17:03:27 <Sukhdev> #startmeeting: networking_l2gw
17:03:27 <openstack> Meeting started Mon May 23 17:03:27 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is Sukhdev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:03:29 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:03:31 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to '__networking_l2gw'
17:03:50 <Sukhdev> #topic: Agenda
17:03:54 <Sukhdev> #link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/L2Gateway#Meeting_May_23.2C_2016
17:04:11 <Sukhdev> #topic: Announcements
17:04:28 <Sukhdev> We released Mitaka release few weeks back
17:04:40 <Sukhdev> has anybody had a chance to play with it ?
17:04:56 <oferby> was no aware that it was out....
17:04:59 <oferby> not
17:05:52 <Sukhdev> oferby : yes - you can pull it from pypi - it was tagged 2016.1.0
17:06:07 <oferby> will do that tomorrow
17:06:36 <Sukhdev> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw
17:07:46 <Sukhdev> #topic: Patches under review
17:08:05 <Sukhdev> #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/networking-l2gw,n,z
17:08:34 <Sukhdev> We are looking good from the patches point of view
17:09:26 <Sukhdev> #topic: L2GW as cloud interconnect
17:09:56 <Sukhdev> oferby : I heard you had back issue and hence, could not attend the summit
17:10:06 <Sukhdev> I was looking forward to meet with you
17:10:16 <oferby> yes .... too bad for me. really wanted to be there.
17:10:25 <oferby> to meet you guys.
17:10:43 <Sukhdev> armax had planned a session on Friday for L2GW
17:10:52 <oferby> :-(
17:11:21 <Sukhdev> but, we cancelled it as not many people were not there to participate
17:12:02 <oferby> before we move on, did you have a chance to check the patch I added for the DVR fix?
17:12:36 <Sukhdev> oferby : that was on my mind - and kind of slipped
17:12:57 <Sukhdev> I started to look at it and got distracted - will go back and look at it
17:13:17 <oferby> no warriesno worries
17:14:27 <Sukhdev> so, if I understand correctly - in the present implementation - if we have a L2GW connected to a neutron n/w
17:14:35 <oferby> the new API blueprint was not committed yet. can move to implementation?
17:14:51 <Sukhdev> we can not route to the gateway from other n/w by using router
17:14:59 <oferby> the problem is
17:15:41 <oferby> that in DVR, there is no host attached to the router, so the process fails
17:16:38 <oferby> so I added a method to look for the SNAT router that is located on the NN and put that host's IP
17:17:56 <Sukhdev> one time armax was explaining to me an issue which had to do with on the similar line - but, sounded a bit different
17:19:05 <Sukhdev> if you have a network which is connected to L2Gw and you have other networks which are routed - VMs from the attached network could connect to the L2GW, but the VMs from the other network could not
17:20:07 <oferby> when you say that you have other that are routed, what L2 is it? is the L2 connected to neutron too?
17:22:04 <Sukhdev> two different neutron subnets - L3 routing between them - one of these segments is connected to L2GW
17:22:27 <Sukhdev> the VMs from the other routed subnet could not route to the L2GW
17:22:43 <oferby> is there a bug on this? didn't see one. I can check this tomorrow.
17:23:57 <Sukhdev> no - I do not think he filed the bug - he just mentioned to me over a beer
17:24:19 <oferby> ok. I will check it.
17:24:21 <Sukhdev> If you have a setup, you can test it -
17:24:28 <oferby> I will.
17:24:31 <Sukhdev> this will impact the cloud interconnect
17:24:36 <oferby> yep.
17:24:39 <Sukhdev> hence, I thought I mention to you
17:25:53 <Sukhdev> I will review the DVR patch and will ask others to review as well
17:26:04 <oferby> great
17:27:56 <Sukhdev> Are you going to pick the work on the cloud inter-connect work in N release?
17:28:48 <oferby> I would like to start working on splitting the API from impl, add the new API and start impl, OK?
17:29:58 <Sukhdev> sorry - did not follow
17:30:58 <oferby> we talk some time before on splitting the API from implementation
17:31:28 <oferby> so that others can use their own implementation (Midokura)
17:31:47 <Sukhdev> Oh I see  - got it - I thought you said you were splitting the API itself
17:31:54 <oferby> this is with the current API
17:32:26 <oferby> after that I would like to start working on the new API. The one that I posted the blueprint .
17:32:46 <Sukhdev> got it -
17:33:08 <Sukhdev> is there a better time to move this meeting to so that more people can attend this meeting?
17:33:36 <Sukhdev> I can look for alternate slot and move the meeting, if it works better that way
17:33:59 <oferby> I'm open for suggestions ... just rimember that I'm on GMT +2
17:35:39 <Sukhdev> so, this is 6PM for you?
17:35:53 <oferby> 20:30
17:36:38 <Sukhdev> oh I see - that is kind of tight -
17:37:08 <oferby> I just found out that I'm +3 and not +2 (daylight saving time probably)
17:38:21 <Sukhdev> so, if we move this meeting to afternoon - say 3pm, will that be better for you?
17:38:24 <Sukhdev> or 4pm?
17:38:31 <oferby> sure
17:38:39 <Sukhdev> 4pm PDT
17:39:18 <oferby> PDT ??? that is in middle of the night for me
17:39:59 <Sukhdev> yup - I just checked :-)
17:40:25 <Sukhdev> I was confused between AM and PM :-)
17:40:30 <oferby> :-)
17:41:13 <Sukhdev> check with midokura guys as well - and come up with couple of time slots - if it helps, I can move the time around
17:41:29 <Sukhdev> we could move it one or 1.5 hour earlier
17:42:06 <oferby> that will be good. midokura guys are in my time zone too
17:42:43 <Sukhdev> only if we can have more people attend, will be worthwhile to change
17:42:56 <oferby> right
17:42:57 <Sukhdev> I can ask India folks as well - this time is bad for them as well
17:43:04 <oferby> ok
17:43:10 <Sukhdev> Sounds good
17:43:21 <Sukhdev> Do we need to discuss anything else?
17:43:59 <oferby> I just wanted to update you that the fix I made to IDL to support passive mode was committed in OVS project
17:44:13 <oferby> we can add IDL to L2GW now
17:44:21 <Sukhdev> oh - cool
17:44:31 <Sukhdev> great - lets do that
17:44:55 <Sukhdev> can you send me the link - I will add it to the wiki
17:46:12 <oferby> https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/af3582371193ad296801fe5e32803b8faa0dced6
17:46:24 <Sukhdev> #link: https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/af3582371193ad296801fe5e32803b8faa0dced6
17:47:37 <Sukhdev> Thanks
17:48:21 <Sukhdev> Anything else?
17:48:28 <oferby> nop
17:48:46 <Sukhdev> so, let me know after you speak with midokura folks
17:49:01 <oferby> sure. will email you.
17:49:11 <Sukhdev> I have to check if the channels are available -
17:49:15 <Sukhdev> sounds good
17:49:21 <Sukhdev> thanks
17:49:23 <Sukhdev> we are done for today
17:49:30 <oferby> ok.
17:49:34 <Sukhdev> bye
17:49:36 <oferby> bye.
17:49:41 <Sukhdev> #endmeeting