12:01:30 <xek> #startmeeting barbican
12:01:30 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Aug  8 12:01:30 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is xek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
12:01:30 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
12:01:30 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'barbican'
12:01:39 <xek> #topic Roll Call
12:02:03 <xek> Courtesy ping for dmendiza[m] ade_lee d34dh0r53 Luzi tosky tobias-urdin jjung mharley
12:02:21 <lpiwowar> o/
12:02:25 <tosky> o/
12:02:39 <tosky> shouldn't lpiwowar  be added to that list? :)
12:02:45 <dmendiza[m]> 🙋
12:03:33 <lpiwowar> tosky, good point:), I will ad myself to the etherpad
12:04:31 <xek> morning :)
12:05:22 <xek> As usual our agenda can be found here:
12:05:29 <xek> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/barbican-weekly-meeting
12:05:49 <xek> Just the usual agenda items today
12:05:56 <xek> #topic Review Past Meeting Action Items
12:06:44 <xek> #link https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/barbican/2023/barbican.2023-08-01-12.02.html
12:07:13 <lpiwowar> I have a question for dmendiza[m]. Do we need running master barbican-tempest-plugin in the older jobs (e.g., in stable/victoria)? Can
12:07:35 <dmendiza[m]> Can ... ?
12:07:37 <dmendiza[m]> :)'
12:07:47 <dmendiza[m]> IIUC, Tempest has no branches, therefore we have to run master on all
12:08:15 <lpiwowar> :D ... Can we pin it to victoria-last? => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/barbican-tempest-plugin/+/890784
12:09:46 <dmendiza[m]> I don't see why not.  I'm not sure I understand what the purpose of the tags are, but this seems like a good use.
12:09:47 <lpiwowar> It is branch-less but upper-constraints limit what is the newest version of tempest that can run in a job. I was discussing the possibility of bumping up the tempest for stable/victoria in requirements here but I was told that it might break some things so if it is possible we should try to avoid it.
12:09:54 <dmendiza[m]> what do you think Grzegorz Grasza ?
12:10:16 <tosky> that pinning is what other projects do
12:10:39 <lpiwowar> The only disadvantage it will have that you will not run tests from master. I do not know whether it is something relevant for barbican and stable/victoria branch.
12:10:49 <dmendiza[m]> Cool.  If all my project friends are jumping off the bridge, then I'm jumping too! 😜
12:10:58 <xek> I'm ok with pinning
12:11:11 <tosky> lpiwowar: but do you need to add barbican and python-barbicanclient to the reuqired projects? I thought they were inherited
12:11:18 <tosky> and they don't change the version
12:12:54 <tosky> and for the record, the same override rules should apply to train and ussuri too
12:13:04 <tosky> and wallaby, which is EM too
12:13:17 <lpiwowar> tosky: Yes, they are inherited. But I need to specify the override-checkout for the barbican-tempest-plugin.
12:13:18 <tosky> at some point I guess the older branches will move to EOL
12:13:50 <tosky> lpiwowar: yes, but then you can just add barbican-tempest-plugin, with its version override, to the required-projects key
12:14:16 <lpiwowar> tosky: Ok, I will fix that.
12:15:17 <lpiwowar> tosky: I agree with changing it for train and ussuri too.
12:15:48 <tosky> and wallaby, there is wallaby-last
12:16:37 <lpiwowar> +1
12:16:51 <xek> +1
12:17:00 <tosky> thanks!
12:18:27 <xek> @dmendiza so
12:18:37 <xek> @dmendiza are you jumping with us? ;)
12:18:49 <dmendiza[m]> I'm in! :)
12:18:57 <lpiwowar> \o/
12:19:34 <xek> allright, let's go to the next topic
12:19:37 <xek> #topic Liaison Updates
12:19:59 <xek> I guess we are covered on QA front
12:20:37 <lpiwowar> xek: +1 ... We have just this patch for barbican-tempest-plugin which to me seems like good to go => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/barbican-tempest-plugin/+/890598
12:22:25 <xek> @lpiwowar ack
12:24:13 <xek> #topic Open Discussion
12:24:42 <xek> The SQLAlchemy 2.0 patches need reviews
12:24:44 <xek> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:sqlalchemy-20+project:openstack/barbican
12:27:34 <xek> Ok, let's continue to the last topic
12:27:44 <xek> #topic Bug Review
12:28:16 <xek> There were no new bugs since our last meeting :)
12:29:04 <xek> This is it for today
12:29:39 <xek> See y'all next week!
12:29:47 <xek> #endmeeting