*** bobh has joined #tacker | 00:15 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 00:18 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 00:19 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 00:22 | |
*** uck_ has joined #tacker | 00:37 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 00:37 | |
*** s3wong_ is now known as s3wong | 01:04 | |
*** gongysh2 has quit IRC | 01:06 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 01:07 | |
*** uck_ has quit IRC | 01:10 | |
*** gongysh2 has joined #tacker | 01:29 | |
openstackgerrit | wei zhang proposed openstack/tacker: Replaces uuid.uuid4 with uuidutils.generate_uuid() https://review.openstack.org/395993 | 01:34 |
---|---|---|
*** bobh has quit IRC | 01:58 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 02:02 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 02:14 | |
openstackgerrit | Songming Yan proposed openstack/tacker: hacking: Use uuidutils or uuidsentinel to generate UUID https://review.openstack.org/397480 | 02:25 |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 02:32 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 02:37 | |
*** s3wong has quit IRC | 02:49 | |
*** links has joined #tacker | 02:49 | |
tung_doan | gongysh: could you help me elaborate what happens when two Tacker server are running? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/397306/1/tacker/vnfm/plugin.py@658 | 03:06 |
gongysh | the information we get from one tacker server can be not true on another tacker server. | 03:07 |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 03:12 | |
gongysh | n-harada, hi | 03:18 |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 03:18 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 03:19 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 03:20 | |
tung_doan | gongysh: actually it is quite not clear to me. This check is just done when a scaling request comes. How does it impact to another Tacker server here? Thanks | 03:21 |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 03:23 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 03:24 | |
gongysh | tung_doan, I mean your checking may not hold if we have more than one tacker server is dong jobs. | 03:25 |
gongysh | tung_doan, for example. tacker server1 and server2 have seen the 2 of vnf instances. and then scale-in comes in on server1, and another scale-in comes in on server2, and then both of two will pass your check, right? | 03:27 |
gongysh | tung_doan, I think it is better to let's the heat to do the check. | 03:28 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tacker-horizon: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/395389 | 03:29 |
tung_doan | gongysh: right.. make sense to me.. However, currently when vnf does scale in this case, vnf always stucks in PENDING_SCALE_IN state.. how can we deal with that? I met this problem when alarm triggers a scaling-in request to Tacker | 03:34 |
openstackgerrit | venkatamahesh proposed openstack/tacker: Small correction in glance cli of openwrt document https://review.openstack.org/394939 | 03:34 |
gongysh | tung_doan, didn't heat throw some exception so that we can change our vnf state in this case? | 03:35 |
tung_doan | gongysh: that I am thinking about.. I am not sure this is done by Heat side.. will check it again. Thanks | 03:37 |
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 03:47 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 03:57 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
gongysh | KanagarajM, hi | 04:01 |
KanagarajM | gongysh, hi | 04:01 |
gongysh | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/397031/ can you help with this? | 04:02 |
KanagarajM | gongysh, ok | 04:02 |
n-harada | gongysh: hello | 04:09 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tacker: Add vnffg_id into nfp dict https://review.openstack.org/397031 | 04:12 |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 04:34 | |
*** sanjayks has joined #tacker | 04:37 | |
*** dkushwaha has joined #tacker | 05:02 | |
sripriya | n-harada: ping | 05:03 |
*** dkushwaha has left #tacker | 05:04 | |
openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker: Update test-requirements for hacking https://review.openstack.org/397526 | 05:05 |
sripriya | tackers, i do not have any agenda items for tomorrow's meeting, please let me know if you have any topics you want to discuss, if i do not hear anything , i will cancel tomorrow's meeting | 05:05 |
sripriya | gongysh: KanagarajM can you please respond to the comments on vnfc spec, we can target to wrap it up this week | 05:06 |
KanagarajM | sripriya, ok | 05:10 |
gongysh | sripriya, sure | 05:10 |
gongysh | sripriya, when is the meeting time? | 05:12 |
*** trinaths has joined #tacker | 05:33 | |
n-harada | sripriya: hi | 05:35 |
tbh | gongysh, ping | 05:38 |
gongysh | tbh, pong | 05:38 |
tbh | gongysh, regarding your comment on VNFC, can you please elaborate? | 05:38 |
gongysh | tbh, I am thinking how to reconfig/clean a vnfc, after the first installation. | 05:39 |
gongysh | tbh, if we cannot think it throughly now, I am afraid we will have to refactor much later. | 05:41 |
gongysh | tbh, we also need to be able to list the vnfc in the system | 05:42 |
*** Vijayendra has quit IRC | 05:42 | |
tbh | gongysh, yup, I think we already discussed on this part. The plan is to introduce vnf-upgrade later which handles upgrade/clean. Passing reconfig at the creation of VNF may not work well as reconfig/upgrade is dynamic(I mean we don't know how to install upgraded s/w component) | 05:44 |
gongysh | tbh, are we able to support multiple vnfc for a vnf? | 05:45 |
tbh | gongysh, you mean VDU or VNF? | 05:45 |
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 05:46 | |
gongysh | vnfc for vdu, since vnfc is on vdu according to the spec. | 05:46 |
tbh | yup | 05:47 |
tbh | if we have multiple VDU we have multiple VNFCs | 05:47 |
gongysh | tbh, I mean multiple vnfcs on one vdu | 05:48 |
tbh | gongysh, yes | 05:48 |
tbh | gongysh, we are supporting multiple VNFC for one VDU | 05:49 |
gongysh | tbh, if we scale out the vdu, what will happen to the vnfc on it? | 05:50 |
tbh | gongysh, I have tested this scenario, as we are totally taking support of heat here, the scaled VDU will have those VNFC installed | 05:51 |
gongysh | ok, thanks | 05:51 |
gongysh | n-harada, hi | 05:53 |
gongysh | n-harada are you working on nsd spec? | 05:53 |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 05:58 | |
n-harada | gongysh: hi | 05:58 |
n-harada | gongysh: No, I don't working on nsd | 05:59 |
sripriya | n-harada: can you respond to anne's comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/332183/? | 06:10 |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 06:14 | |
*** Vijayendra has joined #tacker | 06:25 | |
n-harada | sripriya: sure, I will. | 06:25 |
gongysh | sripriya, I don't think the mac problem should be the blocker. | 06:29 |
sripriya | gongysh: i think anne needs to test that patch and facing that error | 06:31 |
*** trinaths has quit IRC | 06:43 | |
openstackgerrit | Songming Yan proposed openstack/tacker: hacking: Use uuidutils or uuidsentinel to generate UUID https://review.openstack.org/397480 | 07:05 |
openstackgerrit | Songming Yan proposed openstack/tacker: hacking: Use uuidutils or uuidsentinel to generate UUID https://review.openstack.org/397480 | 07:05 |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 07:09 | |
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC | 07:27 | |
openstackgerrit | Naoya Harada proposed openstack/tacker: Initial api-ref skeleton for Tacker https://review.openstack.org/332183 | 07:31 |
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker | 07:32 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 08:22 | |
*** sanjayks has quit IRC | 08:32 | |
*** sanjayks has joined #tacker | 08:33 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 08:55 | |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 08:59 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 09:18 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 09:19 | |
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 10:38 | |
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 11:23 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 11:43 | |
*** sanjayks has quit IRC | 12:24 | |
*** lehswe has joined #tacker | 12:46 | |
lehswe | I am planning to use tacker to deploy a VNF that performs DPI (Deep Packet Inspection) functions. The actual flow is not only IP but also ARP, DHCP and others. Do tacker support this today? It looks like networking-sfc do not support anything but IP level, and it looks like tacker is based on networking-sfc. | 12:50 |
* lehswe | 13:05 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 13:09 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 13:09 | |
*** lamt has joined #tacker | 13:16 | |
*** lamt has quit IRC | 13:16 | |
*** lamt has joined #tacker | 13:17 | |
*** lamt has quit IRC | 13:24 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 13:26 | |
*** diga has joined #tacker | 13:51 | |
*** Vijayendra has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
*** bobmel has joined #tacker | 13:59 | |
*** bobmel_ has quit IRC | 14:02 | |
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
*** lamt has joined #tacker | 14:55 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 15:05 | |
*** sanjayks has joined #tacker | 15:11 | |
*** igordcar1 has quit IRC | 15:19 | |
*** igordcard has joined #tacker | 15:19 | |
*** sanjayks has quit IRC | 15:28 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 15:49 | |
*** s3wong has joined #tacker | 16:05 | |
*** lehswe has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
*** s3wong has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 16:49 | |
*** trinaths1 has joined #tacker | 17:01 | |
*** trinaths1 has left #tacker | 17:33 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 17:44 | |
*** diga has quit IRC | 18:14 | |
*** s3wong has joined #tacker | 18:48 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 19:44 | |
*** santoshk has joined #tacker | 19:46 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 19:50 | |
*** uck_ has joined #tacker | 20:05 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 20:50 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 20:55 | |
*** uck_ has quit IRC | 21:11 | |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 21:39 | |
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 21:54 | |
*** manikanta has joined #tacker | 22:29 | |
*** manikanta has quit IRC | 22:36 | |
*** lamt has quit IRC | 22:48 | |
*** manikanta has joined #tacker | 22:49 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 23:05 | |
*** bobmel has quit IRC | 23:22 | |
*** lamt has joined #tacker | 23:23 | |
*** lamt has quit IRC | 23:41 | |
*** lamt has joined #tacker | 23:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!