20:02:33 #startmeeting barbican 20:02:35 Meeting started Mon Mar 14 20:02:33 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:02:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:02:36 though reading further in scrollback, is the question just whether it's acceptable to make the e-mail addresses of refstack data submitters public knowledge? as long as they know up front that's happening, i don't see why it would be a concern. for example every one of our thousands of developers ahs their e-mail addresses published in git commit messages 20:02:39 The meeting name has been set to 'barbican' 20:02:45 #topic Roll Call 20:02:48 o/ 20:02:48 o/ 20:02:49 o/ 20:02:50 o/ 20:02:54 o/ 20:02:57 o/ 20:03:00 o/ 20:03:10 As usual the agenda can be found here: 20:03:12 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican#Agenda 20:03:21 o/ 20:03:26 o/ 20:03:26 Lots of barbicaneers here today! 20:04:12 \o 20:04:18 #topic Action Items from last meeting 20:04:21 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2016/barbican.2016-03-07-20.00.html 20:04:30 o/ 20:04:33 First action item was for me to -2 pending CRs. 20:04:59 no progress to report, so I'm punting to next week 20:05:04 o/ late 20:05:08 #action redrobot to -2 pending CRs with a note to resubmit for N and a deadline to mark them as abandoned 20:05:22 Looks like rellerreller isn't here 20:05:31 so we'll punt on his action item as well. 20:05:42 #action rellerreller to work on fish bowl descriptions 20:05:51 ok, on to the actual agenda 20:06:15 #topic Critical fixes for python-barbicanclient in Mitaka 20:06:33 redrobot he is working on the fish bowl descriptions 20:06:46 kfarr awesome, thanks for the update 20:07:10 for this topic 20:07:29 Doug Hellman is fixin' to create stable branches for mitaka for the clients 20:07:30 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/088853.html 20:07:51 Currently we have a 4.0.0 tag that could be used as the stable branch in Mitaka 20:08:09 unless we have critical fixes that need to land for use by other projects in Mitaka 20:08:30 If we do create the stable branch, then we will have to backport future fixes 20:08:51 Questions/comments? Any bugs we absolutely need to fix in a 4.0.X ? 20:09:29 So what does this mean for outstanding patches? Like could we still merge outstanding CR's today cause it looks like some are waiting to be merged. 20:09:53 o/ 20:10:17 silos so, if we want to include those patches in Mitaka, then we need to do another release after they land 20:10:27 ah k. 20:12:21 going once ... 20:12:44 lots of shy barbicaneers here today ;) 20:13:16 sorry, no strong barbican opinions from me today ;) 20:13:22 #topic Design Session topics for Austin Summit 20:13:23 silence is consent 20:13:29 haha, nice 20:13:58 Just a reminder that we have an etherpad to track design session topics 20:13:58 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-barbican-design-sessions 20:14:23 Any questions/comments? 20:14:58 good list so far 20:14:58 redrobot, kfarr, any word on BYOK. I wont be available tomorrow so I was wondering if you can check for me during the security meeting. 20:15:09 redrobot, how many sessions do we have? 20:15:44 alee_ they're still sorting that out. I requested 2 fishbowls, 8 Design Sessions, 1 Meetup 20:15:52 diazjf, redrobot we hope to get the description through internal review soon, hopefully this week 20:16:08 I'll let y'all know when I hear what the official allocation is 20:16:20 kfarr, awesome. I'll be collaborating with you and rellerreller then :) 20:18:36 any other questions? 20:19:54 ok then, movin gon 20:19:56 *moving on 20:20:03 #topic Open Discussion 20:20:08 that's all I had on the agenda for today. 20:20:15 Any other topics we should talk about? 20:20:22 Pending reviews? 20:20:23 oh yeah 20:20:29 #topic RC1 due this week 20:20:46 We fixed some bugs last week during the bugsquash 20:21:13 I fixed one bug that I'm hoping I can land in the next couple of days 20:21:34 silos diazjf any other reviews pending form the bugsquash? 20:22:05 I have one for alembic. Let me get the link. 20:22:05 redrobot, yuppo 20:22:18 all minor 20:22:20 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292523/ 20:22:28 If it gets merged we can use alembic in the gate :D 20:22:34 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290765/ 20:22:52 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291454/ 20:23:02 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287523/ 20:23:16 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/284368/ 20:23:20 are all the bugs I see 20:23:26 and silos 20:23:56 diazjf silos thanks 20:24:07 no prob 20:24:07 core reviewers, please take a look at those 20:24:13 np 20:24:29 redrobot, also do we want to make sure the Barbican API Guide gets published to the site 20:24:55 diazjf doc publication isn't tied to the release, so we don't need it to release RC1 20:25:02 redrobot, gotcha 20:26:10 any other topics? 20:27:04 **cricket cricket** 20:27:15 diazjf beat me to it. 20:27:33 ok, seems like we've got ourselves an extra 30 min of workday 20:27:39 \o/ 20:27:40 thanks for coming everyone! 20:27:45 #endmeeting