| @mnaser:matrix.org | Excellent | 02:34 |
|---|---|---|
| @mnaser:matrix.org | https://hub.docker.com/_/registry is now failing to pull in our CI | 02:34 |
| @mnaser:matrix.org | (our aka Zuul CI) | 02:34 |
| @mnaser:matrix.org | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/zuul/build/ca593c1de1474064bf1a8aca9068753a | 02:35 |
| @mnaser:matrix.org | They must have changed something. | 02:35 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | I think the rate limits may differ by project too like open source things get more or something? | 03:07 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | It's possible it isn't even a blanket change but something soecifc | 03:07 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | Looks like microk8s is consistently failing? Maybe we need to debug that first? | 03:13 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Artem Goncharov proposed: | 10:02 | |
| - [zuul/zuul] 859939: Implement Gitea driver https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/859939 | ||
| - [zuul/zuul] 859940: Implement tests of the gitea driver https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/859940 | ||
| @yustinakvr:matrix.org | Hi Zuul team! I have a question regarding zuul update. Currently we have zuul 8.2.1 and ansible-core 2.14.10. Next major zuul is 9.5.0, could you please share which ansible version do we need? And which ansible-core version needed for the latest 11.1.0 zuul? Thank you! | 13:39 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | yustinakvr: always consult the upgrade notes: https://zuul-ci.org/docs/zuul/latest/releasenotes.html#relnotes-9-5-0 | 13:46 |
| @yustinakvr:matrix.org | I've checked, there is info only about ansible 8 or 9 | 13:46 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | 9.5.0 deprecates but does not remove ansible 6 (core 2.13) | 13:46 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | "Ansible versions 6 is now deprecated in Zuul since it is unmaintaned, and it will be removed from a future version of Zuul. Ansible 8 is now the default version in Zuul." | 13:47 |
| @yustinakvr:matrix.org | I'm talking about core version of ansible, there is no info regarding this | 13:47 |
| @yustinakvr:matrix.org | so, ansible sore 2.14.10 is fine for zuul 9.5.0, right? | 13:48 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | yustinakvr: see https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/reference_appendices/release_and_maintenance.html for what version of ansible-core corresponds to each major ansible release | 13:48 |
| @yustinakvr:matrix.org | thank you! | 13:49 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | but yes, it looks like ansible-core 2.14 corresponds to ansible 7, which is still supported in zuul 9.5.0 | 13:49 |
| @yustinakvr:matrix.org | ok, thanj you) Will zuul 11.1.0 works with ansible 2.17 (latest)? | 13:50 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | it doesn't look like ansible 10 support (ansible-core 2.17) has been added in development yet. zuul 10.0.0 added support for ansible 9 (ansible-core 2.16) | 13:53 |
| @yustinakvr:matrix.org | thank you very much for the support! | 14:01 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: [zuul/zuul-registry] 935370: Ignore 404 on swift object delete https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-registry/+/935370 | 16:29 | |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | yustinakvr: fungi note I don't think any zuul release had ansible 7 support. We went from 6 to 8 then 9 | 16:34 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | and if you need specific versions of ansible you can always run a nested ansible within your job | 16:35 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | oh, huh, 7 never got added? | 16:36 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | i missed that | 16:36 |
| @yustinakvr:matrix.org | no no, we just need to upgrade from 8.2.1 to the latest. Accordingly docs it should be done from major to major versions, that's why I'm asking about ansible upgrade | 16:37 |
| @yustinakvr:matrix.org | eventually we need zuul 11.1.0 | 16:37 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | yes you should upgrade zuul from major version to major version and not skip those (and read the release notes there will be any important upgrade info in them) | 16:37 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Zuul merged on behalf of James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com: [zuul/zuul-registry] 935370: Ignore 404 on swift object delete https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-registry/+/935370 | 16:51 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Clark Boylan proposed: | 20:11 | |
| - [zuul/zuul-registry] 935403: Extend time blobs are considered valid during pruning https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-registry/+/935403 | ||
| - [zuul/zuul-registry] 935404: Implement paging in swift object listing https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-registry/+/935404 | ||
| @clarkb:matrix.org | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/zuul/build/6a3045491d6b4abfb5d28ee795bf4e22 I would epect that library/alpine is one of the "make lots of requests if you want" images | 20:22 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | ugh | 20:22 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | theory: are we maybe hitting those limits via our caches? its ironic isn't it that we'd get more requests overall if we stopped caching | 20:23 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | but I'm beginning to suspect that may be the case | 20:23 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Clark Boylan proposed: [zuul/zuul-registry] 935404: Implement paging in swift object listing https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-registry/+/935404 | 20:26 | |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | Eating lunch hlbut ya got a +2 on a rerun so it's not the single intermediate registry | 20:37 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | corvus: re those two changes the first one should be very safe. The second one I'm not sure how much testing we have for the swift backend and worry that I may break things with that update. Half wonder if we should do a tag before merging these (regardless of how much extra review and testing they may get) so that we have aquick easy fallback point | 20:54 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | I need to step out now otherwise I'll miss my opportunity for the one day of rain free bike riding this week. I'll check back in later today | 20:55 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | But best I can tell things are in a reasonably happy state right now if under pruned | 20:56 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | Clark: ack; i don't think we need a tag; if it breaks, we'll find out soon and we'll just revert. | 23:19 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed on behalf of Clark Boylan: [zuul/zuul-registry] 935404: Implement paging in swift object listing https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-registry/+/935404 | 23:20 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed on behalf of Clark Boylan: [zuul/zuul-registry] 935404: Implement paging in swift object listing https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-registry/+/935404 | 23:25 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!