*** tbh has joined #tacker | 00:15 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 00:16 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 00:19 | |
*** prashantD has quit IRC | 01:08 | |
*** prashantD has joined #tacker | 01:15 | |
*** prashantD has quit IRC | 01:25 | |
*** prashantD has joined #tacker | 01:26 | |
*** bobh_ has joined #tacker | 01:59 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 02:03 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tacker: Use heat devstack plugin https://review.openstack.org/361692 | 02:32 |
---|---|---|
*** s3wong has quit IRC | 02:45 | |
gongysh | sridhar_ram, hi | 02:56 |
gongysh | sridhar_ram, do we have meeting today? | 02:56 |
sridhar_ram | gongysh: yes, we do | 02:57 |
gongysh | got it | 02:57 |
sridhar_ram | asia-pac cores: bobh_: gongysh: tbh: can you please review tackerclient patchsets as a priority .. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/python-tackerclient+AND+status:open+AND+label:Code-Review%253D2 ? | 03:00 |
tbh | sure | 03:00 |
sridhar_ram | I'm looking to merge these tackerclient changes as interim patchset to include them in a tackerclient release | 03:00 |
sridhar_ram | tbh: thanks | 03:01 |
sridhar_ram | Again, by no means these need to be final client change, we still have some time to iterate tackerclient | 03:01 |
*** prashantD has quit IRC | 03:08 | |
openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Get service type according to tacker server change https://review.openstack.org/416418 | 03:25 |
openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Get service type according to tacker server change https://review.openstack.org/416418 | 03:44 |
*** links has joined #tacker | 03:56 | |
*** bobh_ has quit IRC | 04:02 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 04:06 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 04:24 | |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 04:52 | |
openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker-horizon: Get service type according to tacker server change https://review.openstack.org/416418 | 05:03 |
*** subh has joined #tacker | 05:08 | |
openstackgerrit | Tung Doan proposed openstack/tacker: [WIP] Alarm monitor: Monasca support in Tacker https://review.openstack.org/415216 | 05:11 |
*** Yan has joined #tacker | 05:15 | |
openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker: Remove deprecated heat infra_driver https://review.openstack.org/387240 | 05:16 |
*** Yan has quit IRC | 05:19 | |
*** Yan has joined #tacker | 05:20 | |
openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker: [WIP] NSD: Mistral workflow https://review.openstack.org/414937 | 05:24 |
sridhar_ram | tacker weekly meeting in few mins.. head to #openstack-meeting channel | 05:28 |
gongysh | tacker guys are flock to meeting root. | 05:29 |
gongysh | flocking to meeting room. | 05:30 |
*** s3wong has joined #tacker | 05:46 | |
*** dkushwaha has joined #tacker | 05:51 | |
*** janki has left #tacker | 06:02 | |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 06:02 | |
*** diga has joined #tacker | 06:06 | |
*** prashantD has joined #tacker | 06:13 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 06:22 | |
openstackgerrit | venkatamahesh proposed openstack/tacker: Support parameter input for vnffg template https://review.openstack.org/404696 | 06:25 |
openstackgerrit | venkatamahesh proposed openstack/tacker: Support parameter input for vnffg template https://review.openstack.org/404696 | 06:26 |
*** subh has quit IRC | 06:27 | |
openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Implement client support for NSD https://review.openstack.org/412188 | 06:28 |
sridhar_ram | janki: ping | 06:30 |
janki | sridhar_ram, hey | 06:30 |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram, KanagarajM: I just checked your bug report and may know the reason. | 06:30 |
tbh | forget to ask, anyone if you can try and review VNFC, that would be really great | 06:30 |
s3wong | tung_doan: that's great! | 06:30 |
janki | does it make sense to delete inline-vnfd if vnf is in error state? | 06:31 |
janki | sridhar_ram, ^ | 06:31 |
tung_doan | KanagarajM: just make sure if SP is empty in your test, right? | 06:31 |
janki | I am not sure if an errored vnf can be made active again | 06:31 |
sridhar_ram | tbh: i gave an initial pass, looks i forgot to press the submit button :( | 06:31 |
tbh | sridhar_ram, oh is it | 06:32 |
diga | Happy New Year to all | 06:33 |
tbh | sridhar_ram, I hope it worked for you :) | 06:34 |
sridhar_ram | janki: no, inline vnfd delete should happen as part of vnf-delete operation. when vnf ends up in error state, the vnf-delete is not called. So, I'd conclude inline vnfd, if coded like i said here, won't be deleted when a vnf enters error state | 06:35 |
sridhar_ram | diga: happy new year! | 06:35 |
janki | sridhar_ram, I understand it wont be deleted. My question is would that deletion make sense? | 06:36 |
sridhar_ram | tbh: just pushed the comments out for vnfc | 06:37 |
sridhar_ram | janki: no need, let's keep the code simple and symmetric by keeping inline vnfd delete as part of vnf-delete | 06:37 |
*** prashantD has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
janki | sridhar_ram, done :) | 06:38 |
tbh | sridhar_ram, sure, thanks! | 06:38 |
janki | sridhar_ram, I have also pushed the spec for HOT support https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416231/. It will help to start a discussion | 06:39 |
sridhar_ram | janki: thanks, will look into it.. there is no consensus last time we discussed and your update will help | 06:40 |
janki | sridhar_ram, thanks :). I will also update the container one by end of this week | 06:40 |
sridhar_ram | janki: sounds good, thanks! | 06:42 |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram: i think we had problem with scaling design | 06:43 |
janki | sridhar_ram, wc. Have a good ahesd :) | 06:45 |
gongysh | tbh, hi | 06:46 |
gongysh | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/412188/5 | 06:46 |
sridhar_ram | tung_doan: can you elaborate? | 06:46 |
gongysh | I have given some comments. thanks | 06:46 |
tbh | gongysh, hi | 06:46 |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram: once we define targets inside SP, it will not work in tosca-parse at all https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/samples/tosca-templates/vnfd/tosca-vnfd-scale.yaml#L65 | 06:47 |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram: this code shows the reason: https://github.com/openstack/tosca-parser/blob/master/toscaparser/topology_template.py#L134 | 06:47 |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram: in our current design, tosca-parser will return an empty target list | 06:49 |
tbh | gongysh, will address the comments, thanks for quick review! | 06:49 |
tbh | gongysh, I plan to display all columns in ns-list | 06:49 |
sridhar_ram | tung_doan: hmm, isn't that what KanagarajM is working with tosca-parser team to fix? | 06:49 |
sridhar_ram | KanagarajM: ^^ | 06:49 |
gongysh | tbh, that's not good. it will make mess with user screen. | 06:50 |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram: just my quick look, need his confirmation | 06:50 |
gongysh | tbh, choose most frequently used listed by default. | 06:50 |
sridhar_ram | tung_doan: np, your inputs are quite valuable.. please help in this area | 06:51 |
tbh | gongysh, may be name, id status and mgmt_urls? | 06:51 |
gongysh | tbh, user always can use -c option too choose what to be listed if he/she want to customize. | 06:51 |
sridhar_ram | folks - i'm quite fried through the day, signing off... please go ahead and land NSD client. i'll request a client release tomorrow | 06:52 |
gongysh | tbh, id, name, nsd_id, status, mgmt_urls | 06:52 |
tbh | gongysh, makes sense | 06:52 |
*** subh has joined #tacker | 06:52 | |
gongysh | sridhar_ram, get some wet please. | 06:52 |
gongysh | :) | 06:53 |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram: i have a request, could you become a approver in my blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/monasca-alarm-monitor ? | 06:54 |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram: the code was launched and I have intention to bring it into ocata cycle | 06:55 |
sridhar_ram | tung_doan: sure, will review it.. assuming it doesn't have client changes, it is technically possible for ocata. the challenge will be code-reviewers time as we are getting close to the busy release window. We can try a best case effort, hopefully this is slightly easier given this is 2nd monitoring driver after ceilometer | 06:58 |
tung_doan | sridhar_ram: it is absolutely slight. almost job was done by RFE with alarm monitor.. this patch only impacts to tacker server. thanks | 07:00 |
*** Yan has left #tacker | 07:09 | |
openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Implement client support for NSD https://review.openstack.org/412188 | 07:10 |
tbh | gongysh, I think I addressed your comments in the latest patch | 07:11 |
openstackgerrit | xu-haiwei proposed openstack/tacker-specs: Integrate Senlin resource to Tacker for VDU management https://review.openstack.org/352943 | 07:11 |
gongysh | sripriya, hi | 07:15 |
gongysh | tung_doan, hi | 07:24 |
gongysh | tung_doan, why https://github.com/openstack/tosca-parser/blob/master/toscaparser/topology_template.py#L134 will block the targets inside SP? | 07:25 |
tung_doan | gongysh: just looked at Sahdev's comment, he showed a scaling template, targets are out of scaling properties. Because we defined it in scaling properties, therefore tosca-parser will assume that target list is empty. Policy cannot be excecuted | 07:29 |
tung_doan | https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat-translator/+bug/1652928 | 07:29 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1652928 in Heat Translator "Fails to translate the derived polices" [High,New] - Assigned to Sahdev Zala (spzala) | 07:29 |
tung_doan | gongysh: ^^ | 07:30 |
gongysh | tung_doan, https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/samples/tosca-templates/vnfd/tosca-vnfd-alarm-scale.yaml#L73 | 07:35 |
gongysh | tung_doan, there are no targets under vdu_hcpu_usage_scaling_out | 07:36 |
gongysh | tung_doan, so what are the difference with scaling_out and scaling_in? why one has targets, one hasn't? | 07:37 |
gongysh | tung_doan, https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/samples/tosca-templates/vnfd/tosca-vnfd-alarm-scale.yaml#L93 | 07:37 |
*** YanXingan has joined #tacker | 07:38 | |
tung_doan | gongysh: ouch!!! in alarm policies, targets does not make sense because it is controlled by metadata. targets in vdu_lcpu_usage_scaling_in is meaningless. I forgot to remove it | 07:40 |
openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Implement client support for NSD https://review.openstack.org/412188 | 07:40 |
*** s3wong has quit IRC | 07:52 | |
gongysh | KanagarajM, hi | 07:52 |
*** gongysh_ has joined #tacker | 07:59 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 08:00 | |
openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/python-tackerclient: Implement client support for NSD https://review.openstack.org/412188 | 08:00 |
*** subh has quit IRC | 08:04 | |
*** jchhatbar has joined #tacker | 08:17 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 08:19 | |
*** subh has joined #tacker | 08:36 | |
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC | 08:37 | |
openstackgerrit | Tung Doan proposed openstack/tacker: Fix: nested resources are ignored https://review.openstack.org/415935 | 08:44 |
*** tung_doan has quit IRC | 08:46 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 08:51 | |
gongysh | tbh, hi | 08:52 |
gongysh | I see the mgmt_url is empty at your demo url. | 08:52 |
gongysh | dkushwaha, hi | 09:03 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-tackerclient: Implement client support for NSD https://review.openstack.org/412188 | 09:18 |
tbh | gongysh, hi | 09:22 |
tbh | gongysh, after ns become active you can see mgmt_urls | 09:22 |
tbh | gongysh, brb | 09:22 |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 09:23 | |
*** YanXingan has left #tacker | 09:30 | |
gongysh | tbh, ok | 09:40 |
*** jchhatbar_ has joined #tacker | 09:50 | |
*** jchhatbar has quit IRC | 09:53 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 10:03 | |
openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker: Remove support for legacy VNFD templates. https://review.openstack.org/382786 | 10:19 |
*** subh has quit IRC | 10:49 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 10:57 | |
*** subh has joined #tacker | 11:16 | |
*** links has joined #tacker | 11:21 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 11:21 | |
openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker: Remove support for legacy VNFD templates. https://review.openstack.org/382786 | 11:25 |
openstackgerrit | Tung Doan proposed openstack/tacker: Fix: nested resources are ignored https://review.openstack.org/415935 | 11:44 |
*** dkushwaha has quit IRC | 11:45 | |
*** diga has quit IRC | 11:55 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 12:33 | |
*** bobmel has joined #tacker | 13:06 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 13:07 | |
*** bobmel has quit IRC | 13:11 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 13:23 | |
*** lamt has joined #tacker | 13:33 | |
*** diga has joined #tacker | 13:34 | |
*** subh has quit IRC | 13:57 | |
*** diga has quit IRC | 14:00 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 14:02 | |
openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker: [WIP] NSD: Mistral workflow https://review.openstack.org/414937 | 14:02 |
*** bobh_ has joined #tacker | 14:59 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 14:59 | |
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 15:16 | |
*** tung_doan has joined #tacker | 15:31 | |
*** jchhatbar_ has quit IRC | 16:37 | |
*** prashantD has joined #tacker | 17:23 | |
*** bobmel has joined #tacker | 18:04 | |
openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed openstack/tacker: Implement VNFC support https://review.openstack.org/358321 | 18:38 |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 18:44 | |
*** s3wong has joined #tacker | 18:52 | |
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 18:55 | |
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 19:49 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 19:53 | |
tbh | sridhar_ram, ping | 19:55 |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 20:03 | |
*** prashantD has quit IRC | 20:07 | |
*** prashantD has joined #tacker | 20:07 | |
*** lamt has quit IRC | 20:39 | |
*** lamt has joined #tacker | 21:50 | |
sridhar_ram | s3wong: bobh_: sripriya: can you please review a high prio horizon fix - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416418/ .. thanks! | 22:18 |
s3wong | sridhar_ram: ack | 22:19 |
sridhar_ram | s3wong: thanks! | 22:20 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tacker-horizon: Get service type according to tacker server change https://review.openstack.org/416418 | 22:25 |
* bobh_ isn't fast enough apparently.... | 22:29 | |
s3wong | bobh_ can still review if he feels like it :-) | 22:30 |
bobh_ | s3wong: that's one way to bump the stackalytics numbers | 22:31 |
s3wong | bobh_: unfortunately no --- as review / any voting is shut off after merged :-) | 22:42 |
*** bobh_ has quit IRC | 22:45 | |
*** openstack has joined #tacker | 22:56 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 23:02 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 23:26 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 23:28 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 23:31 | |
*** lamt has quit IRC | 23:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!