| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Simon Westphahl proposed: [zuul/zuul] 951768: Make unique images provider independent https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/951768 | 13:17 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Simon Westphahl proposed: [zuul/zuul] 951768: Make unique image uploads provider independent https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/951768 | 13:17 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Dong Zhang proposed: [zuul/zuul] 951777: Fix wrong `secret name` in 'sub' claim of OIDC token https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/951777 | 14:25 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Dong Zhang proposed: [zuul/zuul] 951777: Fix wrong `secret name` in 'sub' claim of OIDC token https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/951777 | 14:26 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Dong Zhang proposed: [zuul/zuul] 951777: Fix wrong `secret name` in 'sub' claim of OIDC token https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/951777 | 14:29 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Zuul merged on behalf of Simon Westphahl: [zuul/zuul] 951134: Include image build name in zuul vars https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/951134 | 15:15 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: [zuul/zuul-client] 951725: Add nodes/nodeset-requests commands https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-client/+/951725 | 18:00 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Zuul merged on behalf of James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com: [zuul/zuul] 951212: Use formatted timestamp for nodeset state_time in API https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/951212 | 18:15 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: [zuul/zuul] 951802: Include more info in nodes/requests lists https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/951802 | 18:23 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: [zuul/zuul] 951803: Add more context to niz quota log messages https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/951803 | 18:31 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Antoine Musso proposed: [zuul/zuul-jobs] 951804: add-build-sshkey: slightly enhance tasks names https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/951804 | 18:47 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Antoine Musso proposed: [zuul/nodepool] 951809: Change entry point busy loop to 'sleep infinity' https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/nodepool/+/951809 | 19:51 | |
| @amusso:matrix.org | my last contributions to Nodepool were 10 years ago 🥲 | 19:56 |
|---|---|---|
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: | 20:14 | |
| - [zuul/zuul] 951802: Include more info in nodes/requests lists https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/951802 | ||
| - [zuul/zuul] 951803: Add more context to niz quota log messages https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/951803 | ||
| @michael_kelly_anet:matrix.org | Is there a way to limit the number of queue items in a pipeline on a per project basis? One of the things we're finding is that multiple long running items coming from a single repository will tend to do things like, eg: lock up our gate pipeline | 21:02 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | there's a pipeline window, but nothing exactly like what you describe | 21:10 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | * there's a pipeline active window, but nothing exactly like what you describe | 21:10 |
| @michael_kelly_anet:matrix.org | Any suggestions to mitigate pipeline lockups in this sense? | 21:23 |
| @michael_kelly_anet:matrix.org | I guess this is where the active window comes in? | 21:23 |
| @michael_kelly_anet:matrix.org | The idea that we're potentially exploring is to move things into separate *tenants* but obviously this has some negative implications around shared repos and such. | 21:24 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | https://zuul-ci.org/docs/zuul/latest/config/pipeline.html#attr-pipeline.window and below are the docs for the window | 21:24 |
| @michael_kelly_anet:matrix.org | Yea, was just looking at that. My colleague who is poking at this seemed to imply that the behaviour we're seeing wasn't improved by that which seemed very strange to me. | 21:26 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | yes, and there are some other features for balancing demands from different tenants... | 21:30 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | in general, you could split queues, pipelines, or even tenants, but you lose progressively more integration features as you do that | 21:31 |
| @michael_kelly_anet:matrix.org | "split queues" -> what does this entail? | 21:37 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | not having the project share a change queue; it's almost as bad as moving to a different tenant from an integration standpoint, but simpler. | 21:39 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | * not having the projects share a change queue; it's almost as bad as moving to a different tenant from an integration standpoint, but simpler. | 21:39 |
| @michael_kelly_anet:matrix.org | Oh, right. Now I remember this. Lost in the mists of time to me, but I recall doing this to have the special "topics" queue. | 21:40 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: [zuul/zuul] 951346: Add options to manage nodes/requests https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/951346 | 22:36 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!