16:01:04 #startmeeting api wg 16:01:04 Meeting started Thu Apr 21 16:01:04 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is etoews. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:07 The meeting name has been set to 'api_wg' 16:01:11 hey 16:01:15 hi 16:02:47 so.... all ready for next week? 16:03:05 pretty much 16:03:11 nice =) 16:03:15 which is to say, not really. 16:03:19 hahah! 16:03:32 i should /not/ have taken a sip of tea lol 16:03:37 :) 16:03:59 so the API WG meeting is at 2 pm. 16:04:09 on monday? 16:04:17 yep 16:04:19 want to get together for lunch at noon and chat? 16:04:20 cool 16:04:25 yea, sure 16:04:50 sorry I'm late 16:04:59 no worries, just the 2 of us so far 16:05:15 how about this. let's meet at the room where the session will be at 11:30 am and then we can walk to lunch from there? 16:05:26 sounds good to me 16:05:46 * cdent is so envious 16:05:50 or am I jealous? 16:06:04 jealvious? 16:06:46 elmiko: okay. see irl at 11:30 am on monday at Hilton Austin - Level 6 - Salon J 16:06:58 s/see/see you/ 16:07:18 +1 16:07:22 * cdent weeps 16:07:40 we'll get you in on hangouts =) 16:08:13 isn't mirantis sending the vr-bot again? 16:08:19 it's a real bummer you won't be there cdent 16:08:25 +1 16:09:00 I'm taking tues-thur off to see the outdoors 16:09:35 nice 16:09:51 That's under the assumption things will be a bit quiet around here 16:10:10 i'd imagine so 16:10:11 #topic previous meeting action items 16:10:20 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_wg/2016/api_wg.2016-04-07-16.00.html 16:11:18 man, i've totally spaced on what my action item is about. gotta check the logs lol 16:11:45 elmiko: we talked about maybe changing how frequently we send mail to the list about pending guidelines 16:11:53 you and I thought that perhaps we should send more, not less mail 16:11:53 ok, right 16:12:13 i just read up on "tc candidates love api-wg" 16:12:16 yea, let me add that to the etherpad 16:12:26 not sure what to expect at the summit... 16:13:14 etoews: few of the candidates that professed love of api-wg were actually elected 16:13:20 let's hope we get a good crowd this time. we had a nice intimate chat in tokyo lol 16:13:23 but some were 16:15:10 16:15:29 {{ insert-topic }} 16:15:38 bon chance et bon voyage? 16:15:56 lol 16:16:17 i think the agenda looks pretty good, https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/austin-api-wg-session-plans 16:16:49 ++ 16:16:54 not sure if that list needs wrangling, but it's a start 16:17:06 agenda looks good to me too 16:17:09 cool 16:18:02 Might be interesting to have an "open input: state of the apis" 16:18:11 good idea 16:18:34 basically to find out what people care about, what we don't know, etc 16:18:45 ack, that's what i thought you meant 16:19:23 ok, updated 16:19:44 rad 16:19:53 gnarly dude 16:20:04 linked to https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-api-wg too 16:20:09 ++ 16:20:31 #topic guidelines 16:20:41 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/api-wg,n,z 16:21:08 it's so weird not seeing all of the microversion guidelines in there 16:21:24 heh 16:21:26 hehe 16:21:35 looks like we have some that are working towards freeze though 16:21:39 at least our old friend https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190743/ is still around 16:21:45 but, i imagine we should hold on freezing until after summit? 16:22:24 makes sense 16:26:13 agreed. i'm just perusing some of the guidelines... 16:26:19 same 16:27:38 brb, i think someone is at my door 16:28:03 surprise it's me! 16:28:26 haha 16:29:54 thanks etoews for reviewing https://review.openstack.org/308336 16:30:07 np 16:30:19 I think the input from 2 projects so far is "wait, content won't be in api-site repo?" so taking care of that input as it comes in 16:30:32 i think we can just merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305590/1 under our process right? 16:30:55 etoews: yeah, I believe so yes 16:31:10 +1 16:31:28 yeah 16:32:13 done 16:33:37 this reads like typo fixes to me too https://review.openstack.org/#/c/301805/1/guidelines/http.rst 16:34:09 yeah, i thought we could fast track that change as well 16:34:25 * cdent puts another notch on the bedpost 16:34:35 done 16:37:16 here's another one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/303369/1 16:37:28 it doesn't materially change the guideline 16:37:45 yea, +1 16:38:23 done 16:38:25 I've got a spec in place for nova to switch to the new header style, fyi 16:38:35 nice 16:41:17 alrighty. since we're not freezing anything this close to the summit, that looks like that's it to me for now. 16:41:25 * agentle rebases the api docs patch 16:41:46 anything else to cover? 16:41:58 nothing here 16:42:01 * cdent doesn't have anything 16:43:11 cool. see you soon elmiko! 16:43:18 yup, take care o/ 16:43:32 #endmeeting