20:00:21 #startmeeting barbican 20:00:22 Meeting started Mon Dec 1 20:00:21 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:23 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:25 The meeting name has been set to 'barbican' 20:00:35 #topic Roll Call 20:00:42 o/ 20:00:45 o/ 20:00:52 0/ 20:00:53 o/ 20:00:54 ^( ^___^ )> 20:01:04 _o/ 20:01:15 jvrbanac you're alive! 20:01:20 redrobot, yes 20:01:31 o/ 20:01:49 awesome, lots of barbicaneers today 20:01:59 as usual the agenda can be found here: 20:02:01 o/ 20:02:01 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican 20:02:13 #topic Kilo Blueprints 20:02:19 I'm not sure who added this topic, but I agree 20:02:33 I added it 20:02:36 I think we need to get some BPs approved soon 20:02:56 Just curious if a video mini-meetup could help with the review proces 20:03:15 that would be a good idea, probably will speed things up 20:03:16 some of these BPs are heavy 20:03:22 o/ - sorry I'm late 20:03:32 woodster_, +1 20:04:07 woodster_, +1 20:04:19 I think that is something we would want to do this week. 20:04:29 hyakuhei, we were just talking about maybe having a video meeting to review some of the bigger blueprints out there 20:04:30 with the holidays around the corner, I'm concerned that BPs are going to slip into next year 20:04:47 oh cool, that'd be a nice way to tie things up before the holidays 20:05:28 redrobot: I can see that happening :/ 20:05:46 woodster_, yup - I'd like to get through the BP's before the holidays. 20:06:15 later this week? 20:06:18 Kilo Milestone 1 is coming up in about two weeks 20:06:26 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Kilo_Release_Schedule 20:06:43 for me, the earlier the better 20:06:45 and as of now, we don't actually have any code for the milestone 20:06:48 or beginning of next week 20:06:48 #link https://launchpad.net/barbican/+milestone/kilo-1 20:07:07 SSL (sorry so late) - starbucks wifi was acting up 20:07:12 redrobot, do we have goals for the milestone? 20:07:27 redrobot: maybe because Juno's code was so good? 20:07:29 alee I would have liked to see at least _some_ blueprints land 20:07:35 woodster_ lol 20:08:13 redrobot, so can we set up a video conference for later this week? 20:08:43 what about Monday next week? :D 20:08:44 alee yes, I think early AM in CST would be ok for our folks across the pond? 20:08:44 google hangouts perhaps? 20:09:41 or if it's in the morning in the US, then it could work 20:09:49 this week 20:10:30 Would BP's be useful for plugins too ? We've been building a KMIP secret store that is similar to the MKEK PKCS8 plugin 20:10:54 +1 20:11:00 hyakuhei yes, a BP would be the first step for adding a new plugin 20:11:14 ok, we'll get that written up 20:13:00 jaosorior how does 4pm UTC sound for you? 20:13:15 I'm thinking Wednesday morning 20:13:24 to give people a chance to catch up on BPs today and tomorrow? 20:13:27 #link http://time.is/1000AM_3_Dec_2014_in_CST/EST/UTC 20:14:13 just one hour earlier would fit perfectly for me 20:14:33 jaosorior that cuts into my sleeping time, but I think it would work 20:14:53 #link http://time.is/900AM_3_Dec_2014_in_CST/EST/UTC/London 20:14:54 I'll have to miss the first part of that meeting if at 9am 20:15:08 ^ ditto ^ 20:15:17 redrobot: would you want my Castellan Certificate handling BP in by then? or are you really just referring to the Barbican stuff that's in the backlog now 20:15:20 oh :/ 20:15:47 My last bus out of the office leaves at 4pm UTC, that's why I said it would fit nicely 20:16:14 rm_work just barbican stuff. Castellan is still waiting to be created... 20:16:19 kk :) 20:16:32 redrobot, there are something like 16 specs that are out there right now - that will make for a pretty long meeting. 20:17:23 alee I don't think we'd want to cover everything... maybe just timebox it? Or pick the ones that have the most disagreement 20:18:17 woodster_ hockeynut is 9am doable another day? Maybe Thursday? 20:18:24 redrobot, can somebody please update the video meeting details on our meeting page? 20:18:44 atiwari sure thing, as soon as we figure it out I'll add it to the meeting page 20:18:52 thurs is ok for me. driving down to Castle tomorrow, won't be there before 9:30 20:19:01 thurs works for me too 20:19:12 same here 20:19:18 me too. 20:19:18 hockeynut I was proposing 9am for wednesday. Tomorrow is no good for me either. 20:19:44 but it seems Thursday will work for everyone... 20:20:09 redrobot thurs is still better for me :-) 20:20:16 I really would like to see some movement in the BPs before then though 20:20:28 ie, I don't want everyone to just wait til Thursday to go look at them :) 20:21:02 redrobot, it would be nice if we identified a list of BPs we were going to look at. that way we can get folks to look at them before thurs. 20:21:07 alee, are we going to hash out all BPs in one day? 20:21:20 atiwari, I think thats unlikely 20:21:22 alee surely. I'll be cleaning up https://blueprints.launchpad.net/barbican because it's a mess right now 20:21:30 alee, +1 20:22:05 alee I think we can go down the list by priority? ... once I clean that up that is. 20:22:26 redrobot, we may need a couple of these meetings. maybe one this week and one the next. but by priority sounds fine by me. 20:22:26 in that case I think we should prioritize and add the BP link in the meeting page along with details? 20:22:27 +1 for having it prioritized 20:22:34 +1 redrobot 20:23:22 #action redrobot to clean launchpad blueprint page 20:23:41 #action redrobot to fill in details of Google hangout on Wiki 20:24:27 #agreed Google hangout will be Thursday 3pm UTC http://time.is/900AM_4_Dec_2014_in_CST/EST/UTC 20:25:07 I think that wraps up this topic 20:25:16 And I don't have anything else on the agenda. 20:25:29 Does anyone have anything they would like to discuss? 20:25:44 Maybe clear up questions about BPs? 20:25:46 Do we know when the mid-cycle meetup will be? 20:25:53 aaah, true that 20:25:57 #topic Mid-cycle meetup 20:26:06 I'm still trying to figure out the details 20:26:18 Are we still gonna try to do it somewhat aligned to Keystone and OSSG? 20:26:31 Keystone is having their meetup in San Antonio in the middle of January 20:26:48 OSSG wants to have theirs in the bay area in mid-February 20:27:01 ah damn 20:27:19 well... If we do it in SAT, would it be possible for OSSG to reconsider? 20:27:48 last OSSG meeting I went to everyone was pretty much set on SF 20:28:29 I'm also waiting to hear about budget from the Rack... I don't know how many of us would make it out to SF if we were to have it there 20:29:01 kaitlin-farr I guess to answer your question, I would prefer mid-february. It would be right after Kilo-2 milestone 20:29:37 What days is the OSSG meeting? 20:29:56 Ok, I had heard a rumor it might be mid-January, but mid-February works better for me at least, not sure about Nate 20:30:09 March 5th is Kilo feature proposal freeze, so I think Feb is late to have a barbican mid cycle 20:30:10 jaosorior they don't have a set date yet. I'm waiting to hear back from Geekdom SF about space availability. Dates will depend on that. 20:30:23 So, there was a lot of love for SF from OSSG and the Barbican folks that were at our meeting 20:30:37 Waiting for redrobot on availability :) 20:30:58 Because we had a fair number of people who wanted to attend both, butting OSSG up against Barbican made a bunch of sense 20:31:07 Especially for people outside the US 20:31:24 but as always we are willing to bend to the will of the wider community 20:31:34 I agree. I think we have more overlap between OSSG/Barbican than Keystone/Barbican 20:31:53 woodster_ I would hope we have our features figured out before the mid-cycle. 20:32:07 I agree with woodster_ that feb late, but whatever fits you guys 20:33:04 woodster_, I would hope that we end up using the midcycle to whip through implementation CR reviews .. in which case, feb may not be that late. 20:33:13 redrobot, yeah hopefully we'll be more hacking to make progress on features by then 20:33:23 alee, that's true 20:33:31 So SF it is? 20:34:02 besides SF is cooler :) 20:34:03 for me it's the same thing, still a long ass trip :P, so whatever you guys prefer 20:34:11 lol 20:34:21 as long as you promise me excellent mexican food I'm happy haha 20:34:48 (had to bring it up) 20:34:51 for me it would be much easier in SA, since I don't have to ask for a budget to send a ton of folks away... but I think most people prefer SF 20:34:53 hmm, easier to promise that in SA than SF I think <_< 20:35:17 redrobot, woodster_ keystone tries to have their meeting early because they want to get changes in early so people can integrate with them. 20:35:36 eventually we probably want to go to the same model - but we're not there yet 20:35:44 alee, that makes sense 20:35:59 I would like some of your changes to get in early so I can interface with them <_< 20:36:05 alee +1 20:36:20 I have no preference either way on location - though I suspect SA will be easier on the budget. 20:36:30 rm_work, me too :) 20:37:36 Will it take you guys long to figure out the budget thing? Maybe that can be sorted out for next week (or something) and once that's done, then a decision can be made 20:37:39 ok, I'll update you guys as soon as I hear back from Geekdom 20:37:57 redrobot: me too please :) 20:38:04 good luck getting RS to commit to a budget this far ahead of time (or ever) :P 20:38:12 hyakuhei for sure :) 20:38:54 I think those SF hotels are what stress out that budget :) All sharing a room is not an option... 20:39:27 Freemont has some very nicely priced hotels :P 20:39:36 If we decide to do SF it will just mean some Barbicaneers will have to teleconference in 20:39:57 maybe set up a Geekdom-to-Geekdom link :-O 20:39:58 hyakuhei is that the place you've been complaining about the hotels for the last 3 years? 20:40:05 well, for the people not in SAT, how does things look for you? 20:40:13 Ok, just to clarify, if the meeting is in SA, will it probably still be in mid-February, even if it doesn't line up with Keystone? 20:40:42 does it make any difference? (the place) 20:40:45 kaitlin-farr: That's my understanding 20:40:58 Either way the ambition is to have OSSG and Babrican run together 20:41:12 and it's just nuts to try mixing three projects in 20:41:25 well... I don't think it's a bad idea to have the three consecuently 20:41:33 but I do think it's hard 20:41:49 hyakuhei, if thats the case, though - then it makes sense to have it with ossg -- which means sf, right? 20:41:55 Especially hard for those of us with families etc who aren't based from the area 20:42:03 alee: That's the preference 20:42:52 kaitlin-farr yes, that's the plan so far 20:43:12 alee hyakuhei +1 20:43:44 ok, thanks! I know it's all still tentative at this point, but it's helpful for planning 20:45:01 I should also point out that the mid-cycle is not mandatory. The TC has been discussing mid-cycles the last few weeks and they want to make sure that mid-cycles don't turn into mini-summits. 20:45:25 redrobot: then again, last one was extremely useful to get things done 20:45:28 redrobot: Interesting, so from a cost pov I understand that 20:45:47 but actually that's what they are (imho) and we (OSSG/Barbican/whoever) get a crap-tonne done 20:47:04 yeah, it's been interesting to watch the TC discussions about it. They're concerned that mid-cycles may be a symptom of bad Design Summits 20:47:22 +1000 to that 20:47:45 However, fixing the complete mess of the last design summit would be a good start to avoiding 'mini-summits' 20:47:55 lol, I agree 20:47:58 sorry, I get ranty past 8pm 20:48:10 no prob... 20:48:18 I think we've beaten this topic to death 20:48:22 to be fair, there really isn't enough time during the actual Design Summits to get actual design/work done <_< so much presenting and such 20:48:25 anything else that we want to discuss? 20:48:49 Just a note to those who are interested in Ephemeral PKI stuff 20:49:03 We've named it "anchor" and it should be landing in stackforge this week 20:49:16 That's all :) 20:49:44 awesome, I think rm_work was looking for that 20:50:16 thanks :) yeah 20:50:18 I'll take a look 20:50:22 We've got a few things to tidy up but we figured we get our laundry out in the open asap 20:51:16 cool 20:51:20 I think we can call it a day 20:51:26 So I'm curious about the Kite project then...I meant to ask at the summit about it, but was constantly distracted :) 20:51:29 thanks everyone for coming. See you all Thursday 20:51:38 Thanks 20:51:46 woodster_: ping tkelsey re: kite 20:51:53 excellent 20:51:55 see ya people 20:51:57 hyakuhei, will do 20:52:05 #endmeeting