20:05:30 #startmeeting barbican 20:05:31 Meeting started Mon Aug 29 20:05:30 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:05:32 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:05:35 The meeting name has been set to 'barbican' 20:05:42 Sorry I'm late y'all 20:05:46 #topic Roll Call 20:06:00 o/ 20:06:06 o/ 20:06:09 o/ 20:06:09 o/ 20:06:21 o/ 20:06:37 * redrobot needs to invest in a better alarm clock for these meetings 20:07:17 As usual the agenda can be found here: 20:07:23 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican 20:08:04 #topic Swift Keymaster 20:08:15 Question around swift keymaster : Does it have barbican/castellan impl in newton release? 20:08:23 arunkant this is your topic 20:08:34 I don't know the answer, maybe kfarr does? 20:08:51 last time I looked at it, which was several months ago, it did not 20:08:57 redrobot: yes, trying to find out what kind of barbican integration is there, if any , for swift keymaster 20:09:23 you mean in swift itself, or does there exist a keymaster for swift that uses barbican? 20:09:45 notmyname I think the latter 20:10:02 notmyname, swift using barbican as one swift keymaster impl ? 20:10:19 I don't know about the latter (for the former, no there's nothing in-tree yet that has barbican, although it's on the short-list for next things in crypto) 20:10:30 thanks notmyname ! 20:10:36 happy to help 20:10:46 notmyname, were there any plans to use Castellan instead? 20:11:10 kfarr: oh, yeah. in my mind, castellan and barbican are generically the same ;-) 20:11:27 "those things over there that do the hard part" ;-) 20:11:47 notmyname haha gotcha, I am curious to see what it will look like! 20:12:08 IIRC the most recent thinking was to use castellan instead of barbican directly. but it's not somehting I've been paying close attention to in the last month or so 20:13:57 notmyname, thanks, I'll keep an eye out for it 20:14:37 arunkant does that answer your question? 20:15:12 redrobot: yes it does..so it appears that work is post-newton . thanks notmyname 20:15:33 ok, cool 20:15:34 moving on 20:15:47 #topic Feature Freeze Exception for Multiple Backend 20:16:19 This week is the newton-3 milestone release week 20:16:29 which includes the Feature freeze 20:16:51 all implementation is in review, so if we can land by tomorrow/wednesday then we won't need a FF 20:17:19 redrobot: I have all of the reviews impl for multiple backend. So was hoping to get exception so that all 5 reviews .. I am not sure if all can be done by this week 20:17:22 if for some reason reviews are slow we can have a FFE, since there's still a couple of weeks left before RC1 20:17:27 #link https://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html 20:17:36 arunkant yeah, I really want this stuff to land for newton 20:17:48 arunkant we'll do a FFE if it doesn't all land by Wednesday. 20:18:24 redrobot: okay. 20:18:38 Any other questions/comments about this feature? 20:19:31 cool deal, 20:19:46 cores, please take a look at the agenda page since all pending reviews are listed there 20:20:06 or see here: 20:20:08 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/multiple-secret-backend 20:20:33 ok, moving on 20:20:46 #topic python-barbicanclient release 20:21:23 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/102451.html 20:21:34 per Doug Hellman, we need to make a release of python-barbicanclient this week 20:22:06 I'll be requesting the release by wednesday along with the newton-3 barbican release unless someone things we shouldnt? 20:22:29 redrobot +1 sounds good to me 20:23:19 redrobot: did the midcycle client work bring up any issues with the barbican client? 20:23:36 * woodster_ can't recall if there were any big gaps to try to fill 20:23:45 woodster_ nothing that's broken, I think... lots of missing features though 20:25:03 ok, moving on 20:25:15 #topic Barcelona Design Summit Room Requirements 20:25:29 I need to let Thierry know how much space to set aside for Barbican in Barcelona 20:26:02 So any potential O-cycle PTLs can chime in 20:26:15 since this needs to be finalized before the next PTL election 20:26:21 curious how many barbican cores are attending the summit? 20:26:36 * woodster_ very likely not going myself :( 20:26:38 woodster_ afaik nobody at Rackspace has gotten the official go-ahead 20:27:26 For reference, in Austin we had 2x Fishbowl, 6x Working Room sessions, and 1x half-day contributors meetup 20:27:37 I think we may only need one fishbowl this time around? 20:27:43 may not need a big room this go around :) 20:27:43 I'll be in Barcelona! 20:27:52 kfarr \o/ 20:27:58 I'll be there too ! 20:28:01 nice! 20:28:12 alee did you see the workshop was accepted? :D 20:28:21 we'll have some barbican reps then 20:28:23 I did indeed :) 20:28:52 redrobot, so we have some work ahead of use before the summit 20:29:17 did any other barbican related talks get accepted? 20:29:23 alee yup! I'm crossing my fingers that I'll get to go... still haven't heard from the powers that be 20:31:20 redrobot, so yeah - the room we had in austin was sufficient 20:31:59 alee I agree... I was thinking maybe asking for 1fb, 8wr, 1cm this time around 20:32:21 sounds ok to me 20:34:33 #topic Open discussion 20:34:51 That's all we have on the agenda for today. Any other topics we need to talk about before we call it a day? 20:36:41 redrobot, I believe you and fernando were going to add to the install guide 20:37:06 alee ah yes... I need to start chipping away at my midcycle TODOs 20:37:18 can we get folks to look at that, so that we can publish it this cycle? 20:37:53 it would be nice to have an accurate install guide we can point folks to in the summit demo 20:39:46 alee +1 20:42:45 Anything else? 20:45:42 alrighty guys, thanks for coming! 20:45:45 #endmeeting