Monday, 2016-07-25

*** amotoki has joined #tacker00:00
*** amotoki has quit IRC00:15
*** amotoki has joined #tacker00:24
*** amotoki has quit IRC00:28
*** amotoki has joined #tacker00:33
*** mbound has joined #tacker00:47
*** bobh has quit IRC00:52
*** mbound has quit IRC00:52
*** bobh has joined #tacker00:54
*** bobh has quit IRC01:08
*** vishwanathj has joined #tacker01:08
openstackgerritdharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Body can not be None while creating vnfd  https://review.openstack.org/34655701:09
*** bobh has joined #tacker01:12
*** bobh has quit IRC01:22
*** bobh has joined #tacker01:24
openstackgerritxu-haiwei proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Fix KeyError happened in vim-list  https://review.openstack.org/34523501:25
*** amotoki_ has joined #tacker01:25
*** amotoki has quit IRC01:28
*** bobh has quit IRC01:39
*** amotoki has joined #tacker01:57
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC02:00
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC02:13
*** lulei has joined #tacker02:15
*** lamt has joined #tacker02:37
*** lulei has quit IRC02:42
*** lulei has joined #tacker02:42
*** vishwanathj has joined #tacker03:43
openstackgerritvenkatamahesh proposed openstack/tacker: Change the amin_user_name to admin_user_name  https://review.openstack.org/34658003:47
*** lulei has quit IRC04:11
*** neel has joined #tacker04:16
*** Vijayendra_ has joined #tacker04:28
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker04:32
*** janki has joined #tacker05:17
*** neel has quit IRC05:33
*** gongysh has joined #tacker05:39
*** neel has joined #tacker05:42
gongyshsridhar_ram, hi05:55
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker05:59
sridhar_ramgongysh: hi !06:14
gongyshsridhar_ram, I wanted to refactor the vm plugin device db, devicetemplate into vnfm, but I thought https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/1589018.06:19
openstackLaunchpad bug 1589018 in tacker "Rename db table names, relevant columns and API calls to MANO term." [Low,New] - Assigned to Sripriya (sseetha)06:19
gongyshsridhar_ram, then I have no questions now for u.06:19
sridhar_ramgongysh: okay, it is high time we need to move away from device db table names06:21
gongyshsridhar_ram, yes.06:21
sridhar_ramgongysh: pls check with sripriya if she is okay to have u take this up06:21
gongyshsridhar_ram, it seems Sripriya will do it.06:21
sridhar_ramgongysh: sounds good06:22
jankisridhar_ram: I am almost done with VNFFG support for horizon06:32
jankiShould I file a bug and submit the patch there?06:32
*** tbh has joined #tacker06:34
sridhar_ramjanki: cool, no need to file a bug...just refer to the blueprint in the commit mesg & use the same topic as tim's patchset06:35
*** neel has quit IRC06:36
jankisridhar_ram: ok. thanks06:36
jankisridhar_ram: I do have 2 patches in review. one with vnf_get_details and one of legacy deprecate warning on client side (server side is merged). Please have look whenever possible06:38
jankihttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/340838/06:38
jankihttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/334581/06:38
sridhar_ramjanki: will do06:39
jankisridhar_ram: thanks06:39
*** neel has joined #tacker06:47
openstackgerritManikantha Srinivas Tadi proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Created nfvo directory for nfvo specific unit tests in python-tackerclient  https://review.openstack.org/34593906:56
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #tacker07:16
*** mbound has joined #tacker08:07
*** yfujioka has joined #tacker08:07
*** yfujioka has quit IRC08:08
*** tbh has quit IRC08:11
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC08:15
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker: Support purge of soft-deleted resources from DB tables  https://review.openstack.org/32965208:22
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC08:23
*** saju_m has joined #tacker09:01
*** diga has joined #tacker09:02
openstackgerritLu lei proposed openstack/tacker: Use assertEqual() instead of assertDictEqual()  https://review.openstack.org/34665909:05
openstackgerritdharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker: Monitoring driver keep monitoring, even if vnf status showing ERROR  https://review.openstack.org/34666509:20
*** neel has quit IRC09:37
*** neel has joined #tacker09:37
*** tbh has joined #tacker10:05
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC10:15
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker10:39
*** amotoki has quit IRC11:08
*** amotoki has joined #tacker11:23
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC11:45
*** amotoki has quit IRC11:50
*** neel has quit IRC11:51
openstackgerritsajuptpm proposed openstack/tacker: Validate file size at server side  https://review.openstack.org/34654311:54
*** gongysh has quit IRC12:03
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker12:04
*** diga has quit IRC12:24
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #tacker12:27
*** bobh has joined #tacker12:35
openstackgerritManikantha Srinivas Tadi proposed openstack/tacker: Store the right description of VNF given from Horizon/CLI.  https://review.openstack.org/33103912:40
*** manikanta_ has joined #tacker12:46
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC12:48
*** manikanta_ has quit IRC12:48
tbhbobh, ping12:48
bobhtbh: hello12:56
tbhbobh, I have two VNFDs https://gist.github.com/bharaththiruveedula/b657022c448d480f4eb886f769c3b114 and https://gist.github.com/bharaththiruveedula/2e9931cf4c6dc2747fe5859aca054bd512:57
tbhbobh,  in nsd we want to use CP11 of vnf1.yaml using substitution_mappings12:57
tbhbobh, here is the NSD I am using https://gist.github.com/bharaththiruveedula/2fe1d28625c75eefdb8c5b04e36ee45512:58
tbhin NSD CP11 is VirtualLinkable to VL312:59
tbhcan we define new VirtualLink  definition like we did in vnfds in nsd?12:59
bobhtbh: I don't see VL3 defined in vnf1 or vnf2 so it should be able to be defined in the nsd13:02
tbhbobh, yeah exactly, can we use any virtualLink defined in VNFD in NSD and if not present we can define in NSD?13:03
tbhis that right assumption?13:03
bobhI believe so13:03
*** amotoki has joined #tacker13:05
tbhbobh, and can we override those values in NSD?13:06
bobhoverride what is defined in VNF?13:06
tbhbobh, yes13:07
bobhI don't know - it might cause namespace issues, or might be fine13:07
*** janki has quit IRC13:08
tbhbobh, I was assuming VNFD should work independently or with NSD13:09
bobhit should - I'm not sure how the namespaces are handled in tosca-parser13:09
tbhbobh, if that is true, we must have some way to override those values defined in VNFD  when we are using NSD13:09
tbhbobh, oh okay13:10
*** bobh has quit IRC13:17
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC13:17
*** bobh has joined #tacker13:17
*** bobh has quit IRC13:22
*** __achatterjee has joined #tacker13:32
*** __achatterjee has quit IRC13:33
*** santoshk has joined #tacker13:52
santoshkKanagarajM: ping..13:52
santoshkcan you please check reply comment for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/326670/13:53
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC13:54
openstackgerritsajuptpm proposed openstack/tacker: Validate file size at server side  https://review.openstack.org/34654314:07
openstackgerritsajuptpm proposed openstack/tacker: Validate file size at server side  https://review.openstack.org/34654314:16
*** gongysh has joined #tacker14:27
openstackgerritsajuptpm proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Validate file size before uploading  https://review.openstack.org/34095014:28
*** diga has joined #tacker14:28
openstackgerritsajuptpm proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Validate file size before uploading  https://review.openstack.org/33420314:34
*** vishwanathj has joined #tacker14:42
openstackgerritsajuptpm proposed openstack/tacker: Transition default VIM to API and DB operation  https://review.openstack.org/34212715:18
*** diga has quit IRC15:30
*** derekjhyang has quit IRC15:32
*** prashantD has joined #tacker15:36
*** amotoki has quit IRC15:40
*** gongysh has quit IRC15:43
*** Liuqing has joined #tacker15:56
*** Liuqing has quit IRC15:57
*** Liuqing has joined #tacker15:58
*** bobh has joined #tacker16:03
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker16:07
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #tacker16:10
*** Liuqing has quit IRC16:10
openstackgerritSantosh Kodicherla proposed openstack/tacker: Functional test for static ip support and anti_spoof_protection fields in tosca template  https://review.openstack.org/32410116:36
*** KanagarajM_ has joined #tacker16:44
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC16:45
*** bobh has quit IRC16:46
*** mbound has quit IRC16:55
*** sripriya has joined #tacker17:04
openstackgerritbharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Tacker VNFC support  https://review.openstack.org/33979817:11
*** mbound has joined #tacker17:33
*** KanagarajM_ has quit IRC17:35
tbhsridhar_ram, ping17:36
sridhar_ramtbh: pong17:37
*** s3wong has joined #tacker17:38
tbhsridhar_ram, can we override VirtualLink definitions(which already defined in VNFD)  in NSD?17:38
sridhar_ramtbh: hmm, why would you need to do that ? can you explain bit more on your scenario ?17:40
sridhar_ramsripriya: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/342394/ need to wait until https://review.openstack.org/#/c/342127/ merges ?17:42
tbhsridhar_ram, let's say I need to have http://paste.openstack.org/show/541631/ NS17:43
tbhsridhar_ram, and this is how VNF1 looks like http://paste.openstack.org/show/541632/17:44
tbhand nsd http://paste.openstack.org/show/541634/17:45
sripriyasridhar_ram: it is the other way, 342127 depends on 342394 because of the devstack script changes17:45
tbhsridhar_ram, can we redefine VL1 in nsd?17:46
sridhar_ramsripriya: okay, so client need to merge first ?17:46
sridhar_ramsripriya: we need to make a client release w/ this change17:47
*** sripriya has quit IRC17:47
*** bobh has joined #tacker17:49
sridhar_ramtbh: need to think about this a bit.. my initial thought is the VLs in the VNFD are referring to external VLs defined outside VNFD.. for e.g. VL2 within VNFD exists purely for modeling purpose, there is no role for orchestrator to create/delete VL2. So, VL outside VNFD and VL inside VNFD can code exist. Outside VL might have concrete ip-addr cidr, gw, etc.17:50
sridhar_ramwhile the VL within VNFD might just be a reference to that external VL17:50
tbhsridhar_ram, I am actually assuming these VNF1.yaml and VNF2.yaml can exists independently with out associating to NSD17:51
sridhar_ramtbh: agree17:51
sridhar_ramtbh: so there is no override at NSD level.. as long as some VL identifier (say VL name) is same across NSD and VNFD yaml.. they all will end up pointing to the same network17:53
tbhsridhar_ram, so when a NS wants to use VNF1, I am thinking NSD can override VL2 according to the new needs17:54
*** sripriya has joined #tacker17:55
sridhar_ramtbh: ah, are you worried about same node name "VL2" used both in VNF1 and VNF2 ?17:55
sripriyasridhar_ram: yes17:55
tbhsridhar_ram, that is one concern, and other is if any new NSD have to use VNF, we have restrict to same VL217:59
tbhsridhar_ram, may be we don't have to worry about internal VLs from NSD point of view17:59
sridhar_ramtbh: i believe so, but let's think it through if there are any gotchas.. you are asking the right questions :)18:00
* sridhar_ram stepping away for few mins18:00
tbhsridhar_ram, sure18:02
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC18:02
*** bobh has quit IRC18:04
openstackgerritMerged openstack/python-tackerclient: Transition default VIM to API and DB operation  https://review.openstack.org/34239418:05
*** tbh has quit IRC18:09
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker18:11
*** mbound has quit IRC18:23
*** mbound has joined #tacker18:24
*** mbound has quit IRC18:25
*** tbh has joined #tacker18:48
sridhar_ramsripriya: can you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337266/ (scale client patchset), so that we can make a client release along with 342394 that just merged ^^^19:06
sripriyasridhar_ram: just added to the review, will take a look soon.19:09
sridhar_ramsripriya: thanks!19:09
*** prashantD_ has joined #tacker19:22
*** prashantD has quit IRC19:22
*** mbound has joined #tacker19:25
*** mbound has quit IRC19:31
*** sripriya has quit IRC19:34
*** shaikapsar_ has joined #tacker19:37
*** saju_m has quit IRC19:49
*** sripriya has joined #tacker19:55
*** prashantD__ has joined #tacker19:55
*** prashantD_ has quit IRC19:58
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC20:03
*** tbh has quit IRC20:15
*** amotoki has joined #tacker20:59
*** sripriya has quit IRC21:01
*** sripriya has joined #tacker21:05
santoshksridhar_ram: ping21:10
santoshkgate job is taking time to schedule run..https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324101/21:11
*** bobh has joined #tacker21:11
*** shaikapsar_ has quit IRC21:16
*** shaikapsar has joined #tacker21:21
*** bobh has quit IRC21:23
*** prashantD_ has joined #tacker21:48
*** prashantD__ has quit IRC21:51
sridhar_ramsantoshk: pong21:53
santoshksridhar_ram: i did a recheck to see if gate job starts, i saw gatejob did not start even after 2-3 hours21:54
* sridhar_ram checking zuul queue21:54
sridhar_ramsantoshk: http://status.openstack.org/zuul/21:56
sridhar_ramsantoshk: it is still in the zuul queue.. estimate shows an unusual 5hr wait time...21:56
santoshkyeah, may be some other jobs in queue..??21:57
sridhar_ramchecking few things, no heads up in the infra mailer21:58
sridhar_ramthis is not specific to tacker.. could be server availablilty issue in openstack CI21:58
vishwanathjthere are 485 jobs waiting....will take a while21:59
sridhar_ramyes, zuul queue is huge, will take sometime to clear out.. don't known the root cause. hang in there!22:00
openstackgerritTim Rozet proposed openstack/tacker: [WIP] Implements VNFFG into NFVO  https://review.openstack.org/34452222:24
*** prashantD_ has quit IRC22:34
*** prashantD_ has joined #tacker22:36
*** Murali_ has joined #tacker22:39
openstackgerritvishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker: Support purge of soft-deleted resources from DB tables  https://review.openstack.org/32965222:39
*** Murali has quit IRC22:40
*** Murali_ is now known as Murali22:40
*** prashantD_ has quit IRC22:56
*** prashantD has joined #tacker22:59
*** amotoki has quit IRC23:13
*** sripriya has quit IRC23:18
*** bobh has joined #tacker23:24
*** amotoki has joined #tacker23:24
*** amotoki has quit IRC23:29
*** n-harada has joined #tacker23:33
*** n-harada has quit IRC23:37
*** bobh has quit IRC23:38
haiweisripriya: hi23:50
openstackgerritxu-haiwei proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Add client support for vnffgd  https://review.openstack.org/34138923:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!