13:00:35 <redrobot> #startmeeting barbican
13:00:36 <openstack> Meeting started Tue May 12 13:00:35 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:00:37 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
13:00:39 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'barbican'
13:00:54 <redrobot> #topic Roll Call
13:00:57 <moguimar> o/
13:01:04 <rosmaita> o/
13:01:18 <redrobot> Courtesy ping for ade_lee dave-mccowan hrybacki jamespage Luzi lxkong mhen moguimar raildo rm_work xek nearyo
13:01:31 <tosky> o/
13:01:45 <redrobot> As usual, our agenda can be found here:
13:01:48 <redrobot> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/barbican-weekly-meeting
13:02:34 <redrobot> Hi everybody!  Let's get started
13:02:35 <redrobot> #topic Review Past Meeting Action Items
13:03:15 <redrobot> or ... maybe let's skip this because eavesdrop is down, and I don't remember what was on the Action Item list
13:04:20 <redrobot> #topic Liaison Updates
13:04:26 <redrobot> moguimar, any updates from Oslo?
13:04:27 <moguimar> nothing from oslo
13:04:34 <redrobot> cool beans
13:04:39 <moguimar> I guess things will go back to normal next week
13:04:49 <moguimar> past GA
13:05:01 <redrobot> right on
13:05:15 <redrobot> Ok, moving on
13:05:34 <redrobot> #topic Barbican-Cinder barbican-tempest-plugin cooperation (rosmaita)
13:05:43 <rosmaita> hi
13:05:48 <redrobot> hi rosmaita!
13:05:56 <rosmaita> the Cinder team is interested in proposing a patch to have the barbican-tempest-plugin "register" with tempest so it can be used by other plugins
13:06:12 <rosmaita> gmann mentioned this in an email last week:
13:06:21 <rosmaita> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-May/014778.html
13:06:27 <redrobot> d'oh, I missed that email
13:06:34 <rosmaita> and here is the part from the tempest guide:
13:06:35 <redrobot> seems reasonable.
13:06:42 <rosmaita> #link https://docs.openstack.org/tempest/latest/plugins/plugin.html#service-clients
13:06:53 <rosmaita> TBH, he was a little vague about how well this works
13:07:12 <rosmaita> but the Cinder team is interested in proposing a patch, if you barbicanners are interested
13:07:23 <rosmaita> to register the barbican service client
13:07:33 <rosmaita> and then hopefully, we can use it from our cinder-tempest-plugin
13:07:49 <rosmaita> and then could remove all the volume-encryption scenario tests we have living in your tempest plugin
13:07:50 <redrobot> rosmaita, sounds good to me
13:08:09 <rosmaita> cool, just wanted to make sure you were OK with that general direction
13:08:13 <redrobot> we're definitely on-board with getting crossproject integrations well tested
13:08:21 <rosmaita> redrobot: ++
13:08:31 <tosky> iirc, it's about implementing all the bits from ServiceClients in the plugin.py file (see http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/101552.html)
13:09:09 <rosmaita> from gmann's email, it sounds like we're not the only projects in this situation
13:09:30 <rosmaita> so i think the QA team will be motivated to help out if the registration framework isn't quite completed
13:09:44 <rosmaita> anyway, we can give it a shot and see what happens
13:09:53 <rosmaita> also, on a related topic
13:10:14 <rosmaita> i'd like to formally propose tosky to be the Barbican-Cinder liason for testing-related matters
13:10:14 <tosky> if I read the code correctly, barbican_tempest_plugins already implements get_service_clients in its BarbicanTempestPlugin class, so no extra work may be needed
13:10:31 <rosmaita> he's a cinder-tempest-plugin core, and an all-around knowledgeable guy
13:10:52 <redrobot> :-O
13:10:53 <rosmaita> i like the sound of no work required!
13:11:12 <redrobot> What do you think about being a liaison tosky? 🤔
13:11:37 <tosky> I will be glad to help, if it's fine for you
13:12:10 <redrobot> I love seeing more folks involved with Barbican, so it's a definite yes from me. 😁
13:12:15 <tosky> (fine with you, or ok for you, argh, English)
13:12:26 <rosmaita> ok, thank you ... that's all from me
13:12:48 <redrobot> tosky, I'll probably start bugging you during the weekly Liaison Update along with moguimar.
13:12:58 <tosky> so just to be clear: would it be fine, if everything works as intended, that we move the volume tests to cinder-tempest-plugin?
13:13:37 <tosky> that's one of the logistic things that should be solved - on the bright side, we would be able to extend them more quickly
13:13:52 <redrobot> I don't see a problem, as long as we have a way to run those tests in the Barbican gate
13:13:53 <rosmaita> yeah, i didn't even ask, sorry about that
13:14:05 <tosky> and it should be possible to gate against them in barbican, sure
13:14:07 <rosmaita> i just assumed you'd be happy to see them gone!
13:14:11 <redrobot> hehe
13:14:48 <redrobot> The best code is someone else's code. tm
13:15:56 <redrobot> This all sounds like a good plan.  Please let me know when I can help with reviews and what not.
13:16:21 <tosky> sure, thanks!
13:17:03 <redrobot> OK, moving on
13:17:29 <redrobot> #topic 'U' Community Goal: Project Specific Contributor and PTL Docs
13:17:42 <redrobot> #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007236
13:18:04 <redrobot> tosky, ^^^ your topic?
13:18:24 <redrobot> oh, nope, sorry looks like it's moguimar's topic
13:18:29 <moguimar> yep
13:18:40 <moguimar> saw that in an email thread
13:18:44 <moguimar> we are no bueno
13:18:52 <moguimar> any plans for that?
13:19:06 <moguimar> if none, I can take it
13:19:51 <redrobot> I don't have any plans for that yet
13:20:06 <redrobot> definitely seems like a good topic to add to our Virtual PTG topic list
13:20:59 <moguimar> ok
13:22:10 <rosmaita> moguimar: it wasn't too bad
13:22:26 <rosmaita> you can copy what we did for cinder and just s/cinder/barbican/
13:22:34 <rosmaita> https://opendev.org/openstack/cinder/commit/98e04c7b024aa4ec7bed5fe970e65556014b7b04
13:22:42 <moguimar> I was thinking the same about what we did in oslo
13:22:56 <moguimar> I can check both and come up with something
13:23:09 <redrobot> Right on.  Yeah that'd be awesome if you can take care of that moguimar
13:24:05 <moguimar> ok
13:24:58 <redrobot> Cool, moving on
13:25:02 <redrobot> #topic Virtual PTG
13:25:54 <redrobot> Just a reminder that we'll be having the Barbican Virtual PTG on June 4th, from 1300-1700 UTC.
13:26:02 <redrobot> #link https://ethercalc.openstack.org/126u8ek25noy
13:26:25 <redrobot> and the etherpad for topics is over here:
13:26:28 <redrobot> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/barbican-victoria-topics
13:27:11 <redrobot> #topic Open Discussion
13:27:19 <redrobot> That's all we have on the agenda for today.
13:27:26 <redrobot> Anything else y'all want to talk about?
13:29:29 <tosky> please remember the gate fix for python-barbicanclient: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/721203/
13:29:51 <tosky> which should be backported to ussuri (and a new release tagged) and any the other failing branch
13:30:13 <redrobot> Yep, I'm about halfway through that review
13:30:20 <tosky> there are also a bunch of cleanup reviews open around (cleanup of python2, translation import, etc), but I guess that one is more important
13:30:22 <tosky> oki :)
13:30:23 <redrobot> mostly looks good so far
13:30:29 <tosky> that's also for the other silent reviewers
13:31:39 <redrobot> thanks for the reminder, tosky :D
13:31:48 <redrobot> alrighty, y'all, let's call it a day
13:31:52 <redrobot> thanks for coming, everyone!
13:31:56 <redrobot> See y'all online!
13:31:58 <redrobot> #endmeeting