*** mbound has joined #tacker | 00:11 | |
*** Qiming has quit IRC | 00:26 | |
*** lhcheng has quit IRC | 00:39 | |
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 00:40 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 00:45 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 00:46 | |
*** mbound has quit IRC | 00:58 | |
*** Qiming has joined #tacker | 01:16 | |
*** sridhar_ram_ has joined #tacker | 01:22 | |
*** lhcheng has quit IRC | 01:30 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 01:48 | |
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 02:32 | |
*** lhcheng has quit IRC | 02:37 | |
*** dkushwaha has joined #tacker | 03:02 | |
*** sridhar_ram_ has quit IRC | 03:35 | |
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 03:45 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 04:09 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 05:09 | |
*** saitou has joined #tacker | 05:29 | |
*** saitou has quit IRC | 05:44 | |
*** Regalla has joined #tacker | 05:50 | |
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 05:56 | |
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #tacker | 05:56 | |
tbh | KanagarajM, ping | 06:45 |
---|---|---|
KanagarajM | tbh, hi | 07:09 |
*** amotoki_ has joined #tacker | 07:25 | |
*** lhcheng has quit IRC | 07:26 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 07:28 | |
*** zeih has joined #tacker | 07:32 | |
*** mbound has joined #tacker | 07:58 | |
*** dmk0202 has joined #tacker | 08:19 | |
*** hparekh_ has joined #tacker | 08:47 | |
*** hparekh_ has quit IRC | 08:47 | |
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 09:27 | |
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 09:38 | |
*** Regalla has quit IRC | 10:08 | |
*** Qiming has quit IRC | 10:30 | |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 10:34 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 10:47 | |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 10:55 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 11:01 | |
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC | 11:03 | |
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 11:04 | |
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC | 11:08 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 11:11 | |
*** zeih has quit IRC | 11:30 | |
openstackgerrit | Manikantha Srinivas Tadi proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Add "Description" parameter while onboarding VNF in horizon. https://review.openstack.org/316024 | 11:32 |
*** janki has quit IRC | 11:51 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 12:06 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 12:12 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 12:15 | |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 12:28 | |
*** Liuqing has joined #tacker | 12:29 | |
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #tacker | 12:36 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 12:40 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 12:56 | |
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 12:59 | |
*** zeih has joined #tacker | 13:01 | |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 13:03 | |
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 13:14 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 13:15 | |
*** Qiming has joined #tacker | 13:27 | |
*** zeih has quit IRC | 13:35 | |
*** Liuqing has quit IRC | 13:45 | |
*** mbound has quit IRC | 13:53 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 14:09 | |
*** vishwanathj has joined #tacker | 14:12 | |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 14:39 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 14:51 | |
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker | 15:00 | |
*** arturt_ has quit IRC | 15:11 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 15:21 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 15:30 | |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 15:31 | |
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker | 15:32 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 15:32 | |
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 15:33 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 15:34 | |
*** tbh_ has joined #tacker | 15:41 | |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 15:43 | |
*** dmk0202 has quit IRC | 15:47 | |
*** tbh_ has quit IRC | 15:51 | |
*** tbh_ has joined #tacker | 15:53 | |
*** Qiming has quit IRC | 15:59 | |
trozet | vishwanathj: hi | 16:16 |
vishwanathj | trozet hi | 16:16 |
trozet | vishwanathj: do you mind responding to my question on the tacker vnffg spec please? Just trying to wrap it up asap | 16:17 |
vishwanathj | trozet, let met do that now | 16:17 |
trozet | thanks | 16:17 |
*** sridhar_ram_ has joined #tacker | 16:21 | |
vishwanathj | sridhar_ram_ hi ... | 16:27 |
*** EsdMi has joined #tacker | 16:29 | |
*** EsdMi has left #tacker | 16:29 | |
trozet | sridhar_ram_: can you also please review the comments in the vnffg spec :) ? | 16:29 |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 16:31 | |
vishwanathj | sridhar_ram_ is allowing duplicate names for multiple VNFDs a bug that has been overlooked or is that something we allow in Tacker similar to duplicate instance names in NOVA? The duplicate VNFD names could impact tacker-vnffg work where vnfd name would be specified ..... should his code error out if he encounters multiple VNFDs with the same name? Thanks | 16:31 |
vishwanathj | trozet just responded...let me know what you think | 16:36 |
trozet | vishwanathj: that sounds good to me | 16:36 |
vishwanathj | trozet ok | 16:37 |
trozet | vishwanathj: I'll add that in the spec | 16:37 |
trozet | thanks! | 16:37 |
*** Ravikiran_K_ has joined #tacker | 16:38 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 16:40 | |
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
*** tbh_ has quit IRC | 16:53 | |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 16:58 | |
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
sridhar_ram_ | trozet: sure, I'm on it ... | 17:05 |
sridhar_ram_ | vishwanathj: we are switching to enforce unique names across all our resources - vnfd, vnf, vnffg, etc. | 17:06 |
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 17:07 | |
vishwanathj | sridhar_ram_ sounds good...thanks for the response | 17:07 |
*** Ravikiran_K_ has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 17:32 | |
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 17:42 | |
*** s3wong has joined #tacker | 17:44 | |
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 17:49 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 17:52 | |
sridhar_ram | dkushwaha: ping | 17:52 |
tbh | vishwanathj, Hi, Can you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/315475/ when you find time? | 18:16 |
vishwanathj | tbh sure, will do | 18:23 |
tbh | vishwanathj, thanks | 18:23 |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 18:28 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 18:30 | |
*** santoshk has joined #tacker | 18:30 | |
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker | 18:39 | |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 18:41 | |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 18:52 | |
*** mbound has joined #tacker | 19:02 | |
*** sripriya__ has joined #tacker | 19:11 | |
*** sridhar_ram_ has quit IRC | 19:15 | |
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC | 19:15 | |
openstackgerrit | Sridhar Ramaswamy proposed openstack/tacker: WIP: openwrt mgmt driver using paramiko sshclient https://review.openstack.org/320108 | 19:17 |
vishwanathj | trozet hi | 19:31 |
trozet | vishwanathj: hi | 19:32 |
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker | 19:33 | |
vishwanathj | FYI: I added another comment to your patchset asking for an example of CLI command that would create VNFFG given TOSCA file as an input.....would that be supported? | 19:34 |
*** sripriya__ has quit IRC | 19:36 | |
trozet | vishwanathj: you mean create VNFFGD from TOSCA? | 19:40 |
*** uck has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
vishwanathj | trozet apologize my question was unclear/confusing....a VNFFGD contains one or more VNFFG definitions under the Groups section and also has Forwarding Path targets defined in the same file, right? | 19:45 |
vishwanathj | trozet never mind, I got it, ignore my comment | 19:48 |
trozet | vishwanathj: yeah thats right | 19:56 |
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 20:30 | |
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 20:34 | |
sridhar_ram | trozet: just replied to your questions.. one extra note on doc / devref | 20:36 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: thanks | 20:37 |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 20:42 | |
sridhar_ram | Tackers - anyone here have a specific agenda to discuss in tomorrow's IRC meeting ? | 20:42 |
*** uck has quit IRC | 20:46 | |
trozet | sridhar_ram: still there? | 20:58 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: yes | 21:03 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: what field name would you like to see for the ingress/egress label of a port? | 21:03 |
vishwanathj | sridhar_ram no specific agenda for tomorrow from my side | 21:03 |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 21:04 | |
trozet | sridhar_ram: btw, i don't think that TOSCA example is valid yaml heh | 21:04 |
sridhar_ram | vishwanathj: ack ! | 21:05 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: you mean the one in the spec ? | 21:05 |
openstackgerrit | Sridhar Ramaswamy proposed openstack/tacker: Re-organize tacker sample templates https://review.openstack.org/313783 | 21:05 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: yeah | 21:06 |
trozet | - forwarder: VNF1 | 21:06 |
trozet | capability: CP11 | 21:06 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: :) | 21:07 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: the spacing is messed up haha | 21:07 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: yep... | 21:08 |
* sridhar_ram is pulling up a yaml editor | 21:08 | |
trozet | --- | 21:08 |
trozet | requirements: | 21:08 |
trozet | - | 21:08 |
trozet | capability: CP11 | 21:08 |
trozet | forwarder: VNF1 | 21:08 |
trozet | - | 21:08 |
trozet | capability: CP12 | 21:08 |
trozet | forwarder: VNF1 | 21:08 |
trozet | - | 21:08 |
trozet | capability: CP32 | 21:08 |
trozet | forwarder: VNF3 | 21:08 |
trozet | can be like that^ | 21:08 |
vishwanathj | trozet you can use this link http://yaml-online-parser.appspot.com/ | 21:09 |
vishwanathj | to check for yaml syntax and correctness | 21:09 |
trozet | vishwanathj: yeah i use yamllint.com, but just noticed it now that its wrong in the spec haha | 21:11 |
vishwanathj | ok | 21:11 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: I'm not surprised at all.. | 21:11 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: .. well, I would've surprised if it was well formed 0-) | 21:12 |
sridhar_ram | 8-) | 21:12 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: so what kind of label should we use? | 21:12 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: I was debating between having the label in VNFD vs in the VNFFGD | 21:13 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: hmm | 21:14 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: if you look at http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/tosca-nfv/v1.0/csd03/tosca-nfv-v1.0-csd03.html#_Toc447714739 ... | 21:15 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: i see... heh more typos s/egres/egress | 21:15 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: you will see "forwarder_ingress" and "forwarder_egress" ... these are just labels.. | 21:15 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: ok so then it should be done in VNFD? | 21:16 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: we just hired a editor for TOSCA NFV profile spec | 21:16 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: .. CSD04 version will be better | 21:16 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: yes, lets pencil it to come from VNFD CP property | 21:17 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: also what if someone specifies symmetrical, then both CPs for the VNF will have to have ingress/egress capabilities | 21:17 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: i should put that in the spec | 21:17 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: hmm.. then there is no difference... | 21:18 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: got to run, will upload a new version of the spec tonight | 21:20 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: never mind.. they are all relative to the previous node in the graph | 21:20 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: sure.. | 21:20 |
sridhar_ram | s3wong: ping, any further comments on vnffg spec ? can you request louis and cathy to sign off on this ? | 21:21 |
s3wong | sridhar_ram, trozet: I have not read the latest one yet (I assume there has been updates since last Thurs) | 21:22 |
sridhar_ram | bobh: can you please provide your thoughts on vnffg spec ? particularly from tosca-parser p.o.v ? | 21:23 |
openstackgerrit | Santosh Kodicherla proposed openstack/tacker: Adding vnf testcase with monitoring with new tosca template https://review.openstack.org/300248 | 21:45 |
sridhar_ram | bobh: sripriya_: please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/313783/ ... this proposes to move all the samples out of "devstack" dir | 21:57 |
*** santoshk has quit IRC | 21:59 | |
sripriya_ | sridhar_ram: the func tests in the patch did not run | 22:00 |
sripriya_ | sridhar_ram: any clue? | 22:00 |
sridhar_ram | sripriya_: checking... | 22:06 |
sridhar_ram | sripriya_: devstack relies on vim-config.yaml ... | 22:07 |
sridhar_ram | sripriya_: now, I remember why I moved it back to devstack dir 8-) | 22:07 |
sridhar_ram | sripriya_: given you were the vim / multisite owner, what is your thoughts.. ? I'm tempted to make 'devstack' dir self sufficient by keep vim-config.yaml .. | 22:08 |
sridhar_ram | sripriya_: while adding one more "sample" vim-config with fake ip addr in the new tacker/sample/vim dir | 22:09 |
sripriya_ | sridhar_ram: that is a good idea | 22:10 |
sripriya_ | sridhar_ram: it failed in the patch because tacker file was referring to devstack path and you moved it to samples/vim right? | 22:10 |
sripriya_ | sridhar_ram: never mind, just confirmed in logs | 22:12 |
sridhar_ram | sripriya_: sounds good.. will push a new patchset.. | 22:15 |
sripriya_ | sridhar_ram: thanks | 22:15 |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 22:16 | |
openstackgerrit | Sridhar Ramaswamy proposed openstack/tacker: Re-organize tacker sample templates https://review.openstack.org/313783 | 22:19 |
*** sripriya__ has joined #tacker | 22:50 | |
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 22:53 | |
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC | 22:54 | |
*** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker | 22:55 | |
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 22:56 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
*** Qiming has joined #tacker | 23:05 | |
*** santoshk has joined #tacker | 23:05 | |
*** ksantoshk has joined #tacker | 23:08 | |
*** santoshk has quit IRC | 23:11 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 23:18 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 23:20 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tacker: Re-organize tacker sample templates https://review.openstack.org/313783 | 23:36 |
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 23:38 | |
*** arturt_ has quit IRC | 23:44 | |
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker | 23:44 | |
*** arturt_ has quit IRC | 23:49 | |
*** Qiming has quit IRC | 23:51 | |
*** arturt_ has joined #tacker | 23:52 | |
*** mbound has quit IRC | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!