16:01:25 <Sukhdev> #startmeeting: ironic_neutron
16:01:26 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Aug  8 16:01:25 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is Sukhdev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:01:27 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:01:29 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to '__ironic_neutron'
16:01:31 <TheJulia> o/
16:01:50 <Sukhdev> #topic: Agenda
16:01:52 <devananda> o/
16:01:55 <hshiina2> o/
16:01:57 <Sukhdev> #link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic-neutron#Meeting_August_8.2C_2016
16:02:41 <Sukhdev> feel free to add to the agenda, if you like to bring up anything additional
16:02:51 <Sukhdev> #topic: Annoncements
16:03:23 <Sukhdev> All patches for Ironic-neutron integration for phase-1 are now merged
16:03:33 <Sukhdev> congratulation to the team
16:04:05 <Sukhdev> finally we have ironic, nova, and neutron patches - all in
16:04:22 <Sukhdev> thanks to jroll for pushing the last nova patch last week
16:04:30 <jroll> \o
16:04:42 * jroll apologizes for being late
16:05:00 <Sukhdev> jroll : no worries - you are just in time
16:05:19 <Sukhdev> Any other announcements?
16:05:24 <mjturek1> o/
16:05:50 <Sukhdev> #topic: Update on testing
16:06:14 <Sukhdev> I have been testing all of the new merged code for last couple of weeks
16:06:27 <Sukhdev> most of it works just fine, with the exception of one issue
16:06:54 <Sukhdev> I filed the bug for the issue that I discovered -
16:06:58 <Sukhdev> see here - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1610389
16:06:58 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1610389 in Ironic "IPA fails to pull image after reboot" [Undecided,New]
16:07:09 <jroll> that almost certainly isn't related to this work
16:07:34 <Sukhdev> jroll : probably - but, can't tell
16:07:51 <jroll> well, it isn't a networking issue, I can tell that much :)
16:08:18 <Sukhdev> If I reboot the controller then IPA fails to get image because of tmpurl issue
16:08:22 <Sukhdev> jroll : right
16:09:03 <Sukhdev> on the surface it seems that devstack sets the tmpurl which gets messed up over the reboot (i.e. not persistent)
16:09:24 <jroll> well, no, ironic generates the tempurl
16:09:29 <Sukhdev> However, I tried to look through the devstack code and could not find anywhere tmpurl set
16:09:33 <jroll> I'm wondering if it's being cached or something
16:09:42 <jroll> but regardless, I think we can take that out of this meeting :)
16:09:59 <Sukhdev> right
16:10:14 <Sukhdev> Wanted to see if any of you folks have seen this?
16:10:36 <Sukhdev> or may have any clue where to look
16:11:04 <Sukhdev> Other than this, everything is looking great!!!
16:12:04 <Sukhdev> that is the update from on the testing of new code
16:12:24 <Sukhdev> now on to the older agenda
16:13:07 <Sukhdev> jroll : when is the FF for ironic for Newton?
16:13:38 <jroll> Sukhdev: we don't have a hard feature freeze, but we try to stop merging risky/large features a few weeks before cycle end
16:14:14 <Sukhdev> so, sometime in early October/late sept..
16:14:49 <Sukhdev> #topic: Work items for Newton
16:14:56 <jroll> no
16:15:04 <jroll> final releases are Sep 26-30
16:15:25 <jroll> so Sep 12-16 at the latest, possibly a week or two earlier
16:15:50 <Sukhdev> oh - so we have appx a month to get the code ready
16:16:14 <Sukhdev> we have three items that I am tracking for Newton
16:16:52 <Sukhdev> Port groups, inspector, and security groups
16:17:14 <jroll> right
16:17:19 <jroll> I think inspector is the most important
16:17:42 <Sukhdev> sambets is working on it - I have not seen him for past few weeks
16:18:08 <jroll> he's been around
16:18:50 <Sukhdev> I will ping him on ironic channel to see if he has any update
16:19:12 <xenogear_> join #heat
16:19:37 <Sukhdev> xenogear_ : did not understand that
16:19:53 <jroll> that was a typo
16:20:19 <Sukhdev> :-)
16:21:43 <Sukhdev> mjturek1 had posted a patch for port groups - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347549
16:22:06 <Sukhdev> #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347549
16:22:16 <mjturek1> Sukhdev: just to be clear it's just breaking out the classes from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/332177/
16:22:34 <mjturek1> (which I'm fixing the failing tests on right now)
16:22:40 <Sukhdev> mjturek1 : right - that is what I meant
16:22:46 <mjturek1> :)
16:23:44 <Sukhdev> I am still caught up with the testing - probably will be busy for another week or so
16:24:00 <Sukhdev> after that I plan on jumping on to the security group implementation
16:25:06 <jroll> Sukhdev: please do start the SG thing soon, there isn't a lot of time this cycle and it isn't on our priority list
16:25:55 <Sukhdev> jroll: yes, it is on my list of things to do - just the bug which mentioned earlier chewed up a lot of my time
16:26:03 <Sukhdev> and it has become a blocker for me
16:26:45 <jroll> Sukhdev: okay, just a warning because we're already starting to pick what will and will not make it
16:28:06 <Sukhdev> jroll : right probably will get to it next week -
16:28:44 <jroll> ok, thanks
16:28:44 <Sukhdev> Anything else?
16:29:33 <Sukhdev> If anybody can help with the bug I mentioned earlier, please give me a shout -
16:30:14 <Sukhdev> With this, we have covered the main agenda items -
16:30:29 <Sukhdev> I have listed all the details (patches, etc) on the wiki - feel free to check it out
16:30:46 <Sukhdev> #topic Open Discussion
16:30:58 <mjturek1> Sukhdev: just curious, the issue you mentioned last week (where you had to specify the driver in the node create I believe). Was that solved?
16:31:39 <Sukhdev> mjturek1 : As long as I specify the driver information at the time of create, everything works just fine
16:31:58 <Sukhdev> So, I changed the script -
16:31:59 <mjturek1> is that intended behavior though? Should update be available?
16:32:26 <jroll> there's only certain states in which you can update the network_interface field, and iirc Sukhdev's node was not in that set of states
16:32:28 <Sukhdev> I could not tell if it is a bug or change in behaviour
16:32:51 <mjturek1> jroll: got it, makes sense
16:33:55 <Sukhdev> right - I assumed it to be a change in behavior --- which is different from earlier version
16:34:35 <Sukhdev> in the past you could create a node without much details and then update to specify details about driver
16:34:41 <Sukhdev> with new code, that is changed
16:35:37 <Sukhdev> Once node is created correctly, all works just fine -
16:35:52 <mjturek1> cool :)
16:35:58 <Sukhdev> So, if you have some older scripts, you might see this
16:36:43 <jroll> yeah
16:37:00 <jroll> and I think it's safe to assume deployers don't have older scripts for this yet :)
16:37:15 <mjturek1> lol true :)
16:37:25 <Sukhdev> right
16:38:20 <Sukhdev> things are looking really good - very predictable
16:38:44 <jroll> awesome, I'm excited to release this
16:38:57 <jroll> my goal is tomorrow, might be wednesday given our gate breakages though
16:39:01 <jroll> 6.1.0
16:40:33 <Sukhdev> jroll : so 6.1.0 is official Ironic release ?
16:40:47 <Sukhdev> something equivalent to N2?
16:40:47 <jroll> Sukhdev: it will be this week, yes
16:40:52 <jroll> and likely 7.0.0 at end of cycle
16:40:55 <jroll> and for stable/newton
16:41:06 <Sukhdev> perfect -
16:41:40 <Sukhdev> Once it is out, I will switch to this - to keep my test setup predictable
16:42:14 <Sukhdev> Anything else?
16:42:54 <Sukhdev> I guess we are done
16:43:04 <Sukhdev> Thanks everybody
16:43:23 <jroll> thanks Sukhdev :)
16:43:39 <Sukhdev> bye
16:43:46 <Sukhdev> #endmeeting