Wednesday, 2015-12-02

*** lhcheng has quit IRC00:03
*** u_kozat has quit IRC00:18
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC00:31
*** u_kozat has joined #tacker00:38
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC00:46
*** gongysh has joined #tacker00:54
*** gongysh has quit IRC00:54
*** xianghui has quit IRC00:59
*** xianghui has joined #tacker00:59
*** prashantD has quit IRC00:59
*** xianghui has quit IRC00:59
*** prashantD has joined #tacker01:00
*** u_kozat has quit IRC01:14
*** gongysh has joined #tacker01:17
*** ksantoshk has quit IRC01:25
*** sripriya has joined #tacker01:35
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker01:51
*** lhcheng has quit IRC01:56
*** gongysh has quit IRC02:19
*** changzhi has joined #tacker02:26
*** gongysh has joined #tacker02:31
*** gongysh has quit IRC02:37
*** changzhi has quit IRC02:38
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:53
*** sripriya has quit IRC03:03
*** prashantD has quit IRC03:03
*** changzhi has joined #tacker03:03
*** changzhi has quit IRC03:28
*** changzhi has joined #tacker03:34
*** tbh has joined #tacker04:23
*** tbh has quit IRC04:33
*** tbh has joined #tacker04:49
*** gongysh has joined #tacker05:20
*** gongysh has quit IRC05:23
*** gongysh has joined #tacker05:28
*** gongysh has quit IRC05:46
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker06:01
sridhar_ramtbh: hi06:32
*** gongysh has joined #tacker06:33
gongyshhi, sridhar_ram06:34
sridhar_ramgongysh: hi there..!06:34
gongyshEPA?06:34
sridhar_ram:) that's the name we float for vnf-performance work ..06:35
sridhar_ramEPA = Enhanced Platform Awareness06:35
sridhar_raman Intel acronymn06:35
gongyshgot it06:35
sridhar_ramwe really need to converge to use one term .. VNF placement sometimes means policy based vnf placement which is not in scope for the vnf-performance work..06:37
sridhar_ram.. atleast in the initial phase06:37
gongyshplacement should care performance06:38
sridhar_ramgongysh: fyi, we had good discussions in today's weekly mtg.. mostly on SFC and TOSCA parser. see http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tacker/2015/tacker.2015-12-01-17.00.log.html06:39
gongyshok, I will check it06:39
sridhar_ramgongysh: yeah, I hope we can purely do the initial iteration focused on vnf-performance06:40
gongyshsridhar_ram, you are  still awake? what is the time over there?06:42
sridhar_ram10:43pm .. it is late!06:43
sridhar_ramcatching up on few things..06:43
sridhar_rambtw, we need to find a way to get you folks on APAC join tacker meetings06:43
gongyshyes06:44
gongyshalternatively?06:44
sridhar_ramyeah.. that's an option06:44
sridhar_ramI'm thinking to host an adhoc meeting in the #tacker channel just to kick off EPA and make it Asia friendly06:45
sridhar_ramgongysh: what is the typical UTC range for meetings that is China friendly06:47
gongyshUTC 1:00< time range<UTC 14:0006:51
sridhar_ramgongysh: thanks.. lets plan to discuss in the ML / next week's irc mtg06:56
tbhsridhar_ram, Hi, I have few questions for the BP https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250291/06:57
sridhar_ramtbh: sure, shoot06:58
tbhsridhar_ram, I have seen artifacts in TOSCA, but not exactly sure about it06:58
tbhsridhar_ram, and regarding the 'created_resources' column, I named it as 'created_resources' because the column will be empty if tacker doesn't create the resources07:01
sridhar_ramtbh: may I ask which part ?07:01
tbhand it will dict if tacker creates the resources07:01
tbhsridhar_ram, this one http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML/v1.0/csprd01/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.0-csprd01.html#_Toc43001567407:02
sridhar_ramtbh: checking few things in tosca-parser07:03
sridhar_ramtbh: give me a min07:03
tbhsridhar_ram, sure07:03
sridhar_ramtbh: sorry for the delay, checked few things in tosca-parser .. but I digressed :)07:14
tbhsridhar_ram, :)07:15
sridhar_ramtbh: artifact is the one we are planning to use in the oasis tosca-nfv workgroup ..07:15
sridhar_ramtbh: .. I was trying to see if tosca-parser has proper references to it07:15
sridhar_ramtbh: .. I do see this .. https://github.com/openstack/tosca-parser/blob/master/toscaparser/elements/TOSCA_definition_1_0.yaml#L73907:15
sridhar_ramtbh: we need to check w/ tosca-parser folks if they support qcow2 artifact type with a file URI07:16
tbhsridhar_ram, why do we have different versions for TOSCA template07:17
sridhar_ramtbh: sorry, I didn't understand the question.. can you elaborate07:18
tbhsridhar_ram, the templates we are using in tacker and templates mentioned in spec  are somewhat different07:18
sridhar_ramtbh: yes, mostly for historical reasons.. we took an initial stab at implementing tosca-nfv parsing ourselves.07:20
sridhar_ramtbh: more and more we want to move towards proper tosca syntax that conforms to its CSD07:20
sridhar_ramtbh: hence the effort that bobh is starting07:21
tbhsridhar_ram, so most of the templates we are using now going to be change?07:21
sridhar_ramtbh: we need to continue to support for at least for 1 or 2 cycles before depracting them07:22
tbhsridhar_ram, oh okay07:22
sridhar_ramtbh: that why .. we also need template versioning07:23
tbhsridhar_ram, by seeing some tests in tosca-parser I think they are supporting qcow2 artifact07:23
sridhar_ramtbh: seems to be. both iso ans qcow2 make sense to use for VDU images07:24
tbhsridhar_ram, yes07:24
sridhar_ramtbh: are you planning to respond / respin another version of this spec ?07:25
tbhsridhar_ram, one more question, from the comments, I have seen we were discussing about the resource busy event?07:25
tbhsridhar_ram, we can delete flavor and image with out resource busy error07:26
sridhar_ramtbh: I see, we can delete flavor & image even if some VMs are active using those two ?07:27
tbhsridhar_ram, yes07:28
sridhar_ramtbh: that's cool..07:28
tbhsridhar_ram, I just checked it07:28
tbhsridhar_ram, for both image and flavor07:28
tbhsridhar_ram, yes I am planning to respin the spec addressing the comments07:28
sridhar_ramtbh: back to 'created_resources', is that a per-VDU dict ?07:29
tbhsridhar_ram, yes something like {'vdu1': {'image':<UUID>, 'flavor':<UUID>}, 'vdu2': {'image':UUID}}07:30
sridhar_ramtbh: okay.. on the naming 'created_resource'. it still sounds odd to me .. but again, that's just a name..not a huge deal breaker07:31
tbhsridhar_ram, but I have problem with network resources07:32
tbhsridhar_ram, as bobh raised the important issue, we need to store the network/subnet id per VDU07:32
sridhar_ramtbh: yes, network resource going to need some thinking...07:32
sridhar_ramtbh: did you see my response to that ?07:33
tbhsridhar_ram, yes07:33
tbhsridhar_ram, network creation at VNF creation time07:34
sridhar_ramtbh: perhaps it can be deferred until vnf create07:34
sridhar_ramtbh: yes07:34
tbhsridhar_ram, network details has to come under devices table then?07:34
tbhsridhar_ram, *deviceattributes07:35
sridhar_ramtbh: yes07:35
sridhar_ramtbh: I mean, we might need to parser the tosca and have heat create networks/subnets on vnf-creation time07:35
sridhar_ramtbh: I got to wind down.. :(07:36
tbhsridhar_ram, if heat creates the network resources then no need to store network details07:36
tbhbecause it will delete along the other stack resources07:37
sridhar_ramtbh: yep, exactly !07:37
tbhsridhar_ram, okay, will continue tomorrow, I will update the spec, with the discussion we have07:37
sridhar_ramtbh: technically we can do the same for flavor.. but vnfd is bit more optimized07:37
sridhar_ramtbh: but for glance img, vnfd is the only option07:38
sridhar_ramtbh: one quick side note before I forget, your client patchset https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248536/ looks close07:38
sridhar_ramtbh: except for couple of minor nits07:38
sridhar_ramtbh: would you mind a quick respin.. I'd like to merge it soon07:39
tbhsridhar_ram, yes it is in my todo list, I am going to update that now07:39
sridhar_ramtbh: gr8.. thanks07:39
sridhar_ramtbh: ttyl .. have a nice day07:40
tbhsridhar_ram, ttyl07:40
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC07:48
*** egonzalez has joined #tacker08:29
*** zeih has joined #tacker08:30
*** gperal has joined #tacker08:44
*** gperal has quit IRC08:49
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker08:54
*** zeih has quit IRC09:02
*** gperal has joined #tacker09:02
*** zeih has joined #tacker09:02
*** egonzalez has quit IRC09:14
*** mbound_ has joined #tacker09:49
openstackgerritbharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker: Add clients module to Tacker  https://review.openstack.org/24853609:49
*** weihan has joined #tacker10:48
*** mbound_ has quit IRC11:01
*** lhcheng_ has joined #tacker11:02
*** lhcheng has quit IRC11:03
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker11:04
*** lhcheng_ has quit IRC11:04
*** mbound_ has joined #tacker11:06
*** mbound_ has quit IRC11:27
*** igordcard has joined #tacker11:30
*** mbound_ has joined #tacker11:30
*** changzhi has quit IRC11:50
*** egonzalez has joined #tacker12:13
*** bobh has joined #tacker13:03
*** tbh has quit IRC13:04
*** igordcard has quit IRC13:06
*** bobh has quit IRC13:15
*** amotoki has joined #tacker13:34
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker13:48
*** mbound_ has quit IRC13:53
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC13:53
*** igordcard has joined #tacker13:58
*** mbound_ has joined #tacker13:58
*** igordcard_ has joined #tacker14:05
*** igordcard__ has joined #tacker14:07
*** igordcard has quit IRC14:07
*** igordcard_ has quit IRC14:08
*** igordcard_ has joined #tacker14:10
*** zeih_ has joined #tacker14:12
*** igordcard__ has quit IRC14:13
*** zeih has quit IRC14:15
*** gperal has quit IRC15:10
*** dandruta has joined #tacker15:13
*** bobh_ has joined #tacker15:23
*** zeih_ has quit IRC15:23
*** weihan has quit IRC15:30
*** zeih has joined #tacker15:33
*** gongysh has quit IRC15:34
*** egonzalez has quit IRC15:34
*** lhcheng has quit IRC15:34
*** jhan1 has quit IRC15:34
*** radez has quit IRC15:35
*** igordcard_ has quit IRC15:35
*** mbound_ has quit IRC15:35
*** mdnadeem has quit IRC15:35
*** lsp42 has quit IRC15:35
*** dmellado has quit IRC15:35
*** cgoncalves has quit IRC15:35
*** dandruta has quit IRC15:35
*** egonzalez has joined #tacker15:39
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker15:39
*** jhan1 has joined #tacker15:39
*** dmellado has joined #tacker15:40
*** cgoncalves has joined #tacker15:40
*** gongysh has joined #tacker15:42
*** dandruta has joined #tacker15:44
*** radez has joined #tacker15:44
*** zeih has quit IRC15:47
openstackgerritRico Lin proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Remove py26 support  https://review.openstack.org/25248416:04
*** zeih has joined #tacker16:04
*** zeih has quit IRC16:13
*** prashantD has joined #tacker16:16
*** amotoki has quit IRC16:18
*** lsp42 has joined #tacker16:34
*** mdnadeem has joined #tacker16:34
*** mbound_ has joined #tacker16:34
*** igordcard_ has joined #tacker16:34
*** gperal has joined #tacker16:34
*** jhan1_ has joined #tacker16:41
*** jhan1 has quit IRC16:41
*** gperal has quit IRC16:45
*** igordcard_ has quit IRC16:45
*** mbound_ has quit IRC16:45
*** mdnadeem has quit IRC16:45
*** lsp42 has quit IRC16:45
*** gperal has joined #tacker16:46
*** igordcard_ has joined #tacker16:46
*** mdnadeem has joined #tacker16:46
*** lsp42 has joined #tacker16:46
*** mbound_ has joined #tacker16:46
*** radez has quit IRC16:48
*** radez has joined #tacker16:48
openstackgerritbharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Automatic resoure creation for Tacker  https://review.openstack.org/25029117:05
*** gperal has quit IRC17:05
*** u_kozat has joined #tacker17:07
*** mbound_ has quit IRC17:17
*** egonzalez has quit IRC17:29
*** tbh has joined #tacker17:37
*** dandruta has quit IRC17:38
*** lhcheng has quit IRC17:40
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC18:33
*** vishwanathj has joined #tacker18:34
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker18:42
*** santoshk has joined #tacker18:43
*** s3wong has joined #tacker18:49
sridhar_ramtbh: ping19:03
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker19:04
*** u_kozat has quit IRC19:07
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC19:08
sridhar_ramgongysh: ping19:08
*** lhcheng has quit IRC19:09
*** sripriya has joined #tacker19:12
openstackgerritMerged openstack/python-tackerclient: Remove py26 support  https://review.openstack.org/25248419:22
*** mbound_ has joined #tacker19:28
*** mbound_ has quit IRC19:29
*** tbh has quit IRC19:42
*** igordcard_ has quit IRC19:44
*** u_kozat has joined #tacker20:07
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker20:10
*** u_kozat has quit IRC20:14
*** lhcheng_ has joined #tacker20:21
*** lhcheng has quit IRC20:24
*** lhcheng_ has quit IRC21:13
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker21:13
*** lhcheng has quit IRC21:18
sridhar_ramhi tackers - anyone else hitting "ERROR: port_security_enabled not allowed in value_specs" during vnf-create in latest master ?21:25
santoshksridhar_ram: was just hitting that error..21:33
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker21:37
*** u_kozat has joined #tacker22:11
*** u_kozat has quit IRC22:15
sridhar_ramsantoshk: thanks for the ack.. I'm checking few things22:18
*** u_kozat has joined #tacker22:36
sridhar_ramlooks "port_security_enabled" flag moved up from value_spec{} to a proper property of OS::Network::Net / OS::Network::Port22:41
sripriyasridhar_ram: link?22:46
*** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker23:01
*** bobh_ has quit IRC23:01
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC23:02
*** lhcheng has quit IRC23:21
*** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC23:23
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker23:26
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker23:29
*** sripriya has quit IRC23:33
sridhar_ramsripriya_: I suspect https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248719/ caused it ..23:53
sridhar_ramsripriya_: .. it removed a validate() method in engine/resource/openstack/neutron/port.py and now the validate() method in the parent NeutronResource is getting kicked in and that had this value_spec for a while now23:54
sridhar_ram.. I meant, the parent had this value_spec check for a while23:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!