*** yfujioka has quit IRC | 00:07 | |
*** prashantD has joined #tacker | 00:20 | |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 01:05 | |
*** trozet has joined #tacker | 01:27 | |
*** trozet has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 02:26 | |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 02:42 | |
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker | 02:44 | |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 02:47 | |
*** s3wong has quit IRC | 02:50 | |
*** oss_xzdong has joined #tacker | 02:50 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 02:54 | |
*** oss_xzdong has quit IRC | 03:02 | |
*** prashantD has quit IRC | 03:09 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 03:12 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 03:14 | |
*** trozet has joined #tacker | 03:14 | |
*** oss_xzdong has joined #tacker | 03:21 | |
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 03:35 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 03:36 | |
*** lhcheng_ has quit IRC | 03:38 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 04:04 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 04:12 | |
*** trozet has quit IRC | 04:42 | |
*** prashantD has joined #tacker | 04:46 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/tacker: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/266176 | 05:06 |
---|---|---|
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 05:10 | |
*** prashantD has quit IRC | 06:00 | |
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 06:52 | |
*** lhcheng has quit IRC | 06:54 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 07:30 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 07:32 | |
*** egonzalez90 has joined #tacker | 07:44 | |
*** egonzalez90 has quit IRC | 07:58 | |
*** egonzalez90 has joined #tacker | 08:11 | |
*** karimb has joined #tacker | 08:19 | |
openstackgerrit | zhangguoqing proposed openstack/tacker: Keep py3.X compatibility for urllib https://review.openstack.org/266242 | 08:28 |
*** egonzalez90 has quit IRC | 08:38 | |
openstackgerrit | zhangguoqing proposed openstack/tacker: Keep py3.X compatibility for urllib https://review.openstack.org/266242 | 08:38 |
*** zeih has joined #tacker | 08:46 | |
*** kluka_ has joined #tacker | 08:48 | |
*** mbound has joined #tacker | 09:01 | |
*** karimb has quit IRC | 09:02 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 09:05 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 09:07 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 09:07 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 09:17 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 09:18 | |
*** karimb has joined #tacker | 09:27 | |
*** oss_xzdong has quit IRC | 09:33 | |
*** vishwana_ has joined #tacker | 09:54 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 09:55 | |
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC | 09:56 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 09:59 | |
*** oss_xzdong has joined #tacker | 10:56 | |
*** oss_xzdong has left #tacker | 10:57 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 11:17 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 11:18 | |
*** zeih has quit IRC | 11:21 | |
*** zeih has joined #tacker | 11:38 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 11:44 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 11:46 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 11:50 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 12:02 | |
openstackgerrit | Martin Oemke proposed openstack/tacker: Fix E713 and F811 errors in tacker code https://review.openstack.org/264749 | 13:12 |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 13:25 | |
*** karimb has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
*** dandruta has joined #tacker | 14:03 | |
*** karimb has joined #tacker | 14:05 | |
*** trozet has joined #tacker | 14:18 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 14:20 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 14:21 | |
*** karimb_ has joined #tacker | 14:35 | |
*** karimb_ has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
*** karimb has quit IRC | 14:38 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 14:40 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 14:47 | |
*** zeih_ has joined #tacker | 14:48 | |
*** zeih has quit IRC | 14:48 | |
*** ahelkhou has joined #tacker | 15:20 | |
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 15:22 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 15:27 | |
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 16:03 | |
*** dandruta has quit IRC | 16:14 | |
*** egonzalez has joined #tacker | 16:22 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 16:26 | |
openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Automatic resource creation for Tacker https://review.openstack.org/250291 | 16:26 |
*** lhcheng has quit IRC | 16:34 | |
*** egonzalez has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 16:46 | |
*** brucet has joined #tacker | 16:59 | |
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 17:02 | |
*** mbound has quit IRC | 17:41 | |
*** zeih_ has quit IRC | 17:42 | |
*** prashantD has joined #tacker | 17:59 | |
*** zeih has joined #tacker | 18:00 | |
*** brucet has quit IRC | 18:02 | |
*** zeih has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 18:05 | |
vishwana_ | tbh hI | 18:15 |
tbh | vishwana_, hey | 18:15 |
vishwana_ | tbh, pardon my ignorance, I am trying to understand the issues/challenges with image check or upload at VNF creation.... | 18:16 |
vishwana_ | I am thinking that glance api's can be used to check if an image is uploaded and already available OR it can be used to upload from the URL if its not already available at VNF creation | 18:18 |
vishwana_ | what are the shortcomings with the above approach? | 18:18 |
tbh | vishwana_, but using what parameters we can check the validity of the image? | 18:19 |
vishwana_ | Oh, I see | 18:20 |
tbh | vishwana_, we can totally rely on the image name and UUID | 18:20 |
tbh | vishwana_, because we may have same details existed but may not belongs to same VNFD | 18:21 |
tbh | *can't | 18:21 |
* vishwana_ thinking | 18:22 | |
vishwana_ | tbh, tell me if the below scenario is possible and if my thinking is right .... | 18:25 |
tbh | sure | 18:26 |
vishwana_ | VNFD A refers to image X, Y and Z | 18:26 |
vishwana_ | VNFD B refers to images V, W, X, Y and Z | 18:26 |
vishwana_ | Will glance have 1 copy of image V and W, and 2 copies of images related to X, Y and Z | 18:27 |
*** zeih has joined #tacker | 18:27 | |
vishwana_ | tbh, you there? | 18:28 |
tbh | vishwana_, am not sure, it really checks for image uniqueness, it will two entries for X, Y and Z | 18:29 |
tbh | vishwana_, * it will have two entries for each X | 18:30 |
tbh | vishwana_, and I feel it also depends on backend we are using for glance | 18:30 |
*** zeih has quit IRC | 18:32 | |
tbh | vishwana_, checking that now | 18:34 |
vishwana_ | tbh, what is the advantage gained by processing image creation at VNFD instead of VNF create? | 18:35 |
vishwana_ | tbh, I created 2 images from horizon with exactly same name and URL successfully | 18:35 |
tbh | vishwana_, one image per VNF(one VDU case) | 18:36 |
tbh | vishwana_, we can create images, I am just looking into how glance is storing it, do we have two copies of same images or soft link kind of stuff | 18:37 |
vishwana_ | tbh, so if a VNF has multiple VDUs referring the same image, we want to download and create a single image instead of downloading and creating multiple images, rgith? | 18:37 |
tbh | vishwana_, yes | 18:38 |
vishwana_ | tbh, am wondering if it can still be done at VNF creation time by parsing the VDU images in the VNFD template and creating a single OS::Glance::Image resource? | 18:41 |
vishwana_ | creating a single resource for the duplicates if any found | 18:42 |
vishwana_ | tbh, I may not be making sense, please feel free to disagree | 18:42 |
tbh | vishwana_, we can do that, but for the next time when we are creating the VNF how will we process the image? | 18:43 |
tbh | off the topic | 18:44 |
tbh | vishwana_, sripriya_ bobh can you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265582/ ... new UI page for VNFD | 18:44 |
vishwana_ | You mean the second instantiation of the same VNFD template? | 18:44 |
tbh | vishwana_, yes | 18:44 |
vishwana_ | good point | 18:46 |
vishwana_ | tbh, for any horizon patch sets, please add lhcheng as well to the review....he is one of the OpenStack Horizon Cores that has agreed to help us with tacker-horizon reviews | 18:47 |
tbh | vishwana_, oh I am not aware of it, thanks for letting me know | 18:48 |
tbh | lhcheng, I pushed a new patchset https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265582/, can you please review it? | 18:49 |
vishwana_ | tbh no problem, thanks for also taking up tacker-horizon bugs | 18:49 |
tbh | sure | 18:49 |
tbh | it was in my task list from so many days | 18:49 |
lhcheng | tbh: sure, just add me in the reviewer | 18:49 |
sripriya_ | tbh: ack for review | 18:49 |
tbh | lhcheng, sure thanks | 18:50 |
tbh | sripriya_, thanks | 18:50 |
vishwana_ | lhcheng, I just added you as a reviewer since tbh does not know that "lin hua cheng" is you | 18:50 |
tbh | vishwana_, :) | 18:51 |
vishwana_ | tbh, is your plan to associate all unique VDU image uuids with the VNFD after the image creation? | 18:53 |
tbh | vishwana_, correct | 18:54 |
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC | 18:54 | |
vishwana_ | tbh, thanks for the informative discussion | 18:57 |
tbh | vishwana_, :) it all improves the quality of the spec | 18:59 |
vishwana_ | tbh definitely tells me that you have thought through a variety of scenarios | 18:59 |
vishwana_ | tbh I will probably have another discussion with you to understand why we need a state to be assigned to a VNFD template...I know its past mid nite for you now | 19:00 |
tbh | vishwana_, sure, | 19:02 |
tbh | vishwana_, http://ibin.co/2TEVxUDsVu27 | 19:04 |
tbh | vishwana_, glance is storing multiple copies of same image | 19:04 |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 19:08 | |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 19:20 | |
sripriya | bobh: quick one for review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266176/ | 19:23 |
bobh | sripriya: done | 19:24 |
sripriya | bobh: thanks | 19:24 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tacker: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/266176 | 21:20 |
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker | 21:34 | |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 22:15 | |
*** ahelkhou has quit IRC | 22:24 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 22:25 | |
*** ahelkhou has joined #tacker | 22:26 | |
*** ahelkhou has quit IRC | 23:14 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!