14:00:13 #startmeeting airship 14:00:14 Meeting started Tue Jan 22 14:00:13 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mattmceuen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:17 The meeting name has been set to 'airship' 14:00:17 #topic rollcall 14:00:29 GM/GE everyone! 14:00:42 Agenda today is here, please add anything you'd like to discuss today: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-meeting-2019-01-22 14:00:57 We'll get started in a few mins 14:01:08 hi everyone 14:01:15 hey georgk 14:01:29 hi all 14:01:36 Hiya 14:01:37 Hi 14:01:57 kiriti proposed openstack/airship-specs master: Added the spec for Uboat. https://review.openstack.org/632145 14:02:03 o/ 14:02:09 O/ 14:02:14 Uboat eh? 14:02:17 howdy all 14:02:39 yeah, if you want eyes on a spec, now's the ideal time to push a PS for advertisement purposes ;-) 14:02:54 #topic Airship summit talks 14:03:32 So reminder and warning everyone -- EOD tomorrow is the last chance to submit a talk proposal for the Open Infra summit in Denver! 14:03:45 We'd like to have several AIrship talks there 14:03:57 o/ 14:04:14 I for one have been a procrastinator, but plan to submit another one before the deadline, and I encourage you to do the same 14:04:17 hey roman 14:04:34 hogepodge had put together an etherpad to track talk submissions: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AirshipTalks2019 14:04:48 It is woefully empty atm :) 14:05:27 Let's get some interesting things in there, since this is our chance to show off what we're doing and garner more participation in it! 14:06:01 Anything else on the conference talk topic? 14:06:08 No :( 14:06:39 If anyone would like to collaborate on a talk, let folks know, many hands make light work 14:06:50 I'll be putting a workshop using armada 14:07:02 that's awesome portdirect 14:07:04 I would want to collaborate. 14:07:08 So hopefully that gets accepted, and runs super smooth :) 14:07:17 I think I will be on some presentation using airship, tbc. 14:07:32 evrardjp: that would rock 14:07:37 ++ 14:08:06 I didn't say I am not gonna bash it, don't be so thrilled in advance! 14:08:12 joking though :p 14:08:16 lol 14:08:32 I'll bring tomatos to the talk evrardjp 14:08:43 whether you get fresh produce afterwards or a mess to clean up is up to you 14:08:50 :p 14:09:00 Alrighty - moving on: 14:09:03 oh I thought that was your role :p 14:09:10 anyway... 14:09:14 * mattmceuen fact! 14:09:23 #topic Minikube for Airskiff 14:09:30 Take it away dwalt 14:09:36 Alrighty 14:09:51 recently, the OpenStack-Helm project introduced Minikube for their gates 14:10:21 We have been working to integrate their gate script into Airskiff and adopting it for use behind proxy servers 14:10:31 #link https://review.openstack.org/622610 14:10:54 dwalt: why fork, can you not help on the script in osh-infra and use that? 14:10:56 What are the benefits/differences of Minikube vs the previous KubeADM setup dwalt? 14:12:00 portdirect: I would be happy to add my additions to the OSH one, but I think we would like to avoid having to clone the OSH-infra repo when deploying Airskiff 14:12:16 You need to for helm-toolkit 14:13:27 We do, but IIRC, Armada does so in the bootstrap phase 14:13:34 In other words, we would also need to clone at the very beginning 14:14:04 Zuul makes that simple :) 14:14:08 I think it's a good thing to consider 14:14:18 deduplication of code is good 14:14:58 Agreed. I will propose my changes over on OSH-infra and see what comes of it :) 14:15:11 -2 :p 14:15:17 lol 14:15:20 To the earlier question, as for why Minikube over KubeADM 14:15:22 Seriously though, it would be great 14:15:52 Minikube cuts the K8s deployment process in half. With Minikube, the Airskiff gate completes in under an hour 14:15:58 Yep I'd say do both in parallel since you already have the PS directly against airskiff already, and then we can refactor later if it all goes well 14:16:04 That's awesome dwalt 14:16:25 Sounds like a plan mattmceuen 14:17:14 Anything else on the topic of minikube, airskiff, or gating in general folks? 14:18:03 #topic Requests for Review 14:18:14 Our weekly segment to make sure things that need eyeballs have eyeballs 14:18:30 Ansible framework for Divingbell 14:18:30 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628221/ 14:18:30 Airskiff fixes 14:18:30 https://review.openstack.org/631598 14:18:30 https://review.openstack.org/631610 14:18:30 https://review.openstack.org/631886 14:18:52 ^ copied from the etherpad. Let's please try to get some looks at these guys today. Any others? 14:20:20 #topic Roundtable 14:20:42 What else is percolating that we'd like to discuss today 14:21:16 is there a proceess for adding a new repo? 14:21:34 cd .. 14:21:38 woops 14:21:57 o/ 14:22:32 o/ srwilkers 14:22:39 sorry, a bit late to the party 14:22:44 georgk: weird folder name 14:22:47 "woops" 14:22:51 There is the normal OpenStack Infra process to add a repo 14:23:07 I'd like to additionally add a guideline that we discuss repo adds here first 14:23:11 evrardjp: you donĀ“t want to see my local filesystem ;-) 14:23:17 mattmceuen: I guess you must first ask airship governance (wink) 14:23:23 Prior to getting them merged, since it's difficult/impossible to roll back repo adds 14:23:34 not to beat a dead horse, but it would be awesome to see any work needed for the minikube bits and bobs to work with airskiff happen in openstack-helm-infra. as portdirect pointed out, zuul makes the process for adding a project painless 14:23:43 that way we can avoid divergence 14:24:19 srwilkers: thanks, I'll get that proposed today! 14:24:21 TY srwilkers 14:24:35 dwalt: awesome. ping me if you need anything 14:24:44 will do srwilkers 14:25:04 Any objections to a rule to discuss new repo adds in team meeting first? 14:25:16 mattmceuen: i think that sounds great 14:25:24 that's a sane path 14:25:25 start lightwight and go from there ;P 14:25:26 I think following that, a core +1 on the PS to add the repo would help confirm that the appropriate convo has occurred 14:26:01 I've missed. What would be the new repo be used for? 14:26:04 that'll help us scale airship up as time goes on 14:26:15 roman_g: mostly storing bank recipts etc 14:26:16 This is an imaginary abstract repo :) 14:26:24 Just talking process 14:27:51 Couple more PS to request review on -- these are a couple longstanding PS to add passphrase generation/encryption to pegleg 14:27:55 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628021/ 14:27:55 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/605425/ 14:28:31 These will be really good things to get in so that we can begin using them for ++security and as part of our CICD processes 14:29:06 Any other roundtable items? 14:29:21 Wanted to note that we already have 15 airship-* repos, including temptest, utils, in-a-bottle, spyglass, treasuremap... 14:29:38 roman_g: this is where my q came from 14:29:49 Need to have mode developers, than repos. 14:29:55 a few sprung up recently - and no one really knew where they came from.. 14:29:56 *contributors 14:29:56 +1 14:30:00 zing 14:30:13 That has never been a concept in this project @roman_g 14:30:54 yeah, thanks for bringing it up portdirect - is timely 14:32:42 Cool guys - if nothing else today I will let you all go! Thanks for your efforts/discussion, and have a great week 14:32:50 #endmeeting