13:00:07 #startmeeting barbican 13:00:08 Meeting started Tue Oct 13 13:00:07 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:09 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'barbican' 13:00:20 #topic Roll Call 13:00:35 Courtesy ping for ade_lee dave-mccowan hrybacki jamespage Luzi lxkong mhen moguimar raildo rm_work xek nearyo 13:00:42 As usual the agenda etherpad is here: 13:00:45 o/ 13:00:49 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/barbican-weekly-meeting 13:00:54 o/ 13:02:52 There were no action items last week 13:03:01 so let's go straight into the liaison updates 13:03:05 #topic Liaison Updates 13:03:08 moguimar, any news from Oslo? 13:03:39 yep 13:03:51 we have a DPL governance mode now 13:04:07 which is composed of 5 people so far 13:05:08 coolness 13:05:15 you can check it our here 13:05:19 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#Project_Leadership_Liaisons 13:05:30 still watiing until after PTG for the oslo.utils release? 13:06:54 yep 13:07:34 cool 13:07:39 tosky, around? any news from testing? 13:08:13 nothing on my side 13:08:40 Cool, moving on. 13:09:13 #topic Kanban Review 13:09:16 #link https://tree.taiga.io/project/dmend-openstack-barbican/kanban 13:09:39 No progress in the microversions patches (blocker for moguimar's Secret Consumers work) 13:09:45 moguimar, any updates on HVAC? 13:09:49 nope 13:10:29 raildo, any updates on the Policy work? 13:10:48 redrobot, yeah, we do have some updates 13:11:17 we have a bit more organized patches, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/755163/ this is the first one 13:11:37 where we're defining the new roles/scopes that will be used on all of the APIs changes 13:12:11 and here is the first example of usage of it https://review.opendev.org/#/c/755875/2 on the TransportKey, still need to have the unit tests fixed, but I'm working on it 13:12:35 Awesome! 13:12:50 so would be nice to have a feedback on the new roles definition, also if we want to deprecate some of of the older roles, we can add a deprecation note later 13:13:12 and any suggestion on which API calls would be nice to be implementing the default roles support next? 13:14:08 probably some of the less used ones, like secret stores or quotas 13:14:26 redrobot, cool, I'll add those APIs to the todo list 13:15:11 that's all that I have for now 13:16:05 cool, moving on 13:16:08 #topic Bug Review 13:16:12 #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project_group/barbican 13:16:48 Looks like we did get a new Story in Storyboard: 13:16:49 #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008238 13:16:59 > Typo in cp command in contributor/dev doc 13:17:09 Anyone want to volunteer to triage that one? 13:17:32 seems like low hanging fruit for sure 13:18:19 I can champion it 13:18:27 I have someone in mind to fix it =D 13:18:33 Haha, nice! 13:18:41 thanks moguimar! 13:19:02 And it looks like no new bugs for Castellan 13:19:03 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/castellan/+bugs?orderby=-id&start=0 13:19:37 #topic Wayward Reviews 13:19:40 #link https://tinyurl.com/y3ydwmkl 13:20:25 looks like our 14 day patches are for stable branches 13:20:47 I did a lot of patch petting yesterday 13:20:51 I'm planning on spending some time this week to make sure our stable branches are in good shape 13:20:55 nice moguimar! 13:20:58 I' 13:21:05 actually thought it was Tuesday xD 13:21:18 haha 13:21:56 but yeah, there are good number of patches that need a 2nd core to look at them 13:22:25 and kudos to aj for putting the bandit patch together 13:23:35 I've seen a rechecks on the old reviews on stable/queens - I guess it was to refresh the logs 13:24:45 #action redrobot to check stable branches for health 13:24:47 the current status is still fully described by one of the last comments in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699186/ (which combines https://review.opendev.org/#/c/697210/ and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/695327/) 13:26:06 most likely a few additional fixes need to be squashed inside https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699186/ (for sure the fix for the tests using an "expired" date) 13:26:32 Ah yes, the expired dates ... 5 years seemd like such a long time back then. :-P 13:28:06 gotta always check for the release lifespan 13:29:15 couldn't those expiration dates be moved even forward in time? Like 2038, which is going to be problematic anyway? (but probably not for 64 bit systems) 13:30:02 Yeah, that would work 13:30:08 does 2039 breaks for 64 bits? xD 13:31:54 I think 64 bit time will roll-over when it won't be a problem for the humanity anymore :D 13:32:11 ah good 13:32:20 🤣🤣🤣 13:32:37 I was thinking about "just put a date that we all will be retired at that time" 13:33:31 "boom has been planted" Counter Strike feelings 13:34:26 #topic Open Discussion 13:34:34 Anything else y'all want to talk about? 13:34:57 not with you xD 13:35:13 haha, jerk 13:35:16 I'd like to ask tosky a few questions after the meeting 13:35:26 😝 13:35:31 sure 13:35:31 cool, sounds like it's a wrap 13:35:36 thanks for joining everyone! 13:35:38 but it is oslo's business 13:35:40 #endmeeting