*** uck has joined #tacker | 00:17 | |
*** Aqsa has quit IRC | 00:19 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 00:21 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 00:45 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 00:50 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 00:59 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 01:14 | |
*** s3wong has quit IRC | 01:17 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 01:54 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 02:31 | |
openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker master: Refactor mistral workflow to lay foundation for monitor to use it https://review.openstack.org/457843 | 02:31 |
---|---|---|
openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker master: Refactor mistral workflow to lay foundation for monitor to use it https://review.openstack.org/457843 | 02:32 |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 02:35 | |
*** tung_doan has joined #tacker | 02:37 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 02:50 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 03:15 | |
openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker master: VIM reachable monitoring via mistral workflow https://review.openstack.org/457140 | 03:18 |
*** links has joined #tacker | 03:19 | |
openstackgerrit | Yan Xing an proposed openstack/tacker-specs master: encrypt vim credentials with barbican https://review.openstack.org/445543 | 03:24 |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 03:35 | |
openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker master: Refactor mistral workflow to lay foundation for monitor to use it https://review.openstack.org/457843 | 03:37 |
openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker master: Make vim test config file aware of devstack keystone setting https://review.openstack.org/457852 | 03:46 |
*** KanagarajM has joined #tacker | 03:54 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 03:56 | |
*** amotoki_ has joined #tacker | 03:58 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC | 04:06 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 04:19 | |
*** trinaths has joined #tacker | 04:20 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 04:33 | |
*** diga has joined #tacker | 04:34 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 04:36 | |
*** links has joined #tacker | 04:52 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 05:01 | |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 05:22 | |
*** thebling has joined #tacker | 05:22 | |
*** amotoki_ has joined #tacker | 05:23 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 05:25 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 05:26 | |
*** YanXing_an has joined #tacker | 05:31 | |
*** nmathew has joined #tacker | 05:36 | |
*** links has joined #tacker | 05:37 | |
thebling | join openstack-telemetry | 06:28 |
*** sanjay_ has joined #tacker | 06:29 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 06:30 | |
sridhar_ram | thebling: may i ask why? :) | 06:35 |
gongysh | trinaths, hi | 06:37 |
gongysh | sridhar_ram, http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115568.html | 06:37 |
gongysh | what do you mean by: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115568.html? | 06:37 |
sridhar_ram | gongysh: i was just pointing out the ML discussion | 06:38 |
sridhar_ram | .. with latest suggestions | 06:38 |
gongysh | sorry, I mean the text in this email: I agree 'nfv' is an umbrella term and it has significance for other | 06:38 |
gongysh | projects as well (like nova). | 06:38 |
gongysh | significance for other projects as well ( like nova)? | 06:39 |
gongysh | I just quite understand it. | 06:39 |
*** mohankumar has joined #tacker | 06:41 | |
sanjay_ | Hi Sridhar and Team, I am new to to tacker and want to contribute. Please suggest me how to start | 06:42 |
sridhar_ram | you might know this, lots of nfv related features were worked on by different projects like nova (sr-iov, EPA, ..) .. i was just referring that | 06:42 |
gongysh | sridhar_ram, ? | 06:42 |
sridhar_ram | gongysh: still unclear ? | 06:43 |
sridhar_ram | sanjay_: welcome to the tacker project! gongysh is the current PTL ... he has lined up tons of interesting items to work on | 06:44 |
gongysh | that is what NFV is demanding on these projects. | 06:45 |
sridhar_ram | sanjay_: i'd suggest you start picking up some simple bugs .. https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/ | 06:45 |
sanjay_ | Thanks. Ok. I will start looking intoit | 06:45 |
trinaths | gongysh: hi | 06:46 |
gongysh | the NFV output on openstack community should be tacker. | 06:46 |
sridhar_ram | gongysh: i guess the general concern is .. tacker is just an orchestration project and it can't take up the whole 'nfv' namespace .. as this first level namespace belongs to the whole openstack project family. | 06:46 |
sridhar_ram | No.. tacker is just the orchestration component of openstack's NFV offering .. atleast that is the argument | 06:47 |
trinaths | sanjay_: Hi, Welcome to Tacker project. Start your contribution by fixing something here, at https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-tackerclient | 06:47 |
*** nmathew- has joined #tacker | 06:47 | |
gongysh | sridhar_ram, in fact no one is objecting to use nfv from other projects. | 06:47 |
gongysh | since there is no organization to arrange the first level namespace, we can use it anyway. | 06:48 |
trinaths | gongysh: but NFV is a very broad umberella. where NFVI, VNFs, NFVO, VNFM and OSS/BSS fit into it. | 06:49 |
sanjay_ | Sure trinaths | 06:49 |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 06:49 | |
gongysh | yes, right. so take the broader one if narrow one cannot contain it. | 06:50 |
sridhar_ram | i'm not sure about the full review process for OSC .. ML email is the general good first step.. we need to reach out to atleast anne gentle to get more eyes on this | 06:50 |
*** YanXingan has joined #tacker | 06:51 | |
*** nmathew has quit IRC | 06:51 | |
gongysh | sridhar_ram, we can do first one our side. if there is big objection, we can change. | 06:51 |
sridhar_ram | one reason 'vnf' keyword grew on me is it make the CLI concise .. | 06:51 |
gongysh | anne gentle is not the one to review the namespace. | 06:52 |
*** Aqsa has joined #tacker | 06:52 | |
sridhar_ram | 'openstack vnf create' vs 'openstack nfv vnf create' | 06:52 |
sridhar_ram | i like the first more .. more concise and easy to understand | 06:52 |
*** YanXing_an has quit IRC | 06:52 | |
sridhar_ram | the problem comes only for "network-service" | 06:52 |
sridhar_ram | there is no easy choice .. imo | 06:53 |
sridhar_ram | of the choices .. i prefer 'vnf' as it keeps the CLI family consistent | 06:53 |
openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker master: Adds unique constraint on deleted_at https://review.openstack.org/455421 | 06:53 |
trinaths | gongysh: Choosing broader one is a good choice, But we dont do NFVI directly. We rely on Openstack projects for that. | 06:53 |
gongysh | trinaths, there is no one will have nfvi command. | 06:54 |
trinaths | gongysh: perfectly agree | 06:54 |
gongysh | there is no nfvi command. | 06:54 |
trinaths | gongysh: agree. my comment above is w.r.t broader view. | 06:55 |
gongysh | KanagarajM, dkushwaha , could you please give your comments? | 06:56 |
gongysh | tbh, please. | 06:56 |
tbh | gongysh, I haven't gone through complete ML discussion, but imo though nfv is broader term tacker can fit into some of the functionalities | 06:58 |
tbh | and for nfv orchestration I don't think there is no other project is doing that | 06:58 |
gongysh | trinaths, it is not a P1 job. | 06:59 |
tbh | many other projects like nova though facilitating "nfv" features but is there any API they are exposing? | 06:59 |
gongysh | we can hold it for a while. | 06:59 |
trinaths | gongysh: +1 , agree. | 06:59 |
sridhar_ram | gongysh: can you reply to the ML w/ your views ? | 06:59 |
gongysh | sridhar_ram, sometimes, we can decide it on our own. | 06:59 |
gongysh | since you have sent out email, and get some ideas on it. we can do some decision. | 07:01 |
tbh | gongysh, sridhar_ram very basic question, is there any limitation for openstack x y(like openstack user list), does x also refer to single openstack project? | 07:02 |
tbh | s/also/always | 07:03 |
gongysh | tbh, I don't think so. | 07:03 |
sridhar_ram | here are some data points .. for all your thoughts .. there are commands like 'openstack router create', 'openstack port create' and 'openstack network create' .. all these are coming from one Neutron project. They are all *not* hiding under one top-level keyword like 'openstack network port create' , 'openstack network router create' ... this is were we | 07:03 |
sridhar_ram | need to switch out of Tacker project and think at openstack "product" level and decide things that make sense for OpenStack .. | 07:03 |
tbh | sridhar_ram, yes, makes sense | 07:05 |
* sridhar_ram is going to doze off soon ... | 07:05 | |
gongysh | there is one point with network-service named vnf service. but I cannot come up with better way to do it. | 07:07 |
trinaths | gongysh: else, we can have $> openstack nfv|vfn network service create|delete | 07:09 |
gongysh | trinaths, also vnf event list, here the 'vnf' is becoming a prefix. | 07:10 |
gongysh | vnf create, here, vnf is a nfv term: vnf. | 07:10 |
sridhar_ram | 'network-service' is the main hurdle .. | 07:10 |
trinaths | otherwise, can we split this way, VNFM and NFVO commands | 07:10 |
gongysh | sridhar_ram, a confustion. sometimes 'vnf' is a prefix, sometimes, it is a term. | 07:11 |
trinaths | $> openstack vnfm vnf create | 07:11 |
trinaths | $> openstack nfvo network service create | 07:11 |
sridhar_ram | for osc is always a term .. given no hyphens are allowed | 07:11 |
sridhar_ram | trinaths: no.. bad, bad idea to expose s/w components in CLIs / APIs | 07:12 |
trinaths | sridhar_ram: sorry. my mistake. | 07:12 |
trinaths | sridhar_ram: I thought we are exposing capabilites from tacker. | 07:13 |
sridhar_ram | trinaths: no problem.. these are good suggestions.. ideate as much as possible | 07:13 |
trinaths | sridhar_ram: ok | 07:13 |
trinaths | okay. now how we go with OSC commands ? | 07:14 |
sridhar_ram | gongysh: think about it .. as you said we have some time but i'm trinaths would rather like this wrapped up soon... given we are already in the thick of it.. | 07:15 |
sridhar_ram | folks - sorry, got to sign off now | 07:16 |
gongysh | sridhar_ram, good night | 07:16 |
sridhar_ram | gongysh: thanks.. | 07:16 |
dkushwaha | sridhar_ram, gongysh, tbh sorry I missed discussion. Can we use some other term for network-service? I | 07:17 |
trinaths | sridhar_ram: good night | 07:17 |
gongysh | dkushwaha, tbh https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455188/15/specs/pike/python-openstackclient.rst | 07:18 |
gongysh | you can put comments on this patch | 07:18 |
tbh | sure | 07:19 |
dkushwaha | gongysh, sure | 07:19 |
trinaths | gongysh: thanks for this valuable discussion. it was more informative moving forward to adopt osc. | 07:23 |
*** trinaths is now known as trinaths_at_lunc | 07:26 | |
*** trinaths_at_lunc is now known as trinaths_lunch | 07:26 | |
gongysh | dkushwaha, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448466/ | 07:26 |
gongysh | could you please have a look at this patch? | 07:27 |
*** trinaths_lunch is now known as trinaths | 07:50 | |
trinaths | gongysh: | 07:50 |
trinaths | gongysh: ping | 07:50 |
trinaths | gongysh: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455188/15/specs/pike/python-openstackclient.rst , its okay to have $> openstack nfv service create compared to $>openstack nfv network service create ?? | 07:51 |
openstackgerrit | Trinath Somanchi proposed openstack/tacker-specs master: Tacker support in python-openstackclient https://review.openstack.org/455188 | 07:53 |
dkushwaha | gongysh, sure | 07:55 |
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC | 08:22 | |
openstackgerrit | Rajat Sharma proposed openstack/tacker master: Fix doc generation for Python3 https://review.openstack.org/457921 | 08:25 |
*** thebling has quit IRC | 08:26 | |
*** YanXing_an has joined #tacker | 08:35 | |
*** YanXingan has quit IRC | 08:38 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 08:41 | |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 08:49 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 08:56 | |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 08:57 | |
*** Aqsa has quit IRC | 09:05 | |
*** Aqsa has joined #tacker | 09:07 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 09:29 | |
openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-tackerclient master: Explicitly set 'builders' option https://review.openstack.org/457964 | 09:31 |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 09:45 | |
openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-tackerclient master: Use Sphinx 1.5 warning-is-error https://review.openstack.org/457978 | 09:46 |
*** YanXing_an has quit IRC | 09:57 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 09:58 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 10:05 | |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 10:16 | |
gongysh | dkushwaha, hi | 10:19 |
gongysh | KanagarajM hi | 10:21 |
gongysh | tbh hi | 10:21 |
*** janki has quit IRC | 10:37 | |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 10:37 | |
dkushwaha | gongysh, hi | 10:40 |
gongysh | dkushwaha, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448466/ | 10:41 |
gongysh | although this patch does not fix all problem, but it definetely improve the robustness. | 10:41 |
*** janki has quit IRC | 10:41 | |
gongysh | also at line 130 of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448466/5/tacker/vnfm/infra_drivers/openstack/openstack.py | 10:42 |
gongysh | we already have a heatclient.get(vnf_id) | 10:42 |
gongysh | so the exceptions should be temp connection exception most of time. | 10:43 |
dkushwaha | gongysh, Actually my point is, with this fix we un-necessary needs to wait, even if we have actual failure. Otherwise rest looks fine | 10:43 |
dkushwaha | tbh, KanagarajM any thought on this? | 10:44 |
gongysh | I know that. you see at line 130, most of non connection error will be happen there. | 10:44 |
dkushwaha | gongysh, make sense. I Think we can merge this patch, and rest improvements can be done later stage. | 10:48 |
gongysh | thanks | 10:49 |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 10:50 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 10:53 | |
*** Vijayendra has quit IRC | 10:56 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tacker master: Continue waiting to avoid temporary connection error with target VIM https://review.openstack.org/448466 | 10:59 |
*** dmk0202 has joined #tacker | 11:02 | |
openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/tacker master: Adds unique constraint on deleted_at https://review.openstack.org/455421 | 11:13 |
*** janki has joined #tacker | 11:17 | |
*** dmk0202 has quit IRC | 11:21 | |
*** dmk0202 has joined #tacker | 11:21 | |
*** dkushwaha has left #tacker | 11:21 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 11:35 | |
*** trinaths has left #tacker | 11:45 | |
*** sanjay_ has quit IRC | 11:45 | |
*** nmathew- has quit IRC | 11:48 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 11:50 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 11:57 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 12:02 | |
*** diga has quit IRC | 12:11 | |
*** trinaths has joined #tacker | 12:35 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 12:41 | |
*** mohankumar has quit IRC | 12:52 | |
*** trinaths has left #tacker | 12:54 | |
*** nmathew- has joined #tacker | 12:57 | |
*** nmathew- has quit IRC | 12:57 | |
*** Aqsam has joined #tacker | 13:05 | |
*** trinaths has joined #tacker | 13:07 | |
*** Aqsa has quit IRC | 13:08 | |
*** jamesdenton has joined #tacker | 13:11 | |
*** jamesdenton has quit IRC | 13:24 | |
*** jamesdenton has joined #tacker | 13:25 | |
*** mohankumar has joined #tacker | 13:47 | |
openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker master: Make vim test config file aware of devstack keystone setting https://review.openstack.org/457852 | 13:54 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tacker-specs master: encrypt vim credentials with barbican https://review.openstack.org/445543 | 13:54 |
openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker master: Make vim test config file aware of devstack keystone setting https://review.openstack.org/457852 | 14:00 |
*** links has quit IRC | 14:02 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 14:06 | |
*** tung_doan_ has joined #tacker | 14:12 | |
*** haiwei has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
*** tung_doan has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 14:14 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 14:15 | |
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC | 14:29 | |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 14:34 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 14:40 | |
*** trinaths has left #tacker | 14:41 | |
*** mohankumar has quit IRC | 15:05 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/tacker master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/456024 | 15:18 |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 15:19 | |
*** jamesdenton has quit IRC | 15:19 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 15:31 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 15:36 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 15:38 | |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 15:52 | |
*** dmk0202 has quit IRC | 16:09 | |
*** Aqsam has quit IRC | 16:11 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 16:22 | |
*** amotoki has joined #tacker | 16:54 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 17:05 | |
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
*** 17WAAQLLM has joined #tacker | 17:40 | |
*** jamesden_ has joined #tacker | 17:59 | |
*** vishnoianil has joined #tacker | 18:04 | |
*** 17WAAQLLM has quit IRC | 18:07 | |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 18:07 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 18:13 | |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
*** Aqsam has joined #tacker | 19:04 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 19:14 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 19:19 | |
*** uck_ has joined #tacker | 19:34 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 19:34 | |
*** Aqsam has quit IRC | 19:47 | |
*** dmk0202 has joined #tacker | 19:47 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 20:15 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 20:20 | |
*** uck_ has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
*** s3wong has joined #tacker | 20:59 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 21:16 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 21:21 | |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 21:40 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 21:45 | |
*** jamesden_ has quit IRC | 22:03 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 22:17 | |
*** dmk0202 has quit IRC | 22:17 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 22:24 | |
*** gongysh has joined #tacker | 22:38 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker master: Make vim test config file aware of devstack keystone setting https://review.openstack.org/457852 | 22:43 |
*** jamesden_ has joined #tacker | 22:59 | |
*** jamesden_ has quit IRC | 23:33 | |
*** uck has joined #tacker | 23:42 | |
*** uck has quit IRC | 23:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!