20:00:33 #startmeeting barbican 20:00:34 Meeting started Mon Apr 4 20:00:33 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:38 The meeting name has been set to 'barbican' 20:00:46 #topic Roll Call 20:00:56 o/ 20:00:59 o/ 20:01:01 o/ 20:01:02 o/ yooooo 20:01:12 \o/ 20:01:15 o/ 20:02:26 As usual the agenda can be found here: 20:02:36 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican#Agenda 20:03:23 And since nobody added agenda items, I'm just going to make them up as we go. :) 20:05:22 #topic Mitaka Release 20:05:49 I think this was done already... I was trying to look for the url to the mailing list announcement but I can't seem to find it. 20:06:33 o/ 20:08:37 hmm... actually I take that back 20:08:40 we did release RC2 20:08:42 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/091021.html 20:08:58 I think the final release is still pending? 20:09:06 should be the same tarball anyway 20:09:18 any questions/comments about the RC2 release? 20:10:16 I guess not... ok, moving on. 20:10:38 #topic Austin Summit Planning 20:10:39 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-barbican-design-sessions 20:10:54 just a reminder that this is the etherpad we're using to plan the summit. 20:12:17 o/ 20:12:30 I'll be updating the summit details in the schedule this week 20:12:45 any questions/comments about the summit? 20:12:59 we should probably start submitting Newton blueprints now 20:13:08 so we can review them before the summit. 20:14:33 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/barbican-specs+status:open 20:14:52 you guys are a quiet bunch today 20:15:08 #topic Open Discussion 20:15:15 o/ 20:15:26 redrobot, lets talk about bugs 20:15:34 -:X 20:15:43 diazjf sure! 20:15:58 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/barbican/ 20:16:09 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-barbicanclient/ 20:16:19 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/castellan 20:16:46 One question I have lingering is should GET /secrets/{uuid} Accept: text/plain -> 406 or return payload if present, I remeber hearing something on legacy barbican needing to return the payload. This is for bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/barbican/+bug/1561701 20:16:47 Launchpad bug 1561701 in Barbican "Incorrect Error Code when Passing Accept Header on a Secret GET" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Fernando Diaz (diazjf) 20:17:34 diazjf yeah, if there is a payload we _should_ return it when the accept header is application/octet-stream, or text/plain for passwords 20:18:24 perfect then that bug is complete after https://review.openstack.org/#/c/299108/ 20:18:46 diazjf awesome 20:19:04 redrobot, gracias 20:19:29 any other questions/comments/bugs/reviews ? 20:19:38 if not we'll have a record-setting short meeting 20:22:32 alrighty, let's call it a day then 20:22:39 thanks everyone for coming! 20:22:43 #endmeeting