12:02:31 <xek> #startmeeting barbican
12:02:31 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Aug  1 12:02:31 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is xek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
12:02:31 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
12:02:31 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'barbican'
12:03:05 <dmendiza[m]> 🙋‍♂️
12:03:20 <lpiwowar> o/
12:04:00 <xek> #topic Roll Call
12:04:04 <xek> Courtesy ping for dmendiza[m] ade_lee d34dh0r53 Luzi tosky tobias-urdin jjung mharley
12:06:09 <xek> #topic Review Past Meeting Action Items
12:06:23 <xek> As usual our agenda can be found here:
12:06:28 <xek> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/barbican-weekly-meeting
12:06:57 <xek> #link https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/barbican/2023/barbican.2023-07-18-12.02.html
12:06:58 <lpiwowar> I was taking a look at this patch => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/barbican-tempest-plugin/+/889354 ... Do we need the newest barbican-tempest-plugin running in the victoria job?
12:07:13 <xek> dmendiza checking how to fix Tempest tests failing in stable/victoria gate
12:07:43 <lpiwowar> I'm trying to bump up the tempest version for the victoria job. I'll see how it goes.
12:08:26 <xek> yep, izuul approved it
12:08:52 <dmendiza[m]> Yeah, I've got a WIP patch, but it's failing on upper constraints 😑
12:09:17 <xek> @dmendiza can you paste the link?
12:09:23 <lpiwowar> Yes, I have a patch here for the requirements repo => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/890140
12:10:35 <lpiwowar> But changing the tempest version can be tricky. It can easily break other stuff.
12:13:53 <dmendiza[m]> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/barbican-tempest-plugin/+/889354
12:14:11 <dmendiza[m]> But lpiwowar 's approach is probably better
12:14:57 <xek> The above is the reverting patch
12:16:42 <xek> ok, let's continue
12:16:56 <xek> #topic Liaison Updates
12:17:13 <xek> No updates from me
12:17:17 <lpiwowar> dmendiza, yes, but I'm not sure whether it will be merged soon. I'm encountering some dependency issues. Maybe we can merge your revert and once I fix the tempest version we can undo the revert? I do not know how much it blocks you now.
12:17:54 <lpiwowar> xek: I was talking with tosky and I could take the QE liaison role for barbican.
12:17:58 <xek> I already +2 your patch, so feel free to merge it
12:18:10 <tosky> yep
12:18:13 <xek> @dmendiza ^
12:19:01 <xek> @lpiwowar, cool, I'll assing you in the etherpad
12:20:14 <xek> #info lpiwowar is the new QE liaison for Barbican
12:20:58 <xek> #info *QA
12:22:35 <xek> Actually, there is both Quality Assurance and Quality Engineering
12:24:41 <xek> #topic Open Discussion
12:26:37 <lpiwowar> I have a question about the broken victoria job. Would it be OK to use the older version of barbican-tempest-plugin in it? Or does it need to run master?
12:28:27 <xek> If I understand things correctly, since Tempest is branchless, we wouldn't be able to fix any bugs in the tempest tests that way
12:30:13 <xek> but I guess it's something we could worry about later
12:31:41 <xek> Maybe we should talk about expiring some of these older branches in Barbican
12:31:58 <dmendiza[m]> +1 to getting rid of branches
12:32:09 <lpiwowar> If we run in the victoria job older version of barbican-tempest-plugin it would not contain the breaking change which dmendiza is trying to revert. But probably better solution is to try to change the tempest version in the job using this change: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/890140
12:32:16 <xek> We still need Train, but at least TripleO skips some release branches
12:34:44 <dmendiza[m]> Maybe we can float that idea on the ML
12:35:03 <dmendiza[m]> Keep Train, Wallaby, and some N number of recent branches
12:38:00 <xek> Ok, I'll write an email to the mailing list
12:38:37 <xek> As to lpiwwoar's comments, @dmendiza I guess it's up to you on how to proceed
12:38:53 <dmendiza[m]> Yeah, I'll sync up with lpiwowar and figure out the best course of action
12:39:59 <xek> and the last topic is:
12:40:08 <xek> #topic Bug Review
12:40:54 <xek> I looked through the bug dashboards - there are no new bugs from our last meeting
12:41:00 <xek> *since
12:41:21 <dmendiza[m]> 🎉
12:41:25 <xek> That concludes our meeting, thanks for attendance!
12:41:36 <dmendiza[m]> thanks Grzegorz Grasza
12:41:36 <xek> #endmeeting