Thursday, 2016-04-21

« Wednesday, 2016-04-20 Index Friday, 2016-04-22 »
*** bobh has joined #tacker00:01
*** bobh has quit IRC00:04
sridhar_rams3wong: sripriya: please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/299737/ to unblock tacker hands on demo folks. Thanks00:06
*** bobh has joined #tacker00:07
*** bobh has quit IRC00:11
*** bobh has joined #tacker00:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack/tacker: Fix monitoring of TOSCA VNFDs  https://review.openstack.org/29973700:29
*** bobh has quit IRC00:32
*** s3wong_ has joined #tacker00:36
*** bobh has joined #tacker00:38
*** s3wong has quit IRC00:39
*** sripriya has quit IRC00:39
*** bobh has quit IRC00:43
*** s3wong_ is now known as s3wong00:53
*** bobh has joined #tacker01:01
*** bobh has quit IRC01:15
*** gongysh has joined #tacker01:18
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker: Apply vcpu and memory definitions to numa node for a VM  https://review.openstack.org/30663501:18
*** uck has quit IRC01:30
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC01:41
*** gongysh has quit IRC01:46
openstackgerritTin Lam proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Fix deprecation warning in tackerclient  https://review.openstack.org/30665601:53
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:00
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC02:00
*** gongysh has joined #tacker02:19
vishwanathjgongysh hi...working on the slides, will send out by Friday Close Of Business02:38
*** bobh has joined #tacker02:40
vishwanathjgongysh see my response to your comment https://review.openstack.org/#/c/306635/1/tacker/vm/tosca/utils.py02:41
vishwanathjneed your +1 for the patch to get merged02:41
*** lhcheng has quit IRC02:50
*** bobh has quit IRC03:02
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker03:09
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC03:09
*** bobh has joined #tacker03:10
*** bobh has quit IRC03:10
*** gongysh has quit IRC03:23
*** gongysh has joined #tacker03:25
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker03:30
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker03:32
*** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker03:34
gongyshvishwanathj, hi03:34
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC03:36
*** amotoki has joined #tacker03:42
vishwanathjgongysh hi03:52
vishwanathjgongysh I responded to your comment, we have captured the behavior in the EVP spec....I am sick, maybe will respond only in the morning my time03:54
gongyshvishwanathj, sorry to hear that.03:55
gongyshvishwanathj, do u have time to update the tacker topic ppt?03:55
vishwanathjgongysh you caught me at the right time, let me send you an updated work in progress slide by Friday morning, I need to capture either screen shots or video for the EVP features03:56
gongyshvishwanathj,  you are strong,  will be get over soon.03:57
vishwanathjgongysh thanks, dont worry about the slide deck, it will be ready and in good shape03:58
*** vishwanathj is now known as vishwanathj_zzz03:59
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:01
*** amotoki has joined #tacker04:11
dkushwahalhcheng, hi04:36
dkushwahalhcheng, issue resolved by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308329/1/tacker_horizon/openstack_dashboard/dashboards/nfv/vnfmanager/tables.py04:37
lhchengdkushwaha: great04:38
lhchengcan that line just go to line 139?04:38
dkushwahalhcheng, yes. It seems error raised by api.tacker.get_vnf was deffer04:40
lhchengdkushwaha: good job pinpointing the problem04:43
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker04:50
*** sripriya has joined #tacker04:52
*** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC04:52
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker04:54
*** lhcheng_ has joined #tacker05:23
*** lhcheng has quit IRC05:26
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker05:36
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC05:37
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker05:44
*** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker05:50
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC05:50
sridhar_ram1gongysh: ping05:52
sridhar_ram1gongysh: why was python-tackerclient tarball was added to test-requirements.txt in your recent patchset .. ? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295089/8/test-requirements.txt05:53
openstackgerritSridhar Ramaswamy proposed openstack/tacker: Ignore: Test to test tackerclient deprecation warning fix  https://review.openstack.org/30750505:55
openstackgerritSridhar Ramaswamy proposed openstack/tacker: Cleanup and fix Tacker coverage  https://review.openstack.org/30849706:08
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker06:25
*** lhcheng_ has quit IRC06:29
*** janki has joined #tacker07:16
jankiHi, I am installing Tacker mitaka using Devstack07:17
jankiDevstack fails with below error07:17
jankiInvalid command u'vim-register --name'07:17
jankiI wasnot facing this issue last week07:18
jankiHaven't changed any settings or the conf file07:18
*** zeih has joined #tacker07:21
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC07:22
*** sripriya has quit IRC07:22
sridhar_ram1janki: is this using master or stable/mitaka ?07:49
*** mbound has joined #tacker08:09
*** mbound has quit IRC08:09
*** mbound has joined #tacker08:10
sridhar_ram1gongysh: you there ?08:20
*** lhcheng has quit IRC08:26
jankisridhar_ram1: it is using Mitaka08:32
gongyshsridhar_ram1, hi08:35
sridhar_ram1gongysh: I had a question on recent test-requirements.txt change...08:35
sridhar_ram1gongysh: why was python-tackerclient tarball was added to test-requirements.txt in your recent patchset .. ? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295089/8/test-requirements.txt08:35
sridhar_ram1janki: can you check if proper version of tackerclient is installed ... vim-register is a mitaka feature and if by mistake you used an earlier client it would fail08:37
gongyshsridhar_ram1, we need it to run functional test, don't we?08:37
gongyshsridhar_ram1, https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/tacker/tests/functional/base.py#L2308:38
sridhar_ram1gongysh: today tacker devstack plugin installs tackerclient directly from git08:38
sridhar_ram1gongysh: using LIBS_FROM_GIT08:38
sridhar_ram1so no need to explicitly do this tarball install08:39
jankisridhar_ram1: client is master, server is mitaka08:39
jankisridhar_ram1: Devstack always installs master cleint no matter the server version is specified. This is what I have observered in other projects too08:40
sridhar_ram1that doesn't make sense08:42
sridhar_ram1ideally we will install clients off pypi and we will do that soon for tacker08:43
sridhar_ram1this tarball install is creating problems in verifying tackerclient patches using Depends-On .. see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/307505/08:43
jankisridhar_ram1: what could be the possible workaround/solution?08:46
sridhar_ram1janki: that sounds like a testbed sanity issue to me.. try (after saving your work) a clean_stack and stack up again08:48
jankisridhar_ram: sure will do08:49
gongyshsridhar_ram1, en, we need a way to do this.08:59
sridhar_ram1gongysh: meanwhile, can we remove the tarball from test-requirements.txt ?09:00
gongyshsridhar_ram1, if you are sure the devstack will install it, we can do this09:01
sridhar_ram1gongysh: quite sure, that's how dsvm func gate is been working so far09:01
gongyshsridhar_ram1, we remove it09:02
*** amotoki has quit IRC09:02
*** zeih has quit IRC09:06
openstackgerritSridhar Ramaswamy proposed openstack/tacker: Disable nova quota for dsvm functional test  https://review.openstack.org/30885409:11
sridhar_ram1gongysh: meanwhile, I pushed this ^^^ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308854/ for dsvm func gate hitting VM max. Please review if you've sometime09:12
gongyshsridhar_ram1, wait for the ci test result09:13
*** zeih has joined #tacker09:13
sridhar_ram1gongysh: will check back later.. signing off09:14
dkushwahagongysh, hi09:14
gongyshdkushwaha, hi09:14
dkushwahagongysh, I have putted a comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291032/409:15
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker09:15
dkushwahagongysh, although, it was for sripriya, but can you please confirm the same.09:16
gongyshdkushwaha, ok09:17
dkushwahagongysh, thanks09:18
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC09:18
*** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC09:19
*** zeih has quit IRC09:23
*** zeih has joined #tacker09:35
gongyshvishnoianil, hi09:35
*** zeih has quit IRC09:45
*** amotoki has joined #tacker09:59
*** zeih has joined #tacker10:08
*** zeih has quit IRC10:25
*** mbound has quit IRC10:56
*** mbound has joined #tacker10:57
*** zeih has joined #tacker11:02
*** amotoki has quit IRC11:07
*** bobh has joined #tacker11:28
*** bobh has quit IRC11:29
*** janki has quit IRC11:36
*** amotoki has joined #tacker11:58
*** amotoki_ has joined #tacker12:09
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:11
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC12:11
*** amotoki has joined #tacker12:21
*** gongysh has quit IRC12:39
*** gongysh_ has joined #tacker12:39
*** gongysh has joined #tacker12:42
*** zeih has quit IRC12:45
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:52
*** zeih has joined #tacker12:53
*** gongysh has quit IRC12:56
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC13:01
*** amotoki has joined #tacker13:16
*** gongysh_ has joined #tacker13:18
*** lrensing has joined #tacker13:34
*** uck has joined #tacker13:58
*** bobh has joined #tacker14:02
*** gongysh has joined #tacker14:13
*** mageshgv has joined #tacker14:21
*** uck has quit IRC14:56
*** zeih has quit IRC15:30
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC15:48
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker15:49
gongyshvishnoianil, hi15:54
*** uck has joined #tacker16:06
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker: Apply vcpu and memory definitions to numa node for a VM  https://review.openstack.org/30663516:09
*** vishwanathj_zzz is now known as vishwanathj16:10
*** prashantD has joined #tacker16:12
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker: Adds sample TOSCA VNFDs for EVP features  https://review.openstack.org/30624116:12
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker16:12
*** lhcheng has quit IRC16:13
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker16:13
*** mbound has quit IRC16:35
*** uck_ has joined #tacker16:50
*** uck has quit IRC16:51
*** uck has joined #tacker17:03
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker17:03
*** igordcar1 has joined #tacker17:03
*** uck_ has quit IRC17:04
*** igordcard has quit IRC17:04
*** igordcar1 has quit IRC17:04
*** igordcard has joined #tacker17:04
*** gongysh has quit IRC17:05
*** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker17:10
uckFolks, does tosca-parser utilize "substitution_mappings"? I am trying to figure out how a VNF topology defined in one yaml file and exposed outside with substitution_mappings can be used in another yaml file for NSD.17:16
*** s3wong has joined #tacker17:16
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC17:19
sridhar_ram1uck: AFAIK tosca-parser does support substitution_mapping, http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tosca-parser/tree/toscaparser/topology_template.py17:22
sridhar_ram1uck: .. we will rely / enhance as needed as part of NSD work in Newton17:23
sridhar_ram1uck: fyi, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304667/17:24
sridhar_ram1uck: bottomline we haven't exercised substitution_mappings yet.. will do it the next few weeks & months17:25
*** janki91 has joined #tacker17:33
sridhar_ram1bobh: can you please cherrypick https://review.openstack.org/#/c/299737/ to mitaka stable ?17:43
ucksridhar_ram1: Thanks. I was also going through topology_template.py and noticed that there were mainly placeholders.17:43
uck17:43
sridhar_ram1uck: ouch17:43
sridhar_ram1uck: we will be meeting tosca-parser team next week in the summit17:43
sridhar_ram1bobh: can you add substitution_mappings to the etherpad you've for list of things we need for Tacker from tosca-parser and heat-translator ?17:44
ucksridhar_ram1: ok. I will try to join. when will it be?17:44
* sridhar_ram1 is looking up17:45
bobhsridhar_ram1: I tried - it says Merge Conflict17:46
*** prashantD_ has joined #tacker17:47
sridhar_ram1bobh: alas, that means manual cherrypick :(17:48
bobhsridhar_ram1: I was afraid of that17:48
sridhar_ram1bobh: shd we un-abandon (!!?) https://review.openstack.org/308297 ?17:48
bobhmight as well try17:49
sridhar_ram1uck: here it is https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/931017:49
sridhar_ram1bobh: is https://review.openstack.org/308297 close enough to your master patchset ?17:49
sridhar_ram1bobh: I meant to ask, "identical"17:49
bobhI think so - I'll restore it and rebase17:49
*** prashantD has quit IRC17:49
*** sripriya has joined #tacker17:50
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker17:50
*** sripriya has quit IRC17:53
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC17:53
*** sripriya has joined #tacker17:54
bobhsridhar_ram1: there are slight differences because of the SRIOV patchset that went in before 29973717:59
ucksridhar_ram1: thanks for the meeting link!18:02
*** lhcheng has quit IRC18:08
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker18:09
*** lhcheng has quit IRC18:09
*** dkushwaha_ has joined #tacker18:09
sripriyadkushwaha_: ping18:09
dkushwaha_sripriya, hello18:11
sripriyadkushwaha_: reg https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291032/, did you happen to try adding it to cleanup to see if it works?18:13
dkushwaha_Although, I have not tried with cleanup, it was my doubt.18:16
dkushwaha_sripriya, some times I observed that it works without wait_until_vnf_delete too, So I could not be sure.18:18
dkushwaha_sripriya, Regarding cleanup call, I checked in some other components and observed the same in some places like https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/api/volume/test_volumes_snapshots.py#L76-L7918:24
sripriyadkushwaha: the reason behind this problem is thatclient immediately returns after sending out the DELETE request and does not wait for delete to actually complete on the server side18:29
sripriyadkushwaha: we can do something similar for cleanup, wait for status and then delete18:30
dkushwaha_sripriya, so is it mean to wait for vnf deletion complete in cleanup call?18:34
sripriyadkushwaha: yes18:34
sripriyadkushwaha: the other concern is the msg displayed when delete command is issued18:35
sripriyadkushwaha: the client immediately returns with a Deleted VNF when in actuality the server is still in PENDING_DELETE for resource18:35
sripriyadkushwaha: https://github.com/openstack/python-tackerclient/blob/master/tackerclient/tacker/v1_0/__init__.py#L53318:36
dkushwaha_sripriya, do we needs to cheange the message accordingly ?18:38
dkushwaha_sripriya, I have submitted a patch to handle it in horizon side: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308329/18:40
sripriyadkushwaha_: thats cool, we will have to think something similar on client side as well, we dont want to do it in __init__ file though since that would affect all resources18:42
dkushwaha_sripriya, yes sure18:43
sripriyadkushwaha_: we can hold that cli change for now and go with existing changes, let us think a bit more to handle cli side message separately18:44
dkushwaha_sripriya, ok, fine18:45
sripriyadkushwaha_: we cna explore how other projects do for delete and have similar behavior in cli.18:45
dkushwaha_sripriya, ok, Thanks for your confirmation. I will make changes regarding cleanup wait & delete, and will explore some solution for cli.18:49
sripriyadkushwaha_: nova's behavior for delete is what we should for vnf delete as well, similar to Request to delete server ea406dba-88ac-44fd-8205-86c4fe64cc67 has been accepted.18:50
sripriyadkushwaha_: i will create a RFE to track this and we can work on it18:50
dkushwaha_sripriya, yes sure.18:51
*** uck has quit IRC18:54
*** uck has joined #tacker18:54
*** amotoki has quit IRC19:05
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker19:07
*** lhcheng has quit IRC19:08
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker19:08
*** janki91 has quit IRC19:10
bobhsridhar_ram1: looks like 308297 didn't need a rebase - it was cherry picked before the changes that caused the merge conflict19:23
*** mbound has joined #tacker19:23
*** prashantD__ has joined #tacker19:27
*** prashantD_ has quit IRC19:30
*** dkushwaha_ has quit IRC19:43
*** dkushwaha_ has joined #tacker19:44
*** prashantD__ has quit IRC19:59
*** prashantD__ has joined #tacker20:01
sridhar_ram1folks - for those attending summit next, here is the blog post that list all Tacker related presentations and design summit sessions.. https://nfvworld.tech/2016/04/20/tacker-in-openstack-austin-summit/20:14
s3wongsridhar_ram1: nice Tacker logo... :-)20:16
sridhar_ram1s3wong: the real logo is not out yet.. waiting for OpenStack marketing to give some guidance. This is just my quick shot at it...20:17
s3wongsridhar_ram1: I can see t-shirt with this logo available at Hot Topic soon...20:19
sridhar_ram1:)20:19
sripriyato me it looks like some rock band logo which is nice :-)20:19
s3wongsripriya: hence Hot Topic :-)20:20
sripriyas3wong: Tacker rocks! ;)20:20
sridhar_ram1Here is a tag line - Tacker takes care NFV !20:21
dkushwaha_sridhar_ram1, superb line :)20:21
sripriyaanother one just because i want to get it out of mind20:22
sripriyaNFV served hot with Tacker20:22
sridhar_ram1dkushwaha_: thanks!20:23
sridhar_ram1sripriya: ++20:24
sridhar_ram1has anyone tried latest stable/mitaka in the last day or so ? have you seen any issues stacking up or in basic vnfd/vnf CLIs ?20:30
openstackgerritSridhar Ramaswamy proposed openstack/tacker: Disable nova quota for dsvm functional test  https://review.openstack.org/30885420:32
openstackgerritTim Rozet proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Adds Tacker VNFFG/SFC spec  https://review.openstack.org/29219620:42
openstackgerritTim Rozet proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Adds Tacker VNFFG/SFC spec  https://review.openstack.org/29219620:44
*** lrensing has quit IRC21:01
*** bobh has quit IRC21:02
*** bobh has joined #tacker21:03
*** bobh has quit IRC21:07
*** prashantD__ has quit IRC21:10
*** dkushwaha_ has quit IRC21:18
sridhar_ram1tacker-cores: bobh: s3wong: please review https://review.openstack.org/303092 , this is a high priority bug fix21:19
s3wongsridhar_ram1: so we are not addressing gongysh_'s concern in this patch?21:20
sridhar_ram1s3wong: that is more an enhancement request .. that would cut across all unit tests (using mock framework instead of mox).21:21
sridhar_ram1s3wong: there is a separate rfe bug opened for it and .. in fact Tin picked it up21:22
s3wongsridhar_ram1: OK (who is Tin?)21:22
s3wongsridhar_ram1: never mind... Tin Lam, I see it from the bug21:23
*** sridhar_ram1 is now known as sridhar_ram21:23
openstackgerritMerged openstack/python-tackerclient: Do not display password in VIM command outputs  https://review.openstack.org/30309221:29
sridhar_ramsripriya: qq on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/306241 .. did you mean to do +2/+A instead of +1 ?21:30
*** dkushwaha_ has joined #tacker21:32
*** bobh has joined #tacker21:33
*** bobh has quit IRC21:35
*** prashantD has joined #tacker21:42
openstackgerritSridhar Ramaswamy proposed openstack/tacker: Disable nova quota for dsvm functional test  https://review.openstack.org/30885422:01
sripriyasridhar_ram: no i did not mean to +2/+A since you had -1 on patch, i wanted you to approve/merge. that is why i just left a +122:11
*** mbound has quit IRC22:14
sridhar_ramsripriya: np.. will merge22:30
*** bobh has joined #tacker22:31
openstackgerritMerged openstack/tacker: Adds sample TOSCA VNFDs for EVP features  https://review.openstack.org/30624122:34
openstackgerritSridhar Ramaswamy proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Adds toctree for Newton release  https://review.openstack.org/30798022:36
*** mageshgv has quit IRC22:50
*** bobh has quit IRC23:00
*** bobh has joined #tacker23:58
« Wednesday, 2016-04-20 Index Friday, 2016-04-22 »

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!