacker | 00:59 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 00:59 | |
| *** xianghui has quit IRC | 00:59 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 01:00 | |
| *** u_kozat has quit IRC | 01:14 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 01:17 | |
| *** ksantoshk has quit IRC | 01:25 | |
| *** sripriya has joined #tacker | 01:35 | |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 01:51 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 01:56 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 02:19 | |
| *** changzhi has joined #tacker | 02:26 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 02:31 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 02:37 | |
| *** changzhi has quit IRC | 02:38 | |
| *** s3wong has quit IRC | 02:53 | |
| *** sripriya has quit IRC | 03:03 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 03:03 | |
| *** changzhi has joined #tacker | 03:03 | |
| *** changzhi has quit IRC | 03:28 | |
| *** changzhi has joined #tacker | 03:34 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 04:23 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 04:33 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 04:49 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 05:20 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 05:23 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 05:28 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 05:46 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 06:01 | |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: hi | 06:32 |
|---|---|---|
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 06:33 | |
| gongysh | hi, sridhar_ram | 06:34 |
| sridhar_ram | gongysh: hi there..! | 06:34 |
| gongysh | EPA? | 06:34 |
| sridhar_ram | :) that's the name we float for vnf-performance work .. | 06:35 |
| sridhar_ram | EPA = Enhanced Platform Awareness | 06:35 |
| sridhar_ram | an Intel acronymn | 06:35 |
| gongysh | got it | 06:35 |
| sridhar_ram | we really need to converge to use one term .. VNF placement sometimes means policy based vnf placement which is not in scope for the vnf-performance work.. | 06:37 |
| sridhar_ram | .. atleast in the initial phase | 06:37 |
| gongysh | placement should care performance | 06:38 |
| sridhar_ram | gongysh: fyi, we had good discussions in today's weekly mtg.. mostly on SFC and TOSCA parser. see http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tacker/2015/tacker.2015-12-01-17.00.log.html | 06:39 |
| gongysh | ok, I will check it | 06:39 |
| sridhar_ram | gongysh: yeah, I hope we can purely do the initial iteration focused on vnf-performance | 06:40 |
| gongysh | sridhar_ram, you are still awake? what is the time over there? | 06:42 |
| sridhar_ram | 10:43pm .. it is late! | 06:43 |
| sridhar_ram | catching up on few things.. | 06:43 |
| sridhar_ram | btw, we need to find a way to get you folks on APAC join tacker meetings | 06:43 |
| gongysh | yes | 06:44 |
| gongysh | alternatively? | 06:44 |
| sridhar_ram | yeah.. that's an option | 06:44 |
| sridhar_ram | I'm thinking to host an adhoc meeting in the #tacker channel just to kick off EPA and make it Asia friendly | 06:45 |
| sridhar_ram | gongysh: what is the typical UTC range for meetings that is China friendly | 06:47 |
| gongysh | UTC 1:00< time range<UTC 14:00 | 06:51 |
| sridhar_ram | gongysh: thanks.. lets plan to discuss in the ML / next week's irc mtg | 06:56 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, Hi, I have few questions for the BP https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250291/ | 06:57 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: sure, shoot | 06:58 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, I have seen artifacts in TOSCA, but not exactly sure about it | 06:58 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, and regarding the 'created_resources' column, I named it as 'created_resources' because the column will be empty if tacker doesn't create the resources | 07:01 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: may I ask which part ? | 07:01 |
| tbh | and it will dict if tacker creates the resources | 07:01 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, this one http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML/v1.0/csprd01/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.0-csprd01.html#_Toc430015674 | 07:02 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: checking few things in tosca-parser | 07:03 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: give me a min | 07:03 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, sure | 07:03 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: sorry for the delay, checked few things in tosca-parser .. but I digressed :) | 07:14 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, :) | 07:15 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: artifact is the one we are planning to use in the oasis tosca-nfv workgroup .. | 07:15 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: .. I was trying to see if tosca-parser has proper references to it | 07:15 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: .. I do see this .. https://github.com/openstack/tosca-parser/blob/master/toscaparser/elements/TOSCA_definition_1_0.yaml#L739 | 07:15 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: we need to check w/ tosca-parser folks if they support qcow2 artifact type with a file URI | 07:16 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, why do we have different versions for TOSCA template | 07:17 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: sorry, I didn't understand the question.. can you elaborate | 07:18 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, the templates we are using in tacker and templates mentioned in spec are somewhat different | 07:18 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: yes, mostly for historical reasons.. we took an initial stab at implementing tosca-nfv parsing ourselves. | 07:20 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: more and more we want to move towards proper tosca syntax that conforms to its CSD | 07:20 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: hence the effort that bobh is starting | 07:21 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, so most of the templates we are using now going to be change? | 07:21 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: we need to continue to support for at least for 1 or 2 cycles before depracting them | 07:22 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, oh okay | 07:22 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: that why .. we also need template versioning | 07:23 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, by seeing some tests in tosca-parser I think they are supporting qcow2 artifact | 07:23 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: seems to be. both iso ans qcow2 make sense to use for VDU images | 07:24 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, yes | 07:24 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: are you planning to respond / respin another version of this spec ? | 07:25 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, one more question, from the comments, I have seen we were discussing about the resource busy event? | 07:25 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, we can delete flavor and image with out resource busy error | 07:26 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: I see, we can delete flavor & image even if some VMs are active using those two ? | 07:27 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, yes | 07:28 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: that's cool.. | 07:28 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, I just checked it | 07:28 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, for both image and flavor | 07:28 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, yes I am planning to respin the spec addressing the comments | 07:28 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: back to 'created_resources', is that a per-VDU dict ? | 07:29 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, yes something like {'vdu1': {'image':<UUID>, 'flavor':<UUID>}, 'vdu2': {'image':UUID}} | 07:30 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: okay.. on the naming 'created_resource'. it still sounds odd to me .. but again, that's just a name..not a huge deal breaker | 07:31 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, but I have problem with network resources | 07:32 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, as bobh raised the important issue, we need to store the network/subnet id per VDU | 07:32 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: yes, network resource going to need some thinking... | 07:32 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: did you see my response to that ? | 07:33 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, yes | 07:33 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, network creation at VNF creation time | 07:34 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: perhaps it can be deferred until vnf create | 07:34 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: yes | 07:34 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, network details has to come under devices table then? | 07:34 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, *deviceattributes | 07:35 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: yes | 07:35 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: I mean, we might need to parser the tosca and have heat create networks/subnets on vnf-creation time | 07:35 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: I got to wind down.. :( | 07:36 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, if heat creates the network resources then no need to store network details | 07:36 |
| tbh | because it will delete along the other stack resources | 07:37 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: yep, exactly ! | 07:37 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, okay, will continue tomorrow, I will update the spec, with the discussion we have | 07:37 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: technically we can do the same for flavor.. but vnfd is bit more optimized | 07:37 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: but for glance img, vnfd is the only option | 07:38 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: one quick side note before I forget, your client patchset https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248536/ looks close | 07:38 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: except for couple of minor nits | 07:38 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: would you mind a quick respin.. I'd like to merge it soon | 07:39 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, yes it is in my todo list, I am going to update that now | 07:39 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: gr8.. thanks | 07:39 |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: ttyl .. have a nice day | 07:40 |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, ttyl | 07:40 |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 07:48 | |
| *** egonzalez has joined #tacker | 08:29 | |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 08:30 | |
| *** gperal has joined #tacker | 08:44 | |
| *** gperal has quit IRC | 08:49 | |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 08:54 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 09:02 | |
| *** gperal has joined #tacker | 09:02 | |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 09:02 | |
| *** egonzalez has quit IRC | 09:14 | |
| *** mbound_ has joined #tacker | 09:49 | |
| openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker: Add clients module to Tacker https://review.openstack.org/248536 | 09:49 |
| *** weihan has joined #tacker | 10:48 | |
| *** mbound_ has quit IRC | 11:01 | |
| *** lhcheng_ has joined #tacker | 11:02 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 11:03 | |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 11:04 | |
| *** lhcheng_ has quit IRC | 11:04 | |
| *** mbound_ has joined #tacker | 11:06 | |
| *** mbound_ has quit IRC | 11:27 | |
| *** igordcard has joined #tacker | 11:30 | |
| *** mbound_ has joined #tacker | 11:30 | |
| *** changzhi has quit IRC | 11:50 | |
| *** egonzalez has joined #tacker | 12:13 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 13:03 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 13:04 | |
| *** igordcard has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 13:15 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 13:34 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 13:48 | |
| *** mbound_ has quit IRC | 13:53 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 13:53 | |
| *** igordcard has joined #tacker | 13:58 | |
| *** mbound_ has joined #tacker | 13:58 | |
| *** igordcard_ has joined #tacker | 14:05 | |
| *** igordcard__ has joined #tacker | 14:07 | |
| *** igordcard has quit IRC | 14:07 | |
| *** igordcard_ has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
| *** igordcard_ has joined #tacker | 14:10 | |
| *** zeih_ has joined #tacker | 14:12 | |
| *** igordcard__ has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 14:15 | |
| *** gperal has quit IRC | 15:10 | |
| *** dandruta has joined #tacker | 15:13 | |
| *** bobh_ has joined #tacker | 15:23 | |
| *** zeih_ has quit IRC | 15:23 | |
| *** weihan has quit IRC | 15:30 | |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 15:33 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 15:34 | |
| *** egonzalez has quit IRC | 15:34 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 15:34 | |
| *** jhan1 has quit IRC | 15:34 | |
| *** radez has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** igordcard_ has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** mbound_ has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** mdnadeem has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** lsp42 has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** dmellado has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** cgoncalves has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** dandruta has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** egonzalez has joined #tacker | 15:39 | |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 15:39 | |
| *** jhan1 has joined #tacker | 15:39 | |
| *** dmellado has joined #tacker | 15:40 | |
| *** cgoncalves has joined #tacker | 15:40 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 15:42 | |
| *** dandruta has joined #tacker | 15:44 | |
| *** radez has joined #tacker | 15:44 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 15:47 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rico Lin proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Remove py26 support https://review.openstack.org/252484 | 16:04 |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 16:04 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 16:13 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 16:16 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 16:18 | |
| *** lsp42 has joined #tacker | 16:34 | |
| *** mdnadeem has joined #tacker | 16:34 | |
| *** mbound_ has joined #tacker | 16:34 | |
| *** igordcard_ has joined #tacker | 16:34 | |
| *** gperal has joined #tacker | 16:34 | |
| *** jhan1_ has joined #tacker | 16:41 | |
| *** jhan1 has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
| *** gperal has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
| *** igordcard_ has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
| *** mbound_ has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
| *** mdnadeem has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
| *** lsp42 has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
| *** gperal has joined #tacker | 16:46 | |
| *** igordcard_ has joined #tacker | 16:46 | |
| *** mdnadeem has joined #tacker | 16:46 | |
| *** lsp42 has joined #tacker | 16:46 | |
| *** mbound_ has joined #tacker | 16:46 | |
| *** radez has quit IRC | 16:48 | |
| *** radez has joined #tacker | 16:48 | |
| openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Automatic resoure creation for Tacker https://review.openstack.org/250291 | 17:05 |
| *** gperal has quit IRC | 17:05 | |
| *** u_kozat has joined #tacker | 17:07 | |
| *** mbound_ has quit IRC | 17:17 | |
| *** egonzalez has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 17:37 | |
| *** dandruta has quit IRC | 17:38 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 17:40 | |
| *** vishwanathj has quit IRC | 18:33 | |
| *** vishwanathj has joined #tacker | 18:34 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 18:42 | |
| *** santoshk has joined #tacker | 18:43 | |
| *** s3wong has joined #tacker | 18:49 | |
| sridhar_ram | tbh: ping | 19:03 |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 19:04 | |
| *** u_kozat has quit IRC | 19:07 | |
| *** vishwanathj has quit IRC | 19:08 | |
| sridhar_ram | gongysh: ping | 19:08 |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 19:09 | |
| *** sripriya has joined #tacker | 19:12 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-tackerclient: Remove py26 support https://review.openstack.org/252484 | 19:22 |
| *** mbound_ has joined #tacker | 19:28 | |
| *** mbound_ has quit IRC | 19:29 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 19:42 | |
| *** igordcard_ has quit IRC | 19:44 | |
| *** u_kozat has joined #tacker | 20:07 | |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 20:10 | |
| *** u_kozat has quit IRC | 20:14 | |
| *** lhcheng_ has joined #tacker | 20:21 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 20:24 | |
| *** lhcheng_ has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 21:13 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 21:18 | |
| sridhar_ram | hi tackers - anyone else hitting "ERROR: port_security_enabled not allowed in value_specs" during vnf-create in latest master ? | 21:25 |
| santoshk | sridhar_ram: was just hitting that error.. | 21:33 |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 21:37 | |
| *** u_kozat has joined #tacker | 22:11 | |
| *** u_kozat has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
| sridhar_ram | santoshk: thanks for the ack.. I'm checking few things | 22:18 |
| *** u_kozat has joined #tacker | 22:36 | |
| sridhar_ram | looks "port_security_enabled" flag moved up from value_spec{} to a proper property of OS::Network::Net / OS::Network::Port | 22:41 |
| sripriya | sridhar_ram: link? | 22:46 |
| *** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker | 23:01 | |
| *** bobh_ has quit IRC | 23:01 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 23:02 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 23:21 | |
| *** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC | 23:23 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 23:26 | |
| *** sripriya_ has joined #tacker | 23:29 | |
| *** sripriya has quit IRC | 23:33 | |
| sridhar_ram | sripriya_: I suspect https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248719/ caused it .. | 23:53 |
| sridhar_ram | sripriya_: .. it removed a validate() method in engine/resource/openstack/neutron/port.py and now the validate() method in the parent NeutronResource is getting kicked in and that had this value_spec for a while now | 23:54 |
| sridhar_ram | .. I meant, the parent had this value_spec check for a while | 23:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!