| openstackgerrit | Sripriya Seetharam proposed openstack/tacker: Fix vnfd template nodes order https://review.openstack.org/363988 | 00:04 |
|---|---|---|
| *** sripriya has quit IRC | 00:10 | |
| bryan_att | sridhar_ram: trozet: got a little farther, but now stuck at starting the tacker server, fails with "ImportError: Plugin 'vnfm' not found" | 00:12 |
| openstackgerrit | JiWei proposed openstack/tacker: test: make enforce_type=True in CONF.set_override https://review.openstack.org/363990 | 00:17 |
| *** dkushwaha has joined #tacker | 00:48 | |
| *** vishwanathj has quit IRC | 00:53 | |
| *** s3wong has quit IRC | 01:18 | |
| *** pmannidi has quit IRC | 01:20 | |
| *** trozet_ has joined #tacker | 01:23 | |
| *** trozet has quit IRC | 01:27 | |
| *** changzhi has joined #tacker | 01:37 | |
| openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker: Try to fix the monitor bug https://review.openstack.org/363398 | 01:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Zhi Chang proposed openstack/tacker: Tacker deploy OpenWRT as VNF guide https://review.openstack.org/357728 | 01:53 |
| *** dkushwaha has quit IRC | 01:57 | |
| openstackgerrit | Zhi Chang proposed openstack/tacker: Tacker deploy OpenWRT as VNF guide https://review.openstack.org/357728 | 01:58 |
| *** changzhi has quit IRC | 02:00 | |
| *** changzhi has joined #tacker | 02:04 | |
| *** dkushwaha has joined #tacker | 02:10 | |
| *** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 02:33 | |
| openstackgerrit | Nguyen Hung Phuong proposed openstack/tacker: Clean imports in code https://review.openstack.org/359023 | 02:44 |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 02:51 | |
| openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker: Alarn monitor: Alarm framework Co-Author: Dharmendra Kushwaha https://review.openstack.org/362975 | 02:55 |
| openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker: Alarn monitor: Alarm framework https://review.openstack.org/362975 | 02:56 |
| openstackgerrit | Zhi Chang proposed openstack/tacker: Tacker deploy OpenWRT as VNF guide https://review.openstack.org/357728 | 02:58 |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 03:08 | |
| openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker: Try to fix the monitor bug https://review.openstack.org/363398 | 03:10 |
| *** yifei has quit IRC | 03:17 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 03:21 | |
| *** yifei has joined #tacker | 03:22 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 03:30 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 03:32 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 03:35 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 03:37 | |
| *** haiwei has joined #tacker | 03:47 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
| *** sripriya has joined #tacker | 04:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker: Try to fix the monitor bug https://review.openstack.org/363398 | 04:05 |
| *** changzhi has quit IRC | 04:09 | |
| gongysh | sripriya, hi | 04:11 |
| sripriya | gongysh: hello | 04:11 |
| gongysh | sripriya, could you help with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/363461/ | 04:12 |
| sripriya | gongysh: i already +2ed it | 04:12 |
| gongysh | sripriya, yes, I should grab sridhar_ram. :) | 04:13 |
| sripriya | gongysh: sridhar_ram is on PTO for the rest of this week, i would suggest you to ping other cores to get it merged | 04:14 |
| gongysh | PTO? | 04:14 |
| sripriya | gongysh: on travel | 04:14 |
| gongysh | sripriya, ok, thanks | 04:15 |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 04:16 | |
| sripriya | bryan_att: ping | 04:23 |
| *** links has joined #tacker | 04:32 | |
| *** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 04:33 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kanagaraj Manickam proposed openstack/tacker: VNF scaling: Functional test https://review.openstack.org/363573 | 04:35 |
| *** sripriya has quit IRC | 04:37 | |
| *** amit213 has quit IRC | 04:37 | |
| *** amit213 has joined #tacker | 04:40 | |
| dkushwaha | tung_doan, ping | 04:55 |
| gongysh | KanagarajM, can you help with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/363461/? | 05:13 |
| *** tung_doan_ has joined #tacker | 05:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker: Alarn monitor: Alarm framework https://review.openstack.org/362975 | 05:24 |
| *** saju_m has joined #tacker | 05:28 | |
| *** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 05:29 | |
| *** neel has joined #tacker | 05:34 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tung Doan proposed openstack/tacker: Alarn monitor: Alarm framework https://review.openstack.org/362975 | 05:43 |
| *** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 05:51 | |
| *** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 05:51 | |
| *** janki has joined #tacker | 06:04 | |
| *** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 06:14 | |
| openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker: [WIP]Alarm monitor: Update WSGI and API https://review.openstack.org/355975 | 06:31 |
| *** saju_m has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
| dkushwaha | gongysh, hi | 06:51 |
| gongysh | hi | 06:51 |
| dkushwaha | gongysh, Regarding comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/363549/ , please let me know how can I test the neutron port name | 06:52 |
| gongysh | dkushwaha, you can add a neutron client and get the neutron port. | 06:53 |
| dkushwaha | gongysh, by neutron cli? | 06:53 |
| gongysh | dkushwaha, no. I think tempest should have this kind of stuff. the neutron API client. but we can also use openstack sdn | 06:54 |
| dkushwaha | gongysh, for nova VM , I verified it on horizon and it was created successfully | 06:54 |
| gongysh | sdn -> sdk. | 06:54 |
| gongysh | dkushwaha, we should write it in functional test, not verified by human, right? | 06:55 |
| dkushwaha | gongysh, yes sure | 06:55 |
| openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker: Alarn monitor: Alarm framework https://review.openstack.org/362975 | 07:07 |
| janki | gongysh, ping | 07:32 |
| gongysh | hi | 07:32 |
| janki | gongysh, regarding the test cases in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/340838 | 07:41 |
| janki | vnf_details can hold 2 values - empty list [ ], or list of dict. of. resources [{'name':, 'type':, 'id'}]. I am using assertIsNotNone to pass the test cases in any of the 2 vnf_details values. | 07:42 |
| janki | gongysh, Could you please guide me into what different assert condition should I use? | 07:43 |
| gongysh | janki, as unit test, we can mock heat to return the values so that we can get the related stuff via plugin.get_vnf_resources | 07:43 |
| janki | gongysh, wouldn't this be like avaoiding the case when heat is not available | 07:44 |
| janki | ? | 07:44 |
| gongysh | so to test what cases we will get [], what cases we will get list of dict. | 07:44 |
| janki | we will get [ ], when vnf is != active or heat is not available | 07:45 |
| *** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 07:46 | |
| gongysh | janki, then write it alike. use mock to stub something. | 07:46 |
| janki | gongysh, what about the functional test? | 07:47 |
| gongysh | janki, I think we should have unit tests to cover empty and list of dicts. | 07:47 |
| gongysh | functional test does not mock. | 07:47 |
| janki | gongysh, are you suggesting writing 2 tests to check for empty and not empty lists? | 07:48 |
| janki | gongysh, so in functional test, is the applied condition assertIsNotNone appropriate? | 07:48 |
| gongysh | janki, if VNF is active, its resources should not be empty, right? | 07:50 |
| janki | gongysh, yes if vnf is active and heat is available, response can not be empty. but the response from heat can be empty if heat-api service is not available | 07:51 |
| *** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 07:52 | |
| janki | gongysh, in test cases, we check the final output after calling heat-api | 07:53 |
| gongysh | janki, the API should return error if heat-api is not there when we call get_vnf_resource API. | 07:55 |
| tung_doan_ | dkushwaha: ping | 07:57 |
| janki | gongysh, we have decided to drop the "error" parameter currently. instead, it is logged and an empty list is returned. | 07:57 |
| gongysh | janki, why, it is not user friendly. | 07:58 |
| janki | gongysh, PS 26 describes error_reason but was dropped following a discussion on that | 07:58 |
| *** saju_m has joined #tacker | 07:59 | |
| janki | gongysh, 1. error column from client patch was removed and the client release was done. | 07:59 |
| gongysh | janki, this is not what I said, it is not error column. It is the HTTP status code. | 08:00 |
| janki | gongysh, 2. sridhar wanted the error to go in as a single resource and with individual resources. current API framework doesnot support that | 08:00 |
| janki | gongysh, are you suggesting that I raise an exception for that? | 08:01 |
| gongysh | janki, yes, and let the API return error status code. | 08:01 |
| janki | gongysh, currently, infra_driver does this when heat is not available | 08:02 |
| janki | except Exception: | 08:02 |
| janki | LOG.error(_("C | 08:02 |
| janki | instead, rasie exception heatnotfound? this would also need introducing a new exception? | 08:03 |
| gongysh | janki, do you have code lines? | 08:03 |
| *** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 08:04 | |
| janki | gongysh, yes. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/340838/29/tacker/vnfm/infra_drivers/heat/heat.py L857-870 | 08:04 |
| gongysh | janki, we can raise some exception and let the API return http error status code. | 08:05 |
| janki | Depending on this, L601-609 is executed in file https://review.openstack.org/#/c/340838/29/tacker/vm/plugin.py | 08:05 |
| gongysh | that is the way define API. API should have 20x status code, and some status code for exception. | 08:05 |
| gongysh | the way to define API. | 08:06 |
| janki | gongysh, let me try doing this way... | 08:06 |
| janki | gongysh, how would this affect the test cases? | 08:07 |
| *** tung_doan_ has quit IRC | 08:08 | |
| gongysh | janki, for functional test, vnf_details = self.client.list_vnf_resources(vnf_id) for good case. | 08:09 |
| gongysh | janki, for exception case, can we call the client.list_vnf_resources(vnf_id) if the vnf is dead? | 08:10 |
| gongysh | janki, it is not easy to simulate the heat-api does not exist. | 08:11 |
| janki | gongysh, sounds good...currently the test_vnf https://review.openstack.org/#/c/340838/29/tacker/tests/functional/vnfm/test_vnf.py asserts that vnf = active. should I write a create a new test file to check for vnf is dead | 08:12 |
| janki | gongysh, yes, heat api not available is difficult to simulate. I explicitly made vnf_details = [ ] to check the asserts | 08:13 |
| gongysh | janki, we can write new file. | 08:14 |
| janki | gongysh, cool..will do that | 08:14 |
| janki | gongysh, thanks for guidin through this :) | 08:15 |
| gongysh | janki, nope | 08:15 |
| tung_doan | dkushwaha: pong | 08:16 |
| *** diga has joined #tacker | 08:18 | |
| *** neel has quit IRC | 08:28 | |
| *** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 08:46 | |
| *** amotoki_ has joined #tacker | 08:55 | |
| *** Ravikiran_K has joined #tacker | 08:56 | |
| *** saju_m has quit IRC | 08:57 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 08:58 | |
| *** saju_m has joined #tacker | 09:10 | |
| dkushwaha | manikanta_tadi, hi | 09:21 |
| manikanta_tadi | hi dkushwaha | 09:27 |
| dkushwaha | manikanta_tadi, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348874/ | 09:27 |
| dkushwaha | manikanta_tadi, regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348874 , Actually I am trying to test this patch. But it looks no impact on output. I am suspecting that i may made some mistake. | 09:29 |
| dkushwaha | manikanta_tadi, Have you tested this on your env? | 09:29 |
| manikanta_tadi | dkushwaha, yes, I did | 09:30 |
| manikanta_tadi | I just removed the id thats it | 09:30 |
| dkushwaha | manikanta_tadi, ok. I m trying to recheck my env again. | 09:31 |
| manikanta_tadi | dkushwaha, Ok sure, | 09:31 |
| dkushwaha | manikanta_tadi, thanks | 09:31 |
| *** neel has joined #tacker | 09:34 | |
| *** diga has quit IRC | 09:49 | |
| openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker: Try to fix the monitor bug https://review.openstack.org/363398 | 09:56 |
| *** neel has quit IRC | 09:56 | |
| *** neel has joined #tacker | 10:03 | |
| *** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 10:07 | |
| *** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 10:22 | |
| gongysh | KanagarajM, hi can you help with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/363461/? | 10:23 |
| *** KanagarajM_ has joined #tacker | 10:30 | |
| *** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 10:30 | |
| *** Qiming has quit IRC | 10:40 | |
| *** Qiming has joined #tacker | 10:45 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tacker: Move tempest_lib to tempest.lib https://review.openstack.org/363461 | 10:47 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tacker: Temporarily disable ping monitor functional test https://review.openstack.org/361933 | 10:47 |
| *** KanagarajM_ has quit IRC | 10:48 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 10:49 | |
| *** KanagarajM_ has joined #tacker | 10:51 | |
| *** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC | 10:52 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/tacker: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/364234 | 10:55 |
| *** KanagarajM_ has quit IRC | 10:59 | |
| *** dkushwaha is now known as dkushwaha_away | 11:00 | |
| *** tung_doan has quit IRC | 11:03 | |
| *** neel has quit IRC | 11:08 | |
| *** neel has joined #tacker | 11:16 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 11:49 | |
| *** rnoriega has quit IRC | 12:04 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 12:04 | |
| *** neel has quit IRC | 12:13 | |
| openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker: Fix the monitor bug https://review.openstack.org/363398 | 12:16 |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 12:20 | |
| *** tbh_ has joined #tacker | 12:29 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 12:36 | |
| tbh_ | sridhar_ram, ping | 12:45 |
| *** tbh_ is now known as tbh | 12:45 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 12:49 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 12:51 | |
| *** tbh_ has joined #tacker | 13:04 | |
| *** tbh_ is now known as tbh | 13:07 | |
| *** thatsdone has joined #tacker | 13:11 | |
| *** tung_doan has joined #tacker | 13:12 | |
| *** amotoki_ has quit IRC | 13:14 | |
| *** tung_doan has quit IRC | 13:16 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 13:16 | |
| gongysh | tbh, hi | 13:17 |
| gongysh | could you please help to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/363398/? which fixed the functional test problem. | 13:17 |
| tbh | gongysh, sure | 13:18 |
| *** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 13:21 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 13:31 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 13:42 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 13:43 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 13:43 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 13:49 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 13:50 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 13:50 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
| *** vishwanathj has joined #tacker | 14:06 | |
| tbh | gongysh, ping | 14:07 |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 14:14 | |
| *** KanagarajM_ has joined #tacker | 14:21 | |
| *** tbh is now known as tbh_afk | 14:27 | |
| *** tbh_afk has quit IRC | 14:27 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 14:33 | |
| bryan_att | sripriya: ping | 14:47 |
| bryan_att | sridhar_ram: trozet_: ping still failing to install Tacker due to "ImportError: Plugin 'vnfm' not found.". My script is at https://git.opnfv.org/cgit/models/tree/tests/utils/tacker-setup.sh | 14:49 |
| *** tbh_ has joined #tacker | 14:54 | |
| *** saju_m has quit IRC | 14:56 | |
| *** janki has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
| *** trozet_ is now known as trozet | 15:04 | |
| *** hparekh has joined #tacker | 15:12 | |
| *** hparekh has quit IRC | 15:13 | |
| *** KanagarajM_ has quit IRC | 15:14 | |
| *** tbh_ has quit IRC | 15:17 | |
| *** sripriya has joined #tacker | 15:18 | |
| trozet | bryan_att: why are you sintalling tacker? | 15:21 |
| trozet | installing tacker* | 15:22 |
| bryan_att | (1) because not everyone does; (2) because I need to know how it works; (3) because that's how I roll | 15:22 |
| trozet | bryan_att: heh | 15:23 |
| trozet | bryan_att: so from Brahmaputra I already have a script that uses bash/puppet to install tacker and client | 15:23 |
| bryan_att | I am using it as a VNFM justlike cloudify, openbaton, juju, etc etc and need to setup install scripts to verify the functionality. | 15:24 |
| trozet | bryan_att: with what OPNFV installer? | 15:24 |
| bryan_att | I will take a look at your script, but I may want to tweak the approach. | 15:24 |
| bryan_att | All installers | 15:24 |
| bryan_att | it's a generic functest use case for the models project | 15:26 |
| bryan_att | starting with hello world and expanding to reference VNFs | 15:26 |
| bryan_att | getting the VNFMs install consistently, and independently of any specific installer tech is the goal | 15:26 |
| bryan_att | if I can't do that, it tells me something important about the VNFM project, e.g. how portable it is to different infra management approaches | 15:27 |
| bryan_att | and how complex/fragile it is... | 15:27 |
| *** KanagarajM_ has joined #tacker | 15:28 | |
| sripriya | bryan_att: ping | 15:30 |
| bryan_att | sripriya: hi | 15:30 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: regarding the vnfm plugin not found, i assume you have the vnfm plugin path added to python namepsace | 15:31 |
| bryan_att | sripriya: not sure, how do I do that? | 15:31 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: referring to https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/stable/mitaka/etc/tacker/tacker.conf#L65 | 15:31 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: and https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/stable/mitaka/setup.cfg#L44 | 15:32 |
| bryan_att | let me check | 15:32 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: since you are installing tacker in virtual env. this path is expected to be in virtual env namepsace | 15:32 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: i assume you tried starting tacker server in virtual env? | 15:33 |
| bryan_att | yes, "service_plugins = vnfm,nfvo" is in tacker.conf | 15:33 |
| bryan_att | yes, the server is running in the venv | 15:33 |
| bryan_att | and the setup.cfg lines are there also | 15:35 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: can you share the tacker server logs as well? | 15:35 |
| bryan_att | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/BErdcCfn/ | 15:36 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: needed the logs which contained the vnfm plugin not found error | 15:37 |
| trozet | bryan_att: I still fail to see the purpose here. Functest doesn't install openstack services | 15:37 |
| bryan_att | sripriya: here is https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/XUbRjUHV/tacker.log | 15:37 |
| trozet | bryan_att: if you want to install tacker, I think you should work with an installer | 15:38 |
| bryan_att | trozet: not sure what you mean; functest installs vIMS using Cloudify as a test driver. I will do the same for a variety of reference VNFs, using Cloudify, Tacker, etc etc | 15:38 |
| openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Add support for multi delete https://review.openstack.org/349806 | 15:39 |
| bryan_att | The VNFMs will only be used for the purpose of the test, and removed afterward. They are part of the test setup/context. | 15:39 |
| trozet | bryan_att: I can't comment on vIMS (i'm not that familiar with it), but I believe that is more of a VNF, not a mano service. To run it, it invokes openstack services to create instances and test against them, right? | 15:40 |
| *** dkushwaha has joined #tacker | 15:41 | |
| bryan_att | trozet: yes, I am not talking about installing control plane services (e.g. OpenStack services) but applications such as vIMS, vRouter, vFW, vProxy, ... | 15:41 |
| trozet | bryan_att: right, and that is fine to do that in functest | 15:41 |
| bryan_att | I use the VNFM (e.g. Tacker) to lifecycle-manage the VNFs, starting with deployment. | 15:41 |
| trozet | bryan_att: but installing the VNFM is a different story, thats an openstack service | 15:42 |
| trozet | bryan_att: so installing services to invoke VNFs, should be done in an installer - not functest | 15:42 |
| bryan_att | trozet: well,... that's a perspective. We don't view ECOMP as an OpenStack service... anything above the VIM is not necessarily an "OpenStack service". We want to keep the control plane light, focused, secure, efficient... NFVO/VNFM sit above it in our view, and across different VIMs (e.g. BM, Kubernetes, OpenStack, SDNCs, ...) | 15:44 |
| trozet | bryan_att: right, but an "OPNFV installer" is not just an "openstack installer" it is supposed to install the OPNFV platform. If you are installing another MANO service onto that platform, then you are skipping the installer | 15:45 |
| trozet | bryan_att: what if other folks want to use tacker, or cloudify with their Apex install? they have to download functest and run a functest suite to do that? | 15:46 |
| trozet | bryan_att: it seems liek the wrong approach to me to put that in a test suite | 15:46 |
| bryan_att | trozet: the vIMS test case installs Cloudify as part of the test setup. I'm just replicating that model. I don't have the resources or time to create VNFM-permuted scenarios and test with a single VNFM in a single deploy run. I need to test as many as possible in a single deploy run. Install, test, wipe, repeat. | 15:46 |
| trozet | bryan_att: ok. I've said my piece :) Fuel and Apex already install Tacker, so those 2 you don't need to worry about. I'm not sure if the other installers already do it as well | 15:47 |
| bryan_att | trozet: others can use the VNFM installer script I am writing to do it, after the deploy is complete. Or they can pick the installer support up-front if they want, and if it's supported by the installer. That's not my focus. My focus is validating VNFM support for standard blueprints and VNF lifecycle management. | 15:47 |
| trozet | bryan_att: yeah but your script will be in the functest repo ? | 15:48 |
| bryan_att | trozet: no, it will be in the models repo https://git.opnfv.org/cgit/models/tree/tests/utils/tacker-setup.sh | 15:48 |
| bryan_att | obviously tailored to my test use-case, but something that is tweakable. Or they can use your script. | 15:49 |
| trozet | bryan_att: i still don't think this is a good idea...but we can move on | 15:50 |
| trozet | bryan_att: i would suggest using puppet to install tacker | 15:50 |
| *** uck has joined #tacker | 15:50 | |
| trozet | bryan_att: you can use this puppet module: https://github.com/trozet/puppet-tacker/tree/fix_db_sync | 15:51 |
| bryan_att | trozet: I think you still don't understand it, but OK. Hopefully the Tacker team can help me get thru this. And yes, if there is a more config-mgmt-methodolgy consisten approach (e.g. puppet) I can use, I will. But as I said, I need to know how it works, first. That's part of the technical assessment of solutions. | 15:51 |
| *** Vijayendra has quit IRC | 15:56 | |
| sripriya | bryan_att: regarding the error, do you have the tacker.vm.plugin:VNFMPlugin file in your venv, can you confirm that? | 15:59 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: also, if there is any error within the file itself, it again does not load. | 16:00 |
| bryan_att | sripriya: do you mean this? https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/r3OvrCW1/ | 16:03 |
| openstackgerrit | Kanagaraj Manickam proposed openstack/tacker: VNF scaling: Functional test https://review.openstack.org/363573 | 16:03 |
| bryan_att | find / -name tacker.vm.plugin:VNFMPlugin (returns nothing) | 16:03 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: within your venv? | 16:04 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: can you navigate to /tmp/tacker/venv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tacker/vm/plugin? | 16:05 |
| bryan_att | within anything on the machine | 16:05 |
| bryan_att | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/CB3gmvRV/ | 16:06 |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 16:06 | |
| bryan_att | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/XMlgbhUK/ | 16:06 |
| *** Vijayendra has joined #tacker | 16:08 | |
| sripriya | bryan_att: one difference i see here is, i dont see the parent tacker directory in the venv path | 16:08 |
| bryan_att | sripriya: not sure what you mean by parent tacker directory | 16:09 |
| bryan_att | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/HStAIkQ9/ | 16:10 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: i can see the plugin file in the path, did you modify the plugin file? | 16:14 |
| bryan_att | sripriya: no - what file is the plugin? | 16:15 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: tacker.vm.plugin:VNFMPlugin | 16:15 |
| bryan_att | sripriya: sorry, I don't see that in the path, what folder do you see it in? | 16:16 |
| *** thatsdone has quit IRC | 16:16 | |
| bryan_att | (maybe I don't understand what you mean by "in the path") | 16:17 |
| *** KanagarajM_ has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
| sripriya | bryan_att: https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/XMlgbhUK/ | 16:17 |
| sripriya | bryan_at: i see the plugin.py file in your venv | 16:18 |
| bryan_att | OK, I was looking for a file named tacker.vm.plugin:VNFMPlugin ! | 16:18 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: no.. | 16:18 |
| bryan_att | yeah I thought that was a weird filename. So what's up with it not being able to be found? | 16:19 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: i suspect the namespace and file path are not the same in venv | 16:21 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: basically tries to resolve the class tacker.vm.plugin:VNFMPlugin inside venv which is not happening | 16:21 |
| bryan_att | OK, I can try it without using the venv, if that works. | 16:22 |
| bryan_att | Since I'm running this in a container maybe I don't need it. | 16:22 |
| sripriya | bryan_att: yes | 16:23 |
| *** sripriya has quit IRC | 16:26 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
| *** Vijayendra has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
| *** uck has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
| *** diga has joined #tacker | 16:58 | |
| *** Vijayendra has joined #tacker | 17:05 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #tacker | 17:08 | |
| tbh | sridhar_ram, ping | 17:34 |
| *** s3wong has joined #tacker | 17:50 | |
| *** uck has joined #tacker | 17:57 | |
| *** uck has quit IRC | 18:02 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 18:12 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 18:18 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 18:19 | |
| *** Murali_ has quit IRC | 18:28 | |
| *** Murali_ has joined #tacker | 18:31 | |
| *** s3wong has quit IRC | 18:38 | |
| *** s3wong has joined #tacker | 18:38 | |
| *** uck has joined #tacker | 18:59 | |
| *** uck has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 19:21 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 19:23 | |
| *** saju_m has joined #tacker | 19:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | vishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker: Logs events for VNF monitoring and actions https://review.openstack.org/361680 | 19:36 |
| openstackgerrit | vishwanath jayaraman proposed openstack/tacker: Logs events for VNF scale operations https://review.openstack.org/363946 | 19:41 |
| bryan_att | sripriya: looks like removing the venv helped. The tacker service seems to be running now. Can you point me to a good "hello world" VNFD that can I try out to see if it's really working? | 20:17 |
| vishwanathj | https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/samples/tosca-templates/vnfd/tosca-vnfd-hello-world.yaml | 20:26 |
| vishwanathj | bryan_att ^^^^ | 20:26 |
| bryan_att | thanks, I'll try that | 20:26 |
| *** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 20:32 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tung Doan proposed openstack/tacker: Alarm monitor: Update Heat driver https://review.openstack.org/347721 | 20:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Tung Doan proposed openstack/tacker: [WIP]Alarm monitor: Update WSGI and API https://review.openstack.org/355975 | 20:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Tung Doan proposed openstack/tacker: Alarn monitor: Alarm framework https://review.openstack.org/362975 | 20:53 |
| *** uck has joined #tacker | 20:53 | |
| *** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 21:36 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 21:51 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tung Doan proposed openstack/tacker: Alarn monitor: Alarm framework https://review.openstack.org/362975 | 21:54 |
| *** s3wong has quit IRC | 21:59 | |
| *** Murali_ has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
| *** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 22:09 | |
| *** Murali_ has joined #tacker | 22:11 | |
| *** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 22:21 | |
| *** dkushwaha has quit IRC | 23:18 | |
| *** Murali_ has quit IRC | 23:25 | |
| *** vishwanathj has quit IRC | 23:30 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 23:35 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 23:59 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!