15:01:42 <tmorin> #startmeeting bgpvpn
15:01:42 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep 29 15:01:42 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tmorin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:01:43 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:01:46 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'bgpvpn'
15:01:50 <matrohon> hi
15:01:56 <janscheurich> hi
15:01:59 <pcarver> hi
15:02:08 <tmorin> hi everyone, doude, janscheurich, matrohon, pcarver
15:02:23 <matrohon> doude is not available today
15:02:29 <tmorin> okay
15:02:36 <tmorin> #topic announcements
15:02:57 <tmorin> no big announcement AFAICT
15:03:11 <tmorin> some merges and work in progress since last week
15:03:19 <tmorin> update of the CLI
15:03:27 <tmorin> (merged)
15:03:34 <tmorin> #link https://review.openstack.org/225118
15:04:56 <tmorin> and use an alembic entry point to update the db, rather than shipping our own neutron-bgpvpn-db-manage
15:05:07 <tmorin> #link https://review.openstack.org/227812
15:05:16 <tmorin> this one isn't merged yet
15:05:41 <tmorin> anything else ??   (more on drivers later today)
15:06:47 <tmorin> #topic API change for associations
15:06:55 <tmorin> we discussed this last week
15:07:04 <matrohon> I did not have time to code it yet, sorry
15:07:21 <tmorin> yes, we agreed on the way to go and to sleep on the decision for a bit before implementing it
15:07:25 <janscheurich> Have you thought about the proposed change?
15:07:50 <tmorin> as far as I'm concerned, I still think we should do this change
15:07:57 <matrohon> +1
15:08:08 <janscheurich> how big will be the impact on the drivers?
15:08:22 <janscheurich> is there a lot of rework needed?
15:08:28 <tmorin> we'll have minor choices to do in different places to see if we want to change things in a backward compatible manner
15:08:58 <tmorin> I think we could do it without changing the drivers, but we could also do it with a minor change on drivers
15:09:11 <tmorin> we are fortunately at a stage where we can break things
15:09:52 <tmorin> same for the CLI, we can keep the "bgpvpn-associate <bgpvpn-uuid> --network <net-uuid>" statement
15:10:00 <matrohon> we would be happy to manage the change to any upstream driver
15:10:15 <janscheurich> it would be nice to see a sketch of the changed API and the updated driver API
15:10:15 <tmorin> we could as well replace it with a "bgpvpn-add-net-association"
15:10:21 <tmorin> matrohon :+1
15:11:09 <matrohon> janscheurich, I'll try to upload a first patch before the end of the week
15:11:40 <janscheurich> matrohon: +1
15:11:52 <tmorin> matrohon: great!
15:12:11 <tmorin> tmorin: I can try to cover neutronclient in parallel
15:12:35 * tmorin just talked to oneself :-/
15:12:46 <tmorin> matrohon: I can try to cover neutronclient in parallel
15:13:05 <tmorin> anything else to add on that ?
15:13:23 <janscheurich> For the continuation of the static routes and port association blueprints I should then assume separate association objects?
15:14:53 <tmorin> janscheurich: I would say yes, I assume it is unlikely we'd find a problematic drawback in having associations appear as sub-resources
15:15:23 <janscheurich> ok
15:16:27 <tmorin> #topic drivers
15:17:17 <tmorin> for the bagpipe driver, we are looking at how to extend the OVS agent with the behaviors we need in a cleaner fashion than what we do now
15:17:44 <tmorin> tmorin: the L2 agent extension framework is currently limited, so we've kickstarted a discussion on openstack-dev
15:18:26 <tmorin> tmorin: we'll have to work on this to have a clean agent extension later, but that will be post-Liberty
15:19:35 <tmorin> the other notable point is that the networking-bagpipe-l2 project, where part of the agent code sits, will move to the openstack namespace on Oct 17th (stackforge is disappearing)
15:21:23 <tmorin> janscheurich: anything on ODL side ?
15:21:56 <janscheurich> I haven't been in the loop there, sorry
15:22:45 <janscheurich> My latest status is that we have a working system of API, plugin, driver, ODL Neutron northbound and L3-VPN service
15:23:16 <tmorin> janscheurich: any idea of when a networking-bgpvpn driver would be submitted for review ?
15:24:10 <janscheurich> Need to double-check. Should this wait until the driver API changes, if any, for the association handling have been made?
15:24:59 <matrohon> If something is already avaliable, please upstream
15:25:09 <tmorin> janscheurich: I does not have to wait, we could take care of adapting it as needed when the API change merges
15:25:22 <matrohon> tmorin : +1
15:25:39 <janscheurich> Ok. Will ask Prem and team to submit
15:25:49 <tmorin> janscheurich: good :)
15:26:07 <tmorin> #topic open discussion
15:26:09 <matrohon> janscheurich, it can be tagged as WIP if needed
15:26:14 <tmorin> #undo
15:26:15 <openstack> Removing item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Topic object at 0x8b93910>
15:26:18 <matrohon> like the contrail driver
15:27:07 <tmorin> #topic open discussion
15:27:22 <tmorin> one thing we would like to progress on is testing
15:27:36 <tmorin> we've started to think about what we would like to improve
15:27:56 <tmorin> we'll try to share asap on that
15:28:09 <tmorin> then help will likely be much welcome to work on it
15:30:14 <tmorin> okay, looks like we are out of things to say :)
15:31:09 <tmorin> let's close the meeting
15:31:10 <janscheurich> :)
15:31:15 <tmorin> thanks everyone!
15:31:22 <pcarver> bye
15:31:27 <janscheurich> thanks and bye
15:31:29 <tmorin> have a good morning/day/night wherever you are
15:31:44 <tmorin> #endmeeting