| *** spzala has joined #tacker | 00:25 | |
| *** xianghui has joined #tacker | 01:37 | |
| openstackgerrit | futangw wang proposed openstack/tacker master: Add allowed_address_pairs support in tacker CP https://review.openstack.org/435187 | 02:00 |
|---|---|---|
| *** spzala has quit IRC | 02:10 | |
| *** trinaths1 has left #tacker | 02:17 | |
| xianghui | tung_doan, hi, thanks for your previous comment on "With ping driver you firstly create a vnf from tosca template. IP address will be created for VNF instance and the ping driver used the IP address to check if VNF instance is reachable" | 02:23 |
| xianghui | I am rethinking it, so need more advice | 02:24 |
| xianghui | do you mean that the ping driver is started in the VNF instance spawned by tosca template? | 02:24 |
| xianghui | does it mean for each VNF instance having different tenant network we need to start a corresponding VNF created by tosca template in the same tenant network? | 02:27 |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 02:28 | |
| openstackgerrit | Andy Yan proposed openstack/tacker master: Fix typo in Tacker https://review.openstack.org/423751 | 02:33 |
| tung_doan | xianghui: Hi. Right after you successfully created VNF using tosca template, ping driver will monitor VNF instance. If ping drivers detect that VNF instance is unreachable, the VNF instance ill be respawned | 02:39 |
| xianghui | tung_doan, where did the ping driver locate? is it in the compute host? | 02:39 |
| xianghui | I am just wondering how does it ping all the VNF having different ip range | 02:40 |
| tung_doan | xianghui: nope... ping driver is in Tacker, therefore, it will be located in controller node. | 02:41 |
| xianghui | tung_doan, ok, https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/tacker/vnfm/monitor_drivers/ping/ping.py | 02:43 |
| xianghui | seems above is the ping driver implementation, if it is just in controller node | 02:44 |
| tung_doan | xianghui: yup | 02:44 |
| xianghui | it simply using "ping -c xxxx" to ping VNF | 02:44 |
| xianghui | does all the VNF having floating ips? | 02:44 |
| tung_doan | xianghui: exactly | 02:44 |
| xianghui | tung_doan, ah, i see ~ | 02:44 |
| xianghui | tung_doan, if this is the specification for all the VNF should having floating ips? | 02:45 |
| tung_doan | xianghui: floating IP is under implementation as I know | 02:45 |
| tung_doan | xianghui: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352123/ | 02:45 |
| xianghui | if there are any scenarios that VNF doesn't need floating ip | 02:45 |
| xianghui | reading.. | 02:45 |
| xianghui | so for all the NFV requirements, every VNF needs a floating ip, or for those who needs to be monitored need floating ips, am I understanding right? tung_doan | 02:47 |
| tung_doan | xianghui: floating IP support is an option IMO. | 02:49 |
| xianghui | tung_doan, if no floating IP support, seems the ping driver won't work as I understand. | 02:50 |
| xianghui | correct me if I am wrong :-) | 02:51 |
| xianghui | Also if the ping driver is setting in the controller nodes, for those lots of network traffic, it may be a little overloaded when having thoughsands of such kind of VNFs. | 02:52 |
| tung_doan | xianghui: dont quite understand your case. It seems the ping driver will works well. If you have some problems with the ping driver in Tacker, please report a bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker | 02:52 |
| tung_doan | xianghui: Tacker team will help you. thanks | 02:52 |
| tung_doan | xianghui: I need to go out for lunch :) | 02:53 |
| xianghui | tung_doan, sorry probably I made you confused, I mean, for example, one VNF has just a private ip 192.168.1.1, I can't understand how does the ping driver on the controller node can ping it with public ips. | 02:54 |
| xianghui | tung_doan, thanks btw, enjoy ! :) | 02:54 |
| xianghui | gongysh, any opinios? :) | 02:57 |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 02:57 | |
| gongysh | xianghui, it depends on how do you networking the target NFVI. | 02:58 |
| gongysh | in all functional tests, we assume management network of tacker can arrvice net_mgmt network of target NFVI. | 02:59 |
| gongysh | arrive at virtual net_mgmt network of target NFVI. | 02:59 |
| gongysh | so we can ping. | 02:59 |
| gongysh | if this assumption fails, to enable the ping or http-ping monitor, we have to depend on floating ip, which tacker management network can access. | 03:00 |
| xianghui | gongysh, for example, if the management network is 10.10.0.0/24 and the VNF tenant network is 192.168.0.0/24, they are binded in some router? | 03:00 |
| xianghui | or with what kind of methods to make it doable | 03:00 |
| gongysh | xianghui, that is a neutron question. | 03:01 |
| xianghui | gongysh, thanks much, I am just not very clear on how does the management networking of tacker can arrive the virtual net_mgmt network of NFVI | 03:01 |
| xianghui | how does this assumption real works | 03:01 |
| xianghui | if the NFVI is deployed with the normal way with neutron/ovs/dpdk/vxlan whatever... | 03:02 |
| gongysh | we can always make tacker management network to access one of virtual network in this or that way. | 03:02 |
| xianghui | the VNF is spawned in those nova compute nodes just same as other kind of instances | 03:02 |
| gongysh | neutron has a concept : provider network, which is the feature do deal with the case. | 03:03 |
| xianghui | for the instance having a tenant network the only way to access is to ping from the network node namespace | 03:03 |
| xianghui | gongysh, ok, so the assumption is based on the provider network? | 03:03 |
| gongysh | xianghui, you can say this way. | 03:04 |
| gongysh | xianghui, there are many way for VM's virutal network to access external network, not via floating ip. | 03:04 |
| gongysh | xianghui, the neutron's l2gw project is one of them. | 03:05 |
| gongysh | xianghui, all of the SDN solutions have this kind of feature. | 03:05 |
| xianghui | gongysh, ah, thanks will read that, do you mean also there are many ways to external network to access VM's virtual network? | 03:05 |
| gongysh | xianghui, yes. | 03:05 |
| xianghui | gongysh, thanks much, I am not clear with this, which SDN solution , do you have one link? I seems really not know that | 03:06 |
| gongysh | ACI, NSX, neutron native, h3c, hauwei ... | 03:07 |
| xianghui | gongysh, ok thanks thanks !!! | 03:08 |
| gongysh | xianghui, Can I ask for your company? | 03:09 |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 03:09 | |
| xianghui | gongysh, lenovo : ) | 03:09 |
| gongysh | xianghui, haha, welcome. | 03:09 |
| xianghui | I am doing some NFV researching. | 03:09 |
| gongysh | Do you have plan to support this project in the long run? | 03:10 |
| xianghui | I am sure will bother you more than you thought :-) | 03:10 |
| xianghui | gongysh, we mainly focus on NFVI so far, but interested on the monitor feature in Tacker, probably there will be some plan, I need to ask top layer if you have some interests.. | 03:11 |
| gongysh | xianghui, we need strong supports from any companies, in particular the long continuous support. | 03:11 |
| gongysh | I have worked in lenovo some times from 2000-2005. | 03:12 |
| xianghui | I will forward this up, but if you have more scenarios can broadcast to them | 03:12 |
| xianghui | gongysh, haha , small world :) | 03:12 |
| xianghui | gongysh, why did your company need this, are you focusing on NFV? | 03:13 |
| gongysh | if lenovo is truly interested in this project, and has budget for employees to contribute, big welcome. | 03:13 |
| gongysh | xianghui, we are openstack company. | 03:14 |
| gongysh | xianghui, we have the obligation to make it move forward. | 03:15 |
| xianghui | gongysh, yeah, I will ask up layer, I can't make any decision. | 03:15 |
| xianghui | gongysh, good to know, cheers :D | 03:16 |
| gongysh | cheers | 03:16 |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 03:32 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 03:46 | |
| *** diga has joined #tacker | 03:55 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 04:02 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 04:10 | |
| *** links has joined #tacker | 04:17 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tacker master: Fix typo in Tacker https://review.openstack.org/423751 | 04:19 |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 04:24 | |
| *** xianghui has quit IRC | 04:35 | |
| gongysh | dkushwaha, sridhar_ram https://review.openstack.org/#/c/437319/ | 04:53 |
| gongysh | vnffg related fix | 04:53 |
| *** xianghui has joined #tacker | 04:54 | |
| *** diga has quit IRC | 05:10 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
| sridhar_ram | gongysh: did an initial scan, need to look more ... will respond in a day | 05:37 |
| *** trinaths has joined #tacker | 05:58 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 06:01 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 06:04 | |
| *** links has joined #tacker | 06:15 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 06:26 | |
| *** trinaths1 has joined #tacker | 06:29 | |
| *** trinaths has quit IRC | 06:29 | |
| *** diga has joined #tacker | 06:31 | |
| *** xianghui has quit IRC | 06:35 | |
| *** xianghui has joined #tacker | 06:37 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 06:58 | |
| *** janki has joined #tacker | 07:00 | |
| *** amotoki_ has joined #tacker | 07:01 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 07:03 | |
| *** diga has quit IRC | 07:13 | |
| *** links has joined #tacker | 07:14 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 07:32 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 07:45 | |
| *** Aqsa has joined #tacker | 07:56 | |
| *** diga has joined #tacker | 08:14 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 08:17 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 08:36 | |
| *** xianghui has quit IRC | 09:36 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 09:48 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 10:00 | |
| diga | Hi | 10:31 |
| diga | gongysh: Hi | 10:31 |
| gongysh | hi | 10:31 |
| diga | gongysh: sorry I got into another meeting yesterday so couldn't reply to your ping | 10:31 |
| diga | gongysh: I will review & test - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/433474/ | 10:33 |
| diga | ps | 10:33 |
| diga | tung_doan: there ? | 10:33 |
| diga | tung_doan: I will test your PS first from tacker | 10:33 |
| diga | tung_doan: can you give me steps for this ? I haven't created nsd template before | 10:34 |
| diga | sorry vnf | 10:35 |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 10:44 | |
| tung_doan | diga: Hi. thanks for your interest. Actually the patch you mentioned is simple. I just added some tosca templates which include scaling and monitoring policies. If you haven't run NSD before, please refer to this link: https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/doc/source/devref/nsd_usage_guide.rst | 11:24 |
| tung_doan | dkushwaha: ^^ please help review too :) thanks | 11:25 |
| dkushwaha | tung_doan, sure | 11:26 |
| *** vishwanathj has quit IRC | 11:29 | |
| *** vishwanathj has joined #tacker | 11:29 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 11:35 | |
| *** dkushwaha has quit IRC | 11:44 | |
| *** dkushwaha has joined #tacker | 11:49 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 11:53 | |
| diga | tung_doan: ok | 11:54 |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 12:04 | |
| *** amotoki_ has quit IRC | 12:07 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 12:08 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 12:13 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #tacker | 12:26 | |
| *** tbh has joined #tacker | 12:28 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 12:43 | |
| *** trinaths1 has left #tacker | 12:58 | |
| *** diga has quit IRC | 13:30 | |
| *** tbh has quit IRC | 13:32 | |
| *** Aqsa has quit IRC | 14:00 | |
| *** janki has quit IRC | 14:01 | |
| *** Aqsa has joined #tacker | 14:01 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
| openstackgerrit | soumiyajit proposed openstack/tacker master: Removed utf-8 encoding https://review.openstack.org/443670 | 14:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Tung Doan proposed openstack/tacker master: Fix monitoring issue for multiple VDUs https://review.openstack.org/443672 | 14:48 |
| *** spzala has joined #tacker | 15:15 | |
| *** Aqsa has quit IRC | 15:41 | |
| openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker master: Add basic task framework https://review.openstack.org/443719 | 15:47 |
| openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker master: Add basic task framework https://review.openstack.org/443719 | 16:04 |
| *** links has joined #tacker | 16:07 | |
| *** spzala has quit IRC | 16:46 | |
| *** uck has joined #tacker | 16:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tung Doan proposed openstack/tacker master: Fix monitoring issue for multiple VDUs https://review.openstack.org/443672 | 17:36 |
| *** links has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tung Doan proposed openstack/tacker master: [WIP] Refactor : separating policy out from monitor https://review.openstack.org/443929 | 18:27 |
| *** s3wong has joined #tacker | 18:57 | |
| *** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 19:59 | |
| *** uck has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
| *** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 21:01 | |
| *** uck has joined #tacker | 21:18 | |
| *** diga has joined #tacker | 23:19 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!