*** amotoki has quit IRC | 00:00 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 00:01 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 00:05 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 00:13 | |
*** s3wong has quit IRC | 00:54 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 00:59 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 01:00 | |
*** prashantD has quit IRC | 01:00 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 01:04 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 01:08 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 01:24 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 01:25 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 01:29 | |
*** yifei has joined #tacker | 01:49 | |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 01:59 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 01:59 | |
*** yifei has quit IRC | 02:16 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 02:25 | |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 02:25 | |
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 02:29 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 02:30 | |
*** yifei has joined #tacker | 02:44 | |
*** amotoki_ has joined #tacker | 02:55 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 02:58 | |
*** links has joined #tacker | 03:10 | |
*** yifei has quit IRC | 03:16 | |
*** prashantD has joined #tacker | 03:23 | |
*** yifei has joined #tacker | 03:25 | |
*** yifei has quit IRC | 03:34 | |
*** vishwanathj_ has quit IRC | 04:14 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 04:18 | |
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC | 04:21 | |
*** lamt has quit IRC | 04:31 | |
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 04:33 | |
*** prashantD has quit IRC | 04:56 | |
*** diga_ has joined #tacker | 04:57 | |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: Hi | 04:57 |
---|---|---|
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #tacker | 05:05 | |
*** neel has joined #tacker | 05:10 | |
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 05:23 | |
*** yifei has joined #tacker | 05:30 | |
*** yifei has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
*** neel has quit IRC | 05:44 | |
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 05:45 | |
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 05:45 | |
*** neel has joined #tacker | 05:55 | |
*** yifei has joined #tacker | 06:13 | |
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 06:15 | |
*** yifei has quit IRC | 06:22 | |
*** neel has quit IRC | 06:26 | |
openstackgerrit | gecong proposed openstack/tacker: Replace LOG.warn with LOG.warning https://review.openstack.org/381435 | 06:29 |
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC | 06:29 | |
openstackgerrit | Sharat Sharma proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Changed the link to home-page https://review.openstack.org/381436 | 06:32 |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 06:43 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 06:49 | |
*** amotoki_ has joined #tacker | 07:24 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 07:27 | |
*** xuhaiwei_ has joined #tacker | 07:36 | |
xuhaiwei_ | sridhar_ram: ping | 07:37 |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: hi | 07:37 |
xuhaiwei_ | I have added a topic in Barcelona summit session page https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tacker-ocata-summit | 07:38 |
xuhaiwei_ | can we have a discussion about it? senlin integration with tacker, sridhar_ram | 07:38 |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: sure, are you going to be in the summit ? | 07:39 |
xuhaiwei_ | sridhar_ram, yes | 07:39 |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: good.. i'll move this item up into the main schedule.. | 07:39 |
xuhaiwei_ | sridhar_ram, thanks a lot | 07:40 |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: btw, quick question on senlin usage for tacker.. | 07:40 |
xuhaiwei_ | sridhar_ram, sure | 07:40 |
xuhaiwei_ | sridhar_ram, senlin can help mentaince VNF auto-scaling, HA and so on | 07:41 |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: beyond what is written in the above BP, i think senlin can also be used for auto-scaling.. is that a different use case of senlin ? | 07:41 |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: but the scope of your BP is only to address HA ? | 07:42 |
xuhaiwei_ | sridhar_ram, Senlin provides a service of clustering management, including auto-scaling | 07:42 |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: currently tacker is using heat auto-scaling.. can heat auto-scaling co-exist with VDUs marked for HA using senlin ? | 07:43 |
xuhaiwei_ | sridhar_ram, yes, the BP is created by other developer, I will make an introduction fo Senlin in summit | 07:44 |
*** n-harada has joined #tacker | 07:44 | |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: sounds good.. that will be useful.. btw, please keep sripriya in the loop | 07:44 |
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 07:45 | |
xuhaiwei_ | sridhar_ram, yes, senlin can work as a intra_driver instead of heat, that means tacker will talk to senlin first and then to heat, also senlin can work under heat, as a heat resource, in that case it will be tacker -> heat -> senlin -> heat | 07:46 |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: tacker -> heat auto-scaling -> senlin make sense to me.. | 07:47 |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: however, heat -> senlin -> heat .. ? that doesn't make sense.. | 07:48 |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: anyways, these are good topics for a F2F summit design session | 07:48 |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: please prepare a short 3 - 5 slides presentation for tacker design summit session in senlin | 07:49 |
xuhaiwei_ | sridhar_ram: if use senlin, you don't need to use heat auto-scaling, senlin uses heat to do orchestration, for auto-scaling, senlin uses its own way to do it | 07:49 |
sridhar_ram | xuhaiwei_: okay, i think i understand.. | 07:49 |
xuhaiwei_ | sridhar_ram, sure, I will prepare for it | 07:49 |
xuhaiwei_ | sridhar_ram: :) | 07:51 |
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 07:53 | |
*** yifei has joined #tacker | 07:59 | |
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #tacker | 08:09 | |
*** diga_ has quit IRC | 08:12 | |
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC | 08:18 | |
*** diga_ has joined #tacker | 08:18 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 08:21 | |
*** yifei has quit IRC | 08:22 | |
*** n-harada has quit IRC | 08:31 | |
*** yifei has joined #tacker | 08:49 | |
*** yifei has quit IRC | 08:54 | |
*** dkushwaha has quit IRC | 09:29 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 09:51 | |
*** prashantD has joined #tacker | 09:54 | |
*** prashantD has quit IRC | 09:59 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 10:07 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 10:39 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 10:40 | |
*** neel has joined #tacker | 10:48 | |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 11:17 | |
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 11:24 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 11:25 | |
*** yifei has joined #tacker | 11:26 | |
*** yifei has quit IRC | 11:30 | |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 11:33 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 11:45 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 11:54 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 11:57 | |
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 12:12 | |
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 12:13 | |
*** neel has quit IRC | 12:15 | |
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC | 12:15 | |
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 12:23 | |
*** diga_ has quit IRC | 12:27 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 12:49 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 12:54 | |
*** dkushwaha has joined #tacker | 13:02 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
*** Vijayendra has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
trozet | sridhar_ram: pong | 13:20 |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 13:38 | |
*** yifei has joined #tacker | 13:44 | |
*** bobmel has joined #tacker | 13:44 | |
*** yifei has quit IRC | 13:49 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 13:49 | |
*** Vijayendra has joined #tacker | 13:55 | |
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: The Gerrit service on review.openstack.org is being restarted to address performance degradation and should return momentarily | 14:02 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 14:17 | |
*** vishwanathj has joined #tacker | 14:53 | |
trozet | sridhar_ram: around? | 14:54 |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 14:58 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 15:16 | |
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 15:16 | |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 15:23 | |
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 15:28 | |
*** prashantD has joined #tacker | 15:40 | |
*** diga_ has joined #tacker | 15:59 | |
*** lamt has joined #tacker | 16:01 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
sridhar_ram | Folks - weekly meeting time! | 16:03 |
sridhar_ram | join #openstack-meeting | 16:03 |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 16:05 | |
*** links has joined #tacker | 16:17 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 16:18 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 16:26 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 16:27 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 16:28 | |
trozet | diga, diga_, sridhar_ram: did you compile the openvswitch packages from source? or did you download the debs somehwere? | 16:29 |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 16:29 | |
sridhar_ram | trozet: didn't compile from src, used the base ovs 2.5 that came w/ Ubuntu 16.04 | 16:30 |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 16:30 | |
trozet | sridhar_ram: heh my 16.04 doesnt have it, I built from source first time, but somethign was broken | 16:30 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: you were just using 2.5.0? | 16:30 |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 16:31 | |
diga_ | trozet: I have just installed ubuntu16.04 with tacker but will install ovs2.5 | 16:32 |
trozet | diga_ so you already had ovs2.5 on your ubuntu, or did you get it from somewhere? | 16:32 |
diga_ | trozet: I installed openvswitch-ipsec | 16:35 |
diga_ | which is 2.5.0 | 16:35 |
diga_ | trozet: hope its correct installable ? | 16:36 |
trozet | diga_: i dont think you need ipsec | 16:36 |
diga_ | trozet: okay | 16:36 |
trozet | diga_: openvswitch-switch_2.5.0-0 openvswitch-common_2.5.0 | 16:37 |
diga_ | trozet: okay, will install it manually, | 16:38 |
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #tacker | 16:41 | |
sridhar_ram | trozet: I just pulled ovs using 'apt-get install openvswitch-vswitch" | 17:01 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: sripriya: Hi, did you get time to look at htis spec - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368511/ | 17:01 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: ok, i found the a deb online and downloaded, looks like things are stacking now | 17:01 |
sridhar_ram | trozet: cool | 17:02 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: not yet fully.. | 17:02 |
*** dkushwaha has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: please review it once you get time, eager to start coding :) | 17:03 |
diga_ | trozet: can you share the link, so that I can download the same | 17:04 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: one general concern i've is .. API / conversion to pecan is a bigger undertaking.. | 17:04 |
sripriya | diga_: not yet, did you plan to cover a substantial report of bringing in the pecan framework, i’m looking around similar lines of pecan spec in neutron (since our api framework was derived from neutron originally) http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/kilo/pecan-switch.html | 17:04 |
diga_ | sripriya: okay | 17:05 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: sripriya: also my understanding is it will most likely force us to do a v2 API bump.. | 17:06 |
*** dkushwaha has joined #tacker | 17:07 | |
sridhar_ram | diga_: again, i'd suggest you to take up smaller RFEs first.. familiarize with the tacker code base first before taking this up.. | 17:07 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: I think you know or not but I am the only person who has written first WSGI+PECAN based implementation for magnum | 17:08 |
sripriya | sridhar_ram: i am not sure there is any change on the API signature itself for the resources, but good to think about.. | 17:08 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: ah, i didn't know that.. in fact u shd guide us also in the magnum exploration! | 17:09 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: :) yeah! sure | 17:09 |
sridhar_ram | sripriya: I'll be happy if switching to pecan *doesn't* force us a version bump | 17:10 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: I have implemented complete docker backend in the magnum along with COE part with apmelton | 17:10 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: question, during magnum pecan work... did you use a separate branch, developed there and merged to master ? | 17:10 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: I have created seperate project on my github repo & then merged it to magnu | 17:11 |
diga_ | magnum* | 17:11 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: super cool.. can u share the link ? | 17:11 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: https://github.com/digambar15/magnum | 17:14 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: this is very first implementation | 17:15 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: did magnum start out with another wsgi component and then switched to Pecan ? Or is Pecan is the first and only WSGI framework introduced in magnum ? | 17:15 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: I think ceilometer used firstly PECAN+WSME | 17:16 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: but when we started the implementation, it was at very early stage in ceilometer, so we built it from scratch | 17:16 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: I see... | 17:17 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: now many openstack project are using WSME+PECAN, neutron, ceilometer, watcher etc | 17:17 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: but talked with many people, I am working with nova scheduler team also but it seems everyone prefers PECAN over falcon | 17:18 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: though its big impact but its not that big like neutron :) | 17:19 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: I see..then i'd encourage you to start some prototype working in a branch off tacker | 17:19 |
diga_ | Thanks sridhar_ram | 17:19 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: what are some of the risks in this venture ? | 17:20 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: I think whole API level changes will be required along with model path. We need to restructure everything related to API according to PECAN approach | 17:21 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: I'm wondering if we should introduce pecan as a configurable option first and then switch it to default and remove the "older" framework in release N+1 | 17:21 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: endpoint will not change | 17:21 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: that can be the good option | 17:22 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: let other people work on existing framework | 17:22 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: what is the timeline for N+1 ? | 17:22 |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: so that I can make sure it will be ready & tested before merge to N+1 | 17:23 |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 17:23 | |
sridhar_ram | diga_: I meant, introduce this in Ocata as an optional framework.. but switch to it being the default in next P release | 17:23 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: Yeah, okay | 17:23 |
sripriya | sridhar_ram: diga_: these are the questions i’m looking for an answer in spec, with tacker’s current state, what are the specifc problems that are addressed by pecan, for example: do i still need to maintain the resource attributes as dictionary inside each extension? what are the advantages the new changes will bring in? how are the validations of attributes done? etc. | 17:24 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: do you have your local.conf handy. i stacked OK but cannot reach neutron 404 | 17:24 |
diga_ | sripriya: According to my understanding, extension part will be removed from PECAN, PECAN will have seperate Modelling & API | 17:25 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: tacker seems ok, but neutron looks screwed up | 17:25 |
sripriya | diga_: exactly, can you please build the spec along these lines? | 17:25 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: yes, can you capture all these points raised .. in the last 15 - 20mins into the spec please ? | 17:26 |
diga_ | sripriya: Sure | 17:26 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: Sure, will do | 17:27 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: great thanks! | 17:27 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: Welcome! | 17:27 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: take care! Get well soon! | 17:27 |
sridhar_ram | sripriya: when u r in the summit and meet infra folks ask them how to create / manage a dev branch for this purpose.. i've no clue | 17:28 |
sridhar_ram | diga_: thanks a lot Digambar! | 17:28 |
sripriya | diga_: cool, thanks, as sridhar_ram already suggested, you can try fixing smaller RFEs around API layer in parallel as you build the spec, this will help design the spec better. | 17:28 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: sripriya : can you add your comments in the spec so that I can capture that in next PS | 17:29 |
sridhar_ram | sripriya: perhaps armax can guide us as well.. they recently created "qos" for classifier work | 17:29 |
sripriya | sridhar_ram: sure, will note it | 17:29 |
sripriya | diga_: will do | 17:29 |
*** Vijayendra has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
diga_ | sripriya: Yep, I will branch out seperate project in my git repo | 17:30 |
diga_ | sripriya: sridhar_ram: I start my openstack work early morning around 4:30AM everyday because I dont get time in office hours, hope if you will be working late at your tz | 17:31 |
sripriya | diga_: i was referring to the main tacker repo itself for API bugs/RFEs, you can also help be a reviewer for API related patches. | 17:32 |
diga_ | sripriya: okay, will review API related paches | 17:32 |
sripriya | diga_: thanks! appreciate your commitment and effort! | 17:34 |
diga_ | sripriya: sridhar_ram: yes, will go through the existing API implementation | 17:35 |
diga_ | sridhar_ram: sripriya: welcome! Thanks for giving me the opportunity to work on this task | 17:35 |
diga_ | sripriya: sridhar_ram: its late here, will talk to you on tomorrow | 17:36 |
sripriya | diga_: ttyl, gn! | 17:36 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: can you tell me what your auth_uri is in neutron.conf? | 17:37 |
trozet | sridhar_ram: oh...openstack network commands work, but not neutron client | 17:38 |
*** diga_ has quit IRC | 17:43 | |
*** yifei has joined #tacker | 17:51 | |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 17:52 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 17:55 | |
*** yifei has quit IRC | 17:56 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 17:56 | |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 18:08 | |
*** LamT__ has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 18:18 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 18:25 | |
*** tung_doan_ has joined #tacker | 18:31 | |
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 18:32 | |
tung_doan_ | sridhar_ram: seems like network service spec is interesting thing for me... will look into this so that i can support in case of alarm monitoring | 18:38 |
sridhar_ram | tung_doan_: absolutely.. please review & provide ur comments.. particularly on alarm monitor point of view | 18:46 |
tung_doan_ | sridhar_ram: will do.. thanks :) | 18:48 |
sridhar_ram | tung_doan_: btw, please continue to help make existing alarm monitor better ... we need func-test for ur feature ASAP | 18:49 |
*** tung_doan_ has quit IRC | 18:53 | |
*** bobmel_ has joined #tacker | 19:02 | |
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 19:04 | |
*** bobmel has quit IRC | 19:06 | |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 19:19 | |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 19:37 | |
*** diga has quit IRC | 19:48 | |
trozet | sridhar_ram: ping? | 19:49 |
*** Vijayendra has joined #tacker | 19:55 | |
trozet | vishnoianil: ping? | 19:58 |
*** achatterjee has quit IRC | 19:59 | |
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker | 19:59 | |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 20:00 | |
*** sripriya_ is now known as sripriya | 20:00 | |
vishnoianil | trozet, heyy | 20:00 |
trozet | vishnoianil: hi. I'm hitting an error with regular networking-sfc: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/443582/raw/ | 20:00 |
trozet | vishnoianil: complaining that hte host_id is none | 20:00 |
trozet | vishnoianil: seen that before? | 20:00 |
*** achatterjee has joined #tacker | 20:01 | |
vishnoianil | trozet, looking | 20:02 |
vishnoianil | trozet, it's while create port-pair-chain? | 20:02 |
vishnoianil | sorry port-pair | 20:02 |
trozet | vishnoianil: yeah, what do you normally fill in for hte host_id? | 20:03 |
vishnoianil | trozet, did you rebase the driver patch? | 20:03 |
vishnoianil | because host_id is not even part of the API as of now | 20:03 |
trozet | vishnoianil: i'm using regular networking-sfc OVS driver | 20:03 |
trozet | vishnoianil: i pulled straight from networking-sfc master | 20:04 |
vishnoianil | okay looks like it something new that is introduced in sfc api | 20:04 |
trozet | vishnoianil: i wonder if this is the new host config port binding for neutron | 20:04 |
vishnoianil | host_id most-probably be compute_id | 20:04 |
*** _achatterjee_ has joined #tacker | 20:04 | |
vishnoianil | trozet, yeah, but this should not be mandatory | 20:04 |
trozet | vishnoianil: networking_sfc/services/sfc/drivers/ovs/driver.py: host_id = port['binding:host_id'] | 20:05 |
*** achatterjee has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
trozet | vishnoianil: so you never fill out the host_id? | 20:06 |
vishnoianil | no, my driver is not rebased on the latest networking-sfc code | 20:07 |
vishnoianil | trozet, this is related to host interface binding | 20:08 |
vishnoianil | trozet, but why is this mandatory field | 20:08 |
trozet | vishnoianil: yeah the pseduo agent binding | 20:08 |
trozet | vishnoianil: i think hostconfig type binding is going to be required in ocata | 20:08 |
trozet | vishnoianil: but not sure why it is in networking-sfc master...if there is no newton branch? | 20:09 |
vishnoianil | trozet, i think stephen or cathy can give us more idea about it | 20:09 |
vishnoianil | trozet, let me check if there is any existing blurprint for this | 20:09 |
trozet | vishnoianil: right. I am sending an email wiht you cc'ed | 20:09 |
vishnoianil | trozet, cool, i will rebase my driver today on master branch and push it | 20:11 |
trozet | vishnoianil: yeah so hte new way you have to configure each OVS with the hardware config | 20:12 |
trozet | vishnoianil: then ML2 reads it and enteres it into neutron DB | 20:12 |
trozet | enters* | 20:12 |
*** lamt has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
trozet | vishnoianil: crap I just realized i didnt devstack with stable/newton | 20:14 |
vishnoianil | trozet, coffee time :D | 20:15 |
trozet | vishnoianil :) | 20:15 |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 20:27 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 20:27 | |
*** lamt has joined #tacker | 20:29 | |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 20:36 | |
*** bobmel has joined #tacker | 20:38 | |
*** bobmel_ has quit IRC | 20:41 | |
*** bobmel has quit IRC | 20:55 | |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 21:05 | |
*** tung_doan_ has joined #tacker | 21:25 | |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 21:25 | |
*** tung_doan_ has quit IRC | 21:29 | |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 21:32 | |
sridhar_ram | trozet: pong | 21:45 |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 21:55 | |
*** yifei has joined #tacker | 21:58 | |
*** yifei has quit IRC | 22:03 | |
*** lamt has quit IRC | 22:08 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 22:10 | |
vishwanathj | looking for reviewers to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/380685/ | 22:19 |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 22:21 | |
*** dkushwaha has quit IRC | 22:41 | |
*** bobmel has joined #tacker | 23:07 | |
*** bobmel has quit IRC | 23:12 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!