Wednesday, 2016-03-02

*** arturt_ has quit IRC00:00
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC00:06
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker00:09
openstackgerritYuuichi Fujioka proposed openstack/tacker: Fix to don't enable some neutron services  https://review.openstack.org/28292300:37
*** prashantD has joined #tacker00:38
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker00:39
*** bobh has joined #tacker00:41
*** bobh has quit IRC00:43
*** uck_ has quit IRC00:57
*** ksantoshk has quit IRC01:09
*** arturt_ has quit IRC01:14
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker01:23
*** bobh has joined #tacker01:29
sridhar_rams3wong: bobh: hi folks - can you please review this cherrypick https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285587/01:33
bobhsridhar_ram: I'll look at it tonight01:34
s3wongsridhar_ram, bobh: does that mean I can't merge it before :-)  ?  (it already has a +2)  :-)01:34
bobhs3wong: all yours :-)01:35
s3wong:-)01:35
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC01:40
*** sripriya has quit IRC01:49
*** gongysh has joined #tacker01:51
*** sripriya has joined #tacker02:39
*** arturt_ has quit IRC02:42
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker02:52
gongyshsridhar_ram, hi02:53
sridhar_ramgongysh: hi !02:54
gongyshsridhar_ram, I am thinking about the tosca support in tacker.02:54
gongyshsridhar_ram, in fact, long ago, IBM guys tried to implement it in heat.02:54
sridhar_ramgongysh: they are still involved in tosca-parser & heat-translator projects02:55
gongyshsridhar_ram, so it seems tacker is just another API for heat.  heat currently has heat-api, heat cloud format api.02:56
gongyshsridhar_ram,  so if it is implemented in heat, heat should have heat-tosca-api.02:56
sridhar_ramheat is just resource orchestrator... TOSCA is one level higher, it has overall life cycle which doesn't belong in heat02:59
openstackgerritBob Haddleton proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Spec for tosca-parser/heat-translator integration  https://review.openstack.org/27547503:01
sridhar_ramHeat models various openstack resources in HOT. TOSCA models network services and fwiw it could Orchestrate even whatever underlying cloud - even beyond OpenStack - say AWS.03:02
*** lhcheng has quit IRC03:02
* sridhar_ram is stepping away, will check back later03:04
*** prashantD has quit IRC03:05
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker03:18
*** bobh has quit IRC03:19
*** s3wong has quit IRC03:37
*** lhcheng_ has joined #tacker03:41
*** arturt_ has quit IRC03:59
*** tbh has joined #tacker04:08
tbhsripriya, Hi04:08
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker04:09
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker04:09
*** sripriya has quit IRC04:10
*** arturt_ has quit IRC04:13
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker04:14
*** yfujioka has joined #tacker04:17
*** tbh has quit IRC04:20
openstackgerritYuuichi Fujioka proposed openstack/tacker: Fix to don't enable some neutron services  https://review.openstack.org/28292304:26
*** lhcheng_ has quit IRC04:29
*** arturt_ has quit IRC04:46
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker04:50
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker04:52
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Enhanced VNF placements blue print  https://review.openstack.org/25784705:02
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Enhanced VNF placements blue print  https://review.openstack.org/25784705:04
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Enhanced VNF placements blue print  https://review.openstack.org/25784705:06
*** amotoki has joined #tacker05:16
*** arturt_ has quit IRC05:17
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker05:18
*** arturt_ has quit IRC05:26
*** yfujioka has quit IRC05:32
*** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker05:34
*** tbh has joined #tacker05:47
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC05:54
sridhar_ram1tbh: gongysh: ping06:08
tbhsridhar_ram1, Hi06:08
sridhar_ram1tbh: gongysh: do you've few mins for a quick sync up on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250291 ?06:08
sridhar_ram1I'd like to converge soon as we don't have much time...06:09
tbhsridhar_ram1, looking into gongysh  comments06:09
sridhar_ram1tbh: sure06:09
tbhsridhar_ram1,   I believe we are  not considering the  metadata for flavor/image in this spec06:12
sridhar_ram1tbh: gongysh: is this essential for glance image handling ? it doesn't look sound like to me06:13
tbhsridhar_ram1, I agree, because we are creating the images using HOT, and giving metadata like distribution of OS is not needed I believe06:15
tbhgongysh,  ^^06:16
sridhar_ram1tbh: one thing you may want to explicitly state - actually acknowledge - images will be uploaded as part of VNF instantiation and deleted with VNF deletion. This feature is not applicable for use-case were a VNF will be instantiated 100s of times.06:16
tbhsridhar_ram1, this feature, you mean supporting metadata?06:18
sridhar_ram1no, gongysh also had a concern about image size06:18
tbhsridhar_ram1, Ok, but if we use HOT to upload images, we can have same images uploaded multiple times06:19
sridhar_ram1tbh: yes, that is of course a concern but other options are even more complicated and convoluted06:21
sridhar_ram1gongysh: you there ?06:21
tbhsridhar_ram1, yeah, so that's why for a quick start we opted this option and modify this feature based on issues we will face06:22
sridhar_ram1tbh: yes, there is always the other - pre-upload to glance and use the glance image name option is always available06:24
sridhar_ram1tbh: future iterations of this can consider to push hardcorded URLs in VNFD creation time.. that is for later06:24
*** gongysh has quit IRC06:24
tbhsridhar_ram1, yes06:25
sridhar_ram1tbh: can you please respond to gongysh with these points.. I've a minor nit, btw06:25
tbhsridhar_ram1, gongysh left the channel06:25
tbhsure sridhar_ram106:25
sridhar_ram1yeah, respond in the gerritt review06:25
*** gongysh has joined #tacker06:26
tbhsridhar_ram1, let me know your nit too06:26
gongyshtbh, sridhar_ram1 hi, I was on meeting just now.06:26
sridhar_ram1gongysh: hi there.. np!06:26
gongyshtbh, sridhar_ram1 metadata of image and flavor is important for nova scheduling06:27
sridhar_ram1gongysh: will give few mins to catchup !06:27
gongyshtbh, sridhar_ram1 another concern is the size and variety of image.06:27
gongyshtbh, sridhar_ram1, but it is not big one.06:28
gongyshtbh, sridhar_ram1 user can choose.06:28
sridhar_ram1gongysh: exactly..06:28
sridhar_ram1gongysh: lets discuss the flavor metadata -06:29
sridhar_ram1are you referring to extra_specs ?06:29
gongyshsridhar_ram1,  it should be06:29
sridhar_ram1but extra-specs are taken care in the EPA spec.. the one you and vishwanathj are working ..06:30
sridhar_ram1that is out for scope for tbh's spec06:30
gongyshsridhar_ram1,  if you think it is, we can make EPA spec to depend on it. and let EPA do it.06:30
sridhar_ram1gongysh: that was my understanding ...06:31
gongyshsridhar_ram1, then I am ok with the this spec.06:31
sridhar_ram1how about glance metadata ?06:31
gongyshsridhar_ram1, yes, I have the feeling to make EPA to depend on the auto spec.06:31
sridhar_ram1gongysh: make sense .. mark it in the launchpad06:32
gongyshsridhar_ram1,  for glance metadata, we can do the same thing, make other spec which needs this feature to do it.06:32
*** amotoki has quit IRC06:33
vishwanathjwould appreciate if someone reviewed the log http://logs.openstack.org/47/257847/10/check/gate-tacker-specs-docs/732295c/console.html and tell me what is the unexpected indentation in line 156 for patchset https://review.openstack.org/25784706:33
* sridhar_ram1 looking up EVP spec for glance metadata06:33
*** amotoki has joined #tacker06:34
gongyshvishwanathj, I am checking06:34
sridhar_ram1gongysh: give me an example of glance metadata needed for EPA spec ?06:34
*** amotoki has quit IRC06:36
gongyshsridhar_ram1,  I am wondering if we will use it in EPA06:36
sridhar_ram1gongysh: yeah, I thought nova flavor extra_specs should cover all of them06:37
sridhar_ram1tbh: just pushed the minor comment..06:39
sridhar_ram1tbh: can you fix it now (if possible) ?06:40
tbhsridhar_ram1, yes updating now..06:41
*** zeih has joined #tacker06:47
gongyshsridhar_ram1,  is https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tacker on?06:48
sridhar_ram1gongysh: sorry I didn't get the question .. that link is our official wiki and it is quite dated and badly needs to be fixed up :(06:52
gongyshsridhar_ram1, ok, got it.06:53
sridhar_ram1zeih: howdy! we made it into big tent :)06:53
*** sridhar_ram1 is now known as sridhar_ram06:54
zeihsridhar_ram: yeah!! :)06:54
zeihsridhar_ram: good morning :)06:54
openstackgerritbharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Automatic resource creation for Tacker  https://review.openstack.org/25029106:54
zeihI will have a look into the meeting logs06:54
sridhar_ramzeih: good morning ! it had a thrilling finish !06:55
zeihsridhar_ram: I can imagine06:55
tbhsridhar_ram1, that's a good news!06:56
sridhar_ramtbh: sorry, I some how that you caught up w/ that news!06:57
tbhsridhar_ram, oh I just came to know06:58
sridhar_ramthe project had a good standing w.r.t diversity and our open culture.... thanks for this amazing community06:58
sridhar_ram*thanks to06:58
sridhar_ramtbh: just +2'd your spec.. please reach out to bobh for the 2nd +206:59
tbhsridhar_ram, sure06:59
sridhar_ramtbh: we are all now official ATCs !07:00
tbhsridhar_ram, yeah!07:00
* sripriya_ notes an acronym ;) 07:01
zeih;)07:01
*** tbh_ has joined #tacker07:02
*** AndChat-16256 has joined #tacker07:03
gongyshsridhar_ram,  *official * happens 10 hours ago. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276417/07:04
gongyshsridhar_ram, right?07:04
sridhar_ramgongysh: yep07:04
gongyshsridhar_ram,  congrats!07:05
gongyshsridhar_ram,  I will let our marketing dept promote this message.07:05
sridhar_ramgongysh: thanks! this is a huge milestone.. we came a long way in the last 8 - 10months07:05
gongyshsridhar_ram, about the deprecation, I think our current process is not odd. or not consistent with other projects.07:06
sridhar_ramgongysh: you are good w/ this one as a one off ?07:07
*** tbh_ has quit IRC07:07
gongyshsridhar_ram,  deprecate  it in the trunk, and then we can remove it in one release away07:07
zeihsridhar_ram: Can you send a announcement to openstack dev and operators ML regarding Bit Tent?07:09
sridhar_ramgongysh: as I explained this was an API that was a left over from servicevm days and it is infact seems to be broken07:09
sridhar_ramgongysh: there is no point in maintaining it, even in deprecated state, in Mitaka...07:10
gongyshsridhar_ram, then that is not deprecation, it is just "removing" the broken codes.07:10
sridhar_ramgongysh:  frankly we could've very well did that.. just that we are doing this with a bit of a caution..07:11
sripriya_vishwanathj: can you put the spec in etherpad or a pastelink . i can try to look at the error07:11
zeihsridhar_ram: gongysh: we should get rid of all servicevm code.. it is confusing and not needed anymore. therefore we should not follow standard deprecation policys07:11
sridhar_ramgongysh: also it serves as a deprecation dry run ;-)07:11
sridhar_ramzeih: ++07:12
sridhar_ramnext thing in the chopping block is tacker/openstack/common07:12
vishwanathjhttp://paste.openstack.org/show/488905/07:12
sridhar_ramwe need to migrate to oslo07:12
zeihsridhar_ram: +107:12
*** amotoki has joined #tacker07:14
sripriya_vishwanathj: did you try putting them in code blocks?07:15
sripriya_starts with a ::07:16
zeihDo someone know how to get an article on http://superuser.openstack.org/ regarding Bit Tent?07:17
gongyshvishwanathj, I think so07:17
gongyshvishwanathj, just like the way we do it in https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/doc/source/install/getting_started.rst07:20
vishwanathjHowever, I am curious as to what's the identation issue in the log07:21
sridhar_ramzeih: reach out to Kathy Cacciatore <kathyc@openstack.org> in the OpenStack Foundation Marketing team07:22
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Enhanced VNF placements blue print  https://review.openstack.org/25784707:31
*** amotoki has quit IRC07:35
sridhar_ramgongysh: any further thoughts on device deprecation ?07:36
*** lhcheng_ has joined #tacker07:37
*** lhcheng has quit IRC07:37
*** vishwanathj is now known as vishwanathj_zzz07:38
*** lhcheng_ has quit IRC07:42
*** amotoki has joined #tacker07:43
gongyshsridhar_ram,  can we write a bug or bp on it, and assign one to coordinate it?07:45
sridhar_ramgongysh: hmm.. for which issue ?07:46
gongyshvishwanathj_zzz, do u have the time to format the EVP bp with code block? if not, I can do it.07:46
gongyshsridhar_ram, about the device API, the device client, the device code07:47
*** amotoki has quit IRC07:48
sridhar_ramgongysh: there was a bug opened sometime back for this https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/154339307:48
openstackLaunchpad bug 1543393 in tacker "Deprecate and remove device API and CLI from Tacker" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to dharmendra (dharmendra-kushwaha)07:48
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Enhanced VNF placements blue print  https://review.openstack.org/25784707:48
vishwanathj_zzzgongysh I have made one more attempt to fix the issue, if it does not work, would appreciate if you can format...thanks for the offer of help07:49
gongyshsridhar_ram, that seems good.07:50
gongyshvishwanathj_zzz, great. wait for the result.07:50
dkushwahasridhar_ram, hi. Is there any  RFE bug created to display runtime VNF instance details in Horizon GUI?07:51
sridhar_ramdkushwaha: not yet.. it is in my backlog07:51
*** AndChat-16256 has quit IRC07:52
dkushwahasridhar_ram, Can you please let me know, what informations are required to display.07:53
sridhar_ramgongysh: we are in a odd situation where the device deprecation on the client side already merged earlier today - https://review.openstack.org/28005507:53
sridhar_ramgongysh: we really need to just proceed w/ the server side deprecation changes07:54
sridhar_ramdkushwaha: let me take couple of mins to write one up... it really needs some discussion which we can have in launchpad07:55
dkushwahasridhar_ram, ok, Thanks.07:55
gongyshsridhar_ram, on master,  I think we can just remove the device related codes since we deprecate it in liberty. what is your idea?07:55
sridhar_ramgongysh: exactly .. dkushwaha has couple of patchsets lined up already for that..07:56
* sridhar_ram looking them up07:56
sridhar_ramhttps://review.openstack.org/279382 (tackerclient) and https://review.openstack.org/283414 (for the server)07:57
dkushwahasridhar_ram, gongysh kindly review these ^ patches too.08:00
vishwanathj_zzzgongysh FYI jenkins passed for the EVP patch set08:03
gongyshvishwanathj_zzz, great08:03
sridhar_ramdkushwaha: just created https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/1552122 for VNF runtime details in Horizon..08:05
openstackLaunchpad bug 1552122 in tacker "Display VNF instance details in Tacker Horizon GUI" [Undecided,New]08:05
sridhar_ramdkushwaha: it is just a starter btw, I'm bit fried as it is quite late here..08:06
gongyshsridhar_ram,  you should take a coffe or go to bed now.08:06
sridhar_ramvishwanathj_zzz: do you've a clone of yourself working this late at night (2AM ?)08:06
sridhar_ramgongysh: prefer the bed option :)08:07
vishwanathj_zzzI am looking forward to the spring break time off and catch up on some sleep08:07
sridhar_ramI think our friend vishwanathj_zzz is actually "sleep working" ;-)08:07
vishwanathj_zzzI am on PTO march 14, march 17, 18th...hipefully that will be a good break08:08
sridhar_ramvishwanathj_zzz: yeah, classic cramming before the big event...08:08
* sridhar_ram signing off for the evening08:08
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC08:10
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker08:18
*** lhcheng_ has joined #tacker08:31
*** lhcheng has quit IRC08:35
*** lhcheng_ has quit IRC08:35
*** mbound has joined #tacker08:42
*** vishwanathj_zzz has quit IRC09:03
*** zeih has quit IRC09:04
gongyshsripriya_, hi09:04
*** gongysh has quit IRC09:21
*** tbh has quit IRC09:51
*** tbh has joined #tacker10:04
*** amotoki has joined #tacker10:18
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker10:23
*** lhcheng has quit IRC10:29
*** tbh has quit IRC11:05
*** tbh has joined #tacker11:17
*** mbound has quit IRC11:41
*** mbound has joined #tacker12:19
*** psousa has joined #tacker12:23
psousahi all,12:24
psousacan anybody tell me if tacker supports service function chaining and how this can be done? thanks12:24
*** tbh has quit IRC12:35
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker12:37
*** lhcheng has quit IRC12:41
*** bobh has joined #tacker13:05
*** bobh has quit IRC13:08
*** dkushwaha_ has joined #tacker13:20
*** Liuqing has joined #tacker13:47
LiuqingHELLO,13:48
Liuqingis this openstack tacker irc channel?13:49
openstackgerritLiuqing Jing proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Remove deprecated models.py  https://review.openstack.org/28719813:54
openstackgerritLiuqing Jing proposed openstack/tacker: Change the mode of devstack plugin.sh  https://review.openstack.org/28722014:19
*** bobh has joined #tacker14:29
openstackgerritLiuqing Jing proposed openstack/tacker: Update DevStack REAMDE  https://review.openstack.org/28722814:29
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #tacker14:33
*** Liuqing has quit IRC14:44
*** bobh has quit IRC14:53
*** trozet has joined #tacker14:56
*** gongysh has joined #tacker14:58
*** vishwanathj_zzz has joined #tacker15:26
*** vishwanathj_zzz is now known as vishwanathj15:27
*** vishwana_ has joined #tacker15:29
*** vishwana_ is now known as vishwanathj_15:31
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC15:31
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker15:39
*** arturt_ has quit IRC15:42
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker15:49
openstackgerritgongysh proposed openstack/tacker: Remove neutron agents codes  https://review.openstack.org/25573715:54
*** leecalcote has joined #tacker15:55
*** dkushwaha_ has quit IRC15:56
*** gongysh has quit IRC15:56
*** mbound has quit IRC16:15
*** mbound has joined #tacker16:15
*** dkushwaha_ has joined #tacker16:20
*** dkushwaha_ has quit IRC16:26
*** gongysh has joined #tacker16:28
*** tbh has joined #tacker16:28
*** dkushwaha_ has joined #tacker16:30
*** tbh has quit IRC16:49
*** uck has joined #tacker16:54
*** arturt_ has quit IRC16:58
*** prashantD has joined #tacker17:03
*** bobh has joined #tacker17:08
*** bobh has quit IRC17:10
*** tbh has joined #tacker17:24
*** leecalcote has quit IRC17:25
*** Ravikiran_K has left #tacker17:36
*** mbound has quit IRC17:44
*** tbh has quit IRC17:52
*** gongysh has quit IRC17:55
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker18:12
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC18:15
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker18:17
sridhar_ramhowdy tackers! we starting this new day as a big tent project team... #ex ited18:23
sridhar_ram#excited18:23
*** bobh has joined #tacker18:24
*** leecalcote has joined #tacker18:25
*** leecalcote has quit IRC18:35
*** leecalcote has joined #tacker18:35
openstackgerritdharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Code clean-up in client.py  https://review.openstack.org/28737418:36
*** bobh has quit IRC18:38
*** leecalcote has quit IRC18:48
*** sripriya has joined #tacker18:54
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker18:58
*** leecalcote has joined #tacker18:59
*** sripriya has quit IRC19:01
*** s3wong has joined #tacker19:11
*** bobh has joined #tacker19:12
vishwanathj_bobh sridhar_ram would appreciate your review of https://review.openstack.org/25784719:22
*** psousa has quit IRC19:23
*** leecalcote has quit IRC19:27
sridhar_ramvishwanathj_: sure19:39
sridhar_rambobh: here is one before vishwanathj_'s in the food chain - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250291/19:40
sridhar_rambobh: tbh's auto-resource creation...19:40
bobhsridhar_ram: ok, I'll put them in the queue - probably won't get to it until tonight19:51
bobhsridhar_ram: the tosca-parser/heat-translator spec is updated19:51
sridhar_rambobh: did an initial pass of tosca-parser, nothing specific popped up.. will finish later today19:52
bobhsridhar_ram: thanks.  0.4.0 heat-translator has been tagged so I need to add it to global infra so we can use it and then I should have a new patchset to try19:53
sridhar_rambobh: cool..19:53
*** zeih has joined #tacker20:00
*** sripriya__ has joined #tacker20:17
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC20:20
*** bobh has quit IRC20:40
*** sripriya__ has quit IRC20:41
*** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker21:01
*** mbound has joined #tacker21:02
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC21:03
*** sripriya has joined #tacker21:27
*** mbound has quit IRC21:30
*** mbound has joined #tacker21:31
*** trozet has quit IRC21:36
*** trozet has joined #tacker21:46
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker22:02
*** sripriya has quit IRC22:04
*** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC22:05
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker22:06
*** zeih has quit IRC22:09
*** trozet has quit IRC22:45
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC22:53
*** mbound has quit IRC22:56
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC22:58
*** sripriya has joined #tacker23:00
*** zeih has joined #tacker23:09
openstackgerritYuuichi Fujioka proposed openstack/tacker: Fix to don't enable some neutron services  https://review.openstack.org/28292323:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!