| *** uck has quit IRC | 00:03 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 00:10 | |
| *** trozet has joined #tacker | 00:20 | |
| *** prashantD_ has joined #tacker | 00:36 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 00:39 | |
| *** trozet has quit IRC | 00:45 | |
| *** mbound has quit IRC | 00:45 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 00:49 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 00:57 | |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 01:08 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 01:16 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 01:17 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 01:30 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
| *** prashantD_ has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 01:41 | |
| *** mbound has joined #tacker | 01:46 | |
| *** vishwanathj has quit IRC | 01:48 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 01:50 | |
| *** mbound has quit IRC | 01:51 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 01:56 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 02:19 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 02:32 | |
| *** sripriya has joined #tacker | 02:49 | |
| *** sripriya_ has joined #tacker | 03:01 | |
| *** sripriya has quit IRC | 03:04 | |
| *** sripriya has joined #tacker | 03:19 | |
| *** sripriya_ has quit IRC | 03:24 | |
| *** mbound has joined #tacker | 03:30 | |
| *** mbound has quit IRC | 03:35 | |
| *** vishwanathj has joined #tacker | 03:36 | |
| *** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 03:49 | |
| KanagarajM | sripriya, hi | 03:51 |
|---|---|---|
| *** vishwanathj has quit IRC | 03:54 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 04:03 | |
| sripriya | KanagarajM: hello | 04:20 |
| KanagarajM | sripriya, I tried to update the docs with above patches. ^^^ pls review them. | 04:24 |
| KanagarajM | and wanted to know, if scaling spec discussed on yesterday meeting? | 04:25 |
| *** janki has joined #tacker | 04:25 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 04:32 | |
| *** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 04:35 | |
| tbh | sripriya, ping | 04:36 |
| *** amotoki_ has joined #tacker | 04:46 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 04:48 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 04:53 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 05:32 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 05:36 | |
| *** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 05:50 | |
| *** amotoki_ has quit IRC | 05:56 | |
| openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Message correction on cli for Delete VNF call https://review.openstack.org/314716 | 06:03 |
| sripriya | KanagarajM: yes, scaling spec was discussed in today's meeting, you can catch up on meeting logs at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tacker/2016/tacker.2016-05-10-16.00.log.html | 06:23 |
| sripriya | tbh: pong | 06:23 |
| sripriya | janki: pong | 06:23 |
| tbh | sripriya, Hey, I want to work on https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/1554280, do you have any thing in your mind on this? | 06:24 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1554280 in tacker "[multi-site-vim] Enable health monitoring for VIM" [Low,New] - Assigned to bharaththiruveedula (bharath-ves) | 06:24 |
| tbh | sripriya, I think it is too late for you now :) | 06:24 |
| sripriya | tbh: well... blame the Time Zones :-) | 06:25 |
| sripriya | tbh: thanks for taking up the RFE, we can start off with some simple VIM monitoring for reachability | 06:26 |
| sripriya | tbh: the bug description pretty much captures what is intended for the feature | 06:27 |
| tbh | sripriya, I thought having a separate class in each VIM driver which runs as a thread, check for authentication | 06:27 |
| sripriya | tbh: there is no reserved scope for the enhancement, feel free to explore | 06:28 |
| tbh | sripriya, or is it just enough to check for reachability | 06:28 |
| tbh | sripriya, okay, I will try out different things, and push a WIP, then work on the comments | 06:29 |
| janki | sripriya: Is the patch for this bug committed? | 06:29 |
| janki | https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/1573815 | 06:29 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1573815 in tacker "VNF row does not highlight color in Horizon on an empty VNF list page" [Low,New] | 06:29 |
| sripriya | tbh: authentication checks happens during vim registration and i believe we dont need to do it periodic intervals | 06:29 |
| janki | I can see the row in yellow colour | 06:29 |
| sripriya | tbh: keystone reachability should be good enough as a starting point, we could then probably enhance this for quota management and update VIM's health based on that | 06:30 |
| tbh | sripriya, sounds good, thanks | 06:30 |
| sripriya | janki: did you observe this on an empty list on Horizon | 06:30 |
| sripriya | tbh: cool. thank you. | 06:31 |
| sripriya | tbh: you may want to consider VNF monitoring status also while you implement this | 06:32 |
| janki | srirpiya: I observed yellow row when a vnf is in PENDING_CREATE state | 06:33 |
| tbh | sripriya, why do we need VNF monitoring in this case? | 06:33 |
| sripriya | tbh: we dont want to be respawning VNFs unnecessarily the moment VIMs are unreachable | 06:33 |
| sripriya | tbh: VNFs on remote VIMs enabled with monitoring | 06:33 |
| janki | I didnot get what you mean by empty list on Horizon | 06:33 |
| tbh | sripriya, got it | 06:34 |
| tbh | sripriya, you mean whenever VNF monitoring shows failure status, first we need to consider it's VIM health? | 06:34 |
| sripriya | janki: emtpy list--> no VNFs in VNF Management page | 06:34 |
| janki | sripriya: Haven't observed that | 06:35 |
| janki | sripriya: vnf row chages to yellow colour when in PENDING_CREATE and back to white in other states | 06:36 |
| sripriya | tbh: it also depends what kinda deployment is that VIM, suppose the controller node running keystone goes down, but the actual VNFs are running on compute nodes and they are still reachable, what should we do in such cases | 06:38 |
| sripriya | janki: can you try the behavior? | 06:38 |
| janki | sripriya: Yes, will do that | 06:39 |
| sripriya | janki: delete all your VNFs on Horizon, deploy a new VNF and observe the behavior | 06:39 |
| janki | sripriya: ohh this already I have done | 06:40 |
| janki | sripriya: the first one that I created to reproduce this issue itself changed the colour | 06:40 |
| janki | sripriya: to be sure, I created another one and it too changed the colour | 06:41 |
| tbh | sripriya, ah exactly, I was going through the same scenario, but I thought of not taking actions, but show the health status to the client/horizon | 06:41 |
| sripriya | janki: hmm i see, can you pl reconfirm, we tried on couple of setups and we observed the same behavior where the very 1st VNF created does not highlight color | 06:43 |
| janki | sripriya: sure, will reconfirm and take a snapshot if required | 06:43 |
| sripriya | tbh: what do you mean by not taking actions? | 06:43 |
| sripriya | janki: yeah please try with a clean slate page where there are no VNFs running and try the scenario, you could update the bug comment | 06:44 |
| tbh | sripriya, like we do in VNF monitoring for example if the VNFs are not reachable we respawn | 06:45 |
| tbh | sripriya, actions: {failure: respawn} | 06:46 |
| tbh | sripriya, I think we can leverage this by taking failure actions input while registering VIM? | 06:47 |
| sripriya | tbh: what kinda failure actions you want to take if VIM is unreachable? | 06:49 |
| tbh | sripriya, I can't think of anything now, so I just want to store the status in db | 06:50 |
| sripriya | tbh: yeah lets get started with that | 06:50 |
| tbh | sripriya, yup | 06:52 |
| sripriya | tbh: cool, calling it a day! will catch up on logs if there are any more discussions. | 06:54 |
| tbh | sripriya, sure, thanks for your inputs | 06:54 |
| janki | I am installing tacker using devstack and facing this error | 06:54 |
| sripriya | tbh: sure np | 06:54 |
| janki | Could not satisfy constraints for 'python-tackerclient': installation from path or url cannot be constrained to a version | 06:54 |
| janki | I faced this some days back as well | 06:54 |
| janki | sripriya: I get this error while installing tacker | 06:56 |
| janki | srirpiya: Could not satisfy constraints for 'python-tackerclient': installation from path or url cannot be constrained to a version | 06:56 |
| janki | sripriya: is this a known issue. If not, i can troubleshoot | 06:57 |
| *** sripriya has quit IRC | 07:00 | |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 07:02 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 07:04 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 07:05 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 07:18 | |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 07:22 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 07:25 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 07:28 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 07:54 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 07:54 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 07:55 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 08:04 | |
| *** dmk0202 has joined #tacker | 08:08 | |
| *** janki has quit IRC | 08:28 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 08:42 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 08:49 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 08:50 | |
| *** manikanta_ has joined #tacker | 08:54 | |
| *** tbh_ has joined #tacker | 08:54 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 08:57 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 08:57 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 09:10 | |
| *** dkushwaha has quit IRC | 09:25 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 09:28 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 09:35 | |
| *** janki has joined #tacker | 09:43 | |
| *** hparekh has quit IRC | 09:44 | |
| *** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 09:45 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 09:47 | |
| *** janki has quit IRC | 09:48 | |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 09:50 | |
| *** manikanta_ has quit IRC | 09:54 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 09:54 | |
| *** hparekh has joined #tacker | 09:56 | |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 10:12 | |
| *** tbh_ has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 10:51 | |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 10:54 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 11:06 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 11:07 | |
| *** dkushwaha has joined #tacker | 11:27 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 11:48 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 12:02 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 12:02 | |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 12:03 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 12:07 | |
| *** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 12:10 | |
| KanagarajM | sripriya: thanks | 12:10 |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 12:11 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 12:16 | |
| openstackgerrit | Manikantha Srinivas Tadi proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Display VNF instance details in Tacker Horizon. https://review.openstack.org/295207 | 12:20 |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 12:22 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 12:24 | |
| *** tbh_ has joined #tacker | 12:24 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 12:27 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 12:33 | |
| *** tbh_ has quit IRC | 12:33 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 12:34 | |
| *** srwilkers has joined #tacker | 12:36 | |
| fxpester | playing with devstack tacker... started sample vnfd... how can connect to it ? I can see qemu running but `nova list` shows no instances | 12:36 |
| *** Liuqing has joined #tacker | 12:37 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 12:43 | |
| KanagarajM | fxpester, which sample you have used, i also tried today first time it worked perfectly without any issues. | 12:51 |
| KanagarajM | fxpester, i tried with http://paste.openstack.org/show/496714/ | 12:54 |
| *** lrensing has joined #tacker | 12:59 | |
| *** srwilkers has quit IRC | 13:03 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 13:08 | |
| fxpester | KanagarajM: yes, this same sample, btw - tacker guide ends at 'start vnf and check it' what to do next ? how to connect to VMs ? | 13:14 |
| fxpester | I`m using devstack mitaka at ubuntu 16.04 ^^ maybe I shouldn`t | 13:15 |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 13:18 | |
| openstackgerrit | Manikantha Srinivas Tadi proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Register VIM : Inconsistency between CLI and tacker horizon Closes-Bug: #1580496 https://review.openstack.org/315034 | 13:33 |
| openstack | bug 1580496 in tacker "Register VIM : Inconsistency between CLI and tacker horizon" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1580496 - Assigned to Manikantha Srinivas Tadi (manikantha-tadi) | 13:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Manikantha Srinivas Tadi proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Register VIM : Inconsistency between CLI and tacker horizon https://review.openstack.org/315034 | 13:37 |
| *** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 13:39 | |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 13:40 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 13:41 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 13:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | Manikantha Srinivas Tadi proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Register VIM : Inconsistency between CLI and tacker horizon https://review.openstack.org/315034 | 13:51 |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 14:01 | |
| *** srwilkers has joined #tacker | 14:07 | |
| *** Liuqing has quit IRC | 14:14 | |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 14:18 | |
| openstackgerrit | Manikantha Srinivas Tadi proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Register VIM : Inconsistency between CLI and tacker horizon https://review.openstack.org/315034 | 14:19 |
| *** Liuqing has joined #tacker | 14:19 | |
| *** srwilkers has quit IRC | 14:21 | |
| *** srwilkers has joined #tacker | 14:26 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 14:30 | |
| *** Liuqing_ has joined #tacker | 14:37 | |
| *** Liuqing has quit IRC | 14:38 | |
| *** Liuqing_ has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
| *** Liuqing has joined #tacker | 14:41 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 14:42 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 14:43 | |
| *** Liuqing has quit IRC | 14:45 | |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 14:48 | |
| *** srwilkers has quit IRC | 14:48 | |
| *** Liuqing has joined #tacker | 14:49 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 14:59 | |
| *** thatsdone has joined #tacker | 15:00 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
| *** srwilkers has joined #tacker | 15:04 | |
| *** Liuqing has quit IRC | 15:12 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 15:19 | |
| *** zeih has joined #tacker | 15:21 | |
| *** twm2016 has joined #tacker | 15:26 | |
| *** trozet has joined #tacker | 15:33 | |
| *** zeih has quit IRC | 15:34 | |
| *** vishwanathj has joined #tacker | 15:34 | |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 15:47 | |
| *** sridhar_ram_ has joined #tacker | 16:01 | |
| sridhar_ram_ | bobh: ping | 16:01 |
| *** dmk0202 has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
| *** lhcheng has quit IRC | 16:09 | |
| *** uck has joined #tacker | 16:12 | |
| bobh | sridhar_ram_: pong | 16:18 |
| sridhar_ram_ | qq on the monitoring action policy .. https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/tacker/vm/monitor.py#L238 | 16:19 |
| sridhar_ram_ | bobh: we have two ActionPolicy callbacks.. one ^^ | 16:19 |
| sridhar_ram_ | bobh: .. and another at https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/tacker/vm/monitor.py#L208 | 16:20 |
| sridhar_ram_ | for the same respawn action | 16:20 |
| bobh | sridhar_ram_: that one can be deprecated - it was from the nova driver I believe | 16:20 |
| sridhar_ram_ | my understanding is only the former is used .. is this correct ? | 16:20 |
| bobh | sridhar_ram_: yes | 16:20 |
| sridhar_ram_ | can the other one safely removed ? | 16:21 |
| bobh | sridhar_ram_: I believe so - I don't think it is used anywhere since the heat driver is always used | 16:21 |
| sridhar_ram_ | i trying to parse this decorator .. "@ActionPolicy.register('respawn', 'heat')" | 16:21 |
| sridhar_ram_ | ... how is 'heat' specified during the actual action invokation ? | 16:22 |
| sridhar_ram_ | the template only specifies 'respawn' | 16:23 |
| bobh | I need to go back and dig through this - the infra_driver is included as a key to the table that gets built/referenced by the decorator | 16:23 |
| bobh | sridhar_ram_: it's not intuitively obvious but I think it does work | 16:23 |
| openstackgerrit | Trevor McCasland proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: mox to mock refactor https://review.openstack.org/313165 | 16:24 |
| *** thatsdone has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
| sridhar_ram_ | bobh: no worries, i realized this is kinda a memory test :) If a thing pops up for you to demystify in this area, please drop a line.. | 16:25 |
| sridhar_ram_ | bobh: thanks! | 16:25 |
| bobh | Line 185 has the infra_driver parameter to the register method so the policy can be registered with or without a specific infra_driver | 16:26 |
| *** srwilkers has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 16:52 | |
| *** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 17:18 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 17:30 | |
| *** sripriya has joined #tacker | 17:31 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 17:33 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 17:34 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 17:45 | |
| Edigar | hey | 17:48 |
| Edigar | how can I do tests on VNF Catalog and VNF Manager | 17:48 |
| Edigar | templates ready | 17:49 |
| *** dkushwaha_ has joined #tacker | 17:50 | |
| *** Ravikiran_K has joined #tacker | 17:52 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 17:54 | |
| *** uck has quit IRC | 17:56 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 18:05 | |
| *** dkushwaha_ has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 18:08 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 18:14 | |
| *** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 18:15 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 18:17 | |
| *** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker | 18:34 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 18:35 | |
| openstackgerrit | vishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker: Devref for EPA usage guide https://review.openstack.org/314258 | 18:38 |
| *** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 18:47 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 18:54 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 18:54 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 18:57 | |
| *** uck has joined #tacker | 18:57 | |
| *** uck has quit IRC | 19:02 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 19:09 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 19:09 | |
| openstackgerrit | Manikantha Srinivas Tadi proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Make VIM name & VIM description optional for Register VIM in horizon https://review.openstack.org/315034 | 19:17 |
| *** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 19:30 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 19:31 | |
| *** trozet has quit IRC | 19:32 | |
| twm2016 | sripriya: re bug/1579167 To clarify, we want to keep all the files in the unit directory? | 19:33 |
| sripriya | twm2016: thats correct | 19:35 |
| *** dmk0202 has joined #tacker | 19:38 | |
| *** trozet has joined #tacker | 19:39 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 19:40 | |
| *** Ravikiran_K has left #tacker | 20:11 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 20:27 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 20:27 | |
| *** uck has joined #tacker | 20:41 | |
| *** lrensing has quit IRC | 20:57 | |
| *** twm2016 has quit IRC | 21:01 | |
| *** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC | 21:05 | |
| *** sripriya_ has joined #tacker | 21:07 | |
| *** sripriya has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 21:27 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 21:29 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 21:43 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 21:44 | |
| *** s3wong has joined #tacker | 21:46 | |
| *** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 21:51 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 22:02 | |
| *** sripriya_ has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
| *** sripriya has joined #tacker | 22:06 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 22:07 | |
| sripriya | tacker cores, please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/313977/ | 22:23 |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 22:29 | |
| s3wong | sripriya: sure, will take a look | 22:29 |
| *** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker | 22:32 | |
| *** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC | 22:32 | |
| *** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker | 22:34 | |
| *** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 22:34 | |
| *** mbound has joined #tacker | 22:41 | |
| *** dmk0202 has quit IRC | 22:47 | |
| *** uck has quit IRC | 22:51 | |
| *** trozet has quit IRC | 23:08 | |
| *** prashantD_ has joined #tacker | 23:10 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 23:14 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 23:15 | |
| *** trozet has joined #tacker | 23:19 | |
| *** Liuqing has joined #tacker | 23:25 | |
| *** Liuqing has quit IRC | 23:30 | |
| *** uck has joined #tacker | 23:37 | |
| *** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC | 23:41 | |
| *** sripriya has quit IRC | 23:52 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!