fungi | hah | 00:02 |
---|---|---|
*** threestrands has joined #zuul | 00:40 | |
*** pwhalen_ has joined #zuul | 00:43 | |
*** pwhalen has quit IRC | 00:43 | |
*** harlowja has quit IRC | 01:13 | |
*** rlandy has joined #zuul | 01:35 | |
openstackgerrit | Ian Wienand proposed openstack-infra/zuul-jobs master: Use readthedocs webhook to trigger build https://review.openstack.org/579434 | 01:40 |
*** rlandy has quit IRC | 02:02 | |
*** trishnag has quit IRC | 02:03 | |
*** logan- has quit IRC | 02:20 | |
*** logan- has joined #zuul | 02:21 | |
*** trishnag has joined #zuul | 02:35 | |
*** trishnag has joined #zuul | 02:35 | |
jhesketh | ianw: there are some events in Australia that I avoid mentioning openstack (pyconau+lca sadly), but I'm surprised openinfra has an aversion to it :-( | 02:55 |
jhesketh | ianw: I was thinking of submitting a what's new in v3 talk. Would that be too similar to yours and/or would you like to co-submit/present? | 02:56 |
ianw | jhesketh: the clarification request suggested that something focused on openstackinfa might be a bit to narrow for what they want. given the audience, probably an introduction to zuul-ci, just in general, i'd think is most appropriate | 02:59 |
jhesketh | ianw: sure. Did you want to modify your submission to be like that or would you be interested in co-presenting? | 03:16 |
ianw | jhesketh: heh, i'm sure you require no help :) you should submit something that is just zuul focused i think, and "don't mention the war" ;) i'll be happy to give feedback on slides etc if you'd like. | 03:24 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: web: add /{tenant}/job/{job_name} route https://review.openstack.org/550978 | 03:26 |
jhesketh | ianw: okay, will think about it :-). Didn't want to tread on your toes. | 03:27 |
jhesketh | Thanks for your review offer :-) | 03:27 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: web: add /{tenant}/job/{job_name} route https://review.openstack.org/550978 | 03:28 |
*** jiapei has joined #zuul | 03:29 | |
openstackgerrit | Ian Wienand proposed openstack-infra/zuul-jobs master: Use readthedocs webhook to trigger build https://review.openstack.org/579434 | 03:37 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: web: add /{tenant}/job/{job_name} route https://review.openstack.org/550978 | 04:05 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: dashboard: add /{tenant}/job.html page to display job details https://review.openstack.org/535545 | 04:05 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: web: add /{tenant}/projects and /{tenant}/project/{project} routes https://review.openstack.org/550979 | 04:07 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: web: add /{tenant}/projects and /{tenant}/project/{project} routes https://review.openstack.org/550979 | 04:26 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: dashboard: add /{tenant}/projects.html web page https://review.openstack.org/537870 | 04:26 |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 05:10 | |
*** robcresswell has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** LinuxJedi has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** mwhahaha has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** gundalow has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** fdegir has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** portdirect has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** dvn has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** jamielennox has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** tristanC has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC | 05:18 | |
*** toabctl has quit IRC | 05:18 | |
*** yuangjay has joined #zuul | 05:20 | |
*** toabctl has joined #zuul | 05:21 | |
*** nchakrab has joined #zuul | 05:23 | |
*** sambetts_ has joined #zuul | 05:23 | |
*** nchakrab has quit IRC | 05:25 | |
*** nchakrab has joined #zuul | 05:25 | |
*** chkumar|ruck has quit IRC | 05:28 | |
*** chkumar|ruck has joined #zuul | 05:29 | |
*** robcresswell has joined #zuul | 05:35 | |
*** LinuxJedi has joined #zuul | 05:35 | |
*** mwhahaha has joined #zuul | 05:35 | |
*** gundalow has joined #zuul | 05:35 | |
*** fdegir has joined #zuul | 05:35 | |
*** portdirect has joined #zuul | 05:35 | |
*** dvn has joined #zuul | 05:35 | |
*** jamielennox has joined #zuul | 05:35 | |
*** quiquell|off is now known as quiquell | 05:39 | |
*** jiapei has quit IRC | 05:39 | |
*** ianychoi has joined #zuul | 05:43 | |
*** nchakrab has quit IRC | 05:51 | |
*** nchakrab has joined #zuul | 05:53 | |
*** nchakrab_ has joined #zuul | 05:59 | |
*** nchakrab has quit IRC | 05:59 | |
*** tobiash has quit IRC | 06:07 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #zuul | 06:27 | |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: web: add /{tenant}/job/{job_name} route https://review.openstack.org/550978 | 06:27 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: web: add /{tenant}/projects and /{tenant}/project/{project} routes https://review.openstack.org/550979 | 06:27 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: web: add /{tenant}/pipelines route https://review.openstack.org/541521 | 06:27 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: scheduler: add job's parent name to the rpc job_list method https://review.openstack.org/573473 | 06:27 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: web: add /{tenant}/labels route https://review.openstack.org/553979 | 06:27 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: web: add /{tenant}/nodes route https://review.openstack.org/553998 | 06:27 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: dashboard: add /{tenant}/job.html page to display job details https://review.openstack.org/535545 | 06:28 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: dashboard: add /{tenant}/projects.html web page https://review.openstack.org/537870 | 06:28 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: dashboard: add /{tenant}/labels.html web page https://review.openstack.org/553980 | 06:28 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: dashboard: add /{tenant}/nodes.html web page https://review.openstack.org/553999 | 06:28 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: dashboard: add jobs graph rendering https://review.openstack.org/537869 | 06:28 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: dashboard: add project pipeline rendering https://review.openstack.org/537871 | 06:28 |
*** tristanC has joined #zuul | 06:31 | |
tristanC | jhesketh: i updated both topics zuul-web-routes and zuul-ui-pages to work with the new ZuulService component | 06:32 |
jhesketh | tristanC: cool, I'll take a look :-) | 06:35 |
*** pcaruana has joined #zuul | 06:36 | |
*** tobiash has joined #zuul | 06:55 | |
*** gtema has joined #zuul | 07:22 | |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: web: add /{tenant}/job/{job_name} route https://review.openstack.org/550978 | 07:32 |
openstackgerrit | Tristan Cacqueray proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: dashboard: add /{tenant}/job.html page to display job details https://review.openstack.org/535545 | 07:33 |
*** tobasco_away is now known as tobasco | 07:54 | |
*** GonZo2000 has joined #zuul | 08:12 | |
*** GonZo2000 has joined #zuul | 08:12 | |
*** hashar has joined #zuul | 08:14 | |
*** magickris has joined #zuul | 08:20 | |
magickris | Is there a case in which json status file for zuulv3 heads list for a given queue has more than one element? | 08:23 |
*** electrofelix has joined #zuul | 08:33 | |
*** threestrands has quit IRC | 08:51 | |
*** gtema has quit IRC | 08:52 | |
*** pwhalen_ has quit IRC | 09:03 | |
*** pwhalen_ has joined #zuul | 09:03 | |
*** nchakrab_ has quit IRC | 09:22 | |
*** sambetts_ is now known as sambetts | 09:30 | |
*** nchakrab has joined #zuul | 09:40 | |
*** GonZo2000 has quit IRC | 09:40 | |
*** GonZo2000 has joined #zuul | 09:41 | |
*** GonZo2000 has joined #zuul | 09:41 | |
*** GonZo2000 has quit IRC | 09:49 | |
*** yuangjay has quit IRC | 09:50 | |
*** GonZo2000 has joined #zuul | 09:50 | |
*** dmellado has quit IRC | 10:36 | |
*** dmellado has joined #zuul | 10:42 | |
*** gouthamr has quit IRC | 10:47 | |
*** GonZo2000 has quit IRC | 10:55 | |
*** gouthamr has joined #zuul | 11:01 | |
*** gtema has joined #zuul | 11:08 | |
*** hashar is now known as hasharAway | 12:10 | |
openstackgerrit | Fabien Boucher proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Add tenant yaml validation option to zuul client https://review.openstack.org/574265 | 12:17 |
openstackgerrit | Fabien Boucher proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Add tenant yaml validation option to zuul client https://review.openstack.org/574265 | 12:19 |
*** rlandy has joined #zuul | 12:35 | |
openstackgerrit | Fabien Boucher proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Remove unecessary shebang and exec bit https://review.openstack.org/583563 | 12:39 |
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|lunch | 12:41 | |
mordred | jhesketh, ianw: just for the record, needing to avoid mention of openstack is super lame - and I PROMISE you I'm not going to do it in my lca submissions | 12:45 |
mordred | like, I know what you're talking about - but I think I've reached my breaking point with people's childishness on the topic | 12:45 |
jhesketh | mordred: agreed, and very happy that you'll not avoid it for LCA :-) | 12:45 |
mordred | jhesketh: :) | 12:47 |
mordred | jhesketh: of course, now I just need to actually submit things :) | 12:48 |
*** quiquell|lunch is now known as quiquell | 12:48 | |
jhesketh | +1 | 12:48 |
openstackgerrit | Joshua Hesketh proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Remove redhat-rpm-config bindep https://review.openstack.org/581252 | 13:05 |
openstackgerrit | Joshua Hesketh proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Fix github setup in zuul from scratch https://review.openstack.org/581253 | 13:05 |
openstackgerrit | Joshua Hesketh proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: fix zuul from scratch user and group creation https://review.openstack.org/581254 | 13:05 |
openstackgerrit | Joshua Hesketh proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Add instructions for deploying zuul with openSUSE https://review.openstack.org/581255 | 13:05 |
openstackgerrit | Joshua Hesketh proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Add instructions on building static web components https://review.openstack.org/581256 | 13:05 |
*** dkranz has joined #zuul | 13:10 | |
Shrews | mordred: any chance for approving this to cleanup the sdk changes? https://review.openstack.org/583338 | 13:18 |
*** pwhalen_ is now known as pwhalen | 13:19 | |
*** pwhalen has quit IRC | 13:19 | |
*** pwhalen has joined #zuul | 13:19 | |
mordred | Shrews: done | 13:22 |
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|launch | 13:23 | |
*** quiquell|launch is now known as quiquell|lunch | 13:23 | |
rcarrillocruz | folks, is there any way to constrain a label to $job or $project | 13:23 |
Shrews | rcarrillocruz: a node label? | 13:24 |
rcarrillocruz | yah | 13:24 |
mordred | rcarrillocruz: no, not currently. there have been some discussions around that use case but I don't think anything definitive has been decided yet | 13:24 |
*** nchakrab_ has joined #zuul | 13:24 | |
Shrews | nodepool doesn't know anything about $jobs or $projects | 13:24 |
rcarrillocruz | ok, my use case is | 13:24 |
rcarrillocruz | having a static node , whiwch has a leg to an internal network | 13:25 |
rcarrillocruz | howevre, it seems that opens the door for the node to be used by any job definition | 13:25 |
mordred | yup | 13:25 |
rcarrillocruz | i.e. all nods are available to everything | 13:25 |
rcarrillocruz | are there specs about it or changes to track on about that | 13:25 |
Shrews | i don't see us building anything like that into nodepool. it would have to be a zuul-side thing | 13:26 |
rcarrillocruz | yah, probably a tenant setting thing ... | 13:26 |
mordred | I don't agree ... i think at the very least we're going to need tenant-scoped labels at some point | 13:26 |
rcarrillocruz | allowed-jobs , below the project or something | 13:26 |
*** nchakrab has quit IRC | 13:28 | |
mordred | although I do agree - I think tying label to job would be too hard | 13:28 |
mordred | and very strange, since jobs are quite dynamic | 13:28 |
rcarrillocruz | also, not sure... if we want to support nodepool as a standalone thing in some setups, having that attribute may be confusing | 13:29 |
rcarrillocruz | it could be optional in case it was integrated with zuul, but not sure... looks to me as not right place | 13:29 |
rcarrillocruz | probably better zuul place | 13:29 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack-infra/nodepool master: Fix plugin and examples for using openstacksdk https://review.openstack.org/583338 | 13:30 |
rcarrillocruz | mordred , clarkb : any spec or changes about that you aware of ? or was it just discussed on IRC/meetings informally | 13:30 |
*** myoung|off is now known as myoung | 13:36 | |
openstackgerrit | Fabien Boucher proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Add tenant yaml validation option to zuul client https://review.openstack.org/574265 | 13:36 |
rcarrillocruz | Erm corvus ^ as well, re restricted labels specs or changes | 13:42 |
mordred | rcarrillocruz: no spec that I know of - just discussions so far | 13:43 |
tristanC | mordred: and a review :) https://review.openstack.org/535546 | 13:54 |
*** quiquell|lunch is now known as quiquell | 13:54 | |
mordred | tristanC, rcarrillocruz: see - it's best not to completely listen to me in the morning | 13:55 |
Shrews | fyi, leaving for an appointment with the wrist doc. bbl | 13:56 |
mordred | Shrews: have 'fun' | 13:57 |
tristanC | mordred: thought this change is not very flexible, and we could draft a more generic limit system, with regexp matching | 13:57 |
Shrews | mordred: oh sure. surgery decision being made today | 13:57 |
mordred | tristanC: yeah - I do like the idea of keeping the limitation defined at the zuul level | 13:59 |
mordred | which would bring me back to agreeing with the thing I disagreed with earlier :) | 13:59 |
mordred | because the thing you really want is for a zuul admin to be able to control which contexts a given label is requested from - nodepool itself doesn't actually need any awareness of that at all | 14:00 |
tristanC | there is another idea i'd like to propose, supporting OWNER file in the pipeline requirement/trigger so that check jobs doesn't run for any changes | 14:01 |
tristanC | e.g. anonymous change, not owned by an OWNER would need a "run-job" comment issued by an OWNER | 14:02 |
tristanC | otherwise, label restriction would only really work for config projects | 14:03 |
mordred | tristanC: I think corvus talked about a similar idea (although I personally do not like the 'owner' idea because of what it implies sociall) | 14:04 |
mordred | tristanC: but having there be a pipeline config or job flag or similar that restricts such jobs to only being able to be run once there is an appropriate code review | 14:05 |
mordred | so - like, once it's got a +2 (or something configurable in the pipeline) - it's ok to run a something | 14:05 |
mordred | tristanC: in fact, I think such a thing could be done today - make a pipeline that is triggered by 'run-job' and has a pipeline requirement of code-review: +2 on it | 14:06 |
tristanC | mordred: yes, but then job doesn't auto-run for core reviewer... | 14:07 |
mordred | tristanC: yeah. I think that's fine personally - I don't like things that behave differently for special people | 14:07 |
mordred | tristanC: this is just me talking though - other people may of course have different views :) | 14:09 |
tristanC | mordred: the things will behave differently for special people adding the 'run-job' anyway | 14:09 |
mordred | they will - but the sequence of actions are obvious and visible and they apply equally to all participants | 14:10 |
mordred | instead of a job running magically for one user but not another | 14:10 |
mordred | if 'normal' people have to get a review and a run-job from someone to get the given job run, then the same rules should apply to core reviewers as well | 14:11 |
tristanC | alright, fair enough. it was just a suggestion :) | 14:11 |
mordred | otherwise we support the theory that core reviewers are somehow privileged | 14:11 |
mordred | tristanC: oh - totally - it's a fair suggestion - and one worth of debate | 14:11 |
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|off | 14:12 | |
tristanC | happy to see how this would be implemented using the 'run-job' input | 14:12 |
mordred | tristanC: I'm also arguing the extremely-egalitarian view we tend to have in openstack land ... I'm not sure whether or not it's zuul's job to support such a viewpoint | 14:12 |
mordred | tristanC: ooh! I see that your dashboard patch landed! | 14:13 |
mordred | yay | 14:13 |
mordred | tristanC: so - did I mention to you my crazy idea related to testing (this is related to your selenium patch) | 14:13 |
tristanC | mordred: i don't think so | 14:15 |
*** hasharAway is now known as hashar | 14:15 | |
tristanC | i hope it doesn't involve more javascript :-) | 14:15 |
mordred | tristanC: basically, make some functional tests in javascript using the normal javascript testing structures - then make a zuul test that spins up fake zuul bits (like it does not) and then actually runs "npm run test" or whatever the command would be | 14:16 |
mordred | tristanC: hehe | 14:16 |
mordred | tristanC: but you LOVE the javascript! | 14:16 |
tristanC | oh boy, something like the e2e nightwatch? | 14:17 |
mordred | tristanC: (of course, I also think we shoudl add some unittests) | 14:18 |
mordred | tristanC: maybe? | 14:18 |
mordred | tristanC: I mean - this is just an idea- so far I've done zero investigation into the feasibility | 14:19 |
tristanC | mordred: i think the main issue is that only chrome implements the building blocks to run such test, the firefox driver is missing some api | 14:20 |
*** nchakrab has joined #zuul | 14:20 | |
*** nchakrab_ has quit IRC | 14:21 | |
tristanC | e.g. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=721859&hide_resolved=1 | 14:21 |
mordred | tristanC: yah - that was sort of why I was thinking about using the js tools - since karma has chrome and firefox drivers | 14:21 |
tristanC | how about defunctzombie/zuul =) | 14:22 |
mordred | hahahaha | 14:23 |
tristanC | as i mentioned at the opendevconf, i worry angular may not be the best option. i find it very difficult to use atm | 14:23 |
mordred | that's fair - it's definitely more complex now than your initial patches were | 14:24 |
tristanC | or maybe it's just something to get used to, but i really like vuejs or react, it seems simpler to write and re-use custom components | 14:25 |
tristanC | for example: https://github.com/TristanCacqueray/zuul-react/blob/master/src/pages/Status.js | 14:27 |
tristanC | so perhaps we should evaluate and pick a framework before we grow a tighter dependency with the js bits, especially with functional testing | 14:28 |
tristanC | evaluate what's available* | 14:31 |
mordred | tristanC: yah- I've been meaning to poke at your react repo a bit more. I know we have some potential react stuff we'd like to do with adding gerrit support to netlify-cms and then using that to manage the zuul website. I don't really relish rewriting the dashboard *again* - but I'd definitely rather do such a thing now, when we actually don't have that much code yet, than later. especially since we haven't | 14:32 |
mordred | rewritten the status page yet | 14:32 |
magickris | Is there any case in which heads list for a given queue has more than one element? (in status json file) | 14:37 |
*** nchakrab has quit IRC | 14:41 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 14:56 | |
openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Emit a log line containing version info around startup https://review.openstack.org/583639 | 14:59 |
corvus | magickris: yes, happens frequently in dependent pipelines. it's, um, called a 'severed head' when the change at the head fails, the changes behind get severed from it, and the one behind becomes the second head while the first change continues to finish its jobs. once it reports and is dequeued, we go back to having one head. | 14:59 |
clarkb | rcarrillocruz: there is a storyboard story for tenant scoped resources iirc | 14:59 |
corvus | magickris: that's the most common case, but there can be other similar cases. i believe zuul.openstack.org's gate pipeline has 2 heads right now. | 15:01 |
*** nchakrab has joined #zuul | 15:01 | |
corvus | over in #openstack-infra, we discovered that the scheduler is leaking memory | 15:02 |
corvus | based on when we restarted, we suspect a commit somewhere in af575001b422119348812439bf0e7626e085860d..c2fe7713feac11cecaa56c3327a3dff13a78058e | 15:02 |
mordred | corvus: 4f93d6d5270e52928190c6a3a8248ca95ae16265 306039f2dc4b2329458d4ea7df66ee5cb9e10efc and 4f93d6d5270e52928190c6a3a8248ca95ae16265 seem like the most likley candidates from a pass through commit messages | 15:07 |
mordred | well, that's the same commit twice too | 15:08 |
magickris | corvus: Thanks! | 15:13 |
openstackgerrit | Jan Gutter proposed openstack-infra/nodepool master: [POC] Add baremetal subimage upload support https://review.openstack.org/583645 | 15:17 |
tobiash | fyi, I'm afk today and tomorrow | 15:25 |
mordred | tobiash: enjoy being afk! | 15:26 |
tobiash | mordred: well, proofreading school reports is not that enjoyable... | 15:29 |
mordred | :) | 15:31 |
pabelanger | Did we ever write a patch to delete all zuul-executor build directories on startup? The use case is if zuul-executor doesn't shutdown cleanly, we can leak them in /var/lib/zuul/builds | 15:43 |
clarkb | in zuul test node git repos we have speculative state checked out to 'master' branch. Do we also create a ref for pointing at the state that is laready merged? something like refs/origin/master? | 15:49 |
*** gtema has quit IRC | 15:52 | |
corvus | mordred, pabelanger, clarkb, tobiash: looking at the objgraph i got from production, i see multiple 'check' pipeline objects pointing to the layout (there should only ever be one). that reminds me that tobiash's change to fix the configuration contamination touched on that quite a bit (eliminating several unecessary layout references), and also that tobiash said that the error may have further implications | 15:55 |
corvus | than just the ones we saw. since tobiash's change has landed since our previous restart, i'm inclined to stop debugging the leak at this point and instead suggest that we observe it for a week to see if it's still a problem. | 15:55 |
corvus | pabelanger: https://review.openstack.org/573302 | 15:55 |
clarkb | I'm fine with that. The leak was fairly slow so should be safe to give it some time and wait | 15:56 |
tobiash | Yay, so I might have fixed a leak by accident :) | 15:57 |
* tobiash goes back to proofreading | 15:58 | |
corvus | clarkb: let me know if this has your answer: https://zuul-ci.org/docs/zuul/user/jobs.html#git-repositories | 15:59 |
clarkb | corvus: it does thank you | 15:59 |
corvus | i guess that should say that origin points to the previous change, or the current state if there are no changes ahead | 16:00 |
*** pcaruana has joined #zuul | 16:00 | |
*** nchakrab has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
openstackgerrit | Paul Belanger proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Delete executor.job_dir on start up https://review.openstack.org/583655 | 16:05 |
pabelanger | corvus: thanks, looking now | 16:05 |
Diabelko | hello again. is there a way to assign some global variable to a variable in vars: section of job definition? A lot of our jobs depend on upstream versions of 3rd party software and we control it in job vars - e.g. we duplicate a lot of 'ocata', which may become 'queens' or 'pike' at some point | 16:11 |
Diabelko | and if I could use site-variables or something similar, that would be great | 16:11 |
*** sshnaidm|rover is now known as sshnaidm|bbl | 16:12 | |
pabelanger | today zuul.yaml file doesn't support templating, which means need to copy 'ocata' around a lot. Depending on job setup, you may be able to parent to another job which has the variable set | 16:14 |
Diabelko | we're trying, but we've got a lot of deployment combos | 16:14 |
Diabelko | ok, thanks | 16:15 |
pabelanger | is the job in question running on the same branch? I am guessing no | 16:15 |
Diabelko | pabelanger: https://github.com/Juniper/contrail-zuul-jobs/blob/master/zuul.d/contrail-jobs.yaml#L135 actually yes | 16:16 |
pabelanger | Diabelko: in rdoproject, we've been able to use the zuul.branch variable to get some of that info too. So if your job is running ocata, then set openstack_version == zuul.branch|replace('stable\/ | 16:17 |
pabelanger | err | 16:18 |
pabelanger | Diabelko: in rdoproject, we've been able to use the zuul.branch variable to get some of that info too. So if your job is running ocata, then set openstack_version == zuul.branch|replace('stable\/', '') | 16:18 |
pabelanger | yah, looks like you can get it from contrail/ocata | 16:18 |
pabelanger | using same trick | 16:19 |
Diabelko | mhm, makes sense | 16:19 |
pabelanger | corvus: any objection if I push up a patch to fix https://review.openstack.org/573302/ ? | 16:29 |
pabelanger | I've left comment also | 16:34 |
corvus | Diabelko: yes there are site variables https://zuul-ci.org/docs/zuul/user/jobs.html#site-wide-variables | 16:35 |
corvus | pabelanger: please do | 16:36 |
corvus | pabelanger: responded | 16:38 |
*** myoung is now known as myoung|lunch | 16:50 | |
*** pwhalen has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
pabelanger | thanks | 17:01 |
*** pwhalen has joined #zuul | 17:03 | |
*** pwhalen has joined #zuul | 17:03 | |
openstackgerrit | Paul Belanger proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Delete stale jobdirs at startup https://review.openstack.org/573302 | 17:22 |
*** electrofelix has quit IRC | 17:23 | |
Shrews | gee, that review ^^ keeps cropping up every couple of months. | 17:30 |
pabelanger | yah, rdoproject hit the issue this morning | 17:31 |
pabelanger | there was also the stuck job in queue from when zuul-executor died (server rebooted) but having trouble finding that in storyboard | 17:32 |
*** pabelanger has quit IRC | 17:34 | |
*** pabelanger has joined #zuul | 17:34 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
*** myoung|lunch is now known as myoung | 18:09 | |
*** sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk | 18:21 | |
*** harlowja has joined #zuul | 18:54 | |
*** hashar has quit IRC | 19:49 | |
openstackgerrit | Paul Belanger proposed openstack-infra/zuul-jobs master: DNM - testing shadowing https://review.openstack.org/583721 | 19:58 |
*** hashar has joined #zuul | 20:00 | |
*** sshnaidm|bbl is now known as sshnaidm|rover | 20:18 | |
pabelanger | glad we finished zuulv3 migration in rdoproject: https://jenkins.io/security/advisory/2018-07-18/ | 20:29 |
openstackgerrit | Matthieu Huin proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Add a dequeue command to zuul client https://review.openstack.org/95035 | 20:31 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack-infra/zuul master: Delete stale jobdirs at startup https://review.openstack.org/573302 | 20:57 |
*** jimi|ansible has joined #zuul | 21:09 | |
*** jimi|ansible has joined #zuul | 21:09 | |
*** myoung is now known as myoung|afk | 21:32 | |
*** hashar has quit IRC | 21:41 | |
*** jimi|ansible has quit IRC | 21:43 | |
clarkb | corvus: tobiash at least over the short term memory usage is holding pretty steady | 22:31 |
corvus | w00t | 22:32 |
mordred | corvus, clarkb: \o/ | 22:48 |
*** rlandy has quit IRC | 22:57 | |
openstackgerrit | Matthieu Huin proposed openstack-infra/zuul master: Add a dequeue command to zuul client https://review.openstack.org/95035 | 22:58 |
*** eikke has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
*** _ari_ has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
*** myoung|afk has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
*** _ari_ has joined #zuul | 23:03 | |
*** myoung has joined #zuul | 23:03 | |
*** threestrands has joined #zuul | 23:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!