| @fzzfh:matrix.org | * hi，when I use nodepool DIB build ubuntu-focal image occur error.https://bugs.launchpad.net/diskimage-builder/+bug/1969093 | 01:44 |
|---|---|---|
| ``` | ||
| 2022-04-13 08:42:56.123 | INFO diskimage_builder.block_device.utils [-] Calling [sudo umount /var/cache/nodepool/dib_tmp/dib_build.3DMuQbbI/mnt/] | ||
| 2022-04-13 08:42:56.675 | INFO diskimage_builder.block_device.utils [-] Calling [sudo kpartx -d /dev/loop0] | ||
| 2022-04-13 08:42:56.715 | DEBUG diskimage_builder.block_device.utils [-] exec_sudo: device-mapper: remove ioctl on loop0p1 failed: Device or resource busy exec_sudo /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/diskimage_builder/block_device/utils.py:135 | ||
| ``` | ||
| I found after build. df -h still have /dev/mapper/loop0p1 like follow. if I run unmount /run/media/root/cloudimg-rootfs,then `kpartx -d /dev/loop0` would be success. Does this need to be unmount. but I don't found unmount /root/media/root/clouding-rootfs on elements script. | ||
| ``` | ||
| [root@managesf.sftests.com /]# df -h | ||
| Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on | ||
| devtmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev | ||
| tmpfs 16G 20K 16G 1% /dev/shm | ||
| tmpfs 16G 19M 16G 1% /run | ||
| tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup | ||
| /dev/mapper/centos-root 863G 33G 831G 4% / | ||
| /dev/sda2 1014M 154M 861M 16% /boot | ||
| /dev/sda1 200M 12M 189M 6% /boot/efi | ||
| /dev/mapper/centos-home 50G 58M 50G 1% /home | ||
| tmpfs 3.1G 52K 3.1G 1% /run/user/0 | ||
| /dev/mapper/loop0p1 3.8G 2.0G 1.6G 57% /run/media/root/cloudimg-rootfs | ||
| ``` | ||
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Zuul merged on behalf of Simon Westphahl: [zuul/zuul] 837506: Don't overwrite result data in compat mode https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/837506 | 06:17 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Alfredo Moralejo proposed: [zuul/zuul-jobs] 838450: Update gpg key file for extras-common in CS9 https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/838450 | 08:19 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Zuul merged on behalf of Albin Vass: [zuul/nodepool] 823978: Add option of configuring imagePullSecrets for openshift drivers https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/nodepool/+/823978 | 08:59 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Zuul merged on behalf of James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com: [zuul/zuul] 837766: Fix git error in stream jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/837766 | 17:07 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: [zuul/zuul] 838561: Make nodepool hostvars available on unreachable hosts https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/838561 | 17:19 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Zuul merged on behalf of James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com: [zuul/zuul] 837757: Add IBM and Azure deps to the default ansible config https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/837757 | 17:22 | |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | corvus: in https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/837770/2/zuul/merger/merger.py you rmtree the repo, but will the next operation implicitly reclone? | 21:20 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | or will we still fail the operation because the next operation won't have a git repo? | 21:21 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | Clark: that build will be toast, but the next one will reclone | 21:28 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | (that's generally the pattern we have for the "OMG git repo makes no sense" errors) | 21:28 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | ok that is sort of what I assumed. Should we reclone there and attempt to not fail? | 21:29 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | these are super rare, so i'd rather keep it simple+safe | 21:29 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | wfm | 21:29 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | (i mean, i'm not necessarily opposed to that, but at least at the moment, i think the trade-off isn't worth it) | 21:30 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | corvus: left a comment on https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/837436 | 21:33 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | mostly worried we're ripping out too much of the testing framework when testing very similar things related to bwrap instead of untrusted vs trusted paths would be useful | 21:34 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | Clark: if we want to do that, i think that would be a new test. i don't think the "remote" tests are the right place for that, since that's testing the action module behavior on remote nodes. i can add that as a followup commit if we think it's important. | 21:40 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | oh ya I don't think we need remote nodes to check that. I do think it would be worth testing just to make sure our assumptions about bwrap behavior hold true (and continue to do so over time) | 21:41 |
| @iwienand:matrix.org | https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/837459 is a hopefully easy one that uncaps sphinx. it would be helpful as the current capped version doesn't work with 3.10. it required a cap because it didn't work with python 3.8, but fixes are released for that now | 21:52 |
| @iwienand:matrix.org | s/with 3.10/with python 3.10/ | 21:52 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: [zuul/zuul] 838602: Add a bubblewrap ro mount test https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/838602 | 22:08 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: [zuul/zuul] 838603: Remove unused bwrap-mounts test fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/838603 | 22:09 | |
| @jim:acmegating.com | Clark: ^ and also v | 22:09 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | thanks I'll try to catch up on reviews after this short indoor bike ride | 22:17 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Zuul merged on behalf of James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com: [zuul/zuul] 837770: Delete repo if unable to reset https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/837770 | 22:45 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Zuul merged on behalf of Ian Wienand: [zuul/zuul] 837459: doc: uncap sphinx https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/837459 | 23:08 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!