20:00:33 <redrobot> #startmeeting barbican 20:00:34 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Apr 4 20:00:33 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:35 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:38 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'barbican' 20:00:46 <redrobot> #topic Roll Call 20:00:56 <jmckind> o/ 20:00:59 <panatl> o/ 20:01:01 <mp1> o/ 20:01:02 <diazjf> o/ yooooo 20:01:12 <silos> \o/ 20:01:15 <edtubill> o/ 20:02:26 <redrobot> As usual the agenda can be found here: 20:02:36 <redrobot> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican#Agenda 20:03:23 <redrobot> And since nobody added agenda items, I'm just going to make them up as we go. :) 20:05:22 <redrobot> #topic Mitaka Release 20:05:49 <redrobot> I think this was done already... I was trying to look for the url to the mailing list announcement but I can't seem to find it. 20:06:33 <alee> o/ 20:08:37 <redrobot> hmm... actually I take that back 20:08:40 <redrobot> we did release RC2 20:08:42 <redrobot> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/091021.html 20:08:58 <redrobot> I think the final release is still pending? 20:09:06 <redrobot> should be the same tarball anyway 20:09:18 <redrobot> any questions/comments about the RC2 release? 20:10:16 <redrobot> I guess not... ok, moving on. 20:10:38 <redrobot> #topic Austin Summit Planning 20:10:39 <redrobot> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-barbican-design-sessions 20:10:54 <redrobot> just a reminder that this is the etherpad we're using to plan the summit. 20:12:17 <arunkant> o/ 20:12:30 <redrobot> I'll be updating the summit details in the schedule this week 20:12:45 <redrobot> any questions/comments about the summit? 20:12:59 <redrobot> we should probably start submitting Newton blueprints now 20:13:08 <redrobot> so we can review them before the summit. 20:14:33 <redrobot> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/barbican-specs+status:open 20:14:52 <redrobot> you guys are a quiet bunch today 20:15:08 <redrobot> #topic Open Discussion 20:15:15 <woodster_> o/ 20:15:26 <diazjf> redrobot, lets talk about bugs 20:15:34 <diazjf> -:X 20:15:43 <redrobot> diazjf sure! 20:15:58 <redrobot> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/barbican/ 20:16:09 <redrobot> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-barbicanclient/ 20:16:19 <redrobot> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/castellan 20:16:46 <diazjf> One question I have lingering is should GET /secrets/{uuid} Accept: text/plain -> 406 or return payload if present, I remeber hearing something on legacy barbican needing to return the payload. This is for bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/barbican/+bug/1561701 20:16:47 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1561701 in Barbican "Incorrect Error Code when Passing Accept Header on a Secret GET" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Fernando Diaz (diazjf) 20:17:34 <redrobot> diazjf yeah, if there is a payload we _should_ return it when the accept header is application/octet-stream, or text/plain for passwords 20:18:24 <diazjf> perfect then that bug is complete after https://review.openstack.org/#/c/299108/ 20:18:46 <redrobot> diazjf awesome 20:19:04 <diazjf> redrobot, gracias 20:19:29 <redrobot> any other questions/comments/bugs/reviews ? 20:19:38 <redrobot> if not we'll have a record-setting short meeting 20:22:32 <redrobot> alrighty, let's call it a day then 20:22:39 <redrobot> thanks everyone for coming! 20:22:43 <redrobot> #endmeeting