13:01:46 #startmeeting barbican 13:01:46 Meeting started Tue May 5 13:01:46 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:01:47 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:01:49 The meeting name has been set to 'barbican' 13:01:55 #topic Roll Call 13:01:57 o/ 13:02:37 Courtesy ping for ade_lee dave-mccowan hrybacki jamespage Luzi lxkong mhen moguimar raildo rm_work xek nearyo 13:02:40 Hi moguimar! 13:02:44 hey 13:02:44 o/ 13:03:15 Hi Luzi! 13:03:25 hi redrobot, hi moguimar :) 13:03:48 hi Luzi 13:03:56 o/ 13:04:04 Hi tosky! 13:04:08 Ok, let's get started 13:04:13 #topic Virtual PTG 13:04:18 looks like we have a meeting this week xD 13:04:38 redrobot, did you get us a room slot? 13:04:49 Was about to ask about that haha 13:04:59 #link https://ethercalc.openstack.org/126u8ek25noy 13:05:20 thanks! I was just about to post that 13:06:06 moguimar, suggested that we could meet around this time 13:06:22 yeah, but the slots might be dificult now 13:06:32 Which works for me, but there seems to be a lot of stuff happening on Tuesday as well 13:07:48 Looks like Cinder is meeting on Tuesday 13:07:58 Luzi, are you planning on joining the Virtual PTG? 13:08:07 room 18/19 have slots 13:08:14 yeah 13:08:29 moguimar, yeah, there's a note about adding a room if needed, so I could look into that also 13:08:50 Cinder is meeting Tue and Wed 13:09:00 should we book another day? 13:09:05 I'm fine with Thursday 13:09:20 That'll work for me too 13:09:36 2 or 3 slots? 13:09:36 Luzi, tosky what do y'all think about having the Barbican discussions on Thursday 13:10:00 I'm fine with that 13:10:25 don't block your program on me - I will popup with some question on testing and zuulv3 (if there are open questions about that) 13:11:13 tosky, you can add those topics here: 13:11:16 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/barbican-victoria-topics 13:11:52 oh, oki 13:12:08 Ok, I've reserved Thursday from 1300-1700 UTC 13:12:24 I'll send an email to openstack-discuss after this 13:12:37 #action redrobot to announce Virtual PTG slot on openstack-discuss 13:13:09 So, yeah, please add topics to that ehterpad 13:13:41 I'm also going to add a topic to review last cycle's etherpad 13:13:49 for stuff we didn't get to that we may still want to do 13:15:54 Any other questions/comments about the Virtual PTG? 13:17:39 OK, moving on 13:17:48 #topic Gerrit Gates 13:18:14 Things are moving again, though I may have broken a few jobs by not configuring stuff correctly switching to Zuul v3 13:18:46 do I understand it correctly that not all jobs have been ported? 13:18:47 Also, a shoutout to AJaeger for helping a bunch with getting our repos updated for Python 3.8 13:21:53 Let me know if you see anything funky going on with the gates and we'll try to get it sorted out 13:22:03 Any other questions/comments on the gate updates? 13:22:08 a quick note about the grenade job: the current one is not working as expected (it does not test barbican :) 13:22:27 tosky, yeah, I totally messed that one up, haha. :( 13:22:54 I tried to address that, but it is failing https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724258/ 13:22:56 tosky, I'll try to get to it soonish, but definitely by Friday 13:23:07 and I'm not sure why, because the smoke tests are passing 13:23:37 tosky, I'll take a look at your patch as soon as I can 13:24:50 unrelated, there is a python-barbicanclient patch (not by me) which should fix the gates there and it may get some reviews: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/721203/ 13:25:18 finally, in case of issues with the zuulv3 conversion and/or any question, I volunteered to help with that goal, so please feel free to ping me anytime/add me to the reviews 13:25:27 and please add native-zuulv3-migration as review topic 13:25:32 tosky, awesome! 13:26:45 OK, moving on 13:26:52 #topic Open Discussion 13:26:58 Anything else y'all want to talk about? 13:27:19 not on my end 13:27:20 a question I wanted to raise - which I haven't discussed with the cinder cores 13:27:41 barbican-tempest-plugin contains tests which also touch cinder (volume encryption tests) 13:27:54 it also has glance-related tests (image signing) 13:28:21 in cinder, we are trying to extend our testing to also include encryption with barbican as key manager 13:28:50 we have cinder-tempest-plugin, but technically the tempest client for barbican is in barbican-tempest-plugin 13:29:29 so I was wondering if it would be possible to co-share the responsibility of barbican-tempest-plugin with other teams (cinder, glance, QA), 13:29:53 tosky, we kinda do something like that wit the Octavia folks 13:30:00 with some kind of gentleperson agreement of not approving tests which cover other projects without an ack for the people from those other projects and/or barbican 13:30:03 oh 13:30:29 For Octavia, we have jobs that check our patches against their TLS tests 13:30:56 And they run the same test suite on their patches ... (though I'm not super familiar with their end of things) 13:32:00 tosky, maybe we need a Cinder->Barbican liaison? Someone (or a few folk) who get added to patches to barbican-tempest-plugin? 13:32:25 redrobot: yes, something like that; I will discuss about this with the other cinder people 13:32:38 (I'm a fresh core on cinder-tempest-plugin, but not on cinder) 13:32:46 Yeah, it seems wasteful to double the efforts to test that integration 13:34:00 tosky, cool, let me know what y'all think about it when you bring it up. 13:34:04 thanks! 13:34:24 (a small review about barbican-tempest-plugin is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/721979/ :) 13:34:31 that's it from me today 13:35:02 Appreciate your input tosky! 13:35:09 OK, anything else before we call it a day? 13:37:10 Cool beans. 13:37:22 Thanks for joining everyone! See you online! 13:37:25 #endmeeting