Friday, 2018-01-26

*** bobh has joined #tacker00:08
*** gongysh has quit IRC00:16
*** bobh has quit IRC00:39
*** bobh has joined #tacker01:24
*** gongysh has joined #tacker01:24
*** bobh has quit IRC01:26
gongyshmardim, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534773/02:09
openstackgerritMerged openstack/tacker master: save tenant_id in ACLMatchCriteria table  https://review.openstack.org/42371202:28
*** xuan0802 has quit IRC02:31
*** xuan0802 has joined #tacker02:32
*** gongysh has quit IRC04:07
*** openstackstatus has quit IRC04:56
*** openstackstatus has joined #tacker04:59
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus04:59
*** gongysh has joined #tacker05:11
*** gongysh has quit IRC05:16
*** links has joined #tacker05:58
mardimphuoc_, good morning07:04
mardimphuoc_, here ?07:04
phuoc_hi mardim07:05
phuoc_I am here :)07:05
mardimphuoc_, I am trying to fix what gongysh proposed in this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534773/07:05
mardimphuoc_, But I do not have any idea how to do so07:06
mardimphuoc_, can you help me a bit07:06
mardim?07:06
mardimphuoc_, I am not so expert to the tacker client07:06
phuoc_I will take a look at it07:07
mardimphuoc_, ok thanks let me know if you have any idea how to fix that07:07
phuoc_but I am not sure about that07:07
phuoc_okie07:07
mardimphuoc_, ok :)07:07
*** egonzalez has joined #tacker07:09
*** masaito has joined #tacker08:12
masaitohello there08:13
masaitoI'm interested in high-availability deployment of VNF. I asked to gongysh about it, he noticed me that it's in progress.08:23
masaitoCan I join the topic?08:23
longkb1Hi masaito. Currently, I and xuan0802 are working on HA topic of VNFs.08:28
longkb1If you are interested in this topic, you can discuss with us :)08:28
masaitolongkb1, thank you for your reception08:39
mardimphuoc_, found it ;008:40
mardim:)08:40
mardimphuoc_, I will update the patch08:40
phuoc_mardim, that's great08:40
phuoc_:)08:41
longkb1masaito, you are welcome08:43
openstackgerritDimitrios Markou proposed openstack/python-tackerclient master: Show classifier's name  https://review.openstack.org/53477308:58
mardimphuoc_, check this out https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534773/09:02
mardimphuoc_, Can we find somebody to merge this soon enough so we can be eligible for the code freeze date ?09:03
mardimdkushwaha, egonzalez can you please guys review this is a bit urgent because the tacker server side code is merged and we should be eligible for the code freeze thanks: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534773/09:07
phuoc_mardim, dkushwaha can merge it09:08
masaitolongkb1, xuan0802, starting point of my work is the placement problem; to protect service from hypervisor failure, I have to place active and standby instances into different compute node but current release of Tacker was not able to define such placement.09:12
masaitolongkb1, xuan0802, I expect the developing feature covers such requirement, doesn't it?09:12
mardimphuoc_, Yes I know that's why I pinged him :)09:13
masaitolongkb1, xuan0802, I'm trying to test the current patch, I haven't get success yet. So please allow me to ask it.09:14
phuoc_mardim, I will test your patch after the dinner09:15
mardimphuoc_, ok thanks :)09:15
longkb1masaito, which patch did you try to test for HA?10:44
longkb1I and xuan0802 have proposed a blueprint that related to deploy VNF across different availability-zones: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/availability-zone-support-in-vnf-creation10:48
longkb1But we are focus on clustering bp, hence the code for above-mentioned bp is not finished10:48
longkb1you can start by contribute into patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533252/10:49
*** daidv has quit IRC10:58
*** mardim has quit IRC11:14
masaitolongkb1, I'm trying "VNF high availability deployment and management": https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/policy-based-vnf-cluster11:15
masaitoThe purpose described above bp seems to match our requirement.11:15
longkb1This patch are under reviewing. But it is not support to deploy cluster nodes over multiple compute nodes now11:18
longkb1This patch just place cluster nodes on VIM. We do not specify compute node in this patch11:21
masaitoTough. How do you think about such requirement? Don't you need to cover in your use case?11:26
longkb1masaito, are you working on NTT, Japan?11:28
masaitoExactly.11:28
longkb1Oh, I guest i met your team in Sydney summit :)11:29
masaitoI hard that our team have met some members in Sydney. It's sad to say but I joined the team after the summit...11:34
longkb1IMO, in order to deploy cluster across compute nodes, I think we can do it with patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533252/11:35
longkb1After availability-zone has been done, we could add it into clustering patch11:36
masaitoI understand your idea.11:40
masaitoI will take a look in these bps.11:48
masaitoThank you.11:49
longkb1Ok, you can dicuss with us whenever you want :)11:49
openstackgerritCong Phuoc Hoang proposed openstack/tacker master: Implementation containerized VNF in Kubernetes type  https://review.openstack.org/52911611:54
*** mardim has joined #tacker12:24
openstackgerritCong Phuoc Hoang proposed openstack/tacker master: Add document and release note for containerised vnf feature  https://review.openstack.org/53614312:26
*** masaito has quit IRC12:32
*** janki has joined #tacker12:51
openstackgerritDimitrios Markou proposed openstack/tacker master: [WIP] Update VNFFG as a whole  https://review.openstack.org/53181713:09
openstackgerritCong Phuoc Hoang proposed openstack/tacker master: Add document and release note for containerised vnf feature  https://review.openstack.org/53614313:23
*** egonzalez has quit IRC14:14
*** bobh has joined #tacker14:17
openstackgerritDimitrios Markou proposed openstack/tacker master: [WIP] Update VNFFG as a whole  https://review.openstack.org/53181714:42
*** janki has quit IRC15:05
mardimphuoc_, hello I have a proposal for you :)16:01
mardimphuoc_, Do you want to implement a new feature for the vnffg side ?16:02
*** links has quit IRC16:05
phuoc_mardim, which one ? :)16:06
phuoc_I want to hear your idea :-)16:06
mardimphuoc_, According to SFC RFC standards16:06
mardimphuoc_, The chains should be decoupled form classifiers16:07
mardimphuoc_, But when we create a chain through the vnffg tempalte16:07
mardimphuoc_, we are not giving the user the capability16:07
mardimphuoc_, to create chain without any classifier16:07
mardimphuoc_, So do you want to create a patch where you allow the creation of a vnffg without classifiers16:08
phuoc_then attach flow-classifiers to that chain16:08
phuoc_Ahhh16:08
mardimphuoc_, Yes of the user wants to attach classifiers to that chain16:08
mardimphuoc_, Then we can give him this ability through the vnffg-update command16:09
phuoc_I got your point16:10
mardimphuoc_, what do you think ?16:10
phuoc_I think it is possible when we can set no criteria in VNFFG descriptor16:10
mardimphuoc_, Yes exactly but we need to write some code for that because we should change a bit the tosca definition16:11
mardimand also we should change some things in the database16:11
mardimphuoc_, Is not difficult to implement16:12
mardimphuoc_, Just need time and positive vibes16:12
mardim;)16:12
phuoc_yes16:12
mardimphuoc_, So are you interested ?16:12
mardimI will appreciate your help a lot16:13
phuoc_I will take a look at it and if it not too difficult16:13
phuoc_I can do it16:13
mardimphuoc_, ok take a look and let me know on Monday no hurries16:13
mardimphuoc_, thanks :016:13
mardim:)16:13
phuoc_mardim, okie ^^16:14
openstackgerritDimitrios Markou proposed openstack/tacker master: [WIP] Update VNFFG as a whole  https://review.openstack.org/53181716:33
*** links has joined #tacker18:01
*** links has quit IRC18:32
*** bobmel_ has quit IRC18:48
*** bobmel has joined #tacker18:49
*** links has joined #tacker19:20
*** links has quit IRC20:43
*** bobh has quit IRC20:54
*** bobh has joined #tacker20:55
*** bobh has quit IRC21:00
*** bobh has joined #tacker21:25
*** bobh has quit IRC21:47
*** bobh has joined #tacker23:28

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!