13:05:24 #startmeeting barbican 13:05:25 Meeting started Tue Jan 28 13:05:24 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:05:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:05:28 The meeting name has been set to 'barbican' 13:05:32 #topic Roll Call 13:05:50 o/ 13:07:58 Courtesy ping for ade_lee dave-mccowan hrybacki jamespage Luzi lxkong mhen moguimar raildo rm_work xek 13:08:04 as usual our agenda can be found here: 13:08:11 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/barbican-weekly-meeting 13:08:32 #topic Liaison Updates 13:08:38 moguimar, anything form Osloland? 13:09:00 I missed the meeting yesterday 13:09:46 correction 13:09:51 there was no meeting yesterday 13:09:55 ben is afk this week 13:10:29 cool 13:10:53 ok, moving on 13:11:00 #topic Consider adding containers-undercloud to gate 13:11:09 I believe this was the TripleO job we broke 13:11:22 could be good to add to gate to make sure it doesn't happen again 13:11:44 +1 13:12:47 Well, that's unanimous. Every single person here +1'd ;) 13:13:25 I think we can start with a non-voting job on the check gate 13:13:33 and go from there. 13:13:49 sounds good 13:14:26 #action redrobot to add containers-undercloud as a non-voting job 13:14:35 ok, that's all I had in the agenda 13:14:38 other projects added a (initially non-voting) cross-project tripleo job, it's good for a quick check 13:14:56 tosky++ 13:15:10 yeah, we would have definitely caught this bug before we broke y'all 13:15:59 (in addition to other things we need to do better) 13:16:12 ok, moving on 13:16:30 moguimar, did you want to talk about anything else today? 13:16:35 yep 13:16:37 FOSDEM 13:16:51 #topic FOSDEM 13:16:55 I have a talk this Saturday in the Security room 13:17:26 Protecting plaintext secrets in configuration files 13:17:42 and there will be a demo of oslo.config fetching secrets through castellan 13:18:02 Nice! 13:18:10 Good luck on the demo. 13:18:15 yup 13:19:18 cool beans 13:19:19 that's all on my end 13:19:26 Alrighty 13:19:30 I think we're done for the day 13:19:36 I have a question 13:19:37 thanks for joining tosky and moguimar 13:19:42 #topic Open Discussion 13:19:44 gibi, shoot 13:19:59 I've posted it on the ML http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-January/012091.html 13:20:19 but it is basically about using a TPM 2.0 device as a secret store 13:20:27 is it a valid idea? 13:20:32 * redrobot checks mail 13:20:35 is it feasible? 13:21:14 gibi, yeah, there's at least one prior implementation using a TPM to secure barbican 13:21:25 I forgot which team worked on it? HP maybe? 13:21:34 In any case, they did not contribute it to the main repo 13:21:51 redrobot: I see. So the idea is valid but no upstream impl exists 13:21:59 gibi, right. 13:22:09 that helps, this means If I find some extra devs then it can be implemented 13:22:26 would barbican accept such contribution? 13:22:39 gibi, yes, of course. :) 13:22:46 redrobot: thanks. 13:22:51 * gibi goes off finding devs :) 13:23:07 that was all from my side 13:23:10 talking about reviews... as I mentioned a few weeks (months!) ago, I have submitted a few fixes for older branches; I received some reviews 13:23:31 tosky, I still don't have perms to merge on stable branches :( 13:23:36 but from the broader stable team; but if you manage to find the stable core for barbican... 13:23:37 oh 13:23:39 :/ 13:23:40 anyway: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/owner:%22Luigi+Toscano+%253Cltoscano%2540redhat.com%253E%22++project:%255Eopenstack/.*barbican.* 13:23:55 I think only dave-mccowan has perms on the barbican team, but he's not around very often 13:24:17 I'll bug the stable team to see if I can get +2 power or at lest bug them enough to get stuff merged 13:24:36 #action redrobot to bug stable team for pending stable backports 13:27:59 anything else y'all? 13:28:47 nothing else for now 13:29:19 cool cool 13:29:24 thanks for stopping by, y'all! 13:29:27 see you next week! 13:29:30 #endmeeting