Tuesday, 2016-11-15

*** bobh has joined #tacker00:15
*** bobh has quit IRC00:18
*** bobh has joined #tacker00:19
*** bobh has quit IRC00:22
*** uck_ has joined #tacker00:37
*** uck has quit IRC00:37
*** s3wong_ is now known as s3wong01:04
*** gongysh2 has quit IRC01:06
*** bobh has joined #tacker01:07
*** uck_ has quit IRC01:10
*** gongysh2 has joined #tacker01:29
openstackgerritwei zhang proposed openstack/tacker: Replaces uuid.uuid4 with uuidutils.generate_uuid()  https://review.openstack.org/39599301:34
*** bobh has quit IRC01:58
*** bobh has joined #tacker02:02
*** gongysh has joined #tacker02:14
openstackgerritSongming Yan proposed openstack/tacker: hacking: Use uuidutils or uuidsentinel to generate UUID  https://review.openstack.org/39748002:25
*** bobh has quit IRC02:32
*** bobh has joined #tacker02:37
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:49
*** links has joined #tacker02:49
tung_doangongysh: could you help me elaborate what happens when two Tacker server are running?  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/397306/1/tacker/vnfm/plugin.py@65803:06
gongyshthe information we get from one tacker server can be not true on another tacker server.03:07
*** bobh has quit IRC03:12
gongyshn-harada, hi03:18
*** bobh has joined #tacker03:18
*** bobh has quit IRC03:19
*** bobh has joined #tacker03:20
tung_doangongysh: actually it is quite not clear to me. This check is just done when a scaling request comes. How does it impact to another Tacker server here? Thanks03:21
*** bobh has quit IRC03:23
*** bobh has joined #tacker03:24
gongyshtung_doan, I mean your checking may not hold if we have more than one tacker server is dong jobs.03:25
gongyshtung_doan, for example. tacker server1 and server2 have seen the 2 of vnf instances. and then scale-in comes in on server1, and another scale-in comes in on server2, and then both of two will pass your check, right?03:27
gongyshtung_doan, I think it is better to let's the heat to do the check.03:28
openstackgerritMerged openstack/tacker-horizon: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/39538903:29
tung_doangongysh: right.. make sense to me.. However, currently when vnf does scale in this case, vnf always stucks in PENDING_SCALE_IN state.. how can we deal with that? I met this problem when alarm triggers a scaling-in request to Tacker03:34
openstackgerritvenkatamahesh proposed openstack/tacker: Small correction in glance cli of openwrt document  https://review.openstack.org/39493903:34
gongyshtung_doan,  didn't heat throw some exception so that we can change our vnf state in this case?03:35
tung_doangongysh: that I am thinking about.. I am not sure this is done by Heat side.. will check it again. Thanks03:37
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker03:47
*** tbh has joined #tacker03:57
*** bobh has quit IRC04:00
gongyshKanagarajM, hi04:01
KanagarajMgongysh, hi04:01
gongyshhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/397031/ can you help with this?04:02
KanagarajMgongysh, ok04:02
n-haradagongysh: hello04:09
openstackgerritMerged openstack/tacker: Add vnffg_id into nfp dict  https://review.openstack.org/39703104:12
*** janki has joined #tacker04:34
*** sanjayks has joined #tacker04:37
*** dkushwaha has joined #tacker05:02
sripriyan-harada: ping05:03
*** dkushwaha has left #tacker05:04
openstackgerritdharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker: Update test-requirements for hacking  https://review.openstack.org/39752605:05
sripriyatackers, i do not have any agenda items for tomorrow's meeting, please let me know if you have any topics you want to discuss, if i do not hear anything , i will cancel tomorrow's meeting05:05
sripriyagongysh: KanagarajM can you please respond to the comments on vnfc spec, we can target to wrap it up this week05:06
KanagarajMsripriya, ok05:10
gongyshsripriya, sure05:10
gongyshsripriya, when is the meeting time?05:12
*** trinaths has joined #tacker05:33
n-haradasripriya: hi05:35
tbhgongysh, ping05:38
gongyshtbh, pong05:38
tbhgongysh, regarding your comment on VNFC, can you please elaborate?05:38
gongyshtbh,  I am thinking how to reconfig/clean  a vnfc, after the first installation.05:39
gongyshtbh, if we cannot think it throughly now, I am afraid we will have to refactor much later.05:41
gongyshtbh, we also need to be able to list the vnfc in the system05:42
*** Vijayendra has quit IRC05:42
tbhgongysh, yup, I think we already discussed on this part. The plan is to introduce vnf-upgrade later which handles upgrade/clean. Passing reconfig at the creation of VNF may not work well as reconfig/upgrade is dynamic(I mean we don't know how to install upgraded s/w component)05:44
gongyshtbh, are we able to support multiple vnfc for a vnf?05:45
tbhgongysh, you mean VDU or VNF?05:45
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker05:46
gongyshvnfc for vdu, since vnfc is on vdu according to the spec.05:46
tbhyup05:47
tbhif we have multiple VDU we have multiple VNFCs05:47
gongyshtbh, I mean multiple vnfcs on one vdu05:48
tbhgongysh, yes05:48
tbhgongysh, we are supporting  multiple VNFC for one VDU05:49
gongyshtbh, if we scale out the vdu, what will happen to the vnfc on it?05:50
tbhgongysh, I have tested this scenario, as we are totally taking support of heat here, the scaled VDU will have those VNFC installed05:51
gongyshok, thanks05:51
gongyshn-harada, hi05:53
gongyshn-harada are you working on nsd spec?05:53
*** tbh has quit IRC05:58
n-haradagongysh: hi05:58
n-haradagongysh: No, I don't working on nsd05:59
sripriyan-harada: can you respond to anne's comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/332183/?06:10
*** tbh has joined #tacker06:14
*** Vijayendra has joined #tacker06:25
n-haradasripriya: sure, I will.06:25
gongyshsripriya, I don't think the mac problem should be the blocker.06:29
sripriyagongysh: i think anne needs to test that patch and facing that error06:31
*** trinaths has quit IRC06:43
openstackgerritSongming Yan proposed openstack/tacker: hacking: Use uuidutils or uuidsentinel to generate UUID  https://review.openstack.org/39748007:05
openstackgerritSongming Yan proposed openstack/tacker: hacking: Use uuidutils or uuidsentinel to generate UUID  https://review.openstack.org/39748007:05
*** amotoki has joined #tacker07:09
*** manikanta_tadi has quit IRC07:27
openstackgerritNaoya Harada proposed openstack/tacker: Initial api-ref skeleton for Tacker  https://review.openstack.org/33218307:31
*** manikanta_tadi has joined #tacker07:32
*** janki has quit IRC08:22
*** sanjayks has quit IRC08:32
*** sanjayks has joined #tacker08:33
*** gongysh has quit IRC08:55
*** tbh has quit IRC08:59
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC09:18
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker09:19
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker10:38
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC11:23
*** links has quit IRC11:43
*** sanjayks has quit IRC12:24
*** lehswe has joined #tacker12:46
lehsweI am planning to use tacker to deploy a VNF that performs DPI (Deep Packet Inspection) functions. The actual flow is not only IP but also ARP, DHCP and others. Do tacker support this today? It looks like networking-sfc do not support anything but IP level, and it looks like tacker is based on networking-sfc.12:50
* lehswe 13:05
*** bobh has joined #tacker13:09
*** bobh has quit IRC13:09
*** bobh has joined #tacker13:09
*** lamt has joined #tacker13:16
*** lamt has quit IRC13:16
*** lamt has joined #tacker13:17
*** lamt has quit IRC13:24
*** bobh has quit IRC13:26
*** diga has joined #tacker13:51
*** Vijayendra has quit IRC13:56
*** bobmel has joined #tacker13:59
*** bobmel_ has quit IRC14:02
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC14:35
*** lamt has joined #tacker14:55
*** bobh has joined #tacker15:05
*** sanjayks has joined #tacker15:11
*** igordcar1 has quit IRC15:19
*** igordcard has joined #tacker15:19
*** sanjayks has quit IRC15:28
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC15:48
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker15:49
*** s3wong has joined #tacker16:05
*** lehswe has quit IRC16:07
*** s3wong has quit IRC16:08
*** uck has joined #tacker16:49
*** trinaths1 has joined #tacker17:01
*** trinaths1 has left #tacker17:33
*** amotoki has quit IRC17:44
*** diga has quit IRC18:14
*** s3wong has joined #tacker18:48
*** amotoki has joined #tacker19:44
*** santoshk has joined #tacker19:46
*** amotoki has quit IRC19:50
*** uck_ has joined #tacker20:05
*** uck has quit IRC20:05
*** amotoki has joined #tacker20:50
*** amotoki has quit IRC20:55
*** uck_ has quit IRC21:11
*** uck has joined #tacker21:39
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker21:54
*** manikanta has joined #tacker22:29
*** manikanta has quit IRC22:36
*** lamt has quit IRC22:48
*** manikanta has joined #tacker22:49
*** bobh has quit IRC23:05
*** bobmel has quit IRC23:22
*** lamt has joined #tacker23:23
*** lamt has quit IRC23:41
*** lamt has joined #tacker23:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!