Wednesday, 2017-01-04

*** tbh has joined #tacker00:15
*** bobh has joined #tacker00:16
*** bobh has quit IRC00:19
*** prashantD has quit IRC01:08
*** prashantD has joined #tacker01:15
*** prashantD has quit IRC01:25
*** prashantD has joined #tacker01:26
*** bobh_ has joined #tacker01:59
*** gongysh has joined #tacker02:03
openstackgerritMerged openstack/tacker: Use heat devstack plugin  https://review.openstack.org/36169202:32
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:45
gongyshsridhar_ram, hi02:56
gongyshsridhar_ram, do we have meeting today?02:56
sridhar_ramgongysh: yes, we do02:57
gongyshgot it02:57
sridhar_ramasia-pac cores: bobh_: gongysh: tbh:  can you please review tackerclient patchsets as a priority .. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/python-tackerclient+AND+status:open+AND+label:Code-Review%253D2 ?03:00
tbhsure03:00
sridhar_ram  I'm looking to merge these tackerclient changes as interim patchset to include them in a tackerclient release03:00
sridhar_ramtbh: thanks03:01
sridhar_ramAgain, by no means these need to be final client change, we still have some time to iterate tackerclient03:01
*** prashantD has quit IRC03:08
openstackgerritgongysh proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Get service type according to tacker server change  https://review.openstack.org/41641803:25
openstackgerritgongysh proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Get service type according to tacker server change  https://review.openstack.org/41641803:44
*** links has joined #tacker03:56
*** bobh_ has quit IRC04:02
*** bobh has joined #tacker04:06
*** bobh has quit IRC04:11
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker04:24
*** janki has joined #tacker04:52
openstackgerritgongysh proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Get service type according to tacker server change  https://review.openstack.org/41641805:03
*** subh has joined #tacker05:08
openstackgerritTung Doan proposed openstack/tacker: [WIP] Alarm monitor: Monasca support in Tacker  https://review.openstack.org/41521605:11
*** Yan has joined #tacker05:15
openstackgerritgongysh proposed openstack/tacker: Remove deprecated heat infra_driver  https://review.openstack.org/38724005:16
*** Yan has quit IRC05:19
*** Yan has joined #tacker05:20
openstackgerritbharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker: [WIP] NSD: Mistral workflow  https://review.openstack.org/41493705:24
sridhar_ramtacker weekly meeting in few mins.. head to #openstack-meeting channel05:28
gongyshtacker guys are flock to meeting root.05:29
gongyshflocking to meeting room.05:30
*** s3wong has joined #tacker05:46
*** dkushwaha has joined #tacker05:51
*** janki has left #tacker06:02
*** janki has joined #tacker06:02
*** diga has joined #tacker06:06
*** prashantD has joined #tacker06:13
*** amotoki has joined #tacker06:22
openstackgerritvenkatamahesh proposed openstack/tacker: Support parameter input for vnffg template  https://review.openstack.org/40469606:25
openstackgerritvenkatamahesh proposed openstack/tacker: Support parameter input for vnffg template  https://review.openstack.org/40469606:26
*** subh has quit IRC06:27
openstackgerritbharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Implement client support for NSD  https://review.openstack.org/41218806:28
sridhar_ramjanki: ping06:30
jankisridhar_ram, hey06:30
tung_doansridhar_ram, KanagarajM: I just checked your bug report and may know the reason.06:30
tbhforget to ask, anyone if you can try and review VNFC, that would be really great06:30
s3wongtung_doan: that's great!06:30
jankidoes it make sense to delete inline-vnfd if vnf is in error state?06:31
jankisridhar_ram, ^06:31
tung_doanKanagarajM: just make sure if SP is empty in your test, right?06:31
jankiI am not sure if an errored vnf can be made active again06:31
sridhar_ramtbh: i gave an initial pass, looks i forgot to press the submit button :(06:31
tbhsridhar_ram, oh is it06:32
digaHappy New Year to all06:33
tbhsridhar_ram, I hope it worked for you :)06:34
sridhar_ramjanki: no, inline vnfd delete should happen as part of vnf-delete operation. when vnf ends up in error state, the vnf-delete is not called. So, I'd conclude inline vnfd, if coded like i said here, won't be deleted when a vnf enters error state06:35
sridhar_ramdiga: happy new year!06:35
jankisridhar_ram, I understand it wont be deleted. My question is would that deletion make sense?06:36
sridhar_ramtbh: just pushed the comments out for vnfc06:37
sridhar_ramjanki: no need, let's keep the code simple and symmetric by keeping inline vnfd delete as part of vnf-delete06:37
*** prashantD has quit IRC06:38
jankisridhar_ram, done :)06:38
tbhsridhar_ram, sure, thanks!06:38
jankisridhar_ram, I have also pushed the spec for HOT support https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416231/. It will help to start a discussion06:39
sridhar_ramjanki: thanks, will look into it.. there is no consensus last time we discussed and your update will help06:40
jankisridhar_ram, thanks :). I will also update the container one by end of this week06:40
sridhar_ramjanki: sounds good, thanks!06:42
tung_doansridhar_ram: i think we had problem with scaling design06:43
jankisridhar_ram, wc. Have a good ahesd :)06:45
gongyshtbh, hi06:46
gongyshhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/412188/506:46
sridhar_ramtung_doan: can you elaborate?06:46
gongyshI have given some comments.  thanks06:46
tbhgongysh, hi06:46
tung_doansridhar_ram: once we define targets inside SP, it will not work in tosca-parse at all https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/samples/tosca-templates/vnfd/tosca-vnfd-scale.yaml#L6506:47
tung_doansridhar_ram: this code shows the reason: https://github.com/openstack/tosca-parser/blob/master/toscaparser/topology_template.py#L13406:47
tung_doansridhar_ram: in our current design, tosca-parser will return an empty target list06:49
tbhgongysh, will address the comments, thanks for quick review!06:49
tbhgongysh, I plan to display all columns in ns-list06:49
sridhar_ramtung_doan: hmm, isn't that what KanagarajM is working with tosca-parser team to fix?06:49
sridhar_ramKanagarajM: ^^06:49
gongyshtbh, that's not good. it will make mess with user screen.06:50
tung_doansridhar_ram: just my quick look, need his confirmation06:50
gongyshtbh, choose most frequently used listed by default.06:50
sridhar_ramtung_doan: np, your inputs are quite valuable.. please help in this area06:51
tbhgongysh, may be name, id status and mgmt_urls?06:51
gongyshtbh, user always can use -c option too choose what to be listed if he/she want to customize.06:51
sridhar_ramfolks - i'm quite fried through the day, signing off... please go ahead and land NSD client. i'll request a client release tomorrow06:52
gongyshtbh, id, name, nsd_id, status, mgmt_urls06:52
tbhgongysh, makes sense06:52
*** subh has joined #tacker06:52
gongyshsridhar_ram, get some wet please.06:52
gongysh:)06:53
tung_doansridhar_ram: i have a request, could you become a approver in my blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/monasca-alarm-monitor ?06:54
tung_doansridhar_ram: the code was launched and I have intention to bring it into ocata cycle06:55
sridhar_ramtung_doan: sure, will review it.. assuming it doesn't have client changes, it is technically possible for ocata. the challenge will be code-reviewers time as we are getting close to the busy release window. We can try a best case effort, hopefully this is slightly easier given this is 2nd monitoring driver after ceilometer06:58
tung_doansridhar_ram: it is absolutely slight. almost job was done by RFE with alarm monitor.. this patch only impacts to tacker server. thanks07:00
*** Yan has left #tacker07:09
openstackgerritbharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Implement client support for NSD  https://review.openstack.org/41218807:10
tbhgongysh, I think I addressed your comments in the latest patch07:11
openstackgerritxu-haiwei proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Integrate Senlin resource to Tacker for VDU management  https://review.openstack.org/35294307:11
gongyshsripriya, hi07:15
gongyshtung_doan, hi07:24
gongyshtung_doan, why  https://github.com/openstack/tosca-parser/blob/master/toscaparser/topology_template.py#L134 will block the targets inside SP?07:25
tung_doangongysh: just looked at Sahdev's comment, he showed a scaling template, targets are out of scaling properties. Because we defined  it in scaling properties, therefore tosca-parser will assume that target list is empty. Policy cannot be excecuted07:29
tung_doanhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/heat-translator/+bug/165292807:29
openstackLaunchpad bug 1652928 in Heat Translator "Fails to translate the derived polices" [High,New] - Assigned to Sahdev Zala (spzala)07:29
tung_doangongysh: ^^07:30
gongyshtung_doan,  https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/samples/tosca-templates/vnfd/tosca-vnfd-alarm-scale.yaml#L7307:35
gongyshtung_doan, there are no targets under vdu_hcpu_usage_scaling_out07:36
gongyshtung_doan, so what are the difference with scaling_out and scaling_in? why one has targets, one hasn't?07:37
gongyshtung_doan, https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/samples/tosca-templates/vnfd/tosca-vnfd-alarm-scale.yaml#L9307:37
*** YanXingan has joined #tacker07:38
tung_doangongysh: ouch!!! in alarm policies, targets does not make sense because it is controlled by metadata. targets in vdu_lcpu_usage_scaling_in is meaningless. I forgot to remove it07:40
openstackgerritbharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Implement client support for NSD  https://review.openstack.org/41218807:40
*** s3wong has quit IRC07:52
gongyshKanagarajM, hi07:52
*** gongysh_ has joined #tacker07:59
*** gongysh has quit IRC08:00
openstackgerritbharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Implement client support for NSD  https://review.openstack.org/41218808:00
*** subh has quit IRC08:04
*** jchhatbar has joined #tacker08:17
*** janki has quit IRC08:19
*** subh has joined #tacker08:36
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC08:37
openstackgerritTung Doan proposed openstack/tacker: Fix: nested resources are ignored  https://review.openstack.org/41593508:44
*** tung_doan has quit IRC08:46
*** gongysh has joined #tacker08:51
gongyshtbh, hi08:52
gongyshI see the mgmt_url is empty at your demo url.08:52
gongyshdkushwaha, hi09:03
openstackgerritMerged openstack/python-tackerclient: Implement client support for NSD  https://review.openstack.org/41218809:18
tbhgongysh, hi09:22
tbhgongysh, after ns become active you can see mgmt_urls09:22
tbhgongysh, brb09:22
*** tbh has quit IRC09:23
*** YanXingan has left #tacker09:30
gongyshtbh, ok09:40
*** jchhatbar_ has joined #tacker09:50
*** jchhatbar has quit IRC09:53
*** tbh has joined #tacker10:03
openstackgerritdharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker: Remove support for legacy VNFD templates.  https://review.openstack.org/38278610:19
*** subh has quit IRC10:49
*** links has quit IRC10:57
*** subh has joined #tacker11:16
*** links has joined #tacker11:21
*** gongysh has quit IRC11:21
openstackgerritdharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker: Remove support for legacy VNFD templates.  https://review.openstack.org/38278611:25
openstackgerritTung Doan proposed openstack/tacker: Fix: nested resources are ignored  https://review.openstack.org/41593511:44
*** dkushwaha has quit IRC11:45
*** diga has quit IRC11:55
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC12:33
*** bobmel has joined #tacker13:06
*** bobh has joined #tacker13:07
*** bobmel has quit IRC13:11
*** bobh has quit IRC13:23
*** lamt has joined #tacker13:33
*** diga has joined #tacker13:34
*** subh has quit IRC13:57
*** diga has quit IRC14:00
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker14:02
openstackgerritbharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker: [WIP] NSD: Mistral workflow  https://review.openstack.org/41493714:02
*** bobh_ has joined #tacker14:59
*** links has quit IRC14:59
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC15:16
*** tung_doan has joined #tacker15:31
*** jchhatbar_ has quit IRC16:37
*** prashantD has joined #tacker17:23
*** bobmel has joined #tacker18:04
openstackgerritbharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker: Implement VNFC support  https://review.openstack.org/35832118:38
*** tbh has quit IRC18:44
*** s3wong has joined #tacker18:52
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC18:55
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker19:49
*** tbh has joined #tacker19:53
tbhsridhar_ram, ping19:55
*** tbh has quit IRC20:03
*** prashantD has quit IRC20:07
*** prashantD has joined #tacker20:07
*** lamt has quit IRC20:39
*** lamt has joined #tacker21:50
sridhar_rams3wong: bobh_: sripriya: can you please review a high prio horizon fix - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416418/ .. thanks!22:18
s3wongsridhar_ram: ack22:19
sridhar_rams3wong: thanks!22:20
openstackgerritMerged openstack/tacker-horizon: Get service type according to tacker server change  https://review.openstack.org/41641822:25
* bobh_ isn't fast enough apparently....22:29
s3wongbobh_ can still review if he feels like it :-)22:30
bobh_s3wong: that's one way to bump the stackalytics numbers22:31
s3wongbobh_: unfortunately no --- as review / any voting is shut off after merged :-)22:42
*** bobh_ has quit IRC22:45
*** openstack has joined #tacker22:56
*** amotoki has quit IRC23:00
*** amotoki has joined #tacker23:02
*** amotoki has quit IRC23:26
*** gongysh has joined #tacker23:28
*** amotoki has joined #tacker23:31
*** lamt has quit IRC23:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!