20:00:01 <dave-mccowan> #startmeeting barbican 20:00:02 <openstack> Meeting started Mon May 1 20:00:01 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dave-mccowan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:03 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:05 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'barbican' 20:00:07 <dave-mccowan> #topic roll call 20:00:40 <diazjf> o/ 20:01:31 <dave-mccowan> hi diazjf 20:01:42 <diazjf> hey dave-mccowan 20:02:13 <kfarr> \o/ 20:02:25 <alee> o/ 20:02:36 <dave-mccowan> hi alee kfarr! 20:02:50 <alee> yo 20:03:03 <dave-mccowan> the agenda is in the usual spot https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican 20:03:12 <dave-mccowan> #topic pike status 20:03:20 <dave-mccowan> 17 weeks to go :-) 20:03:31 <dave-mccowan> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/barbican-tracker-pike 20:04:13 <dave-mccowan> for the py35 community goal, barbican is looking good now. we could expand it to include barbican client, tempest, and castellan. 20:04:35 <dave-mccowan> the goal is to get any functional tests working in both p27 and py35 20:05:03 <dave-mccowan> diazjf what's the latest with deprecation? 20:05:24 <diazjf> Still need some reviews 20:05:54 <diazjf> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459135/ 20:05:59 <diazjf> will rebase it tonight 20:06:35 <dave-mccowan> alee kfarr any pike feature updates? 20:06:55 <kfarr> Nope, not for now! 20:07:00 <alee> dave-mccowan, nope - though I may have a little time this week 20:07:18 <dave-mccowan> #topic summit prep 20:07:34 <dave-mccowan> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/barbican-pike-summit 20:08:06 <dave-mccowan> we already have a pretty full schedule, would anyone be interested in reserving a "hacking room" for a work session? 20:09:02 <alee> dave-mccowan, I think its going to be a pretty full schedule 20:09:12 <kfarr> I think my schedule will be pretty full the whole time 20:09:15 <diazjf> dave-mccowan, I was able to add myself as a speaker for the managing contributions presentation, will have slides complete by Thursday. 20:09:15 <diazjf> kfarr, will review your changes to the workshop application and add some 20:09:15 <diazjf> changes as well as review the presentation. If I am unable to meet tomorrow 20:09:15 <diazjf> I will email y'all with what I have completed. 20:09:39 <redrobot> o/ 20:09:53 <dave-mccowan> i agree... unless we had a specific topic that would benefit from a face-to-face, we shouldn't add another session. 20:10:01 <dave-mccowan> redrobot! \o/ 20:10:07 <alee> redrobot, diazjf , dave-mccowan , kfarr - we still planning on meeting tomorrow? 20:10:22 <kfarr> I was planning on it! 20:10:24 <dave-mccowan> alee +1 11am EDT 20:10:31 <alee> we really should have at least one last meeting to iron out all the things needed 20:10:34 <alee> good 20:10:34 <redrobot> Yes, I'm officially FUNemployed, so I have nothing but time to work on prezos and workshop and stuff :D 20:11:21 <alee> redrobot, no margarita during the meeting please .. 20:11:32 <alee> before and after maybe .. 20:11:38 <diazjf> alee, I'll be up tonight getting a few things ready. Will email you whats done if I cannot attend the meeting 20:12:20 <kfarr> redrobot :( 20:12:40 <redrobot> alee lol 20:12:48 <diazjf> redrobot, make a startup! 20:12:49 <alee> ok - I think we're in pretty good shape - it would be nice to wrap it all all up over the couple of days and do a final test 20:14:22 <dave-mccowan> i'm wrapping up the "Project Update" slides. The foundation sent a template in PPT format, instead of google. I'll upload them for review/comments later tonight. 20:15:49 <dave-mccowan> #topic review requests 20:16:29 <dave-mccowan> Jeremy has had "Refactor barbicanclient" outstanding for a while now. https://review.openstack.org/403604 20:16:41 <dave-mccowan> any thoughts on this? 20:16:57 <diazjf> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459135/ 20:17:07 <diazjf> The deprecation of Certificate Orders 20:18:09 <diazjf> Until when do I have to remove these items. At worst case, I will remove certificates from the API and remove everything else after. dave-mccowan how does that idea sound? 20:19:03 <dave-mccowan> also, please take a look at Nicholas's and Rohan's patches on migrating us to cryptography library. hopefully we can get at least 3 core reviews on these, since crypto has to be right. 20:19:39 <dave-mccowan> diazjf that makes sense to split up the removal like that. i'm not sure we have a deadline... just as long as we don't have every feature at once right at the end. :-) 20:20:11 <diazjf> dave-mccowan, cool! That will make reviewing way easier :) 20:21:03 <dave-mccowan> #topic any other business 20:21:27 <kfarr> I have a question for the dogtag plugin folks: alee 20:21:41 <kfarr> I think the dogtag unit tests are getting skipped in the gate 20:22:10 <kfarr> So I put up a test patch to add dogtag-pki to test-requirements: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/461237/ 20:22:29 <kfarr> And after I added that, it seemed like the tests are *now* running, but barf on config errors 20:23:03 <kfarr> I was wondering that was something that should be addressed 20:23:37 <alee> kfarr, hmm .. I'll take a look at that this week 20:23:54 <alee> kfarr, I know that there was a config issue , but I though oz had resolved it 20:24:06 <kfarr> Right, that was for the functional tests though 20:24:31 <alee> kfarr, oh - the unit tests .. 20:24:43 <kfarr> right right 20:25:10 <alee> kfarr, well its possible those might be skipped because to run those you have to have the dogtag python package installed 20:25:53 <alee> there is a try: import pki at the top of the file 20:26:08 <kfarr> alee, right, exactly, they were being skipped because the package wasn't there 20:26:24 <kfarr> but then, I don't think they were getting run in any gate anywhere 20:26:34 <kfarr> because I thought the dogtag gate only ran the functional tests 20:26:54 <alee> at the time it was because the dogtag client was not pip installable -- but thats no longer true 20:27:07 <alee> so yes, this is something that should be changed 20:27:22 <alee> so it can be run 20:27:31 <alee> kfarr, I'll look into that this week 20:27:45 <alee> kfarr, I suspect there may be things I need to fix :/ 20:27:46 <kfarr> alee ok! 20:27:58 <dave-mccowan> alee's week is filling up. :-) 20:28:25 <dave-mccowan> should we extend the timeout for dogtag functional tests. they look like they almost finish now, but not quite. 20:28:27 <kfarr> yeah in the patch I linked above, it seemed like things were not very happy after I added the dogtag dependency 20:28:28 <alee> dave-mccowan, and I'm not done with meetings today yet 20:29:00 <alee> dave-mccowan, yeah - I'll look into that -- they finish once but not twice iirc 20:29:27 <dave-mccowan> alee i changed it, so we only run once now. (at least for the regular functional tests now) 20:29:57 <alee> dave-mccowan, ok -- so we should be almost three -- I need to see what takes so long to run 20:30:08 <alee> ( I suspect its the package installs) 20:30:47 <alee> and I had a relatively light week this week before now .. 20:31:03 <dave-mccowan> we're very close to all passing gate jobs now. :-) 20:31:25 <dave-mccowan> last two things.... 20:31:33 <dave-mccowan> Congratulations to Jeremy Liu, new Barbican core reviewer 20:31:41 <kfarr> \o/ hooray! 20:31:48 <diazjf> Congrats!!!! 20:31:50 <kfarr> I already saw him giving out +2s 20:31:51 <dave-mccowan> you can still add your +1 to the mail list if you haven't already 20:32:08 <dave-mccowan> and no meeting next Monday due to summit 20:32:28 <kfarr> dave-mccowan also I wanted to ask re: the gate timeouts 20:32:37 <alee> just out of curiosity -- who will be at summit? 20:33:01 <kfarr> I think the gates are launching a full devstack, and we might be able to cut down on time if we just do keystone and barbican 20:33:06 <kfarr> alee me ! 20:33:24 <alee> besides me, dave-mccowan , diazjf , kfarr , redrobot 20:33:44 <alee> kfarr, yeah - that would hep everywhere! 20:33:49 <kfarr> dane-fichter from apl 20:35:38 <dave-mccowan> that's all i have for today then. talk to you all tomoroww! 20:35:46 <dave-mccowan> #endmeeting