Thursday, 2017-04-13

*** amotoki has quit IRC00:07
*** amotoki has joined #tacker00:20
*** arturt_________ has joined #tacker00:24
*** amotoki has quit IRC00:27
*** arturt_________ has quit IRC00:29
*** amotoki has joined #tacker00:33
*** bobh has quit IRC00:45
*** amotoki has quit IRC00:54
*** amotoki has joined #tacker01:02
*** arturt_________ has joined #tacker01:25
*** arturt_________ has quit IRC01:30
*** s3wong has quit IRC01:30
*** gongysh has quit IRC01:31
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker01:36
*** gongysh has joined #tacker01:40
*** bobh has joined #tacker02:26
tung_doanKanagarajM: ping02:27
*** arturt_________ has joined #tacker02:27
*** gongysh has quit IRC02:28
tung_doanKanagarajM: Tosca-parser was released several days ago. That made scaling node and monitoring node failed. I propose a change to temporarily bypass this failure: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/456195/02:30
tung_doanKanagarajM: hope you have time to look into scaling part: http://logs.openstack.org/24/456024/1/check/gate-tacker-python27-ubuntu-xenial/4707be3/console.html#_2017-04-12_07_01_53_51064502:31
*** arturt_________ has quit IRC02:31
*** gongysh has joined #tacker02:54
*** arturt_________ has joined #tacker03:28
*** arturt_________ has quit IRC03:32
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC03:34
*** links has joined #tacker03:36
*** bobh has quit IRC03:48
*** trinaths has joined #tacker03:51
*** arturt_________ has joined #tacker03:54
*** bobh has joined #tacker03:55
*** bobh has quit IRC03:57
*** arturt_________ has quit IRC03:59
*** amotoki_ has joined #tacker04:08
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:10
trinathsgongysh: hi04:25
gongyshtrinaths hi04:25
trinathsgongysh: I received couple of suggestions for OSC04:26
trinathsgongysh: https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg103935.html04:26
trinathsgongysh: https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg103984.html04:26
trinathsgongysh: we need to agree on the command names before we start the BP.04:27
trinathsgongysh: [B] with respect to Kanagaraj comments, on   [1]   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449956/, Can I merge   [2]   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450528/ into my commit [1] ? Since he is the owner of [2].04:31
trinathsgongysh: [C] for comments on   [1]   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449956/ from dkushwaha, I what modified the FT test_vim as suggested and the expected exception was raised in Jenkins FT job. Can that can be taken as assurance that the FT are working fine?04:33
trinathsgongysh:  I have the following 3 tasks which need your suggestions/comments to proceed further.04:34
gongyshtrinaths, I think we can use nfv prefix04:37
trinathsgongysh: okay, as sfc is using..04:38
trinathsgongysh: like in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455188/9/specs/pike/python-openstackclient.rst04:39
trinathsgongysh:  ?04:39
gongyshI think we can use our own shortname04:42
gongyshvnffg, vnf, ns (network service is fine)04:42
gongyshno need to use 'vnf forward graph' to replace vnf04:43
trinathsgongysh:  okay.04:43
gongyshvnffg should be a term in network.04:43
gongyshjust like dhcp ip etc. is the terms we should use, vnffg, vnf should be the terms we can use.04:43
trinathsgongysh: how about sfc, nfp and fc ?04:44
gongyshfor fc, we can use full name04:44
gongyshjust like ns04:44
gongyshsfc, nfp can use its short name.04:45
trinathsgongysh: sfc might contradict networking-sfc ?04:45
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker04:45
gongyshuse the command's description to tell users what are the full name.04:45
trinathsKanagarajM: Good Morning04:45
gongyshwe have nfv prefix04:45
trinathsgongysh: okay. So 'nfv' as prefix for all tacker commands ? or just for conflicting commands ?04:47
gongyshfor all. I suggest.04:48
trinathsgongysh:  like , $> openstack vnf create                  looks simple        compared with  $> openstack nfv vnf create04:48
trinathsgongysh:  for conflicting commands we can propose to have 'nfv' prefixed so that end users can defferentiate.04:50
gongyshtrinaths, you can write a rule in spec about how you name the command.04:50
gongyshyou can have your own rule.04:50
trinathsgongysh: rule ?04:50
gongyshif you think openstack vnf create is better than openstack nfv vnf create04:50
gongyshyou can go with it.04:50
gongyshup to you.04:51
trinathsgongysh: okay. with this discussion I will update the spec for review.04:51
trinathsgongysh:  can you comment on [B] and [C] tasks outlined aboce.04:51
trinathsgongysh: *above04:51
gongyshabout patch merge, you can talk to author, you both can coauthor.04:52
trinathsgongysh:  okay.04:52
trinathsgongysh: about [C]04:52
*** arturt_________ has joined #tacker04:55
gongyshC, I need time to verify it.04:55
trinathsgongysh: okay.04:55
trinathsgongysh:  thank you for the valuable feedback/suggestions04:55
*** bobh has joined #tacker04:58
*** arturt_________ has quit IRC04:59
*** saju_m has joined #tacker05:01
*** bobh has quit IRC05:03
trinathsgongysh: which one to choose, ns or 'network service'. sridhar_ram comented on to use 'network service' but when we say $> openstack network service create                 it becomes a conflict with 'network' commands.05:09
trinathsgongysh:  if we use 'nfv' prefix, at $> openstack nfv network service descriptor create , the command becomes too lengthy05:10
trinathsgongysh:  suggestions?05:10
gongyshopenstack nfv vnfd create05:10
gongyshfor short term which has only two letters, we can use full name05:11
gongyshfor example ns, to use network service05:11
gongyshwrite this rule into your spec.05:11
trinathsthen how the command for nsd ?05:12
gongyshyou can not use 'nfv' for prefix to all commands.05:12
gongyshjust for some conflicted commands.05:12
trinathsgongysh: agree05:12
gongyshthat is the rule you can create in your spec.05:13
trinathsgongysh:  for ns example $> openstack network create descriptor create         ---- is this command okay?05:13
gongyshfine05:13
trinathsthen for vnfd, vnffgd we dont give 'descriptor'05:14
*** tbh has joined #tacker05:14
trinathsgongysh:  it looks odd, can this be some thing like, $> openstack vnf descriptor create05:15
trinaths$> openstack vnffg descriptor create05:15
gongyshthat is also ok05:16
trinathsgongysh:  ok05:16
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC05:18
openstackgerritTrinath Somanchi proposed openstack/tacker-specs master: Tacker support in python-openstackclient  https://review.openstack.org/45518805:19
trinathsKanagarajM: Hi05:23
*** janki has joined #tacker05:29
*** arturt_________ has joined #tacker05:32
*** Vijayendra has joined #tacker05:34
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker05:41
*** mohankumar has joined #tacker05:41
*** amotoki has joined #tacker05:46
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC05:50
*** arturt_________ has quit IRC05:51
*** bobh has joined #tacker05:59
*** bobh has quit IRC06:04
*** saju_m has quit IRC06:07
trinathsKanagarajM: Hi06:14
trinathsgongysh: some review for this, https://review.openstack.org/45518806:30
*** bobh has joined #tacker07:00
*** bobh has quit IRC07:04
*** Aqsa has joined #tacker07:51
*** bobh has joined #tacker08:00
*** bobh has quit IRC08:05
openstackgerritxu-haiwei proposed openstack/tacker master: Integrate senlin to Tacker for autoscaling management  https://review.openstack.org/44947108:07
openstackgerritTrinath Somanchi proposed openstack/tacker-specs master: Tacker support in python-openstackclient  https://review.openstack.org/45518808:07
trinathsgongysh: w.r.t comments, @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455188/10/specs/pike/python-openstackclient.rst , can the ns commands be like, $> openstack nfv network service create ??08:09
*** saju_m has joined #tacker08:34
gongyshlet use nfv network service create and add a notice to say, the neutron is using network prefix.08:36
trinathsgongysh: okay.08:40
openstackgerritTrinath Somanchi proposed openstack/tacker-specs master: Tacker support in python-openstackclient  https://review.openstack.org/45518808:52
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: zuul was restarted due to an unrecoverable disconnect from gerrit. If your change is missing a CI result and isn't listed in the pipelines on http://status.openstack.org/zuul/ , please recheck08:52
*** bobh has joined #tacker09:01
openstackgerritTrinath Somanchi proposed openstack/tacker-specs master: Tacker support in python-openstackclient  https://review.openstack.org/45518809:03
*** bobh has quit IRC09:06
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC09:20
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker09:21
trinathsKanagarajM: ping09:25
*** yifei has quit IRC09:30
*** trinaths has quit IRC09:32
*** trinaths has joined #tacker09:32
trinathsKanagarajM: regarding update to ns and vnffg what we discussed in last status meeting, can you help me outline the FT scenarios that need to be added09:42
*** saju_m has quit IRC09:48
*** bobh has joined #tacker10:02
*** bobh has quit IRC10:07
trinathsKanagarajM: ping10:14
*** trinaths has left #tacker10:18
*** bobh has joined #tacker11:03
*** bobh has quit IRC11:07
gongyshKanagarajM, hi11:08
*** trinaths has joined #tacker11:10
openstackgerritMerged openstack/tacker master: Temporarily bypass Unit tests and Func. tests for scaling and monitoring policcies  https://review.openstack.org/45619511:16
openstackgerritTrinath Somanchi proposed openstack/tacker-specs master: Tacker support in python-openstackclient  https://review.openstack.org/45518811:19
*** bobh has joined #tacker11:21
*** bobh has quit IRC11:48
tung_doangongysh: ping11:52
*** trinaths has left #tacker12:01
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC12:05
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:15
*** gongysh has quit IRC12:26
*** gongysh has joined #tacker12:27
*** gongysh has quit IRC12:27
*** amotoki has joined #tacker12:31
*** tbh has quit IRC12:35
*** gongysh has joined #tacker12:38
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:47
*** amotoki has joined #tacker13:17
*** links has quit IRC13:29
tung_doangongysh: Hi. we need to have one way to test with the master version of Tosca-parser (T-P) and Heat-Translator (H-T). These projects are upstream ones in Tacker. It will be painful for us whenever T-P and H-T are released.13:43
tung_doangongysh: do you have any idea?13:43
*** tung_doan has quit IRC13:59
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC14:30
*** janki has quit IRC14:45
*** zerick_ has joined #tacker15:05
*** afranc has joined #tacker15:09
*** zerick has quit IRC15:10
*** aimeeu has quit IRC15:10
*** Aju has quit IRC15:10
*** eswarthout2 has quit IRC15:10
*** serverascode has quit IRC15:10
*** eswarthout1 has joined #tacker15:11
*** aimeeu has joined #tacker15:11
*** serverascode has joined #tacker15:19
*** tung_doan has joined #tacker15:38
*** amotoki has quit IRC15:48
*** mohankumar has quit IRC15:57
*** openstack has joined #tacker16:36
*** Aqsa has quit IRC17:03
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker17:04
*** gongysh has quit IRC17:15
*** mohankumar has joined #tacker17:35
*** s3wong has joined #tacker18:09
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC18:42
*** bobh has joined #tacker19:08
*** bobh has quit IRC19:12
*** mohankumar has quit IRC19:26
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker19:32
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: The Gerrit service on http://review.openstack.org is being restarted to address hung remote replication tasks.19:53
*** Aqsa has joined #tacker20:14
*** Aqsa has quit IRC22:40

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!